Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals, especially the excessive use of pesticides, whereas organic agriculture minimizes the use of agrochemicals. As the main route for potentially toxic elements’ absorption by humans is by food intake, it is important to evaluate if the method of cultivation influences their concentrations. This study evaluated the levels of potentially toxic elements and nutrients on four leafy vegetables: curly lettuce, collard greens, escarole, and rocket, cultivated by conventional and organic farming. We found that Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr levels were higher in conventional samples, whereas K, Pb, and Zn were higher in organic. Amongst the elements analysed, values of Fe, Al, and K were around 0.2, 0.3, and 70 g kg−1, respectively, except in collard greens, in which the values were lower. On the other hand, Ba, Sr, and Mn presented higher concentration in collard greens compared to the other vegetables in conventional cultivation (~ 35, 80, and 120 mg kg−1, respectively). The principal component analysis result shows that the samples were grouped according to the type of vegetable, regardless of the type of cultivation. Despite this, the evaluation of the cultivation by different types of farming is important in order to choose the healthiest option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) pro-equipment project (proposal no. 189683) CAPES no. 11/2014, and was supported by grant #2016/10796–5, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). da Silva V.D. is a student and a scholarship holder of Scientific and Technological Initiation Without Remuneration (ICT-SR) from UFSCar and is thankful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Gabriel, G.V.M. is thankful to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 (process no. 88882.306808/2018–01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VDS performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. GVMG contributed in the performance of the experiments, participated on the discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. WGB and APF performed the multivariate analysis and reviewed and edited the manuscript. JBC reviewed and edited the manuscript. LCO reviewed and edited the manuscript, participated on the discussion, and contributed with the resources. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Camargo de Oliveira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, V.D., de Mello Gabriel, G.V., Botero, W.G. et al. Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content. Environ Monit Assess 194, 758 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4

Keywords

Navigation