Abstract
In the current study, we report two eye movement experiments investigating how Chinese readers process incremental words during reading. These are words where some of the component characters constitute another word (an embedded word). In two experiments, eye movements were monitored while the participants read sentences with incremental words whose first two characters (Experiment 1) or last two characters (Experiment 2) constituted a word (referred to respectively as “head-embedded” and “tail embedded”). Reading times on these words were longer when the frequencies of the embedded words were lower. However, this was only seen on first fixation duration for head-embedded words. These results suggest that embedded words are activated when Chinese readers process incremental words, and that this activation is earlier for a head-embedded word than for a tail-embedded word. These results support a hierarchical model which assumes that the representation for whole word is activated via the representation of its constituent morphemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000123.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed- effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0041.
Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when short and long finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9.
Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131–143.
Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. (2003). 现代汉语通用词表 [Chinese lexicon] (CLDC-LAC-2003-001). Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation.
Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: An eye-movement-contingent display change study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.667423.
Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 904–910.
Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1550–1570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014253.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003.
Huang, C., & Zhao, H. (2007). Chinese word segmentation: A decade review. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 21(2), 8–19.
Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1612–1627.
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193367.
Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802250900.
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94(Pt 2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661903.
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802193688.
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013484.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package): R package version 2.0-6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2014). Saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 524–530.
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Drieghe, D. (2014). The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.889260.
Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035389.
Ma, G., Pollatsek, A., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it’s composed of noncontiguous characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000298.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
Miwa, K., Libben, G., & Ikemoto, Y. (2017). Visual trimorphemic compound recognition in a morphographic script. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1205204.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 26(2), 820–833.
Pollatsek, A., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2011). Processing novel and lexicalised Finnish compound words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.570257.
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org.
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520.
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. The Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197599.
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2.
Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2010). Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: Activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.875.
Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2013). Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: Evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1990–2001. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033701.
Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2014). Activation of morphemic meanings in processing opaque words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0589-2.
Wang, C., & Peng, D. (1999). The role of surface frequencies, Cumulative morpheme frequencies, and semantic transparencies in the processing of compound words. Acta Psychologica, 31(3), 2–9.
Weingartner, K. M., Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2012). Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.604028.
Wu, A. (2007). Reflection on precedence relationship between word recognition and word segmentation. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 21(3), 20.
Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(May), 259–268.
Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030097.
Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1083594.
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 525–565.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31571125), and the Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology (BAICIT-2016018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, J., Ma, G., Li, X. et al. The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Read Writ 31, 607–625 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y