Abstract
This article proposes entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin schemes (DG) for two-fluid relativistic plasma flow equations. These equations couple the flow of relativistic fluids via electromagnetic quantities evolved using Maxwell’s equations. The proposed schemes are based on the Gauss–Lobatto quadrature rule, which has the summation by parts property. We exploit the structure of the equations having the flux with three independent parts coupled via nonlinear source terms. We design entropy stable DG schemes for each flux part, coupled with the fact that the source terms do not affect entropy, resulting in an entropy stable scheme for the complete system. The proposed schemes are then tested on various test problems in one and two dimensions to demonstrate their accuracy and stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data will be made available on reasonable request.
References
Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A., Miller, D.: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables (National Bureau of Standards applied mathematics series no. 55). J. Appl. Mech. 32(1), 239–239 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3625776
Amano, T.: A second-order divergence-constrained multidimensional numerical scheme for relativistic two-fluid electrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 831(1), 100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/100
Amano, T., Kirk, J.G.: The role of superluminal electromagnetic waves in pulsar wind termination shocks. Astrophys. J. 770(1), 18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/18
Anile, A.M.: Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-fluids. Cambridge Press, New York (1990). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511564130
Anton, L., Miralles, J.A., Marti, J.M., Ibez, J.M., Aloy, M.A., Mimica, P.: Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: renormalized eigenvectors and full wave decomposition Riemann solver. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 188(1), 1–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/188/1/1
Baboolal, S.: Finite-difference modeling of solitons induced by a density hump in a plasma multi-fluid. Math. Comput. Simul. 55(4–6), 309–316 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00310-4
Balsara, D.: Total variation diminishing scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 132(1), 83–101 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1086/318941
Balsara, D.S., Amano, T., Garain, S., Kim, J.: A high-order relativistic two-fluid electrodynamic scheme with consistent reconstruction of electromagnetic fields and a multidimensional Riemann solver for electromagnetism. J. Comput. Phys. 318, 169–200 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.006
Balsara, D.S., Kim, J.: A subluminal relativistic magnetohydrodynamics scheme with ADER-WENO predictor and multidimensional Riemann solver-based corrector. J. Comput. Phys. 312, 357–384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.02.001
Barkov, M., Komissarov, S.S., Korolev, V., Zankovich, A.: A multidimensional numerical scheme for two-fluid relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438(1), 704–716 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2247
Bhoriya, D., Kumar, H.: Entropy-stable schemes for relativistic hydrodynamics equations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-020-1250-8
Bhoriya, D., Kumar, H., Chandrashekar, P.: High-order finite-difference entropy stable schemes for two-fluid relativistic plasma flow equations (2022). ArXiv:2210.08568 [physics]
Birn, J., Drake, J.F., Shay, M.A., Rogers, B.N., Denton, R.E., Hesse, M., Kuznetsova, M., Ma, Z.W., Bhattacharjee, A., Otto, A., Pritchett, P.L.: Geospace environmental modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge. J. Geophys. Res. Sp. Phys. 106(A3), 3715–3719 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999ja900449
Biswas, B., Kumar, H., Bhoriya, D.: Entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin schemes for the special relativistic hydrodynamics equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 112, 55–75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2022.02.019
Biswas, B., Kumar, H., Yadav, A.: Entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methods for ten-moment Gaussian closure equations. J. Comput. Phys. 431, 110148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110148
Blandford, R., Meier, D., Readhead, A.: Relativistic jets from active galactic nuclei. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57(1), 467–509 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948
Bond, D.M., Wheatley, V., Samtaney, R.: Plasma flow simulation using the two-fluid model. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, AFMC 2016 (2016)
Carpenter, M.H., Fisher, T.C., Nielsen, E.J., Frankel, S.H.: Entropy stable spectral collocation schemes for the Navier-Stokes equations: discontinuous interfaces. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36(5), B835–B867 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1137/130932193
Chandrashekar, P.: Kinetic energy preserving and entropy stable finite volume schemes for compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. Commun. Comput. Phys. 14(5), 1252–1286 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.170712.010313a
Chandrashekar, P., Klingenberg, C.: Entropy stable finite volume scheme for ideal compressible MHD on 2-D cartesian meshes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54(2), 1313–1340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1013626
Chen, T., Shu, C.W.: Entropy stable high order discontinuous Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 345, 427–461 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.025
Chiodaroli, E., De Lellis, C., Kreml, O.: Global ill-posedness of the isentropic system of gas dynamics. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 68(7), 1157–1190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21537
Del Zanna, L., Zanotti, O., Bucciantini, N., Londrillo, P.: ECHO: a Eulerian conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and magnetodynamics. Astron. Astrophys. 473(1), 11–30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077093
Duan, J., Tang, H.: High-order accurate entropy stable nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes for the ideal special relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 421, 109731 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109731
Duan, J., Tang, H.: Entropy stable adaptive moving mesh schemes for 2D and 3D special relativistic hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 426, 109949 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCP.2020.109949
Duan, J., Tang, H.: High-order accurate entropy stable finite difference schemes for the shallow water magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 431, 110136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110136
Duan, J., Tang, H.: High-order accurate entropy stable adaptive moving mesh finite difference schemes for special relativistic (magneto)hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 456, 111038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111038
Falle, S.A., Komissarov, S.S.: An upwind numerical scheme for relativistic hydrodynamics with a general equation of state. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 278(2), 586–602 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1093/MNRAS/278.2.586
Fjordholm, U.S., Mishra, S., Tadmor, E.: Arbitrarily high-order accurate entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory schemes for systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50(2), 544–573 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1137/110836961
Fjordholm, U.S., Mishra, S., Tadmor, E.: ENO reconstruction and ENO interpolation are stable. Found. Comput. Math. 13(2), 139–159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-012-9117-9
Friedrich, L., Schnücke, G., Winters, A.R., Fernández, D.C.R., Gassner, G.J., Carpenter, M.H.: Entropy stable space-time discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Sci. Comput. 80(1), 175–222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-019-00933-2
Gallant, Y.A., Arons, J.: Structure of relativistic shocks in pulsar winds: a model of the wisps in the Crab Nebula. Astrophys. J. 435, 230 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1086/174810
Gallego-Valencia, J.P., Klingenberg, C., Chandrashekar, P.: On limiting for higher order discontinuous Galerkin method for 2D Euler equations. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 47(1), 335–345 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-016-0142-1
Gammie, C.F., McKinney, J.C., Toth, G.: HARM: a numerical scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 589(1), 444–457 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1086/374594
Gassner, G.J., Winters, A.R., Kopriva, D.A.: A well balanced and entropy conservative discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method for the shallow water equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 272, 291–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.014
Gassner, G.J., Winters, A.R., Kopriva, D.A.: Split form nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for the compressible Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys. 327, 39–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.013
Godlewski, E., Pierre-Arnaud, R.: Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses-Edition Marketing, Paris (1991)
Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 89–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450036757X
Hakim, A., Loverich, J., Shumlak, U.: A high resolution wave propagation scheme for ideal Two-Fluid plasma equations. J. Comput. Phys. 219(1), 418–442 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.03.036
Hesthaven, J.S., Warburton, T.: Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithmus, Analysis, and Applications, Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 54. Springer New York, New York (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72067-8
Ismail, F., Roe, P.L.: Affordable, entropy-consistent Euler flux functions II: entropy production at shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 228(15), 5410–5436 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.04.021
Kim, J., Balsara, D.S.: A stable HLLC Riemann solver for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 270, 634–639 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.04.023
Komissarov, S.S.: A Godunov-type scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 303(2), 343–366 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02244.x
Komissarov, S.S.: Multidimensional numerical scheme for resistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382(3), 995–1004 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12448.x
Kumar, H., Mishra, S.: Entropy stable numerical schemes for two-fluid plasma equations. J. Sci. Comput. 52(2), 401–425 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-011-9554-7
Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Chapter XV - Relativistic fluid dynamics. In: L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz (eds.) Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn, pp. 505–514. Pergamon (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-033933-7.50023-4
LeVeque, R.J.: Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511791253
Liu, Y., Shu, C.W., Zhang, M.: Entropy stable high order discontinuous Galerkin methods for ideal compressible MHD on structured meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 354, 163–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.043
Martí, J.M., Müller, E.: Extension of the piecewise parabolic method to one-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 123(1), 1–14 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/JCPH.1996.0001
Martí, J.M., Müller, E.: Grid-based methods in relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 1(1), 1–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/LRCA-2015-3
Mattia, G., Mignone, A.: A comparison of approximate non-linear Riemann solvers for relativistic MHD. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510(1), 481–499 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3373
Mignone, A., Bodo, G.: An HLLC Riemann solver for relativistic flows—II Magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 368(3), 1040–1054 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10162.x
Mignone, A., Plewa, T., Bodo, G.: The piecewise parabolic method for multidimensional relativistic fluid dynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 160(1), 199–219 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/430905/FULLTEXT/
Mochkovitch, R., Maitia, V., Marques, R.: Internal shocks in a relativistic wind as a source for gamma-ray bursts? Astrophys. Sp. Sci. 231(1–2), 441–444 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00658666
Munz, C.D., Omnes, P., Schneider, R., Sonnendrücker, E., Voß, U.: Divergence correction techniques for Maxwell solvers based on a hyperbolic model. J. Comput. Phys. 161(2), 484–511 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6507
Orszag, S.A., Tang, C.M.: Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 90(1), 129–143 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207900210X
Qin, T., Shu, C.W., Yang, Y.: Bound-preserving discontinuous Galerkin methods for relativistic hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 315, 323–347 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.02.079
Ryu, D., Chattopadhyay, I., Choi, E.: Equation of state in numerical relativistic hydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 166(1), 410–420 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/505937
Schneider, V., Katscher, U., Rischke, D.H., Waldhauser, B., Maruhn, J.A., Munz, C.D.: New algorithms for ultra-relativistic numerical hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 105(1), 92–107 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1056
Sen, C., Kumar, H.: Entropy stable schemes for ten-moment Gaussian closure equations. J. Sci. Comput. 75(2), 1128–1155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0579-4
Shumlak, U., Loverich, J.: Approximate Riemann solver for the two-fluid plasma model. J. Comput. Phys. 187(2), 620–638 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00151-7
Spiteri, R.J., Ruuth, S.J.: A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40(2), 469–491 (2002)
Tadmor, E.: The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. I. Math. Comput. 49(179), 91 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/2008251
Tadmor, E.: Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems. Acta Numer. 12, 451–512 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492902000156
van Putten, M.H.P.M.: Knots in simulations of magnetized relativistic jets. Astrophys. J. 467(2), L57–L60 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1086/310196
Wardle, J.F., Homan, D.C., Ojha, R., Roberts, D.H.: Electron-positron jets associated with the quasar 3C279. Nature 395(6701), 457–461 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/26675
Wilson, J.R., Mathews, G.J.: Special relativistic hydrodynamics. In: Relativistic Numerical Hydrodynamics, pp. 23–74. Cambridge University Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615917.003
Wu, K., Shu, C.W.: Entropy symmetrization and high-order accurate entropy stable numerical schemes for relativistic MHD equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42(4), A2230–A2261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1275590
Wu, K., Shu, C.W.: Provably physical-constraint-preserving discontinuous Galerkin methods for multidimensional relativistic MHD equations. Numer. Math. 148(3), 699–741 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-021-01209-4
Wu, K., Tang, H.: Physical-constraint-preserving central discontinuous Galerkin methods for special relativistic hydrodynamics with a general equation of state. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 228(1), 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/228/1/3
York, J.W. Jr: In: L.L. Smarr (eds.) Sources of Gravitational Radiation, p. 83. Cambridge University Press, New York (1979)
Zenitani, S., Hesse, M., Klimas, A.: Relativistic two-fluid simulations of guide field magnetic reconnection. Astrophys. J. 705(1), 907–913 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/907
Zenitani, S., Hesse, M., Klimas, A.: Two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic simulations of relativistic magnetic reconnection. Astrophys. J. 696(2), 1385–1401 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1385
Zhang, W., MacFadyen, A.I.: RAM: a relativistic adaptive mesh refinement hydrodynamics code. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 164(1), 255–279 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/500792/FULLTEXT/
Acknowledgements
The work of Praveen Chandrashekar is supported by the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under Project No. 12-R &D-TFR-5.01-0520. The work of Harish Kumar is supported in parts by DST-SERB, MATRICS Grant with file No. MTR/2019/000380 and VAJRA Grant with file No. VJR-2018-000129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
A Computation of Primitive Variables from the Conservative Variables
The evolutionary equations for the two-fluid relativistic plasma system (1) relies on the conserved quantities, \(D_\alpha \), \({\varvec{M}}_\alpha \) and \({\mathcal {E}}_\alpha \) and primitive quantities, \(\rho _\alpha \), \({\varvec{v}}_\alpha \) and \(p_\alpha \). We use the numerical procedure given in [11, 59] for the extraction of primitive variables from the conservative variables. As the procedure for obtaining primitives for the ions and electron fluid quantities is identical, we only focus on the ion-variables. Accordingly, for simplicity, we suppress the subscript \(\alpha \). For the ideal equation of state (2), we obtain the following quartic polynomial for the velocity variable \(v=|{\varvec{v}}|\) with real coefficients which only depend on the conservative variables.
where
with \(M=(M_x^2+M_y^2+M_z^2)^{1/2}\). The quartic polynomial (45) is solved using the Newton’s root solver with the number of iterations fixed to ten. We use the following initial guess \(v_0\) to initialize the root solver,
where
After obtaining the velocity norm, v, we can extract the primitive variables using the following expressions.
B Right Eigenvectors for the Two-Dimensional Two-Fluid Relativistic Plasma System
In this appendix, we provide expressions of the right eigenvectors for the two-dimensional relativistic plasma system (4). The set of right eigenvectors of the matrix \({\textbf{A}}^x\) corresponding to the eigenvalues \(\mathbf {\Lambda }^x\) of the system (4) is obtained by setting \(d=x\) in the ordered set \( {\textbf{R}}^d_{\Lambda ^d} = \left\{ \left( {\textbf{R}}_{\Lambda ^d}^d \right) _n: \ n = 1, \ 2,\ 3,\dots , 18 \right\} \). For \(n=1,2,3,\dots ,18,\) the vectors \(\left( {\textbf{R}}_{\Lambda ^d}^d\right) _n\) are given by
where \({\textbf{R}}^{d}_{\alpha ,k}\), \(\alpha \in \{i,e\}\), is the \(k^{th}\) column vector of the \(5 \times 5\) right eigenvector matrices \({\textbf{R}}^d_\alpha \) of the flux jacobians \(\dfrac{\partial {\textbf{f}}^d_\alpha }{\partial {\textbf{U}}_\alpha }\), and \({\textbf{R}}^{d}_{m,k}\) is the \(k^{th}\) column vector of the right eigenvector matrix \({\textbf{R}}^d_m\) of the flux jacobian matrix \(\dfrac{\partial {\textbf{f}}^d_m}{\partial {\textbf{U}}_m}\). The matrices \({\textbf{R}}^{k}_{\alpha }\) and \({\textbf{R}}^{k}_{m}\) has the following expressions.
-
For \(d =x,y\), \(\alpha \in \{i,e\}\), the right eigenvector matrix \({\textbf{R}}^d_\alpha \) is given by the equation
$$\begin{aligned} {\textbf{R}}_{\alpha }^{d}= \left( \dfrac{\partial {\textbf{U}}_\alpha }{\partial {\textbf{W}}_\alpha } \right) {\textbf{R}}_{\alpha ,{\textbf{W}}}^d \end{aligned}$$where \({\textbf{R}}_{\alpha ,{\textbf{W}}}^d\) is the matrix of right eigenvectors of system (4) written in primitive form. For \(d=x\), the matrix \({\textbf{R}}_{\alpha ,{\textbf{W}}}^d\) has the expression
$$\begin{aligned} {\textbf{R}}_{\alpha ,{\textbf{W}}}^x = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{c_\alpha ^2 h_\alpha } &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} \frac{1}{c_\alpha ^2 h_\alpha } \\ \frac{-\sqrt{Q^x_\alpha }}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma _\alpha \rho _\alpha } &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} \frac{+\sqrt{Q^x_\alpha }}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma _\alpha \rho _\alpha } \\ \frac{\left( c_\alpha -\Gamma _\alpha \sqrt{Q^x_\alpha } {v_{x_\alpha }}\right) {v_{y_\alpha }}}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma ^2_\alpha \rho _\alpha \left( v_{x_\alpha }^2-1\right) } &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} \frac{\left( c_\alpha +\Gamma _\alpha \sqrt{Q^x_\alpha } {v_{x_\alpha }}\right) {v_{y_\alpha }}}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma ^2_\alpha \rho _\alpha \left( u_{x_\alpha }^2-1\right) } \\ \frac{\left( c_\alpha -\Gamma _\alpha \sqrt{Q^x_\alpha } {v_{x_\alpha }}\right) {v_{z_\alpha }}}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma ^2_\alpha \rho _\alpha \left( v_{x_\alpha }^2-1\right) } &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} \frac{\left( c_\alpha +\Gamma _\alpha \sqrt{Q^x_\alpha } {v_{x_\alpha }}\right) {v_{z_\alpha }}}{c_\alpha h_\alpha \Gamma ^2_\alpha \rho _\alpha \left( v_{x_\alpha }^2-1\right) } \\ 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$ -
The eigenvector matrix \({\textbf{R}}^{d}_{m}\) for \(d=y\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} {\textbf{R}}_{m}^{x}= \begin{pmatrix} 0 &{}-1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{}-1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{}-1 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ -1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 \\ 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$
Remark 4
For the \(y-\)directional flux, \({\textbf{f}}^y\), we proceed similarly to obtain the set of eigenvalues \(\mathbf {\Lambda }^y\) of the jacobian matrix \(\dfrac{\partial {\textbf{f}}^y}{\partial {\textbf{U}}}\) as
where, \( Q_\alpha ^y=1-u_{y_\alpha }^2-c_\alpha ^2 (u_{x_\alpha }^2+u_{z_\alpha }^2), \ \alpha \in \{ i, \ e \} \). The corresponding right eigenvectors can be obtained by taking \(d=y\) in the ordered set \({\textbf{R}}^d_{\Lambda ^d} = \left\{ \left( {\textbf{R}}_{\Lambda ^d}^d\right) _n: \ n = 1, \ 2,\ 3,\dots , \ 18\right\} \) where \(\left( {\textbf{R}}_{\Lambda ^d}^d\right) _n\) is defined by Eq. (46) and the updated \(y-\)directional matrices \({\textbf{R}}_{\alpha ,{\textbf{W}}}^y\) and \({\textbf{R}}^{y}_{m}\) are given by
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhoriya, D., Biswas, B., Kumar, H. et al. Entropy Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Two-Fluid Relativistic Plasma Flow Equations. J Sci Comput 97, 72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02387-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02387-z