Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reasoning in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic

Turkish Preservice Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Relation to New Media Literacy

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we explored Turkish preservice teachers’ (PTs) informal reasoning regarding COVID-19 vaccination and new media literacy (NML), and investigated potential relationships between their informal reasoning and NML levels. Participants of the study were 410 PTs enrolled in teacher education programs of 19 different universities in Turkiye. The New Media Literacy Scale was employed to determine PTs’ NML levels, while four open-ended questions assessed the informal reasoning in terms of the quality, quantity, and diversity of the arguments. PTs mostly generated scientific and risk-oriented arguments, respectively, with a notable absence of ecological and economical-oriented arguments. PTs’ highest quality arguments were in science and risk-oriented reasoning modes, while the lowest were in economy and ecology-oriented reasoning modes. Additionally, the study found a limited diversity in PTs’ arguments. The quality, quantity, and diversity scores of supportive arguments were higher than those of counter-arguments and rebuttals. PTs exhibited moderately high NML, with the lowest mean score in critical prosumption. Furthermore, a weak but significant positive correlation was found between the quantity, quality, and diversity of PTs’ arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccination and their NML levels, except for the correlation between the diversity of arguments and critical prosumption, To enhance PTs’ critical prosumption levels, and facilitate their effective use of media in addressing socioscientific issues, teacher education programs can focus on developing PTs’ NML specifically in the context of controversial topics through targeted courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data will be shared on reasonable request to the author of this study.

References

  • Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socioscientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenijević, J., & Andevski, M. (2016). New media literacy within the context of socio-demographic characteristics. Procedia Technology, 22, 1142–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment, Selection and Placement Center (OSYM). (2021). Eğitim kurumlarına göre öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı sayısı [Number of students and teaching stuff by educational institutions], 2020-2021. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/

    Google Scholar 

  • Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballová Mikušková, E. (2018). Conspiracy beliefs of future teachers. Current Psychology, 37, 692–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burki, T. (2020). The online anti-vaccine movement in the age of Covid-19. Lancet, 2(10), e504–e505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30227-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, D. (2016). Vaccine hesitancy: More than a movement. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 12(9), 2464–2468. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1178434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebesoy, U. B., & Chang-Rundgren, S. N. (2021). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037

  • Chang, C. S., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2011). Exploring the media literacy of Taiwanese elementary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 604–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. S., Liu, E. Z. F., Lee, C. Y., Chen, N. S., Hu, D. C., & Lin, C. H. (2011). Developing and validating a media literacy self-evaluation scale (MLSS) for elementary school students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D.-T., Li, J.-Y., Lin, T.-B., Lee, L., & Ye, X. (2014). New media literacy of school students in Singapore (NIE Research Brief No. 14-003). Retrieved from https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/16585/1/NIE_research_brief_14-003.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D.-T., Wu, J., & Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dani, D., Wan, G., & Henning, J. E. (2010). A case for media literacy in the context of socioscientific issues. New Horizons in Education, 58(3), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: An application of the Rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94(2), 230–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Wuchty, S., Funchion, J. R., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Stoler, J. (2023). The relationship between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation. Political Behavior, 45, 81–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, C., & Erişti, B. (2018). Paving the way for media literacy instruction in preservice teacher education: Prospective teachers’ levels of media literacy skills. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 795–810.

  • Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D. R. (2021). Medical disinformation and the unviable nature of COVID-19 conspiracy theories. PLoS One, 16(3), e0245900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Ozer, F. (2022). Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ informal reasoning and decision-making about COVID-19. Science & Education, 31(2), 325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students' contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50, 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Council (2018). Yeni Öğretmen Yetiştirme Lisans Programları​ [New Teacher Education Undergraduate Programs]. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Council. (2023). Tablo 17. Eğitim ve Öğretim Alanlari Siniflamasina Göre Lisans Düzeyindeki Mezun Sayilari, 2021 – 2022 [Table 17. Number of Graduates by Classification of Fields of Education and Training, 2021 – 2022]. Available at: http://istatistik.yok.gov.tr (Accessed June 6, 2023).

  • Irmak, M. (2020). Socioscientific reasoning competencies and nature of science conceptions of undergraduate students from different faculties. Science Education International, 31(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak, M. (2021). Lisans öğrencilerinin sosyobilimsel konularla ilgili muhakeme yeterliklerinin ve tutumlarının geliştirilmesi [Developing Undergraduate Students’ Reasoning Competencies and Attitudes Related to Socioscientific Issues]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(3),1801–1838.

  • Kara, M., Caner, S., Günay Gökben, A., Cengiz, C., İşgör Şimşek, E., & Yıldırım, S. (2018). Validation of an instrument for preservice teachers and an investigation of their new media literacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(7), 1005–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, T. (2000). Pre-service teachers’ misconceptions regarding three environmental issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Anthony, R., & Blades, D. (2014). Decision making through dialogue: A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 903–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman, M., Sadler, T., & Brown, J. (2012a). Viral news: Media literacy for the 21st century. Science Scope, 35(9), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012b). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koc, M., & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of New Media Literacy Scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. B., Li, J. Y., Deng, F., & Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Literat, I. (2014). Measuring new media literacies: Towards the development of a comprehensive assessment tool. Journal of media literacy education, 6(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namdar, B., Aydin, B., & Raven, S. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about hydroelectric power issue: The effect of attitudes towards socio-scientific issues and media literacy. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. O. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuwarda, R. F., Ramzan, I., Weekes, L., & Kayser, V. (2022). Vaccine hesitancy: Contemporary issues and historical background. Vaccines, 10(10), 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, N., & Yılmaz-Tuzun, O. (2017). Preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs and informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 47, 1275–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9548-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1985). Post-primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 562–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasi, P., Vuojärvi, H., & Ruokamo, H. (2019). Media literacy education for all ages. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 11(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2020). Science education in the light of COVID-19. Science & Education, 29(4), 1079–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. (2011). Situating socioscientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T., & Fowler, S. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socio-scientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.55999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saribas, D., & Çetinkaya, E. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ analysis of claims about COVID-19 in an online course. Science & Education, 30(2), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2010). Pre-service science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topçu, M. S., Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Turkish preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuncay, B., Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Tuncer-Teksoz, G. (2012). Moral reasoning patterns and influential factors in the context of environmental problems. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.630576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understandingof science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2019). Ten threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2021a). Considerations for implementing and adjusting public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/considerations-in-adjusting-public-health-and-social-measures-in-the-context-of-covid-19-interim-guidance

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2021b). Status of COVID-19 vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/Status_COVID_VAX_11Nov2021.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a socioscientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socioscientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903505661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye

    Meltem Irmak

  2. Faculty of Educational Sciences, BAUSTEM, Bahcesehir University, İstanbul, Türkiye

    Nilay Ozturk

  3. Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye

    Büşra Tuncay Yüksel

  4. Faculty of Education, Department of Primary Education, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Ağrı, Türkiye

    Birgül Çakır Yıldırım

  5. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Ağrı, Türkiye

    Güliz Karaarslan Semiz

Authors
  1. Meltem Irmak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nilay Ozturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Büşra Tuncay Yüksel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Birgül Çakır Yıldırım
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Güliz Karaarslan Semiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception, design, material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meltem Irmak.

Ethics declarations

Consent to Participate

The data was collected upon the consent of the participants.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Demographic characteristics of the study participants

Table 6

Table 6 Demographic characteristics of the study participants
Full size table

Appendix B: Codes for the quality and modes of informal reasoning on COVID-19 vaccination

Table 7

Table 7 Definition of quality scoring scheme
Full size table

Table 8

Table 8 Definition of modes
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irmak, M., Ozturk, N., Tuncay Yüksel, B. et al. Reasoning in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic. Sci & Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00467-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00467-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation