Abstract
The present study investigates the comprehension of syntactic and affective prosody in adults with autism spectrum disorder without accompanying cognitive deficits (ASD w/o cognitive deficits) as well as age-, education- and gender-matched unimpaired adults, while processing orally presented sentences. Two experiments were conducted: (a) an on-line sentence completion task containing local subject/object ambiguities and (b) an affective prosody task exploring the comprehension of six emotions. The syntactic prosody task revealed that the experimental group performed similar to the control group on the fillers and the object condition. On the other hand, the ASD w/o cognitive deficits group manifested lower accuracy compared to the unimpaired controls in the subject reading condition, as well as slower reaction times in all conditions. In the affective prosody task, the experimental group performed significantly worse than the controls in the recognition of the emotion of surprise, whereas no differences between the experimental and the control group were attested in the recognition of all other emotions. A positive correlation was found between the two tasks in the ASD w/o cognitive deficits group. Thus, individuals with ASD w/o cognitive deficits face slight difficulties with the decoding of prosody, both the syntactic and the affective one. More specifically, these difficulties are attested in the most difficult conditions, i.e. the subject reading and the emotion of surprise.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Slashes indicate prosodic boundaries.
The male speaker was 28 years old with 16 years of education and the female speaker was 29 years old with 18 years of education. Both participants use the standard Modern Greek variety.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Attwood, T. (2008). The complete guide to Asperger’s syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mind blindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (computer program). Version 5.1.07. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 21 Mar 2009.
Bozikas, V. P., Kosmidis, M. H., Anezoulaki, D., Giannakou, M., Andreou, Ch., & Karavatos, A. (2006). Impaired perception of affective prosody in schizophrenia. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 18, 81–85.
Bozikas, V. P., Kosmidis, M. H., Tonia, Th, Andreou, Ch., Focas, K., & Karavatos, A. (2007). Impaired perception of affective prosody in remitted patients with bipolar disorder. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 436–440.
Brookshire, B. L., Chapman, S. B., Song, J., & Levin, H. S. (2000). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children’s discourse after closed head injury: A three-year follow-up. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 741–751.
Charlesworth, W. R. (1969). The role of surprise in cognitive development. In D. Elkind & J. H. Flavell (Eds.), Studies in cognitive development (pp. 257–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doi, H., Fujisawa, T. X., Kanai, C., Ohta, H., Yokoi, H., Iwanami, A., et al. (2013). Recognition of facial expressions and prosodic cues with graded emotional: Intensities in adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2099–2113.
Frith, C. (2003). What do imaging studies tell us about the neural basis of autism? Novartis Foundation Symposium, 251, 149–166.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frith, U. (2004). Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 672–686.
Ghaziuddin, M., Thomas, P., Napier, E., Kearney, G., Tsai, L., Welch, K., et al. (2000). Brief report: Brief syntactic analysis in Asperger syndrome: A preliminary study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(1), 67–70.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
Goldberg, M., Mostofsky, S., Cutting, L., Mahone, E., Astor, B., Denckla, M., et al. (2005). Subtle executive impairment in children with autism and children with ADHD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 279–293.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.
Hiou, K., Vagia, A., Haritidou, E., Karakostas, D., & Kosmidis, M. H. (2004). Affect perception as a cognitive function: Validity and clinical application of a neuropsychological test battery in healthy individuals and patients with brain lesions. Psychology (in Greek), 11(3), 388–401.
Hughes, C., Russell, J., & Robbins, T. (1994). Evidence for executive dysfunction in autism. Neuropsychologia, 32, 477–492.
Hungerford, S., & Gonyo, K. (2007). Relationships between executive functions and language variables. Paper presented at the American speech language hearing association conference, 2007.
Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71(2), 149–185.
Jones, C. R., Pickles, A., Falcaro, M., Marsden, A. J., Happe, F., Scott, S. K., et al. (2011). A multimodal approach to emotion recognition ability in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(3), 275–285.
