Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of changes in rainfall and temperature on age- and sex-specific patterns of rural-urban migration in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluate how changes in weather patterns affected rural-urban migration across 41 sub-Saharan African countries, by age and sex, over the 1980–2015 period. We combine recent age- and sex-specific estimates of net rural-urban migration with historical data on rainfall and temperature from the Climate Research Unit (CRU). We also compare standard unweighted estimates of rainfall and temperature to estimates weighted by the proportion of the country’s total rural population in the CRU grid. Results show that rural out-migration of young adults is the most sensitive to shifts in weather patterns, with lower rainfall, lower variability in rainfall, and higher temperatures increasing subsequent rural out-migration—though the last of these is not observed in weighted models. The strength of these effects has grown stronger over time for 20–24 year olds, though weaker above age 30. In contrast, increasing temperature variability is associated with a higher rural in-migration of children (0–9) and older adults (55–64). Gender differences in these effects are minimal and concentrated in areas which experienced heavy reductions in rainfall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Male and female differences in migration throughout this paper are framed in relation to “gender,” since mechanisms linking climate change to migration focus on how male/female differences are expressed in social relations. In discussing our data, however, or specific aspects of measurement, we refer to “sex.” This difference in linguistic register reflects a basic limitation in our data and arguably in all extant demographic data.

  2. Our “rural” and “urban” categories are based on national administrative definitions. These are not always comparable or valid (Dorélien et al. 2013)—based on measures of population density, they are particularly prone to miscategorize semi-rural areas. However, they are the standard type of data used in country-level analyses and the standard type made available by research arms of multilateral organizations, from the UNFPA and FAO to the European Commission, which produces the Gridded Population data that we describe below. Our assumption here is that in a sample of countries and time periods as large as this one, these categories are sufficiently accurate to capture changes in patterns of movement, especially between unambiguously rural and urban sectors.

  3. The temporal coefficients indicate variability in trends with an initial rise in migration in the late 1980s, followed by declines that lasted into the first decade of the twenty-first century, and ending with a slow rise back to the early 1980s level by 2015. There is clear evidence of the moderating effects of national wealth measured by GDP per capita, which tends to be higher in more urbanized countries in Africa (UN data; own calculations). Of particular interest is the significant positive coefficient of the TFR 15 years prior to migration estimate, which highlights the impact of past fertility levels on current pressures for rural-urban migration. Reductions in fertility reduce the number of adolescents entering the labor market 15–20 years later, pointing to parallels between rural-urban migration in SSA and undocumented migration from Mexico into the USA (Villareal 2014).

References

  • Afifi, T., Milan, A., Etzold, B., Schraven, B., Rademacher-Schulz, C., Sakdapolrak, P., et al. (2016). Human mobility in response to rainfall variability: opportunities for migration as a successful adaptation strategy in eight case studies. Migration and Development, 5(2), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2015.1022974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., Cattaneo, A., & Kokwe, M. (2015). Climate smart agriculture? Assessing the adaptation implications in Zambia. J Agric Econ, 66(3), 753–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A., Cavatassi, R., Alfani, F., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., & Kokwe, M. (2017). Diversification under climate variability as part of a CSA strategy in rural Zambia. J Dev Stud, 1–24.

  • Baez, J., Caruso, G., Mueller, V., & Niu, C. (2017). Droughts augment youth migration in northern Latin America and the Caribbean. Clim Chang, 140(30), 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M., Hertrich, V., & Grieve, M. (2005). Age difference between spouses and contraceptive practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Engl Ed, 60(5–6), 617–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S., Bertinelli, L., and Strobl, E. (2006). Climatic change and rural–urban migration: the case of SSA. J Urban Econ, 60 (3), pp. 357–371. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4892579_Climatic_Change_and_Rural-Urban_Migration_The_Case_of_sub-Saharan_Africa

  • Baylies, C. (2002). The impact of AIDS on rural households in Africa: a shock like any other? Dev Chang, 33(4), 611–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin, C. (2011). Rural–urban migration in West Africa: towards a reversal? Migration trends and economic situation in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire. Population, Space and Place, 17(1), 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin, C., & Bocquier, P. (2004). Migration and Urbanisation in Francophone West Africa: an Overview of the Recent Empirical Evidence. Urban Studies, 41(11), 2245–72.

  • Becker, L. C. (1990). The collapse of the family farm in West Africa? Evidence from Mali. Geogr J, 156(3), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beegle, K., Dehejia, R. H., & Gatti, R. (2006). Child labor and agricultural shocks. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beine, M., & Parsons, C. (2015). Climatic factors as determinants of international migration. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(2), 723–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Charles-Edwards, E. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Popul Dev Rev, 40(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00671.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Kniveton, D., & Schmidt-Verkerk, K. (2011a). Migration and climate change: towards an integrated assessment of sensitivity. Environ Plan, A43, 431–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011b). Climate change: migration as adaptation. Nature, 478(7370), 447–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/478477a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohra-Mishra, P., & Massey, D. S. (2011). Environmental degradation and out-migration: new evidence from Nepal. Migration and climate change, 74–101.

