Abstract
We examined the longitudinal contribution of awareness of inflections and derivations to reading comprehension in Arabic, a morphologically rich language, among 734 second graders. Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, word decoding and reading comprehension tasks were delivered at the beginning and at the end of the school year. Results indicated that readers improved in morphological awareness and reading comprehension over the course of the year. More importantly, in general, morphological awareness at the beginning of the year predicted reading comprehension at the end of the year. Moreover, inflectional awareness at the beginning of the year predicted reading comprehension at the end of the year among readers with low levels of morphological awareness, whereas both inflectional and derivational awareness predicted reading comprehension in high morphological awareness readers, beyond the contribution of word decoding. The results highlight the importance of testing awareness of inflections and derivations separately, and the differential role of inflectional and derivational awareness to Arabic reading comprehension in young readers with different levels of morphological awareness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu Ahmad, H., Ibrahim, R., & Share, D. L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 89–106.
Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.
Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: A study on Italian children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Article ID 1373. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-12094-001.
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–166.
Apel, K., & Diehm, E. (2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75.
Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter naming in Arabic: A developmental study. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 156–168.
Asadi, I. A., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2017a). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81.
Asadi, I. A., Khateb, A., & Shany, M. (2017b). How simple is reading in Arabic? A cross-sectional investigation of reading comprehension from first to sixth grade. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(S1), S1–S22.
Asli-Badarneh, A., & Leikin, M. (2018). Morphological ability among monolingual and bilingual speakers in early childhood: The case of two Semitic languages. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177//1367006918781079.
Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J. F. (1998). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics: Psychological and Linguistic Studies across Languages and Learners, 9(3), 247–266.
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 239–253.
Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 101–116.
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediationand longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 432–451.
Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Francis, K. (2017). The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 1–16.
Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 273–294.
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 46(1), 209–240.
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2004). Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric processing of nonwords: A cross-linguistic comparison. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 691–705.
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). Why is it hard to read Arabic? In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 77–96). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Ferguson, G. A. (1959). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences: An International Journal of Current Research and Theory with Open Peer Commentary, 35(5), 263–279.
Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon Peretz, J. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and reading performance: A cross language comparison. The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(4), 297–317.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Israel statistical yearbook no. 65. Central Bureau of Statistics: Jerusalem, Israel. (Hebrew).
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 389–410.
Laks, L., Hamad, I., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2019). Verbal patterns in Palestinian Arabic. The Mental Lexicon, 14, 209–235.
Layes, S., Lalonde, R., & Rebaï, M. (2017). Study on morphological awareness and rapid automatized naming through word reading and comprehension in normal and disabled reading Arabic-speaking children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(2), 123–140.
Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015.
Mahfoudhi, A., Elbeheri, G., Al-Rashidi, M., & Everatt, J. (2010). The role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension among typical and learning disabled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 500–514.
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 3–12.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2011). Morphemic approaches for reading words. In R. E. O’Connor & P. F. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 88–112). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ruan, Y., Georgiou, G. K., Song, S., Li, Y., & Shu, H. (2018). Does writing system influence the associations between phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 180.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 431–451.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 495–512.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children's ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 607–625.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. Writing Systems Research, 5, 169–188.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Learning to read Arabic. In L. Verhoeven & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 104–126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 454–462.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Elouty, A. (2019). Inflectional and derivational morphological awareness in Arabic-speaking high versus low EFL literacy students. Written Language and Literacy, 21(2), 147–168.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Everatt, J. (2017). Literacy education in Arabic. In N. Kucirkova, C. Snow, V. Grover, & C. McBride-Chang (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of early literacy education (pp. 185–199). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Routledge.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 481–504.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hadieh, A., & Ravid, D. (2012). Acquiring noun plurals in Palestinian Arabic: Morphology, familiarity, and pattern frequency. Language Learning, 62(4), 1079–1109.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Haj, L. (2018). The impact of diglossia on phonological representation in Arabic speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 45, 1377–1399.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The Linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38, 297–315.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Schiff, R. (2016). The impact of diglossia on voweled and unvoweled word reading in Arabic: A developmental study from childhood to adolescence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 311–324.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Shahbari-Kassem, A., & Schiff, R. (2020). Phonological awareness in Arabic: the role of phonological distance, phonological-unit size, and SES. Reading and Writing, 1–26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-020-10019-3.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Taha, T. (2017). The role of phonological and morphological awareness in the early development of word reading and spelling in typical and disabled Arabic readers. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 345–371.
Schiff, R., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). When diglossia meets dyslexia: The effect of diglossia on voweled and unvoweled word reading among native Arabic-speaking dyslexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 1089–1113.
Schiff, R., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). Development and relationships between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and word reading in spoken and standard Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/Fpsyg.2018.00356.
Shalhoub-Awwad, Y., & Leikin, M. (2016). The lexical status of the root in processing morphologically complex words in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(4), 296–310.
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.
Shatil, E., Nevo, B., & Breznitz, Z. (2007). Elul test: A standardized diagnostic test for learning disabilities. Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa.
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2016). The role of phonological versus morphological skills in the development of Arabic spelling: An intervention study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 507–535.
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Morphology and spelling in Arabic: Development and interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 27–38.
Taibah, N. J., & Haynes, C. W. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1019–1042.
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2017). Morphological awareness: Construct and predictive validity in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics: Psychological and Linguistic Studies Across Languages and Learners, 38(5), 1019–1043.
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivation morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V. (2018). Morphological awareness and reading abilities in second- and third-grade Hebrew readers. Applied Psycholinguistics: Psychological and Linguistic Studies Across Languages and Learners, 39(5), 989–1009.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Sarid, M., Raveh, M., & Nevo, E. (2016a). The contribution of morphological awareness to reading comprehension in early stages of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(9), 1915–1934.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Sarid, M., & Shimron, J. (2016b). Morphological awareness and reading in second and fifth grade: Evidence from Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 229–244.
Vaknin-Nussbaum, V., & Shimron, J. (2011). Hebrew plural inflection: Linear processing in a Semitic language. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 197–244.
Velan, H., Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Plaut, D. C. (2005). The processing of root morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting localist and distributed accounts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 169–206.
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics: Psychological and Linguistic Studies Across Languages and Learners, 32, 457–466.
Wolter, J., & Dilworth, V. (2013). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Saiegh-Haddad, E. The contribution of morphological awareness to reading comprehension in Arabic-speaking second graders. Read Writ 33, 2413–2436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10048-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10048-y