Skip to main content
Log in

International perspective on nanotechnology papers, patents, and NSF awards (2000–2016)

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the development of nanotechnology between 2000 and 2016 as reflected in the Web of Science papers, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), World International Property Organization (WIPO) patents, and National Science Foundation (NSF) awards, with a special reference to the United States (US), European Union (EU27), P.R. China, Japan, and South Korea. The field of nanotechnology is branching out into novel scientific and technology platforms, and it is increasingly difficult to separate foundational nanoscale components from divergent application areas. The average global growth rate has been sustained at about 15% for both papers and patents in the selected interval. The growth rates among regions are non-uniform. P.R. China and South Korea have increased faster in both the numbers and quality of their scientific publications, and currently P.R. China has the largest volume of nanotechnology publications and South Korea the most publications per capita in the field of nanotechnology. The US, EU27, and Japan are maintaining leadership in the upstream, better cited, conceptual components of nanotechnology research and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Roco MC, Li X, Lin Y (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nature Nanotech 3:123–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Roco MC, Son J (2013a) Nanotechnology public funding and impact analysis: a tale of two decades (1991-2010). IEEE Nanotech 7:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Roco MC, Son J, Jiang S, Larson CA, Gao Q (2013b) Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding. J Nanopart Res 15:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang Y, Zhang Y, Fan L, Chen H, Roco MC (2010) Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008. J Nanopart Res 12:687–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco MC (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco MC (2005) Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): National Science Foundation funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7(4):343–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Gao Q, Chen H (2015) The roles of sharing, transfer, and public funding in nanotechnology knowledge diffusion networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci & Tech 66:1017–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CC, Kaiser I, Moore VC (2013) Nanotechnology patent literature review: graphitic carbon-based nanotechnology and energy applications are on the rise. Nanotech L & Bus 11:111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay L, Newman N, Youtie J, Porter AL, Rafols I (2014) Patent overlay mapping: visualizing technological distance. J Assoc Inf Sci & Tech 65:2432–2443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L (2013) An evaluation of impacts in “nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis. Scientometrics 94:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9:977–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Hu D, Dang Y, Chen H, Roco MC, Larson CA, Chan J (2009) Nano mapper: an internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development. J Nanopart Res 11:529–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Kaza S, Zhang P, Chen H (2011) Determining inventor status and its effect on knowledge diffusion: a study on nanotechnology literature from P.R. China, Russia, and India. J Am Soc Inf Sci & Tech 62:1166–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux Research (2014) Nanotechnology update: corporations up their spending as revenues for nano-enabled products increase. Ed. H. Flynn, D. Hwang and M. Holman, 18p

  • Roco MC (2016) Building foundational knowledge and infrastructure for nanotechnology: 2000-2030. Chapter 4. In: Cheng et al (eds) Nanotechnology: delivering the promise, vol 1. ACS, Washington, DC, pp 39–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (2000) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for the next decade. Springer (former Kluwer Academic Publishers), Boston, 316p. Available on: http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/

  • Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020. Springer, Berlin, 600p. Available on www.wtec.org/nano2/

  • Suominen A, Li Y, Youtie J, Shapira P (2016) A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies. J Nanopart Res 18:270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmooresnejad L, Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A (2015) The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: where Canada stands in comparison to the United States. Scientometrics 102:753–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Shapira P (2011) P.R. China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics 88:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youtie J, Shapira P, Porter AL (2008) Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. J Nanopart Res 10:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Chen D, Huang M (2014) International collaboration development in nanotechnology: a perspective of patent network analysis. Scientometrics 98:683–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) at the University of Arizona under grant number CMMI-1249210. The fourth co-author was supported by the Directorate for Engineering in NSF. The first three co-authors received funding from NSF under grant number CMMI-1249210, and the work of the fourth co-author was supported by the NSF’s Directorate for Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyi Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Basic keywords used for searching papers, patents, and NSF awards
Table 7 Additional keywords added for searching papers, patents, and NSF awards after beginning of 2011

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Jiang, S., Chen, H. et al. International perspective on nanotechnology papers, patents, and NSF awards (2000–2016). J Nanopart Res 19, 370 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-4056-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-4056-7

Keywords

Navigation