Joseph, R., McGrath, L., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Executive dysfunction and its relation to language ability in verbal school-age children with autism. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 361–378.
Jun, S. A., & Bishop, J. (2014). Implicit prosodic priming and autistic traits in relative clause attachment. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Speech prosody 7 (pp. 854–858). Dublin: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI).
Kent, R. D., & Read, C. (2002). Acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Thomas Learning.
Kjelgaard, M. D., & Speer, S. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–194.
Kjelgaard, M. D., Titone, A., & Wingfield, A. M. (1999). The influence of prosodic structure on the interpretation of temporary syntactic ambiguity by young and elderly listeners. Experimental Aging Research, 25(3), 187–207.
Kosmidis, M. H., & Vlahou, C. E. (2001). Affective prosody test (APT). Neuropsychology Lab, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Landa, R. (2000). Social language use in Asperger syndrome, high functioning autism. In A. Klin, F. R. Volkmar, & S. S. Sparrow (Eds.), Asperger syndrome (pp. 125–155). New York: The Guilford Press.
Landa, R., & Goldberg, M. (2005). Language, social and executive functions in high-functioning autism: A continuum of performance. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 557–573.
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412.
Martzoukou, M., Papadopoulou, D., & Revithiadou, A. (2013). Prosodic cues in the disambiguation of structurally ambiguous sentences: Evidence from Greek. Paper presented at the 10th old world conference in phonology (OCP10), Istanbul, 16–19/1/2013.
McCann, J., & Peppé, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38(4), 325–350.
McCrimmon, A. W., Schwean, V. L., Saklofske, D. H., Montgomery, J., & Brady, D. I. (2012). Executive functions in Asperger’s syndrome: An empirical investigation of verbal and nonverbal skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 224–233.
O’Connor, K. (2007). Brief report: Impaired identification of discrepancies between expressive faces and voices in adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(10), 2008–2013.
Papadopoulou, D., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2005). Morphological cues in children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of subject/object ambiguities in Greek. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 471–481). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Papangeli, A., & Marinis, Th. (2009). E\(\uppi \upvarepsilon \xi \upvarepsilon \uprho \upgamma \upalpha \upsigma \acute{\varrho } \upalpha \updelta {\rm o} \upmu \varrho \upkappa \acute{\upalpha }\upalpha \upmu \varpi \acute{\varrho }\upsigma \upeta \upmu \upomega \upnu \uppi \uprho {\rm o}\uptau \acute{\upalpha }\upsigma \upvarepsilon \upomega \upnu \upsigma \uptau \upeta \upnu \upvarepsilon \uplambda \uplambda \upeta \upnu \upkappa \acute{\upeta }\upomega \zeta \) \(\Gamma 1\) \(\upkappa \upalpha \varrho \) \(\Gamma 2\) [The processing of structurally ambiguous sentences in Greek as L1 and L2]. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the department of linguistics, School of Philology, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, May 2–3, 2009 (pp. 477–486). Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies [Institute Manoli Triantafillidi].
Paul, R., Augustyn, A., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Perception and production of prosody by speakers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(2), 205–220.
Philip, R. C., Whalley, H. C., Stanfield, A. C., Sprengelmeyer, R., Santos, I. M., Young, A. W., et al. (2010). Deficits in facial, body movement and vocal emotional processing in autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40(11), 1919–1929.
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, D. (2002). \(\varGamma \varepsilon \nu \varepsilon \tau \iota \kappa \acute{\eta } \quad \Sigma \acute{\upsilon }\nu \tau \alpha \xi \eta . \quad To \quad \pi \rho \acute{o} \tau \nu \pi o \quad \tau \eta \varsigma \) \({K}\nu \beta \acute{\varepsilon } \rho \nu \eta \sigma \eta \varsigma \) \(\kappa \alpha \iota \quad {A}\nu \alpha \varphi o\rho \iota \kappa \acute{\eta } \varsigma \quad \varDelta \acute{\varepsilon }\sigma \mu \varepsilon \nu \sigma \eta \varsigma .\) [Generative Syntax. The model of Government and Binding Theory]. Athens: Kardamitsas.
