Abstract
This study explores how students’ conceptions of learning relate to their thinking styles by administering the Conceptions of Learning Inventory III and the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II to 350 deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) and 463 hearing university students in mainland China. The reliabilities for the two inventories were first estimated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Then, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the validity of the COL-III. Finally, to predict thinking styles from conceptions of learning, hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted. Results showed that, among both DHH and hearing students, qualitative conceptions of learning (understanding, personal change, continuous, social competence, and duty) were significantly positively associated with a wide range of thinking styles. For DHH students, the contributions of conceptions of learning ranged from 11% to 32%, with a median of 25%. The predominant predictor was personal change. For hearing students, the contributions of conceptions of learning to thinking styles ranged from 9% to 22% (with a median of 15%), with the predominant predictor being duty. Thus, conceptions of learning significantly predicted thinking styles among both DHH and hearing students. The contributions, limitations, and implications of this research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
Berry, J. W. (1991). Cultural variations in field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 289–308). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279.
Boulton-Lewis, G., Marton, F., Lewis, D. C., & Wilss, L. A. (2000). Learning in formal and informal contexts: conceptions and strategies of aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander university students. Learning and Instruction, 10, 393–414.
Boutin, D. L. (2008). Persistence in postsecondary environments of students with hearing impairments. Journal of Rehabilitation, 74, 25.
Braithwaite, D. O., & Thompson, T. (2000). The handbook of communication and physical disability. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brauer, B. A. (1993). Adequacy of a translation of the MMPI into American sign language for use with deaf individuals: linguistic equivalency issues. Rehabilitation Psychology, 38, 247–260.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.
Buckley, C. A., Pitt, E., Norton, B., & Owens, T. (2010). Students’ approaches to study, conceptions of learning and judgements about the value of networked technologies. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 55–65.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL. New York: Springer.
Cheng, S. Y., & Zhang, L. F. (2014). Validating the thinking styles inventory—Revised II among Chinese university students with hearing impairment through test accommodations. American Annals of the Deaf, 159, 22–23.
Cheng, S., Zhang, L.-f., & Hu, X. (2016). Thinking styles and university self-efficacy among deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(1), 44–53.
Chute, P. M. (2012). College experience for young adults with hearing loss. Deafness and Education International, 14, 60–65.
Cliff, A. F. (2000). Dissonance in first-year students’ reflections on their learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 49–60.
Davey, B., & LaSasso, C. (1985). Relations of cognitive style to assessment components of reading comprehension for hearing-impaired adolescents. The Volta Review, 87, 17–27.
Edmunds, R., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). Conceptions of learning approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 295–309.
Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behavior and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407–428.
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approach to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.
Fan, J. Q. (2013). Thinking styles’ socialization and their roles in student development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Hong Kong).
Fan, W. Q., & Zhang, L.-F. (2009). Are achievement motivation and thinking styles related? A visit among Chinese university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 299–303.
Fiebert, M. (1967). Cognitive styles in the deaf. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24(1), 319–329.
Gore, J. R., A, P., Leuwerke, W. C., & Turley, S. E. (2005). A psychometric study of the college self-efficacy inventory. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 7, 227–244.
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–230). New York: Plenum.
Harris, R. I. (1978). The relationship of impulse control to parent hearing status, manual communication, and academic achievement in deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 52–67.
Holcomb, T. (2010). Deaf epistemology: the deaf way of knowing. American Annals of the Deaf, 154, 471–478.
Hu, L. -T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 69–85.
Kane, R. (1997). Outcomes measures. In R. Kane (Ed.), Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Gaithersburg: Aspen.
Lonka, K., Joram, E., & Bryson, M. (1996). Conceptions of learning and knowledge: does training make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 240–260.
Loyens, S. M., Rikers, R. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Students' conceptions of constructivist learning in different programme years and different learning environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 501–514.
Lucas, U. & Meyer, J. H. F. (2003) Understanding students’ conceptions of learning and subject in ‘introductory’ courses: the case of introductory accounting, paper presented at ‘Metalearning in higher education: taking account of the student perspective’, European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 10thBiennial Conference, Padova.
Makoe, M., Richardson, J., & Price, L. (2007). Conceptions of learning in adult students embarking on distance education. Higher Education, 55, 303–320.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. II – Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.
Parasnis, I., & Long, G. L. (1979). Relationships among spatial skills, communication skills, and field independence in deaf students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 879–887.
Paul, P., & Moores, D. (2010). Introduction: toward an understanding of epistemology and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 154, 421–427.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Irving, S. E. (2010). Secondary school students' conceptions of learning and their relationship to achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 167–176.
Prosser, M., Hazel, E., & Waterhouse, F. (2000). Students’ experiences of studying physics concepts: the effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 61–74.
Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (2002). Assessing students' conceptions of learning. Australian Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2, 17–32.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J. A., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 87–100.
Ren, Y. Y. (2011). Longren xuesheng hanyu shumianyu yufa yanjiu zongshu [A review of researches into the grammar of hearing-impaired students. Written in Chinese]. Zhong Guo Teshu Jiao Yu [Chinese Journal of Special Education], 129, 16–19.
Richardson, J. T. E., & Woodley, A. (1999). Approaches to studying in people with hearing loss. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 533–546.
Richardson, J. T. E., & Woodley, A. (2001). Perceptions of academic quality among students with a hearing loss in distance education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 563–570.
Richardson, J. T. E., MacLeod-Gallinger, J., McKee, B. G., & Long, G. L. (2000). Approaches to studying in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 156–173.
Richardson, J. T. E., Barnes, L., & Fleming, J. (2004). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Deafness and Education International, 6, 100–122.
Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective. I. Some common-sense conceptions. Reports from the Department of Education, University of Göteborg, No. 76.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: a theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2003). Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised I. Unpublished test. Yale University.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II. Unpublished test. Tufts University.
Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenograhic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733–1750.
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (2000). Dissonance in students’ regulation of learning processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 75–89.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Abery, B. H., Zhang, D., Ward, K., Willis, D., Hossain, W. A., Balcazar, F., Ball, A., Bacon, A., Calkins, C., Heller, T., Goode, T., Dias, R., Jesien, G. S., McVeigh, T., Nygren, M. A., Palmer, S. B., & Walker, H. M. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 19–30.
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 87–101.
Zhang, L. F. (2002). Thinking styles and cognitive development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 179–195.
Zhang, L. F. (2007). Intellectual styles and academic achievement among senior secondary school students in rural China. Educational Psychology, 27, 675–692.
Zhang, L. F. (2008). Thinking styles and emotions. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 497–515.
Zhang, L. F. (2009). Anxiety and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 347–351.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1–53.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2008a). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, learning conceptions, and approaches to study: a cross-cultural structural model? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(4), 411–423.
Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2008b). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 120–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Inform Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The researcher has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, S. Conceptions of Learning and Thinking Styles Among Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Hearing Students. J Dev Phys Disabil 31, 555–573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09658-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09658-4