Skip to main content
Log in

Fluorescence Spectroscopy Based Identification of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Escherichia Coli Suspensions

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 May 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this article, Fluorescence spectroscopy has been employed for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water suspension. Emission spectra of PA and E. coli suspensions have been acquired by using excitation wavelengths from 270 to 420 nm with steps of 10 nm to explore their spectral features. It has been found that the emission spectra of tryptophan, tyrosine, NADH and FAD, being the intracellular biomolecules present in both bacteria, can be used as fingerprints for their identification, differentiation and quantification. Both bacterial strains can clearly be differentiated from water and from each other by using λex 270–290 nm through spectral analysis and from λex: 300–500 nm by applying statistical analysis. Furthermore, calibration curves for different bacterial loads of PA and E. coli suspensions have been produced between colonies forming units per ml (CFUs/ml) the integrated intensities of their emission spectra. CFUs/ml of both bacterial suspensions have been determined through plate count method which was used as cross-reference for the analysis of emission spectra of both bacterial suspensions. These curves may be used to estimate CFU/ml of both PA and E. coli in unknown water suspensions by determining the integrating intensity of their emission spectra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Change history

References

  1. Bédard E, Prévost M, Déziel E (2016) Pseudomonas aeruginosa in premise plumbing of large buildings. MicrobiologyOpen 5:937–956

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. De Victorica J, Galván M (2001) Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an indicator of health risk in water for human consumption. Water Sci Technol 43:49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauhan A, Goyal P, Varma A, Jindal T (2017) Microbiological evaluation of drinking water sold by roadside vendors of Delhi, India. Appl Water Sci 7:1635–1644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders ER (2012) Aseptic Laboratory techniques: plating methods. J Visualized Experiments: JoVE 1–18

  5. Wang M, Ateia M, Hatano Y et al (2022) Novel fluorescence-based method for rapid quantification of live bacteria in river water and treated wastewater. Environ Science: Adv 1:30–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van De Vossenberg J, Tervahauta H, Maquelin K et al (2013) Identification of bacteria in drinking water with Raman spectroscopy. Anal Methods 5:2679–2687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathi A, Jabbour RE, Treado PJ et al (2008) Waterborne pathogen detection using Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 62:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang W, Rahman A, Huang Q, Vikesland PJ (2022) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy enabled evaluation of bacterial inactivation. Water Res 220:118668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakar A, Pistiki A, Ryabchykov O et al (2022) Detection of multi-resistant clinical strains of E. Coli with Raman spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 414:1481–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yilmaz AG, Temiz HT, Acar Soykut E et al (2015) Rapid Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens using Raman Spectroscopy. J Food Saf 35:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Silge A, Schumacher W, Rösch P et al (2014) Identification of water-conditioned Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Raman microspectroscopy on a single cell level. Syst Appl Microbiol 37:360–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wenning M, Scherer S (2013) Identification of microorganisms by FTIR spectroscopy: perspectives and limitations of the method. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:7111–7120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marques CMS, Pedroso JT, Bhattacharjee T et al (2023) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa post photodynamic therapy with curcumin in vitro. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 285:121916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlos C, Maretto DA, Poppi RJ et al (2011) Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy as a bacterial source tracking tool to discriminate fecal E. Coli strains. Microchem J 99:15–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abu-Aqil G, Suleiman M, Sharaha U et al (2023) Fast identification and susceptibility determination of E. Coli isolated directly from patients’ urine using infrared-spectroscopy and machine learning. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 285:121909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Qadiri HM, Al-Holy MA, Lin M et al (2006) Rapid detection and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli as pure and mixed cultures in bottled drinking water using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. J Agric Food Chem 54:5749–5754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mothershed EA, Whitney AM (2006) Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens: Present and future considerations for the clinical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta 363:206–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammes F, Berney M, Wang Y et al (2008) Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes. Water Res 42:269–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mira P, Yeh P, Hall BG (2022) Estimating microbial population data from optical density. PLoS ONE 17:e0276040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo R, McGoverin C, Swift S, Vanholsbeeck F (2017) A rapid and low-cost estimation of bacteria counts in solution using fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 409:3959–3967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mao Y, Chen XW, Chen Z et al (2021) Characterization of bacterial fluorescence: insight into rapid detection of bacteria in water. Water Reuse 11:621–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shahzad A, Köhler G, Knapp M et al (2009) Emerging applications of fluorescence spectroscopy in medical microbiology field. J Translational Med 7:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sohn M, Himmelsbach DS, Barton FE, Fedorka-Cray PJ (2009) Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection and classification of bacterial pathogens. Appl Spectrosc 63:1251–1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leblanc L, Ric Dufour EŁ (2002) Monitoring the identity of bacteria using their intrinsic fluorescence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 211:147–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Du R, Yang D, Yin X (2022) Rapid Detection of three common Bacteria based on fluorescence spectroscopy. Sensors 22:1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Giana HE, Silveira L, Zângaro RA, Pacheco MTT (2003) Rapid identification of bacterial species by fluorescence spectroscopy and classification through principal components analysis. J Fluoresc 13:489–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baker PRD, Cumberland A SA, et al (2018) Real-time detection of faecally contaminated drinking water with tryptophan-like fluorescence: defining threshold values. Sci Total Environ 622–623:1250–1257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wildeboer D, Amirat L, Price RG, Abuknesha RA (2010) Rapid detection of Escherichia coli in water using a hand-held fluorescence detector. Water Res 44:2621–2628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakar A, Schmilovitch Z, Vaizel-Ohayon D et al (2020) Quantification of bacteria in water using PLS analysis of emission spectra of fluorescence and excitation-emission matrices. Water Res 169:115197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sorensen JPR, Vivanco A, Ascott MJ et al (2018) Online fluorescence spectroscopy for the real-time evaluation of the microbial quality of drinking water. Water Res 137:301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sorensen JPR, Diaw MT, Pouye A et al (2020) In-situ fluorescence spectroscopy indicates total bacterial abundance and dissolved organic carbon. Sci Total Environ 738:139419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meder H, Baumstummler A, Chollet R et al (2012) Fluorescence-based rapid detection of microbiological contaminants in water samples. The Scientific World Journal 2012:234858

  33. Simões J, Dong T (2018) Continuous and real-time detection of drinking-water pathogens with a low-cost fluorescent optofluidic sensor. Sensors 18:2210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gunter H, Bradley C, Hannah DM et al (2023) Advances in quantifying microbial contamination in potable water: potential of fluorescence-based sensor technology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 10:e1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baker A, Cumberland SA, Bradley C et al (2015) To what extent can portable fluorescence spectroscopy be used in the real-time assessment of microbial water quality? Sci Total Environ 532:14–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bridgeman J, Baker A, Brown D, Boxall JB (2015) Portable LED fluorescence instrumentation for the rapid assessment of potable water quality. Sci Total Environ 524–525:338–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Awad F, Ramprasath C, Mathivanan N et al (2014) Optical Fiber-based steady state and fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy for Rapid Identification and classification of bacterial pathogens directly from colonies on Agar plates. Int Sch Res Notices 2014:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Imtiaz S, Saleem M (2023) Fluorescence Spectroscopy Based characterization of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Suspension. J Fluoresc. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10895-023-03436-4/METRICS

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Romero S, Schell RF, Pennell DR (1988) Rapid method for the differentiation of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria on membrane filters. J Clin Microbiol 26:1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Leber AL (2016) Preparation of Routine Media and Reagents Used in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook 1–3:5.20.1.1–5.20.3.10

  41. Scow KM, Schwartz E, Johnson MJ, Macalady JL (2001) Microbial Biodiversity, Measurement of. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity: Second Edition 259–270

  42. Shibata K, Benson AA, Calvin M (1954) The absorption Spectra of suspensions of living micro-organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 461–470

  43. Miyazawa K, Kobayashi KI, Nakauchi S, Hiraishi A (2008) In situ detection and identification of microorganisms at single-colony resolution by spectral imaging. Opt Rev 15:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Beal J, Farny NG, Haddock-Angelli T et al (2020) Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density. Communications Biology 2020 3:1 3:1–29

  45. Chami M, Harmel T (2016) Remote Sensing and Ocean Color. Land Surface Remote Sensing in Urban and Coastal Areas 141–183

  46. Russell BA (2017) Protein encapsulated gold nanoclusters for biological applications, Thesis. University of Strathclyde, Scotland

  47. Islam MS, Honma M, Nakabayashi T et al (2013) pH dependence of the fluorescence lifetime of FAD in solution and in cells. Int J Mol Sci 14:1952–1963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Imtiaz S, Anwar S, Zada L et al (2023) Fluorescence spectroscopy for the Assessment of Microbial Load in UVC treated Water. J Fluoresc 33:2339–2347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We highly acknowledge Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for the award of NRPU project No: 20-14617/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2021 2021.

Funding

This work is funded through a NRPU research project 20-14617/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2021 2021 awarded by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sana Imtiaz did experimental measurements and analysis of the measured data, Muhammad Saleem conceived the concept, did analysis, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Saleem.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not needed because no human or animal was involved for conducting present study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The caption of Figure 3 is correct but the figure legend/labeling on the figure is incorrect.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imtiaz, S., Saleem, M. Fluorescence Spectroscopy Based Identification of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Escherichia Coli Suspensions. J Fluoresc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-024-03608-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-024-03608-w

Keywords

Navigation