Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and characterization of PLGA/collagen composite scaffolds as skin substitute produced by electrospinning through two different approaches

  • Engineering and Nano-engineering Approaches for Medical Devices
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin damage can occur for many reasons, including burns and injuries, which in extreme cases can even lead to death. Different methods such as electrospinning are used to produce scaffolds used in skin tissue engineering. Natural and synthetic polymers were used in this method. It was observed that the use of both natural and synthetic polymers gives better results for cell culturing rather than using of each material solely. In this study, scaffolds of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and collagen were prepared using coating and common solvent methods. The characteristics of samples were evaluated through scanning electron microscopy, porosimetry, mechanical testing, degradation behavior, and in vitro assays. The mechanical and biocompatibility test results of the scaffold prepared by coating method were better than the other one. However, the degradation rate of the common solvent was nearly five times more than coating sample that leads to cytotoxicity in contact with the skin cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shevchenko RV, James SEL, James SEL. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7:229–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP, James R, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Electrospun poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park H, Lee KY, Lee SJ, Park KE, Park WH. Plasma-treated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers for tissue engineering. Macromol. Res. 2007;15:238–43.

  4. Silva MMCG, Cyster LA, Barry JJA, Yang XB, Oreffo ROC, Grant DM, et al. The effect of anisotropic architecture on cell and tissue infiltration into tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5909–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2529–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charcosset C. Principles on membrane and membrane processes. Membr. Process. Biotechnol. Pharm. Elsevier; 2012. p. 1–41.

  7. Chronakis IS. Novel nanocomposites and nanoceramics based on polymer nanofibers using electrospinning process - A review. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;167:283–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiffman JD, Schauer CL. A review: electrospinning of biopolymer nanofibers and their applications. Polym Rev. 2008;48:317–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szentivanyi A, Chakradeo T, Zernetsch H, Glasmacher B. Electrospun cellular microenvironments: understanding controlled release and scaffold structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:209–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paneva D, Ignatova М, Manolova N, Rashkov I. Novel Chitosan–Containing Micro- and Nanofibrous Materials By Electrospinning: Preparation And Biomedical Application. In: Chang WN, editor. Nanofibers Fabr. Performance, Appl. Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2009. p. 73–151.

  11. Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:9622–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao Y-P, Cui F-Z. Surface modification of polyester biomaterials for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2007;2:R24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sultana Naznin. Study of in vitro degradation of biodegradable polymer based thin films and tissue engineering scaffolds. African J Biotechnol. 2011;10:18709–15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norouzi M, Boroujeni SM, Omidvarkordshouli N, Soleimani M. Advances in skin regeneration: application of electrospun scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:1114–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He F, Li J, Ye J. Improvement of cell response of the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/calcium phosphate cement composite scaffold with unidirectional pore structure by the surface immobilization of collagen via plasma treatment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park GE, Pattison Ma, Park K, Webster TJ. Accelerated chondrocyte functions on NaOH-treated PLGA scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3075–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;5(29):39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cao Y, Croll TI, Cooper-White JJ, O’Connor AJ, Stevens GW. Production and Surface Modification of Polylactide-Based Polymeric Scaffolds for Soft-Tissue Engineering. In: Hollander AP, Hatton P V, editors. Biopolym. Methods Tissue Eng. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2004. p. 87–112.

  19. Wenzel RN. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. ACS Publications; 1936;28:988–94.

  20. Yang C, Tartaglino U, Persson BNJ. Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:116103–7.

  21. Jiang Q, Reddy N, Zhang S, Roscioli N, Yang Y. Water-stable electrospun collagen fibers from a non-toxic solvent and crosslinking system. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2013;101A:1237–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jose MV, Thomas V, Dean DR, Nyairo E. Fabrication and characterization of aligned nanofibrous PLGA/Collagen blends as bone tissue scaffolds. Polymer. 2009;50:3778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garric X, Moles J-P, Garreau H, Guilhou J-J, Vert M. Human skin cell cultures onto PLA50 (PDLLA) bioresorbable polymers: Influence of chemical and morphological surface modifications. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2005;72A:180–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu H, Oh HH, Kawazoe N, Yamagishi K. Chen G. PLLA–collagen and PLLA–gelatin hybrid scaffolds with funnel-like porous structure for skin tissue engineering. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2012;13:64210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lowery JL, Datta N, Rutledge GC. Effect of fiber diameter, pore size and seeding method on growth of human dermal fibroblasts in electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone) fibrous mats. Biomaterials. 2010;31:491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadeghi AR, Nokhasteh S, Molavi AM, Khorsand-Ghayeni M, Naderi-Meshkin H, Mahdizadeh A. Surface modification of electrospun PLGA scaffold with collagen for bioengineered skin substitutes. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;66:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cui M, Liu L, Guo N, Su R, Ma F. Preparation, cell compatibility and degradability of collagen-modified poly(lactic acid). Molecules. 2015;20:595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sultana N, Hassan MI, Lim MM. Composite Synthetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.

  29. Fiorani A, Gualandi C, Panseri S, Montesi M, Marcacci M, Focarete ML, et al. Comparative performance of collagen nanofibers electrospun from different solvents and stabilized by different crosslinkers. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25:2313–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Han D. Core-Sheath Polymer Fibers by Coaxial Electrospinning. Universityof Cincinnati. Ohio; 2010.

  31. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:2223–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Molnár K, Vas LM. Electrospun composite nanofibers and polymer composites. Synth Polym Compos. München, Germany: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG; 2012. pp. 301–49.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Song JH, Kim HE, Kim HW. Production of electrospun gelatin nanofiber by water-based co-solvent approach. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zuo W, Zhu M, Yang W, Yu H, Chen Y, Zhang Y. Experimental study on relationship between jet instability and formation of beaded fibers during electrospinning. Polym Eng Sci. 2005;45:704–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:325–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Z, Wang C. One-dimensional nanostructures. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Lockwood DJ. Electrospun nanofibers for energy and environmental applications. In: Ding B, Yu J, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014.

  38. Zeugolis DI, Khew ST, Yew ESY, Ekaputra AK, Tong YW, Yung LYL, et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres - Just an expensive way to make gelatin?. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeugolis DI, Paul GR, Attenburrow G. Cross-linking of extruded collagen fibers-A biomimetic three-dimensional scaffold for tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2009;89A:895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Garric X, Molès J-P, Garreau H, Braud C, Guilhou J-J, Vert M. Growth of various cell types in the presence of lactic and glycolic acids: the adverse effect of glycolic acid released from PLAGA copolymer on keratinocyte proliferation. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2002;13:1189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Kenny JM. Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym Degrad Stab. 2010;95:2126–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim K, Yu M, Zong X, Chiu J, Fang D, Seo Y-S, et al. Control of degradation rate and hydrophilicity in electrospun non-woven poly(D,L-lactide) nanofiber scaffolds for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4977–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gholipour Kanani A, Hajir Bahrami S. Review on electrospun nanofibres scaffold and biomedical applications. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2010;24:93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sharma J, Lizu M, Stewart M, Zygula K, Lu Y, Chauhan R, et al. Multifunctional Nanofibers towards Active Biomedical Therapeutics. Polymers (Basel). 2015;7:186–219.

  45. Shi X, Zhou W, Ma D, Ma Q, Bridges D, Ma Y, et al. Electrospinning of nanofibers and their applications for energy devices. J Nanomater. 2015;;2015:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the central office of Academic Centre for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR, Grant No. 2641-21) for their financial support of this research as well as Dr. Mahdavi for his language editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Reza Sadeghi-avalshahr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi-avalshahr, A.R., Khorsand-Ghayeni, M., Nokhasteh, S. et al. Synthesis and characterization of PLGA/collagen composite scaffolds as skin substitute produced by electrospinning through two different approaches. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5789-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5789-z

Keywords

Navigation