Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal and spatial distributions of precursory seismicity rate changes in the Thailand-Laos-Myanmar border region: implication for upcoming hazardous earthquakes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the prospective areas of upcoming strong-to-major earthquakes, i.e., M w  ≥ 6.0, a catalog of seismicity in the vicinity of the Thailand-Laos-Myanmar border region was generated and then investigated statistically. Based on the successful investigations of previous works, the seismicity rate change (Z value) technique was applied in this study. According to the completeness earthquake dataset, eight available case studies of strong-to-major earthquakes were investigated retrospectively. After iterative tests of the characteristic parameters concerning the number of earthquakes (N) and time window (T w ), the values of 50 and 1.2 years, respectively, were found to reveal an anomalous high Z-value peak (seismic quiescence) prior to the occurrence of six out of the eight major earthquake events studied. In addition, the location of the Z-value anomalies conformed fairly well to the epicenters of those earthquakes. Based on the investigation of correlation coefficient and the stochastic test of the Z values, the parameters used here (N = 50 events and T w  = 1.2 years) were suitable to determine the precursory Z value and not random phenomena. The Z values of this study and the frequency-magnitude distribution b values of a previous work both highlighted the same prospective areas that might generate an upcoming major earthquake: (i) some areas in the northern part of Laos and (ii) the eastern part of Myanmar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann D (2001) Precursory seismic quiescence: two methods of quantifying seismicity rate changes and an application to two Northern Californian mainshocks, Diploma Thesis’s, Department of Earth Sciences of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich

  • Chouliaras G (2009) Seismicity anomalies prior to 8 June 2008, Mw = 6.4 earthquake in Western Greece. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 9(2):327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaras G, Stavrakakis GN (2001) Current seismic quiescence in Greece: implications for seismic hazard. J Seismol 5:595–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton CH, Charusiri P, Wood SH (2003) Recent paleoseismic investigations in northern and western Thailand. Ann Geophys 46(5):957–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(1):363–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermann RE (1983) Teleseismic detection in the Aleutian Island Arc. J Geophys Res 88:5056–5064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermann RE (1987) Man-made changes of seismicity rates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:141–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q (2004) Seismicity pattern changes prior to large earthquakes—an approach of the RTL algorithm. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 15(3):469–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q (2006) Search for reliable precursors: a case study of the seismic quiescence of the 2000 western Tottori prefecture earthquake. J Geophys Res 111:B04301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003982

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Sobolev GA, Nagao T (2001) Characteristics of the seismic quiescence and activation patterns before the M=7.2 Kobe earthquake, January 17, 1995. Tectonophysics 337(1–2):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumata K (2011a) Precursory seismic quiescence before the Mw = 8.3 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake on 26 September 2003 revealed by a re-examined earthquake catalog. J Geophys Res 116:B10307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumata K (2011b) A long-term seismic quiescence started 23 years before the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (M= 9.0). Earth Planets Space 63(7):709–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumata K, Sakai S (2013) Seismic quiescence and activation anomalies from 2005 to 2008 beneath the Kanto district, central Honshu, Japan. Earth Planets Space 65(12):1463–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura M, Chen CC, Wu YM (2014) Seismicity change revealed by ETAS, PI, and Z-value methods: A case study of the 2013 Nantou, Taiwan earthquake. Tectonophysics 634:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacassin R, Replumaz A, Leloup PH (1998) Hairpin river loops and strike-slip sense inversion of Southeast Asian strike-slip faults. Geology 26:703–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda K, Wiemer S (1999) Significance test for seismicity rate changes before the 1987 Chiba-toho-oki earthquake (M 6.7) Japan. Ann Geofis 42:833–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MV, Reasenberg P (1988) Statistical methods for investigating quiescence and other temporal seismicity patterns. Pageoph 126:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murru M, Console R, Montuori C (1999) Seismic quiescence precursor to the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu (M 7.7) earthquake, Japan. Ann Geofis 42:871–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanjo KZ, Holliday JR, Chen CC, Rundle JB, Turcott DL (2006) Application of a modified pattern informatics method to forecasting the locations of future large earthquakes in the central Japan. Tectonophysics 424:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuannin P, Kulhanek O, Persson L (2005) Spatial and temporal b value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32(11):L11307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornthammarath T, Warnitchai P (2016) 5 May 2014 MW 6.1 Mae Lao (Northern Thailand) earthquake: interpretations of recorded ground motion and structural damage. Earthquake Spectra 32(2):1209–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk S, Bayrak Y (2009) Precursory seismic quiescence before 1 May 2003 bing Öl (turkey) earthquake: A statistical evaluation. J Appl Funct Anal 4(4):600–610

  • Pailoplee S, Choowong M (2013) Probabilities of earthquake occurrences in Mainland Southeast Asia. Arab J Geosci 6:4993–5006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S, Choowong M (2014) Earthquake frequency-magnitude distribution and fractal dimension in mainland Southeast Asia. Earth Planets Space 66(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S, Sugiyama Y, Charusiri P (2009) Deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analyses in Thailand and adjacent areas using active fault data. Earth Planets Space 61:1313–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S, Channarong P, Chutakositkanon V (2013) Earthquake activities in the Thailand-Laos-Myanmar border region: a statistical approach. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 24(4):721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palasri C, Ruangrassamee A (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of Thailand. J Earthq Tsunami 4:369–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD, Dewey J, Hartzell S, Mueller C, Harmsen S, Frankel AD, Rukstales K (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Sumatra, Indonesia and across the Southern Malaysian Peninsula. Tectonophysics 390:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD, Harmsen S, Mueller C, Haller K, Dewey J, Luco N, Crone A, Lidke D, Rukstales K (2007). Documentation for the Southeast Asia seismic hazard maps, Administrative Report, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, USA

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-82. J Geophys Res 90(5479–5495):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf-Navarro AH, Muñoz-Diosdado A, Angulo-Brown F (2010) Seismic quiescence patterns as possible precursors of great earthquakes in Mexico. Int J Phys Sci 5(6):651–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle JB, Holliday JR, Yoder M, Sachs MK, Donnellan A, Turcotte DL, Tiampo KF, Klein W, Kellogg LH (2011) Earthquake precursors: activation or quiescence? Geophys J Int 187:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobolev GA, Huang Q, Nagao T (2002) Phases of earthquake’s preparation and by chance test of seismic quiescence anomaly. J Geodyn 33:413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbi MR, Nilfouroushan F, Zamani A (2012) Seismicity patterns associated with the September 10th, 2008 Qeshm earthquake, South Iran. Int J Earth Sci 101(8):2215–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiampo KF, Shcherbakov R (2012) Seismicity-based earthquake forecasting techniques: Ten years of progress. Tectonophysics 522-523:89–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrhammer RA (1986) Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity. Earthquake Notes 57(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Lin YNN, Simons M, Tun ST (2014) Shallow rupture of the 2011 Tarlay earthquake (Mw 6.8), eastern Myanmar. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(6):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Wyss M (1994) Seismic quiescence before the Landers (M=7.5) and Big Bear (M=6.5) 1992 earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:900–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2):684–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YM, Chiao LY (2006) Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M (1991) Reporting history of the central Aleutians seismograph network and the quiescence preceding the 1986 Andreanof Island earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:1231–1254

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M, Hasegawa A, Wiemer S, Umino N (1999) Quantitative mapping of precursory seismic quiescence before the 1989 M7.1 off-Sanriku earthquake, Japan. Ann Geofis 42:851–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Shanker D, Rastogi BK, Das MC, Kumar VC (2011) Probabilities for the occurrences of medium to large earthquakes in northeast India and adjoining region. Nat Hazards 56:145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuchiewicz W, Cuong NQ, Bluszcz A, Michalik M (2004) Quaternary sediments in the Dien Bien Phu fault zone, NW Vietnam: a record of young tectonic processes in the light of OSL-SAR dating results. Geomorphology 60:269–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuniga FR, Reyners M, Villamor P (2005) Temporal variation of the earthquake data in the catalogue of seismicity of new Zealand. Bull NZ Soc Earthquake Eng 38(2):87–105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ratchadapiseksomphot Endowment Fund 2017 of Chulalongkorn University to S Pailoplee. Thanks are also extended to T. Pailoplee for the preparation of the draft manuscript. The Office of Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn University, is also thanked for a critical review and improved English. The thoughtful comments and suggestions by T Braun, the associate editors, and M Choowong as well as anonymous reviewers that significantly enhanced the quality of this manuscript are acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santi Pailoplee.

Additional information

First version (September 16, 2016). Second version (March 20, 2017). Third version (June 20, 2017). Fourth version (August 31, 2017)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puangjaktha, P., Pailoplee, S. Temporal and spatial distributions of precursory seismicity rate changes in the Thailand-Laos-Myanmar border region: implication for upcoming hazardous earthquakes. J Seismol 22, 303–313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9706-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9706-9

Keywords

Navigation