Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In group decision making, it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram M, Arshad M (2018) A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy topsis method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019a) Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 115:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019b) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy N-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23(20):9853–9868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ilyas F, Garg H (2019c) Multi-criteria group decisionmaking based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04105-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270:1122–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: Searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its application in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Liu YT, Liang HM, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl-Based Syst 162:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018b) A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi KM (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34(3):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Xu XX, Lu FL, Li LS, Xu C (2015a) On consensus models with utility preferences and limited budget. Appl Soft Comput 35:840–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li L, Xu X (2015b) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2019) Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. Eur J Oper Res (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Wang H, Guo WW, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2020) Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory. Inf Sci 508:154–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32(3):394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fus 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2016) On a fairness type approach to consensus reaching support under fuzziness via linguistic summaries. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1999–2006

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preference and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Soft degrees of consensus under additive preferences and fuzzy majorities. Consensus Under Fuzziness. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S, Ras ZW (2010) How to support consensus reaching using action rules: a novel approach. Int J Uncertain 18:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak W, Śliwiński T (2003) On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014a) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fus 20:252–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014b) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelta DA, Yager RR (2010) Decision strategies in mediated multiagent negotiations: an optimization approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martínez L (2014) Managing experts behaviors in large-scale consensus reaching process with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan X, Gong ZW, Chiclana F, Zhang N (2018) Consensus modeling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions. Appl Soft Comput 67:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2001) Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2002) Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making. Eur J Oper Res 141:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Gong Z, Chiclana F (2017) Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions. Expert Syst Appl 89:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019a) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negot 28:585–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HH, Gang K, Yi P (2019b) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):964–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S (2019c) Consensus efficiency in group decision making: a comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. Eur J Oper Res 275:580–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Weijun Xu would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grants (Nos. 71771091, 71720107002) from NSF of China, and Yucheng Dong would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grant (No. 71871149) from NSF of China, and Grant (No. sksyl201705) from Sichuan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yucheng Dong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Chen, X., Dong, Y. et al. Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making. Group Decis Negot 30, 1239–1260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09653-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09653-7

Keywords

Navigation