Abstract
According to recent theorizing, cognitive control and affective processing are closely linked. Specifically, it has been suggested that negative affect acts as a driving force for attentional adjustment. Empirical support comes from a study by van Steenbergen et al. (Psychol Sci 20:1473–1477, 2009) demonstrating that negative stimuli increase the congruence sequence effect (CSE), a behavioural marker that indexes attentional adjustment. In this research, we provide a theoretical analysis that identifies motivational orientation (approach vs. avoidance) as a potential moderator. To test this, we replicated the study by van Steenbergen et al. (2009) and additionally manipulated the motivational orientation of participants. Participants either gained extra money after task completion (gain-focused group) or lost money after task completion (loss-focused group). Results showed that negative stimuli boost attentional adjustment, but only in the loss-focused group. This finding highlights the role of motivation for recent theorizing on emotion-driven control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, A., Mitschke, V., Dignath, D., Eder, A., & van Steenbergen, H. (2020). The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 57(5), e13524. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13524
Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.107
Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.356
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G., & Monteiro, K. P. (1981). Selectivity of learning caused by affective states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.451
Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3
Cernterbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach–avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
Clayson, P. E., & Larson, M. J. (2011). Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 1953–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
De Lange, M. A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2007). Going against the grain: Regulatory focus and interference by task-irrelevant information. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.6
Derryberry, D. (1989). Effects of goal-related motivational states on the orienting of spatial attention. Acta Psychologica, 72(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(89)90029-2
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1128–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1128
Dignath, D., & Eder, A. B. (2015). Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0355-6
Dignath, D., Kiesel, A., & Eder, A. B. (2015). Flexible conflict management: Conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000089
Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 1265–1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000673
Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 193–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9
Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2011). If it’s hard to read try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 75(5), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0319-y
Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.003
Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569569
Egner, T. (2017). Conflict adaptation: Past, present, and future of the congruency sequence effect as an index of cognitive control. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 64–78). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118920497.ch4
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach–avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009009018235
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
Förster, J., & Stepper, S. (2000). Compatibility between approach/avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6%3c853::AID-EJSP20%3e3.0.CO;2-1
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1997). Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motor congruence effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85(3), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1419
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.477
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.263
Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
Fritz, J., & Dreisbach, G. (2013). Conflicts as aversive signals: Conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0147-1
Frömer, R., Lin, H., Dean Wolf, C. K., Inzlicht, M., & Shenhav, A. (2021). Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21315-z
Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2005). Approach/avoidance–related motor actions and the processing of affective stimuli: Incongruency effects in automatic attention allocation. Social Cognition, 23(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.23.2.182.65627
Gomez, A., & Gomez, R. (2002). Personality traits of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems: Associations with processing of emotional stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(8), 1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00119-2
Grahek, I., Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Krebs, R. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2019). Motivation and cognitive control in depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 102, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.011
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
Hengstler, M., Holland, R. W., van Steenbergen, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (2014). The influence of approach–avoidance motivational orientation on conflict adaptation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0295-6
Higgins, T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Seff-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185002
Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004
Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089910
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472), 1835–1038. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1051
Paul, K., Pourtois, G., van Steenbergen, H., Gable, P., & Dreisbach, G. (2021). Finding a balance: Modulatory effects of positive affect on attentional and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.002
Rothermund, K., Voss, A., & Wentura, D. (2008). Counter-regulation in affective attentional bias: A basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in motivation and emotion. Emotion, 8, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.34
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
Satterthwaite, T. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J., Elliott, M. A., Gerraty, R. T., & Calkins, M. (2012). Being right is its own reward: Load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth. NeuroImage, 61(3), 723–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.060
Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2014). Mood states influence cognitive control: The case of conflict adaptation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0602-4
Schwager, S., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: Positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing. Cognition and Emotion, 27(5), 971–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.750599
Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(3), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2994
Shah, J., Higgins, T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Lieder, F., Kool, W., Griffiths, T. L., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526
Sheth, S. A., Mian, M. K., Patel, S. R., Asaad, W. F., Williams, Z. M., & Dougherty, D. (2012). Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation. Nature, 488(7410), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11239
Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1446–1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291007
Stürmer, B., Nigbur, R., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2011). Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(335), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00335
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1473–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1629–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385951
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2012). Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.018
Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., González-García, C., Hoofs, V., Notebaert, W., & Braem, S. (2020). Shared neural representations of cognitive conflict and negative affect in the medial frontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(45), 8715–8725. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-20.2020
Yamaguchi, M., & Nishimura, A. (2018). Modulating proactive cognitive control by reward: Differential anticipatory effects of performance-contingent and non-contingent rewards. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1027-2
Yamaguchi, M., & Nishimura, A. (2018). Modulating proactive cognitive control by reward: Differential anticipatory effects of performance-contingent and non-contingent rewards. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1027-2
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the China Scholarship Council and grants within the Priority Program, SPP 1772 from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), Grant no. DI 2126/1-1. Experimental materials, data and analyses scripts can be retrieved from the link: https://figshare.com/s/388457900362b0454030. The authors would like to thank Henk van Steenbergen for providing us with the materials and the E-Prime programm and Sari Alsalti, Julia Ditz and Patrik Seuling for help with the data collection, and Lisa Huether for language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and analysis were performed by the corresponding author. Data collection was performed by research assistants. The first draft of the manuscript was written by the corresponding author and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors listed in the manuscript have agreed to submission of the manuscript in the present form and I have assumed responsibility to inform my coauthors about further steps in the editorial review process.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Neither my co-authors nor I have any interests that might influence the research.
Informed consent
The data were collected according to APA ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Kiesel, A. & Dignath, D. When negative affect drives attentional control: The role of motivational orientation. Motiv Emot 46, 546–556 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09951-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09951-4