  • Bollard, A., McKenzie, D., & Morten, M. (2010). The remitting patterns of African migrants in the OECD. Journal of African Economies, 19(5), 605–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borderon, M., Sakdapolrak, P., Muttarak, R., Kebede, E., Pagogna, R., & Sporer, E. (2019). Migration influenced by environmental change in Africa: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Demogr Res, 41(August), 491–544. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. (2009). Gender, water, and climate change in Sonora, Mexico: implications for policies and programmes on agricultural income-generation. Gend Dev, 17(1), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, R., Feng, S., Oppenheimer, M., & Pytlikova, M. (2016). Climate variability and international migration: the importance of the agricultural linkage. J Environ Econ Manag, 79, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. R. (2005). Placing the environment in migration: environment, economy, and power in Ghana's Central Region. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 925–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). International population movements in the modern world: The age of migration. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, Luis J. and Andrei Rogers. 1983. What the age composition of migrants can tell us. Population Bulletin of the United Nations 15: 63–79.

  • Cattaneo, C., & Peri, G. (2016). The migration response to increasing temperatures. J Dev Econ, 122, 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, A. and Robinson, S. (2018). Economic development and the evolution of internal migration: moving in steps, returnees, and gender differences. Background paper prepared for the state of food and agriculture 2018: migration, agriculture, and rural development. Rome; Washington, D.C., FAO and IFPRI.

  • Caldwell, J. C., Caldwell, P., & Orubuloye, I. O. (1992). The family and sexual networking in sub-Saharan Africa: historical regional differences and present-day implications. Popul Stud, 46(3), 385–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. Y.-P., Valente, P., & Zlotnik. H. (1998). What do we know about recent trends in Urbanization. In Migration, Urbanization, and Development: New Directions and Crises, pp. 59–88. New York: United Nations Fund for Population Activities.

  • Cooper, P. J. M., Dimes, J., Rao, K. P. C., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B., & Twomlow, S. (2008). Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: an essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agric Ecosyst Environ, 126, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, S. R., & Rivero-Fuentes, E. (2003). Engendering migrant networks: The case of Mexican migration. Demography, 40(2), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmann, I., & Millock, K. (2017). Climate variability and inter-state migration in india. CESifo Economic Studies, 63(4), 560–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Savastano, S., & Xia, F. (2017). Smallholders’ land access in sub-Saharan Africa: a new landscape? Food Policy, 67, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Weerdt, J., & Hirvonen, K. (2016). Risk sharing and internal migration. Econ Dev Cult Chang, 65(1), 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. M., Gabaccia, D., Holdaway, J., Manalansan IV, M., & Pessar, P. R. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorélien, A., Balk, D., & Todd, M. (2013). What is urban? Comparing a satellite view with the demographic and health surveys. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00610.x.

  • Ezra, M., & Kiros, G.-E. (2001). Rural out-migration in the drought prone areas of Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. Int Migr Rev, 35(3), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2001.tb00039.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M. (1992). Solidarity networks in preindustrial societies: Rational peasants with a moral economy. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41(1), 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2019. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. http://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf

  • Feder, G., & Noronha, R. (1987). Land rights systems and agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank Research Observer, 2(2), 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, S. E. (1994). Does drought increase migration? A study of migration from rural Mali during the 1983–1985 drought. Int Migr Rev, 28(3), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2546820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E., Hunter, L. M., & Gray, C. L. (2014). Measuring the environmental dimensions of human migration: the demographer's toolkit. Glob Environ Chang, 28, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garip, F. (2012). Discovering diverse mechanisms of migration: the Mexico–US stream 1970–2000. Popul Dev Rev, 38(3), 393–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00510.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, C., et al. (2016). Human capital on the move: education as a determinant of internal migration in selected INDEPTH surveillance populations in Africa. Demogr Res, 34, 845–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, C., & Grobovšek, J. (2019). Communal land and agricultural productivity. J Dev Econ, 138, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. L. (2010). Gender, natural capital, and migration in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 678–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., & Bilsborrow, R. (2013). Environmental influences on human migration in rural Ecuador. Demography, 50(4), 1217–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0192-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. V., Storeygard, A., & Deichmann, U. (2017). Has climate change driven urbanization in Africa? J Dev Econ, 124, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S., Schoumaker, B., & Beauchemin, C. (2004). The impact of rainfall on the first out-migration: A multi-level event-history analysis in Burkina Faso. Population and Environment, 25(5), 423–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton University Press.

  • Hertrich, V., & Lesclingand, M. (2012). Adolescent migration and the 1990s nuptiality transition in Mali. Popul Stud, 66(2), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. and David, E. (2009). Climate change and migration: considering the gender dimensions. IBS, University of Colorado, Boulder, population program working paper POP2009-13.

  • Hunter, L. M., Luna, J. K., & Norton, R. M. (2015). Environmental dimensions of migration. Annu Rev Sociol, 41, 377–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. (2011). Future demographic change and its interactions with migration and climate change. Glob Environ Chang, 21S, S21–S33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessoe, K., Manning, D. T., & Taylor, J. E. (2018). Climate change and labour allocation in rural Mexico: Evidence from annual fluctuations in weather. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 230–261.

  • Jaeger, D. A., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., & Bonin, H. (2010). Direct evidence on risk attitudes and migration. Rev Econ Stat, 92(3), 684–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, S., and Broer, P.N. (2017). A profile of Germany’s refugee populations. Popul Dev Rev 43(1): 149–157. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padr.12042/epdf

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gend Soc, 2(3), 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanson, P., Neufeldt, H., Gassner, A., Mango, J., Kyazze, F. B., Desta, S., et al. (2012). Are food insecure smallholder households making changes in their farming practices? Evidence from East Africa. Food Security, 4(3), 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Burton, I., Malone, E., and Huq, S. (2004). Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. UNDP/Cambridge University Press.

  • Madhavan, S. (2004). Fosterage patterns in the age of AIDS: continuity and change. Soc Sci Med, 58(7), 1443–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., et al. (1993). Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Popul Dev Rev, 19(3), 431–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2010). Environmental change and out-migration: evidence from Nepal. Popul Environ, 32(2), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0119-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathambo, V., and Gibbs, A. (2009). Extended family childcare arrangements in a context of AIDS: collapse or adaptation? AIDS Care, 21(sup1), 22–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120902942949.

  • McLeman, R., and Gemenne, F. (2018). Routledge handbook of environmental displacement and migration. Routledge.

  • Menashe-Oren, A., & Stecklov, G. (2017). Rural/urban population age and sex composition in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Dev Rev, 44(1), 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawrotzki, R. J., Hunter, L. M., Runfola, D. M., & Riosmena, F. (2015). Climate change as a migration driver from rural and urban Mexico. Environ Res Lett, 10(11), 114023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negra, C., Vermeulen, S., Barioni, L. G., Mamo, T., Melville, P., & Tadesse, M. (2014). Brazil, Ethiopia, and New Zealand lead the way on climate-smart agriculture. Agriculture and Food Security, 3(1), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piguet, E., Pécoud, A., & De Guchteneire, P. (2011). Migration and climate change: an overview. Refug Surv Q, 30(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnawalla, M. (2008). Engaging in trans-local Management of Households: Aspects of livelihood and gender transformations among Sri Lankan women and migrant workers. Gend Technol Dev, 12, 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, N. (2008). Feminisation of migration and the social dimensions of development: the Asian case. Third World Q, 29, 1287–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R., Xie, L., Challinor, A.J., Cochrane, K., Howden, S.M., Iqbal, M.M., et al. (2014). Food security and food production systems. In: C.B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, et al. eds. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press, pp. 485–533.

  • Potts, D. (1995). Shall We Go Home? Increasing Urban Poverty in African Cities and Migration Processes. Social Science History, 161(3), 245.

  • Preston, S. H. (1979). Urban-growth in developing-countries—demographic reappraisal. Popul Dev Rev, 5(2), 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymer, J., & Rogers, A. (2007). Using age and spatial flow structures in the indirect estimation of migration streams. Demography, 44(2), 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, K. K., Jones, A., Bergmann, B., Clement, J., Ober, V., Schewe, K., et al. (2018). Groundswell: preparing for internal climate migration. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/29461.

  • Rogers, A., & Jordan, L. (2003). Estimating migration flows from birthplace-specific population stocks of infants. Geogr Anal, 36(1), 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Stark, O. (1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: Evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 905–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, I., & Weinreb, A. A. (2017). Land cover change and fertility in West-Central Africa: rural livelihoods and the vicious circle model. Popul Environ, 38(4), 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijner, S., & Smits, J. (2018). Grandmothers and children’s schooling in sub-Saharan Africa. Hum Nat, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-017-9306-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipton, P. (1990). African famines and food security: anthropological perspectives. Annu Rev Anthropol, 19(1), 353–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. Am Econ Rev, 75(2), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecklov, G., Carletto, C., Azzarri, C., & Davis, B. (2010). Gender and migration from Albania. Demography, 47(4), 935–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A., & Watkins, S. C. (2017). A fraught embrace: The romance and reality of AIDS altruism in Africa. Princeton University Press.

  • Thornton, P. K., Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., BurnSilver, S. B., Waithaka, M. M., Kuyiah, J., et al. (2007). Coping strategies in livestock-dependent households in east and southern Africa: a synthesis of four case studies. Hum Ecol, 35(4), 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen S., Richards M., De Pinto A., Ferrarese D., Läderach P., Lan L., et al. (2016). The economic advantage: assessing the value of climate change actions in agriculture. Rome, Italy: International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).

  • Villarreal, A. (2014). Explaining the decline in Mexico-U.S. migration: The effect of the Great Recession. Demography, 51, 2203–2228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreb, A. A. (2002). Lateral and vertical intergenerational exchange in rural Malawi. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 101–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreb, A., Gerland, P., & Fleming, P. (2008). Hotspots and Coldspots: household and village-level variation in orphanhood prevalence in rural Malawi. Demogr Res, 19(32), 1217. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). (2017). Rural youth employment. Background report. Washington, DC, and Rome.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Isabel McLoughlin and Dr. Fabian Löw for their excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UT-Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Alexander Weinreb

  2. Taub Center for Social Policy, Jerusalem, Israel

    Alexander Weinreb

  3. UBC, Vancouver, Canada

    Guy Stecklov

  4. IFAD, Rome, Italy

    Aslihan Arslan

Authors
  1. Alexander Weinreb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guy Stecklov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aslihan Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Weinreb.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Fixed effects estimates of change in rainfall on age-specific rural out-migration in sub-Saharan Africa, 1980–2015: variables not presented in Table 2
Full size table
Table 5 Fixed effect estimates of change in temperature on age-specific rural out-migration in sub-Saharan Africa, 1980–2015: variables not presented in Table 3
Full size table
Table 6 Fixed effects estimates of changes in population-weighted rainfall and SD temperature on rural out-migration (source of marginal effect graphed in Fig. 4)
Full size table
Table 7 Fixed effects estimates of changes in population-weighted rainfall and SD temperature on rural out-migration (source of marginal effect graphed in Figs. 5 and 6)
Full size table

Appendix 1. The CSRM approach to estimating age- and sex-specific rural-to-urban migration rates

Our estimates of net rural-to-urban migration by age and sex are published in full in Menashe-Oren and Stecklov (2017). Here we summarize the method.

An early version of the census survival ratio method (CSRM) was developed by Hamilton and Henderson (1944) and then extended by Preston (1979). It has been repeatedly applied in United Nations Population Division (UN 1980; UN 2001) analyses, including in their estimates of the share of urban growth that is driven by net rural to urban migration.

The key feature underlying the CSRM is that age- and sex-specific net migration rates can be estimated in contexts with relatively little or no migration data using a minimum of two points in time as long as the rural and urban sector populations are separately measured. Given these minimum data requirements, Preston (1979) showed how net rural to urban migration rates could be calculated for each age group and by sex. In addition, he carefully described the assumptions that make this approach possible.

Underlying the CSRM is the notion that a broad measure of survival for the population can be estimated across time using data from national level cohort survival calculations. These survivorship estimates are then adjusted based on assumptions about rural and urban mortality level differentials. Given the estimated survivorship predictions, differences between the predicted cohort size in each sector and the actual measured size can be calculated. This difference is the net rural to urban flow.

CSRM has two key limitations, widely acknowledged by those who use it. The main one is that the net migration estimates also include reclassification as areas are rezoned over time (Preston 1979; Moultrie et al. 2013). Estimates of reclassification have indicated that it may have accounted for as much as 25% of urban growth in parts of sub-Saharan Africa in the 1980s, though it is unclear whether this figure will have changed in the period we examine here (Beauchemin and Bocquier 2004; Chen et al. 1998).

The second limitation of the CSRM is that it typically ignores international migration, since there is little if any data available for the types of societies where CSRM is most useful. In contexts with high levels of net international migration and strong differentials by age, the estimated survivorship measures that underlie the CSRM therefore yields some bias in the net rural to urban migration estimates.

Here, following Menashe-Oren and Stecklov (2017), we use country-level assessments of urban and rural populations by age and sex (URPAS) across seven 5-year intervals over the 1980–2015 period (United Nations 2014b) for 41 countries in SSA.

Appendix 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weinreb, A., Stecklov, G. & Arslan, A. Effects of changes in rainfall and temperature on age- and sex-specific patterns of rural-urban migration in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Environ 42, 219–254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00359-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00359-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation