Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and molecular characteristics of gliosarcoma and modern prognostic significance relative to conventional glioblastoma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gliosarcoma is a rare histopathologic variant of glioblastoma traditionally associated with a poor prognosis. While gliosarcoma may represent a distinct clinical entity given its unique histologic composition and molecular features, its relative prognostic significance remains uncertain. While treatment of gliosarcoma generally encompasses the same standardized approach used in glioblastoma, supporting evidence is limited given its rarity. Here, we characterized 32 cases of gliosarcoma and retrospectively evaluated survival relative to 451 glioblastoma patients diagnosed during the same era within the same institution. Overall, we identified 22 primary gliosarcomas, representing 4.7% of WHO Grade IV primary glioblastomas, and 10 secondary gliosarcomas. With median age of 62, patients were predominately Caucasian (87.5%) and male (65.6%). Tumors with available molecular profiling were primarily MGMT-unmethylated (87.5%), IDH-1-preserved (100%) and EGFR wild-type (100%). Interestingly, while no significant median survival difference between primary gliosarcoma and glioblastoma was observed across the entire cohort (11.0 vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.269), median survival was worse for gliosarcoma specifically among patients who received modern temozolomide-based (TMZ) chemoradiotherapy (11.0 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.006). Matched-pair analysis also trended toward worse median survival among gliosarcomas (11.0 vs. 19.6 months, log-rank p = 0.177, Breslow p = 0.010). While adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.206, p = 0.035) and TMZ-based chemotherapy (HR 0.531, p = 0.000) appeared protective, gliosarcoma emerged as a significantly poor prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 3.27, p = 0.012). Collectively, our results suggest that gliosarcoma may still portend worse prognosis even with modern trimodality therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG et al (2014) The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a state of the science review. Neuro Oncol 16(7):896–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 35210:987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131(6):803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paulus W, Bayas A, Ott G, Roggendorf W (1994) Interphase cytogenetics of glioblastoma and gliosarcoma. Acta Neuropathol 88(5):420–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biernat W, Aguzzi A, Sure U, Grant JW, Kleihues P, Hegi ME (1995) Identical mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in the gliomatous and the sarcomatous components of gliosarcomas suggest a common origin from glial cells. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 54(5):651–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reis RM, Könü-Lebleblicioglu D, Lopes JM, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2000) Genetic profile of gliosarcomas. Am J Pathol 156(2):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64746-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker C, Joyce KA, Thompson-Hehir J et al (2001) Characterisation of molecular alterations in microdissected archival gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 101(4):321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010000259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Actor B, Ludwig Cobbers JMJ, Büschges R et al (2002) Comprehensive analysis of genomic alterations in gliosarcoma and its two tissue components. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 34(4):416–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.10087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boerman RH, Anderi K, Herath J et al (1996) The glial and mesenchymal elements of gliosarcomas share similar genetic alterations. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 55(9):973–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozak KR, Mahadevan A, Moody JS (2009) Adult gliosarcoma: epidemiology, natural history and factors associated with outcome. Neuro Oncol 11(2):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker GV, Gilbert MR, Prabhu SS, Brown PD, McAleer MF (2013) Temozolomide use in adult patients with gliosarcoma: an evolving clinical practice. J Neurooncol 112(1):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-1029-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frandsen J, Orton A, Jensen R et al (2017) Patterns of care and outcomes in gliosarcoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Neurosurg https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.12.JNS162291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morantz R, Feigin I, Ransohoff J (1976) Clinical and pathological study of 24 cases of gliosarcoma. J Neurosurg 45(4):398–408. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1976.45.4.0398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meis JM, Martz KL, Nelson JS (1991) Mixed glioblastoma multiforme and sarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 26 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cases. Cancer 67(9):2342–2349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perry JR, Ang LC, Bilbao JM, Muller PJ (1995) Clinicopathologic features of primary and postirradiation cerebral gliosarcoma. Cancer 75(12):2910–2918.https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2910::AID-CNCR2820751219>3.0.CO;2-A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Galanis E, Buckner JC, Dinapoli RP et al (1998) Clinical outcome of gliosarcoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group results. J Neurosurg 89(3):425–430. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.3.0425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutterbach J, Guttenberger R, Pagenstecher A (2001) Gliosarcoma: a clinical study. Radiother Oncol 61:57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Adeberg S, Bernhardt D, Harrabi SB, et al (2016) Radiotherapy plus concomitant temozolomide in primary gliosarcoma. J Neurooncol 128(2):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2117-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Chang SM, Parsa AT (2010) Secondary gliosarcoma: a review of clinical features and pathological diagnosis. J Neurosurg 112(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.JNS081081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Han SJ, Yang I, Ahn BJ et al (2010) Clinical characteristics and outcomes for a modern series of primary gliosarcoma patients. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortega A, Nuño M, Walia S, Mukherjee D, Black KL, Patil CG (2014) Treatment and survival of patients harboring histological variants of glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 21(10):1709–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C et al (2014) Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(10):1985–1996. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu C-C, Wang TJC, Jani A et al (2016) A modern radiotherapy series of survival in Hispanic patients with glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 88:260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Castelli J, Feuvret L, Haoming QC et al (2016) Prognostic and therapeutic factors of gliosarcoma from a multi-institutional series. J Neurooncol 129(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2142-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rath G, Sharma D, Mallick S et al (2015) Clinical outcome of patients with primary gliosarcoma treated with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide: a single institutional analysis of 27 cases. Indian J Cancer 52(4):599. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.178407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Damodaran O, Van Heerden J, Nowak AK et al (2014) Clinical management and survival outcomes of gliosarcomas in the era of multimodality therapy. J Clin Neurosci 21(3):478–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Biswas A, Kumar N, Kumar P et al (2011) Primary gliosarcoma—clinical experience from a regional cancer centre in north India. Br J Neurosurg 25(6):723–729. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2011.570881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang SH, Park KJ, Kim CY et al (2011) O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase status determined by promoter methylation and immunohistochemistry in gliosarcoma and their clinical implications. J Neurooncol 101(3):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0267-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cachia D, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Mandel JJ et al (2015) Primary and secondary gliosarcomas: clinical, molecular and survival characteristics. J Neurooncol 125(2):401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1930-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang G, Huang S, Zhang J, Wu Z, Lin S, Wang Y (2016) Clinical outcome of gliosarcoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme: a clinical study in Chinese patients. J Neurooncol 127(2):355–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-2046-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee D, Kang SY, Suh YL, Jeong JY, Lee JI, Nam DH (2012) Clinicopathologic and genomic features of gliosarcomas. J Neurooncol 107(3):643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0790-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Wang reports personal fees and non-financial support from AbbVie, non-financial support from Merck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Doximity, non-financial support from Novocure, personal fees and non-financial support from Elekta and personal fees from Wolthers Kluwer, outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony J. C. Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 88 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, D.R., Wu, CC., Saadatmand, H.J. et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of gliosarcoma and modern prognostic significance relative to conventional glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 137, 303–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2718-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2718-z

Keywords

Navigation