Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A heterogeneous model for a cylindrical fixed bed axial flow reactors applied to a naphtha reforming process with a non-uniform catalyst distribution in the pellet

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work is an attempt to develop a mathematical model which describes the production of aromatics and hydrogen in the naphtha platforming unit of the refinery of Skikda in Algeria. The process is carried out in a cascade of four cylindrical different sized reactors. The mathematical model is based on the assumption that the system is a non-isothermal heterogeneous four fixed bed reactors with a catalytic pellet that contains two metallic catalysts and an acidic catalyst. These catalysts are assumed to be distributed, throughout the pellet, in a non uniform way. The metallic catalysts are Platinum (Pt) and Rhenium (Re). Furthermore, an axial dispersion and resistances to mass and thermal transfers have been considered in this model. The results from the simulation of the model were compared to industrial results, at the start of the cycle well before any deactivation process has taken place, obtained from the naphtha platforming unit of the refinery of Skikda in Algeria. This comparison was carried out in order to validate the model. This led to good agreement between the simulation results and the industrial results. Under the same conditions of validation but with a change in catalyst distributions, the simulated results show an enhancement in the production of aromatics, hydrogen and light products. The simulated results also showed that the fourth reactor is not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antos GJ, Aitani AM, Parra JM (1995) Catalytic naphtha reforming. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raseev S (2003) Thermal and catalytic processes in petroleum refining. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. George JA, Abdullah MA (2004) Catalytic naphtha reforming, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith R (1959) Kinetic analysis of naphtha reforming with platinum catalyst. Chem Eng Prog 55(6):76–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krane HG, Groh AB, Schuhnan BL, Sinfeh JH (1960) Reactions in catalytic reforming of naphthas, Paper presented in Fifth World Petroleum Congress

  6. Henningsen J, Bundgaard-Nielson M (1970) Catalytic reforming. Br Chem Eng 15:1433–1439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ancheyta J, Aguilar E (1994) New model accurately predicts reformate composition. Oil Gas J 31:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ancheyta-Juarez J, Villafuerte-Macias E (2000) Kinetic modeling of naphtha catalytic reforming reactions. Energy Fuels 14:1032–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez MA, Ancheyta J (2011) Detailed description of kinetic and reactor modeling for naphtha catalytic reforming. Fuel 90:3492–3508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taskar U, Riggs JB (1997) Modeling and optimization of a semi-regenerative catalytic naphtha reformer. AIChE J 43(3):740–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JW, Ko YC, Jung YK, Lee KS, Yoon ES (1997) A modeling and simulation study on a naphtha reforming unit with a catalyst circulation and regeneration system. Comput Chem Eng 21:S1105–1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lid T, Skogestad S (2008) Data reconciliation and optimal operation of a catalytic naphtha reformer. J Process Control 18:320–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Padmavathi G, Chaudhuri KK (1997) Modeling and simulation of commercial catalytic naphtha reformers. Can J Chem Eng 75(5):930–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fazeli A, Fatemi S, Mahdavian M, Ghaee A (2009) Mathematical modeling of an industrial naphtha reformer with three adiabatic reactors in series. Iran J Chem Eng 28(3):97–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hongjun Z, Mingliang S, Huixin W, Hongbo ZL, J, (2010) Modeling and simulation of moving bed reactor for catalytic naphtha reforming. Pet Sci Technol 28:667–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khosrozadeh I, Talaghat MR, Roosta AA (2018) Optimization of semi regenerative catalytic naphtha reforming unit to enhance octane number and reformate yield. IAChEJ 15(2):52–64

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rahimpour MR (2009) Enhancement of hydrogen production in a novel fluidized- bed membrane reactor for naphtha reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2235–2251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM (2010) Dynamic optimization of a multi-stage spherical, radial flow reactor for the naphtha reforming process in the presence of catalyst deactivation using differential evolution (DE) method. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:7498–7511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iranshahi D, Rahimpour MR, Asgari A (2010) A novel dynamic radial-flow, spherical- bed reactor concept for naphtha reforming in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:6261–6275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Paymooni K, Bahmanpour AM, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A (2010) Modeling of an axial flow, spherical packed-bed reactor for naphtha reforming process in the presence of the catalyst deactivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:12784–12799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Bahmanpour AM (2011) A comparative study on a novel combination of spherical and membrane tubular reactors of the catalytic naphtha reforming process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:505–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahimpour MR, Vakili R, Pourazadi E, Bahmanpour AM, Iranshahi D (2011) Enhancement of hydrogen production via coupling of MCH dehydrogenation reaction and methanol synthesis process by using thermally coupled heat exchanger reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:3371–3383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Bahmanpour AM, Rahimpour MR (2011) A comparison of two different flow types on performance of a thermally coupled recuperative reactor containing naphtha reforming process and hydrogenation of nitrobenzene. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:3483–3495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iranshahi D, Hamedi N, Nategh M, Saeedi R, Saeidi S (2018) Thermal integration of sulfuric acid and continuous catalyst regeneration of naphtha reforming plants. Chem Eng Technol 41(3):637–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Karimi M, Rahimpour MR, Rafiei R, Shariati A, Iranshahi D (2016) Improving thermal efficiency and increasing production rate in the double moving beds thermally coupled reactors by using differential evolution (DE) technique. Appl Therm Eng 94:543–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karimi M, Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D (2018) Enhanced BTX production in refineries with sulfur dioxide oxidation by thermal integrated model. Chem Eng Technol 41(9):1746–1758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ebrahimian S, Iranshahi D (2020) Modeling and optimization of thermally coupled reactors of naphtha reforming and propane ammoxidation with diferent feed distributions. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 129:315–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei M, Yang M, Qian F, Du W, He W, Zhong W (2017) Dynamic modeling and economic model predictive control with production mode switching for an industrial catalytic naphtha reforming process. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(31):8961–8971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Babaqi BS, Takriff MS, Kamarudin SK, Othman NTA, Ba-Abbad MM (2017) Energy optimization for maximum energy saving with optimal modification in continuous catalytic regeneration reformer process. Energy 120:774–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dong XJ, He YJ, Shen JN, Ma ZF (2018) Multi-zone parallel-series plug flow reactor model with catalyst deactivation effect for continuous catalytic reforming process. Chem Eng Sci 175:306–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Polovina SA, Vojtech M, Dejanovic I, Grujic A, Stijepović M (2018) Modeling a reaction section of a commercial continuous catalytic reformer. Energy Fuels 32(5):6378–6396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmedzeki N, Al-Tabbakh B, Antwan M (2018) Heavy naphtha upgrading by catalytic reforming over novel bi-functional zeolite catalyst. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 125:1127–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Morbidelli M, Gavriilidis A, Varma A (2011) Catalyst design: optimal distribution of catalyst in pellets, reactors and membranes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dario RA, Ardilese R, Scelza OA, Castro AA (1985) Activity and selectivity of nonuniform bifunctional catalysts. Collect Czech Chem Commun 50:726–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dario RA, Ardilese R (1985) Activity and selectivity of nonuniform bifunctional catalysts: analysis of the fixed -bed reactor performance. Collect Czech Chem Commun 51:2509

    Google Scholar 

  36. Boukezoula TF, Bencheikh, (2018) Theoretical investigation of non-uniform bifunctional catalyst for the aromatization of methyl cyclopentane. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 124:15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Letkovà Z, Markos J (1998) Design of catalyst with nonuniform activation distribution for consecutive Reactions-selective hydrogenation of acetylene on Pd /alumina catalyst. Petrol Coal 40:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rase HF (1977) Chemical reactor design for process plants. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT) of Algeria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés Chimiques, Département de Génie des Procédés, Faculté de Technologie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, 19000, Sétif, Algeria

    T. F. Boukezoula & L. Bencheikh

  2. Département de Chimie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, 19000, Sétif, Algeria

    T. F. Boukezoula

  3. Laboratoire du Dosage, Analyse et Caractérisation en Haute résolution, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, 19000, Sétif, Algeria

    D. E. C. Belkhiat

Authors
  1. T. F. Boukezoula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Bencheikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. E. C. Belkhiat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. F. Boukezoula.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 710 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boukezoula, T.F., Bencheikh, L. & Belkhiat, D.E.C. A heterogeneous model for a cylindrical fixed bed axial flow reactors applied to a naphtha reforming process with a non-uniform catalyst distribution in the pellet. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 131, 335–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01851-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01851-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation