Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engaging environmental socioscientific issues (SSI) requires navigating diverse positions regarding people and nature. This qualitative investigation determined how 24 undergraduates experiencing place-based SSI instruction in the Greater Yellowstone Area (includes a national park and its surrounding areas in the western USA) expressed emotive reasoning about people and nature impacted by those SSI. The students’ emotive reasoning ranged from apathy, passive care, and moderated concern to empathetic dissonance—an intense concern for peoples’ and nature’s well-being and SSI resolution. Deeper analyses revealed that the students expressed moderated concern differently toward people and nature when engaging in environmental SSI through value judgments, claiming helplessness, and diffusing responsibility to others. The students also expressed four forms of empathetic dissonance toward people and nature impacted by SSI including deep compassion for those experiencing SSI hardships, guilt for not resolving SSI, anger toward those that are perceived to cause SSI, and righteous indignation when the moral principles of equity and justice were violated because of SSI impacts. The students’ responses included significantly more instances of moderated concern and empathetic dissonance toward people and nature after the place-based SSI instruction. Pedagogical implications include how to instruct SSI in authentic place-based settings that encourage emotive reasoning necessary for environmental SSI engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alagona, P. S., & Simon, G. L. (2010). The role of field study in humanistic and interdisciplinary environmental education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 32(3), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Selective exercise of moral agency. In T. A. Thorkildsen & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Nurturing morality (pp. 37–57). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature–culture constructs in science learning: human/non/human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., Alsop, S., Ritchie, A., Bowen, M., & Chen, S. (2015). Pursuing youth-led socio-scientific activism: conversations of participation, pedagogy and power. In M. Mueller & D. Tippins (Eds.), EcoJustice, citizen science and youth activism. Environmental discourses in science education, vol 1. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer, J. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 110–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M.W. (1997). The complete moral person: Anatomy and formation. In J.M. DuBois (Ed.), Moral issues in psychology: Personalist contributions to selected problems (pp. 11–41). New York: University Press of America, Inc.

  • Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1987). Adolescent development reconsidered. New Directions for Child Development, 37, 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik, L., & Nelson, M. P. (2017). Field philosophy: environmental learning and moral development in Isle Royal National Park. Environmental Education Research, 23(5), 687–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitz, R. (2000). Affective approaches to environmental education: going beyond the imagined worlds of childhood? Ethics, Place and Environment, 3(3), 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C. (2013). Convergence of Postman and Vygotsky's perspectives regarding contemporary media's impact on learning and teaching. Chapter 15 (pp. 293–328) in M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson & D. S. Niederhausers (Eds.) The Nature of Technology: Implications for Teaching and Learning, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Herman, B. C. (2015). The influence of global warming science views and sociocultural factors on willingness to mitigate global warming. Science Education, 1(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of placebased socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. C. Olson, J. K., Colbert, J. T., & Holtz, J. D. (2013). The relationship between environmental freechoice learning and students’ learning, attitudes, and policy views about waterways. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1327–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman B. C., Sadler T. D., Zeidler D. L., & Newton M. H. (2018). A socioscientific issues approach to environmental education. In G. Reis, J. Scott (Eds.), International perspectives on the theory and practice of environmental education: A reader. Environmental discourses in science education (vol 3). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Boston: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 440–455). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. (2009). Empathic accuracy: its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social, and physiological psychology. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 57–70). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Using our heads and HARTSS*: developing perspective-taking skills for socioscientific reasoning (*Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(3), 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, S., O’Brien, E., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Aristotelian character education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdyavtsev, A., Stedman, R. C., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Sense of place in education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Kyunghee, C., Kim, S., Jungsook, Y., Krajcik, J. S., Herman, B. C. & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values as global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. F., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. A., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. P., & Tippins, D. J. (2015). Ecojustice, citizen science and youth activism: situated tensions for science education. Dordrecht: Springer International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. P., Zeidler, D. L., & Jenkins, L. L. (2011). Earth’s role in moral reasoning and functional scientific literacy. In J. L. DeVitis & T. Yu (Eds.), Character and moral education: a reader (pp. 382–391). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, J. (1901). Our national parks. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M. H., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler., D. L. (2016). The longitudinal association of an experitential environmental SSI course with student conceptualizations and behaviors. Paper presented at the 2016 Association for Science Teacher Education Conference, Reno, NV, Jan 07–10, 2016.

  • Noddings, N. (1995). Teaching themes of care. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 675–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010). Complexity in caring and empathy. Abstracta, Special Issue 5, 6–12.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfattheicher, S., Sassenrath, C., & Schindler, S. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48(7), 929–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, G., Ng-A-Fook, N., & Glithero, L. (2015). Provoking ecojustice-taking citizen science and youth activism beyond the school curriculum. In M. P. Mueller & D. J. Tippins (Eds.), EcoJustice, citizen science and youth activism: situated tensions for science education (pp. 39–61). Dordrecht: Springer International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: a neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., & Bebeau, M. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral research. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. (2017). Foster eco-cultural literacies for social, cultural and ecological justice: a perspective from Aotearoa (New Zealand). International Journal of Early Childhood, 49(3), 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2006). Writings on an ethical life. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: reclaiming the heart of nature education. Great Barrington: The Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1996). Preventing genocide: activating bystanders, helping victims and the creation of caring. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: an extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., Zgourou, E., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotional cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M. O., & Bekkers, R. (2010). Helping behavior, dispositional empathic concern, and the principle of care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(1), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: a motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A. & Lin, S. S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Learning, Teaching and Curriculum, College of Education, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Benjamin C. Herman

  2. Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA

    Dana L. Zeidler

  3. Department of Science Education, College of Natural Sciences, California State University, Chico, CA, 95929, USA

    Mark Newton

Authors
  1. Benjamin C. Herman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dana L. Zeidler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Newton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin C. Herman.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 125 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herman, B.C., Zeidler, D.L. & Newton, M. Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Res Sci Educ 50, 2081–2109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation