Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficiency and economic analysis of intervention strategies for recurrent malaria transmission

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In epidemiological modelling, efficiency and economic analyses have become important metrics for identifying efficient and cost-effective intervention strategies that avert highest number of infection cases at cheapest implementation cost. This study examines an optimal control model for malaria dynamics which incorporates all the three categories of recurrent malaria such as, relapse, re-infection and recrudescence with four interventions including, personal protection using insecticide-treated bed nets, anti-relapse strategy using anti-hypnozoites drug, treatment control using anti-malaria drug, and vector control using insecticide spraying. Detailed efficiency and economic methodologies are employed to analyse the model by considering different combinations of interventions which are classified into four distinct groups, namely single control, double control, triple control, and quadruple control interventions. In each of the groups, most efficient intervention is obtained by calculating efficiency indices of each intervention, while most cost-effective intervention is determined using average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) methods. Furthermore, overall groups, it is shown that quadruple control which combines all the four interventions is the most efficient, while personal protection using insecticide-treated bed nets from the single control group is found to be the most cost-effective intervention. Hence, intervention strategies capable of bringing down the menace of recurrent malaria in the population are provided based on availability of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Anonymous reviewers and editor are gratefully acknowledged for their constructive comments and suggestions that led to the presentation of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, analysis and writing of the first draft were performed by S.O. and S.A. Supervision, investigation and resource were carried out by S.O.O.A. and F.C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samson Olaniyi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olaniyi, S., Abimbade, S.F., Ajala, O.A. et al. Efficiency and economic analysis of intervention strategies for recurrent malaria transmission. Qual Quant 58, 627–645 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01664-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01664-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation