Abstract
The present study used three well-known white-box data-driven models, including multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), gene expression programming (GEP), and group method of data handling (GMDH), for generating explicit formulas for the prediction of thermal conductivity of the soil \((\lambda )\). Therefore, 40 soil samples and three input variables, such as moisture content \((\omega )\), porosity \((n)\), and the natural density of soil \((\rho )\), were used to predict \(\lambda \). The performance of the proposed formulas was assessed via statistical indicators such as the determination of coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Statistical criteria have shown that all proposed models provided almost identical results. However, the MARS model was marginally more accurate than the GEP and GMDH models. In addition, the error measures of MARS with RMSE = 0.021, MAE = 0.018, and MAPE = 1.191% were slightly more accurate than GA-ANN (RMSE = 0.030, MAE = 0.025, and MAPE = 1.750%) that reported in the previous study for estimation of \(\lambda \). However, the prominent feature of the suggested white-box data-driven models compared to black-box models such as ANN is to provide explicit equations for estimating \(\lambda \).
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data references are described in the text of the article.
References
B. Tong, Z. Gao, R. Horton, Y. Li, L. Wang, J. Hydrometeorol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0119.1
G. Bovesecchi, P. Coppa, Int. J. Thermophys. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-013-1503-2
N.H. Abu-Hamdeh, Soil Till. Res. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00129-X
T. Nikiforova, M. Savytskyi, K. Limam, W. Bosschaerts, R. Belarbi, Energy Procedia. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.12.034
B.S. Ghuman, R. Lal, Soil Sci. (1985). https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198501000-00011
N.H. Abu-Hamdeh, A.I. Khdair, R.C. Reeder, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(00)00144-7
Y. Du, R. Li, L. Zhao, C. Yang, T. Wu, G. Hu, Y. Xiao, X. Zhu, S. Yang, J. Ni, J. Ma, CATENA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104608
M. Torabi, H. Sarkardeh, S.M. Mirhosseini, Water Supply. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.248
G. Al. Nakshabandi, H. Kohnke, Agric. Meteorol. (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(65)90013-0
I.N. Hamdhan, B.G. Clarke, April. Determination of thermal conductivity of coarse and fine sand soils. In Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress (pp. 1–7) (2010)
G. Karimi, Y. Moradi, Analog Integr Circ Sig Process. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1318-y
V. Balland, P.A. Arp, J. Environ. Eng. Sci. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1139/s05-007
S. Lu, T.S. Ren, Y.S. Gong, R. Horton, Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0041
S.K. Haigh, Geotechnique (2012). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.043
R. Li, L. Zhao, T. Wu, Q. Wang, Y. Ding, J. Yao, X. Wu, G. Hu, Y. Xiao, Y. Du, X. Zhu, Agric. For. Meteorol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.011
H. He, M. Dyck, J. Lv, J. Hydrol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125167
K. Malek, F. Khanmohammadi, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105516
E.R. Ibrahim, M.S. Jouini, F. Bouchaala, J. Gomes, ACS Omega (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04429
Z.H. Rizvi, S.J. Akhtar, W.T. Sabeeh, F, Wuttke. In E3S Web of Conferences. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020504006
M.E. Orakoglu Firat, O. Atila, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-11081-x
N. Kardani, A. Bardhan, P. Samui, M. Nazem, P.G. Asteris, A. Zhou, Int J Therm Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107427
N. Kardani, A. Bardhan, P. Samui, M. Nazem, A. Zhou, D.J. Armaghani, Eng Comput. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01329-3
F.Q. Cui, W. Zhang, Z.Y. Liu, W. Wang, J.B. Chen, L. Jin, H. Peng, Adv. Civ. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8898126
T. Zhang, C.J. Wang, S.Y. Liu, N. Zhang, T.W. Zhang, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102907
S.M. Bateni, D.S. Jeng, S.M. Naeini, Eng Appl Artif Intell. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.02.017
K.Q. Li, Q. Kang, J.Y. Nie, X.W. Huang, Geothermics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102416
C. Wang, G. Cai, X. Liu, M. Wu, Heat Mass Transf. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03209-y
C. Liu, X. Hu, R. Yao, Y. Han, Y. Wang, W. He, L. Du, Adv. Civ. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6631666
N. Nabipour, M. Dehghani, A. Mosavi, S. Shamshirband, IEEE Access (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964584
M. Samadi, H. Sarkardeh, E. Jabbari, Soft Comput. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05413-6
A. Molajou, V. Nourani, A. Afshar, M. Khosravi, A. Brysiewicz, Water Resour. Manag. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02818-2
J.A. Lazzús, Int. J. Thermophys. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-011-0956-4
R. Shafag Lhoron, M. Samadi, A. Shamsai, Water Supply (2022). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.421
M. Samadi, H. Sarkardeh, E. Jabbari, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01794-0
M. Samadi, E. Jabbari, H.M. Azamathulla, M. Mojallal, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2015.1011826
J.H. Friedman, Ann Stat. (1991). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963
M. Samadi, M.H. Afshar, E. Jabbari, H. Sarkardeh, IJST-T CIV Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00364-2
C, Ferreira. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0123-9_54
A.G. Ivakhnenko, IEEE Trans. Cybern. (1971). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308320
A. Guven, A. Pala, Water Supply. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.372
S.S. Band, A. Mohammadzadeh, P. Csiba, A. Mosavi, A.R. Varkonyi-Koczy, IEEE Access. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037134
R. Tariq, Y. Hussain, N.A. Sheikh, K. Afaq, H.M. Ali, Int. J. Thermophys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-2619-9
Acknowledgements
This paper is supported by the University of Sumatera Utara.
Funding
This study did not receive funding from any sources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SISA-H: supervision, conceptualization, methodology, original draft; IM: writing—review and editing; BTS: formal analysis, investigation, methodology; MNF: visualization, resources, writing—review and editing; AKK: validation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Hawary, S.I.S., Muda, I., Sayed, B.T. et al. A Comparative Study of MARS, GEP, and GMDH Methods for Modeling Soil Thermal Conductivity. Int J Thermophys 44, 115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03215-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03215-0