Abstract
The present study investigated language skills and reading comprehension with English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Of the 377 children in the sample, 207 were English monolingual and 170 were Spanish–English bilingual. Data were collected within a cohort-sequential design for two academic years in the fall and spring of each year. Growth modeling was used to estimate initial status on measures of vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, morphological awareness, and syntactic skill. A latent variable was created to capture the construct of reading comprehension, and growth modeling was used to estimate growth and ending status in latent reading comprehension. Analyses controlling for initial status in word recognition investigated relationships between initial status in language skills and growth and ending status in reading comprehension. Results showed that initial status on vocabulary breadth was related to growth in reading comprehension and initial status in vocabulary depth and syntactic skill were related to ending status in reading comprehension. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These students are variously referred to as English language learners (ELLs), English learners (ELs), and Language Minority (LM) students throughout the research base.
The cohort sequential design we employed allowed us to connect data across cohorts and use that data to estimate, through growth modeling, initial status in language skills and ending status and growth in reading comprehension for each student based on the data available for that student. To estimate initial status in language skills for students who we did not assess in second grade (C2 and C3), we first developed growth trajectories for each variable of interest using all of the data we had available, and then we used data on each student to estimate what that students’ second grade score would have been. To estimate ending status in comprehension for students who we did not assess in fifth grade (C1 and C2), we developed a growth trajectory for reading comprehension using all of the data we had available and used data on each student to estimate what that students’ fifth grade score would have been. Growth analysis on the reading comprehension outcome yielded growth estimates for each student based on the data available for that student.
The decision to equate factor scores for the latent reading comprehension variable to the W-scale allowed for an interpretable growth metric for the major outcome of the study. The W score is a transformation of the Rasch scale with equal intervals. The W scale is centered on a value of 500 for the average performance at grade 5.0. On the PC measure, the following W scores are equivalent to grade 2.1, 3.3, 4.4, and 5.2, respectively: 472, 490, 499, 504.
We modeled a latent variable for language skills, and the model did not converge. We also investigated growth in word recognition and language skills and how growth in these skills was related to reading comprehension. There were large standard errors for each of the growth estimates, suggesting that our model may have been underpowered to detect relationships between growth in these variables and reading comprehension.
We also simultaneously tested for interactions between language skill variables and monolingual-bilingual status. None of the interactions were statistically significantly.
References
Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to assess its relation to reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 42–56.
Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305.
August, D., Kenyon, D., Malabonga, V., Louguit, M., & Caglarcan, S. (2001). Extract the base. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Babayiğit, S. (2014). The role of oral language skills in reading and listening comprehension of text: A comparison of monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) speakers of English language. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 22–47.
Blozis, S. A. (2004). Structured latent curve models for the study of change in multivariate repeated measures. Psychological Methods, 9, 334–353.
Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679–694.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 431–443.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure of meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carlo, M., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., & White, C. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–206.
Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181.
Coyne, M., Simmons, D., Kame’enui, E., & Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12, 145–162.
Cremer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2013). The role of accessibility of semantic word knowledge in monolingual and bilingual fifth-grade reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1195–1217.
Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors in reading. Psychometrika, 9, 185–197.
Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545.
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432–451.
Dreyer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of “The simple view of reading”. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 169–175). Washington, DC: The National Reading Conference.
Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000026.
Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1819–1845.
Goodwin, A. P., Huggins, A. C., Carlo, M. S., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2013). Minding morphology: How morphological awareness relates to reading for English language learners. Reading and Writing: An International Journal, 26, 1387–1415.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Grosjean, J. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W.-L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 470–483.
Hirschman, M. (2000). Language repair via metalinguistic means. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 251–268.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39, 484–486.
Kieffer, M. J. (2014). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 44–53.
Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Roles of morphological awareness in English reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 697–725.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170–1204.
Kruk, R. S., & Bergman, K. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34.
Lee Swanson, H., Rosston, K. K., Gerber, M., & Solari, E. (2008). Influence of oral language and phonological awareness on children’s bilingual reading. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 413–429.
Low, P., & Siegel, L. S. (2005). A comparison of the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in native English and ESL speakers. Written Language and Literacy, 8, 207–231.
MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish speaking Language Minority Learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711.
McCutchen, D., Green, L., & Abbot, R. D. (2008). Children’s morphological knowledge: Links to literacy. Reading Psychology, 29, 289–314.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–542.
Miyazaki, Y., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). A test for linkage of multiple cohorts from an accelerated longitudinal design. Psychological Methods, 5, 44–63.
Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, H. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness among fifth graders. Reading Research and Instruction, 46, 73–94.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.
Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (1979). Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.
Ouellette, G. P., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 189–208.
Phillips, B. M. (2014). Promotion of syntactical development and oral comprehension: Development and initial evaluation of a small-group intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 63–77.
Proctor, C. P., Dalton, D., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C. E., & Neugebauer, S. (2011). Improving Comprehension Online (ICON): Effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary journal, 24, 517–544.
Proctor, P., Silverman, R., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1635–1664.
Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score modeling study. Child Development, 86, 159–175.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rydland, V., Aukrust, V. G., & Fulland, H. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 465–482.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
Scott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 184–191.
Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Silverman, R. (2007). Vocabulary development of English-language and English-only learners in kindergarten. Elementary School Journal, 107, 365–383.
Simard, D., Foucambert, D., & Labelle, M. (2014). Examining the contribution of metasyntactic ability to reading comprehension among native and non-native speakers of French. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 586–604.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading comprehension, education in 15 countries: An empirical study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., & Cain, K. (2014). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 22–33.
Tong, X., Deacon, S., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. (2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
Wilkinson, P., & Patty, D. (1993). The effects of sentence combining on the reading comprehension of fourth grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 104–125.
Woodcock, R., Munoz-Sandoval, A., Reuf, M., & Alvarado, C. (2005). Woodcock-Muñoz language survey-revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silverman, R.D., Proctor, C.P., Harring, J.R. et al. Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Read Writ 28, 1381–1405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y