Skip to main content
Log in

Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated language skills and reading comprehension with English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Of the 377 children in the sample, 207 were English monolingual and 170 were Spanish–English bilingual. Data were collected within a cohort-sequential design for two academic years in the fall and spring of each year. Growth modeling was used to estimate initial status on measures of vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, morphological awareness, and syntactic skill. A latent variable was created to capture the construct of reading comprehension, and growth modeling was used to estimate growth and ending status in latent reading comprehension. Analyses controlling for initial status in word recognition investigated relationships between initial status in language skills and growth and ending status in reading comprehension. Results showed that initial status on vocabulary breadth was related to growth in reading comprehension and initial status in vocabulary depth and syntactic skill were related to ending status in reading comprehension. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These students are variously referred to as English language learners (ELLs), English learners (ELs), and Language Minority (LM) students throughout the research base.

  2. The cohort sequential design we employed allowed us to connect data across cohorts and use that data to estimate, through growth modeling, initial status in language skills and ending status and growth in reading comprehension for each student based on the data available for that student. To estimate initial status in language skills for students who we did not assess in second grade (C2 and C3), we first developed growth trajectories for each variable of interest using all of the data we had available, and then we used data on each student to estimate what that students’ second grade score would have been. To estimate ending status in comprehension for students who we did not assess in fifth grade (C1 and C2), we developed a growth trajectory for reading comprehension using all of the data we had available and used data on each student to estimate what that students’ fifth grade score would have been. Growth analysis on the reading comprehension outcome yielded growth estimates for each student based on the data available for that student.

  3. The decision to equate factor scores for the latent reading comprehension variable to the W-scale allowed for an interpretable growth metric for the major outcome of the study. The W score is a transformation of the Rasch scale with equal intervals. The W scale is centered on a value of 500 for the average performance at grade 5.0. On the PC measure, the following W scores are equivalent to grade 2.1, 3.3, 4.4, and 5.2, respectively: 472, 490, 499, 504.

  4. We modeled a latent variable for language skills, and the model did not converge. We also investigated growth in word recognition and language skills and how growth in these skills was related to reading comprehension. There were large standard errors for each of the growth estimates, suggesting that our model may have been underpowered to detect relationships between growth in these variables and reading comprehension.

  5. We also simultaneously tested for interactions between language skill variables and monolingual-bilingual status. None of the interactions were statistically significantly.

References

  • Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to assess its relation to reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, D., Kenyon, D., Malabonga, V., Louguit, M., & Caglarcan, S. (2001). Extract the base. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babayiğit, S. (2014). The role of oral language skills in reading and listening comprehension of text: A comparison of monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) speakers of English language. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 22–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blozis, S. A. (2004). Structured latent curve models for the study of change in multivariate repeated measures. Psychological Methods, 9, 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure of meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, M., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., & White, C. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M., Simmons, D., Kame’enui, E., & Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2013). The role of accessibility of semantic word knowledge in monolingual and bilingual fifth-grade reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1195–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors in reading. Psychometrika, 9, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of “The simple view of reading”. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 169–175). Washington, DC: The National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000026.

  • Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1819–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A. P., Huggins, A. C., Carlo, M. S., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2013). Minding morphology: How morphological awareness relates to reading for English language learners. Reading and Writing: An International Journal, 26, 1387–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, J. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W.-L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, M. (2000). Language repair via metalinguistic means. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39, 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J. (2014). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Roles of morphological awareness in English reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 697–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruk, R. S., & Bergman, K. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Swanson, H., Rosston, K. K., Gerber, M., & Solari, E. (2008). Influence of oral language and phonological awareness on children’s bilingual reading. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, P., & Siegel, L. S. (2005). A comparison of the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in native English and ESL speakers. Written Language and Literacy, 8, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish speaking Language Minority Learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Green, L., & Abbot, R. D. (2008). Children’s morphological knowledge: Links to literacy. Reading Psychology, 29, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, Y., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). A test for linkage of multiple cohorts from an accelerated longitudinal design. Psychological Methods, 5, 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, H. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness among fifth graders. Reading Research and Instruction, 46, 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (1979). Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. M. (2014). Promotion of syntactical development and oral comprehension: Development and initial evaluation of a small-group intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Dalton, D., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C. E., & Neugebauer, S. (2011). Improving Comprehension Online (ICON): Effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary journal, 24, 517–544.

  • Proctor, P., Silverman, R., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1635–1664.

  • Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score modeling study. Child Development, 86, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydland, V., Aukrust, V. G., & Fulland, H. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. (2007). Vocabulary development of English-language and English-only learners in kindergarten. Elementary School Journal, 107, 365–383.

  • Simard, D., Foucambert, D., & Labelle, M. (2014). Examining the contribution of metasyntactic ability to reading comprehension among native and non-native speakers of French. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading comprehension, education in 15 countries: An empirical study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., & Cain, K. (2014). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, X., Deacon, S., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. (2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P., & Patty, D. (1993). The effects of sentence combining on the reading comprehension of fourth grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 104–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R., Munoz-Sandoval, A., Reuf, M., & Alvarado, C. (2005). Woodcock-Muñoz language survey-revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca D. Silverman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silverman, R.D., Proctor, C.P., Harring, J.R. et al. Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Read Writ 28, 1381–1405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y

Keywords

Navigation