Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical methods for investigating quiescence and other temporal seismicity patterns

  • Seismologic and Geodetic Precursors
  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a statistical model and a technique for objective recognition of one of the most commonly cited seismicity patterns:microearthquake quiescence. We use a Poisson process model for seismicity and define a process with quiescence as one with a particular type of piece-wise constant intensity function. From this model, we derive a statistic for testing stationarity against a ‘quiescence’ alternative. The large-sample null distribution of this statistic is approximated from simulated distributions of appropriate functionals applied to Brownian bridge processes. We point out the restrictiveness of the particular model we propose and of the quiescence idea in general. The fact that there are many point processes which have neither constant nor quiescent rate functions underscores the need to test for and describe nonuniformity thoroughly. We advocate the use of the quiescence test in conjunction with various other tests for nonuniformity and with graphical methods such as density estimation. ideally these methods may promote accurate description of temporal seismicity distributions and useful characterizations of interesting patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billingsley, P. (1968),Convergence of probability measures (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. andLewis, P. A. W. (1966),The statistical analysis of series of events (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermann, R. E. (1987),Precursory seismic quiescence: Past, present, and future, Pure and Appl. Geophys., (this volume).

  • Kanamori, H. (1981),The nature of seismicity patterns before large earthquakes. InEarthquake Prediction, An International Review, Maurice Ewing Ser., vol. 4 (eds. D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards) (AGU, Washington, D.C.), pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. V. andReasenberg, P. A. (1987),Comment on Habermann's method for detecting seismicity rate changes. J. Geophys. Res.92, 9443–9445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg, P. A. (1985),Second-order moment of Central California seismicity. J. Geophys. Res.90, 5479–5495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg, P. A. andMatthews, M. V. (1988),Precursory seismic quiescence: A preliminary assessment of the hypothesis, Pure and Appl. Geophys., (this volume).

  • Ross, Sheldon, M. (1983),Stochastic processes (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1986),Density estimation for statistics and data analysis (Chapman and Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, R. A. andThompson, J. R. (1978),Nonparametric probability density estimation (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, M.V., Reasenberg, P.A. Statistical methods for investigating quiescence and other temporal seismicity patterns. PAGEOPH 126, 357–372 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879003

Key words

Navigation