The national primary standard for hardness according to the Martens scales and indentation scales, GET 211-2014, has been created to ensure the uniformity of measurements of hardness in the area of instrumented indentation. Methods for measuring the hardness of materials widely used in the nano- and micro-ranges are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Grodzinski, “An apparatus for the indentation data continuous recording,” Plastics, 18, 312–314 (1953).
S. I. Bulychev, V. I. Alekhin, M. Kh. Shorshorov, et al., “Determining the Young modulus from an indenter penetration diagram,” Zavod. Lab., 41, No. 9, 1137–1140 (1975).
Yu. I. Golovin, Nanoindentation and Its Prospects, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2009).
W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, “An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments,” J. Mat. Res., 7, 1564–1583 (1992).
ISO/FDIS 14577, Metallic Materials – Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters. Part 1–3.
GOST R 8.748-2011, GSI. Metals and Alloys. Measurement of Hardness and Other Characteristics of Materials by Instrumented Indentation. Part 1. Test Method.
E. S. Berkovich, “Trigonal diamond pyramid for implantation testing of hardness,” Zavod. Lab., No. 3, 345–347 (1950).
Yu. I. Golovin, “Nanoindentation and the mechanical properties of solids in sub-microvolumes, thin surface layers, and films. A review,” Fiz. Tverd. Tela, 50, No. 12, 2113–2142 (2008).
Yu. I. Golovin, Introduction to Nanotechnology, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2007).
A. Fisher-Cripps, Nanoindentation, Springer, NY (2003).
E. Aslanyan and P. Krasowski, “Necessity of Russian nanoindentation standard base development,” IMEKO-2010 TC3, TC5, and TC22 Conf. Metrology in Modern Context, Pattaya, Thailand (2010), pp. 199–200.
W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, “Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements in methodology,” J. Mat. Res., 19, No. 1, 3–19 (2004).
K. V. Gogolinskii, A. P. Kuznetsov, V. N. Reshetov, et al., “A study of the metrological characteristics of a scanning measuring probe microscope with use of TGZ calibration grids,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 4, 18–21 (2012).
GOST 8.381-2009, GSI. Standards. Ways of Expressing Accuracy.
A. E. Aslanyan, E. G. Aslanyan, S. M. Gavrilkin, and A. N. Shchipunov, “Studies of inhomogeneities in hardness gauges for transfer of Martens scales in nanoindentation,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 1, 32–34 (2015).
GOST R 8.904-2015, GSI. Measurement of Hardness and Other Characteristics of Materials by Instrumented Indentation. Part 2. Certification and Calibration of Hardness Gauges.
A. Aslanyan, E. Aslanyan, F. Menelao, and Z. Li, “VNIIFTRI/PTB bilaterial comparison of Martens and indentation hardness scales,” Measurement in Research and Industry: XXI IMEKO World Congr., Prague, Czech Rep. (2015), pp. 792–794.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 6, pp. 3–6, June, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslanyan, A.E., Aslanyan, E.G., Gavrilkin, S.M. et al. National Primary Standard for Hardness According to the Martens Scales and Indentation Scales, Get 211-2014. Meas Tech 59, 555–559 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-016-1007-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-016-1007-0