Traxler, M. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children’s processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 75–96.
Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 851–857.
Verte, S., Geurts, H. M., Roeyers, H., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2006). The relationship of working memory, inhibition, and response variability in child psychopathology. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 151(1), 5–14.
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Funding
The present study has been co-financed by the European Union European Social Fund (ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki does not have an ethics committee which evaluates and approves research proposals, with the exception of invasive studies carried out in the Medical School. The University-wide Research Ethics Committee only sets the ethical guidelines, and does not review individual proposals. We can affirm, however, that we followed the ethical guidelines set forth both by the University and by the Declaration of Helsinki regarding the ethical treatment of human participants in research.
Appendix
Appendix
Durations of the verb, the DP and the pauses and pitch range for the utterances produced by the female and the male speaker.
Gender | Items | Conditions | Verb (ms) | Pause (ms) | DP (ms) | Pitch range(Hertz) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os sxeˈ\(\updelta \)iaze /ta ˈskitsa | S | 0.631 | No | 0.482 | 229.788 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os sxeˈ\(\updelta \)iaze ta ˈskitsa/ | O | 0.619 | No | 0.638 | 243.999 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ciniˈ\(\upgamma \)use/ta kuˈneʎa | S | 0.626 | No | 0.522 | 256.838 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ciniˈ\(\upgamma \)use ta kuˈneʎa/ | O | 0.481 | No | 0.766 | 247.539 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈeplene/ta poˈtirʝa | S | 0.431 | No | 0.493 | 264.795 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈeplene ta poˈtirʝa/ | O | 0.335 | No | 0.778 | 232.070 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈesproxne/ta traˈpezʝa | S | 0.498 | No | 0.543 | 180.524 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈesproxne ta traˈpezʝa/ | O | 0.452 | No | 0.744 | 185.086 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ciˈtuse/ta aftoˈcinita | S | 0.606 | 0.143 | 0.661 | 198.872 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ciˈtuse ta aftoˈcinita/ | O | 0.404 | No | 0.958 | 280.595 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈpotize/ta luˈlu\(\updelta \)ʝa | S | 0.551 | No | 0.572 | 173.661 |
Female | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈpotize ta luˈlu\(\updelta \)ʝa/ | O | 0.379 | No | 0.756 | 182.389 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈerave/ ta kuˈbʝa | S | 0.318 | No | 0.453 | 40.482 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈerave ta kuˈbʝa/ | O | 0.215 | No | 0.511 | 60.425 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈ\(\updelta \)ʝavaze/ta ˈ\(\upgamma \)ramata | S | 0.483 | 0.091 | 0.462 | 59.002 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈ\(\updelta \)ʝavaze ta ˈ\(\upgamma \)ramata/ | O | 0.374 | No | 0.608 | 51.095 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈpsekaze/ta ˈfila | S | 0.546 | 0.062 | 0.367 | 48.533 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈpsekaze ta ˈfila/ | O | 0.434 | No | 0.524 | 73.272 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os kseˈskonize /ta ˈrafça | S | 0.745 | No | 0.633 | 50.708 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os kseˈskonize ta ˈrafça/ | O | 0.607 | No | 0.482 | 53.276 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈepsine/ta kuˈlurʝa | S | 0.475 | No | 0.535 | 48.649 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os ˈepsine ta kuˈlurʝa/ | O | 0.314 | No | 0.574 | 55.468 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os maˈʝireve/ta maˈkaroɲa | S | 0.535 | No | 0.612 | 60.349 |
male | kaˈ\(\uptheta \)os maˈʝireve ta maˈkaroɲa/ | O | 0.438 | No | 0.679 | 47.838 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martzoukou, M., Papadopoulou, D. & Kosmidis, MH. The Comprehension of Syntactic and Affective Prosody by Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Cognitive Deficits. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 1573–1595 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9500-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9500-4