Abstract
A one-dimensional model for a narrow ribbon is derived from the plate theory of Kirchhoff by means of a power expansion in the width variable. The energy found coincides with the corrected Sadowsky’s energy. Furthermore, we derive the Euler-Lagrange equations and use them to study an equilibrium configuration of a twisted ribbon. Within this example we also describe how to construct the fine scale oscillations that develop in the deformed configuration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agostiniani, V., DeSimone, A., Koumatos, K.: Shape programming for narrow ribbons of nematic elastomers. J. Elast. 127, 1–24 (2017)
Agostiniani, V., DeSimone, A.: Dimension reduction via \(\varGamma \)-convergence for soft active materials. Meccanica 52, 3457–3470 (2017)
Antman, S.S.: Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity, 2nd edn. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 107. Springer, New York (2005)
Audoly, B., Seffen, K.A.: Buckling of naturally curved elastic strips: the ribbon model makes a difference. J. Elast. 119, 293–320 (2015)
Chen, Y.C., Fosdick, R., Fried, E.: Representation for a smooth isometric mapping from a connected planar domain to a surface. J. Elast. 119, 335–350 (2015)
Chen, Y.C., Fosdick, R., Fried, E.: Representation of a smooth isometric deformation of a planar material region into a curved surface. J. Elast. 130, 145–195 (2018)
Chen, Y.C., Fosdick, R., Fried, E.: Issues concerning isometric deformations of planar regions to curved surfaces. J. Elast. 132, 1–42 (2018)
Chen, Y.C., Fried, E.: Möbius bands, unstretchable material sheets, and developable surfaces. Proc. R. Soc., Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 472, 20150760 (2016)
Chopin, J., Kudrolli, A.: Helicoids, wrinkles, and loops in twisted ribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 174302 (2013)
Chopin, J., Démery, V., Davidovitch, B.: Roadmap to the morphological instabilities of a stretched twisted ribbon. J. Elast. 119, 137–189 (2015)
Dacorogna, B.: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations. Applied Math. Sciences, vol. 78. Springer, Berlin (1989)
Dias, M.A., Audoly, B.: “Wunderlich, Meet Kirchhoff”: a general and unified description of elastic ribbons and thin rods. J. Elast. 119, 49–66 (2015)
Efrati, E.: Non-Euclidean ribbons. J. Elast. 119, 251–261 (2014)
Fonseca, I., Leoni, G.: Modern Methods in the Calculus of Variations: \(L^{p}\) Spaces. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York (2007)
Fosdick, R., Fried, E.: The Mechanics of Ribbons and Möbius Bands. Springer, Dordrecht (2016)
Freddi, L., Hornung, P., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: A corrected Sadowsky functional for inextensible elastic ribbons. J. Elast. 123, 125–136 (2016)
Freddi, L., Hornung, P., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: A variational model for anisotropic and naturally twisted ribbons. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 48, 3883–3906 (2016)
Freddi, L., Hornung, P., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: One-dimensional von Kármán models for elastic ribbons. Meccanica 53, 659–670 (2018)
Freddi, L., Hornung, P., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: Generalised Sadowsky theories for ribbons from three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity. Submitted
Freddi, L., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: Nonlinear thin-walled beams with a rectangular cross-section—Part I. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22, 1150016 (2012)
Freddi, L., Mora, M.G., Paroni, R.: Nonlinear thin-walled beams with a rectangular cross-section—Part II. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23, 743–775 (2013)
Hinz, D.F., Fried, E.: Translation of Michael Sadowsky’s paper “An elementary proof for the existence of a developable Möbius band and the attribution of the geometric problem to a variational problem”. J. Elast. 119, 3–6 (2015)
Kirby, N.O., Fried, E.: Gamma-limit of a model for the elastic energy of an inextensible ribbon. J. Elast. 119, 35–47 (2015)
Kirchhoff, G.: Über das Gleichgewicht und die Bewegung einer elastischen Scheibe. J. Reine Angew. Math. 40, 51–88 (1850)
Kohn, R.V., O’Brien, E.: The wrinkling of a twisted ribbon. J. Nonlinear Sci. 28, 1221–1249 (2018)
Moore, A., Healey, T.: Computation of elastic equilibria of complete Möbius bands and their stability. Math. Mech. Solids (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286518761789
Nardinocchi, P., Pezzulla, M., Teresi, L.: Anisotropic swelling of thin gel sheets. Soft Matter 11, 1492–1499 (2015)
Paroni, R.: An existence theorem for inextensible nets with slack. Math. Mech. Solids 17, 460–472 (2012)
Pipkin, A.C.: Inextensible networks with slack. Q. Appl. Math. 40, 63–71 (1982/1983)
Rivlin, R.S.: Plane strain of a net formed by inextensible cords. J. Ration. Mech. Anal. 4, 951–974 (1955)
Rivlin, R.S.: The deformation of a membrane formed by inextensible cords. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2, 447–476 (1958/1959)
Sadowsky, M.: Ein elementarer Beweis für die Existenz eines abwickelbaren Möbiuschen Bandes und die Zurückführung des geometrischen Problems auf ein Variationsproblem. Sitz.ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 412–415 (1930)
Starostin, E.L., van der Heijden, G.H.M.: The equilibrium shape of an elastic developable Möbius strip. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 7, 2020115–2020116 (2007)
Starostin, E.L., van der Heijden, G.H.M.: Equilibrium shapes with stress localisation for inextensible elastic Möbius and other strips. J. Elast. 119, 67–112 (2015)
Tomassetti, G., Varano, V.: Capturing the helical to spiral transitions in thin ribbons of nematic elastomers. Meccanica 52, 3431–3441 (2017)
Todres, R.E.: Translation of W. Wunderlich’s “On a developable Möbius band”. J. Elast. 119, 23–34 (2015)
Teresi, L., Varano, V.: Modeling helicoid to spiral-ribbon transitions of twist-nematic elastomers. Soft Matter 9, 3081–3088 (2013)
Sawa, Y., Urayama, K., Takigawa, T., Gimenez-Pinto, V., Mbanga, B.L., Ye, F., Selinger, J.V., Selinger, R.L.: Shape and chirality transitions in off-axis twist nematic elastomer ribbons. Phys. Rev. E 88, 022502 (2013)
Wan, G., Jin, C., Trase, I., Zhao, S., Chen, Z.: Helical structures mimicking chiral seedpod opening and tendril coiling. Sensors 18, 2973 (2018)
Wunderlich, W.: Über ein abwickelbares Möbiusband. Monatshefte Math. 66, 276–289 (1962)
Acknowledgements
R. Paroni acknowledges support from the Università di Pisa through the project PRA_2018_61 “Modellazione multi-scala in ingegneria strutturale”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to the memory of Walter Noll
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A.1 Convexification
The aim of this appendix is to determine the convex envelope of
where \(Q\) is a positive definite quadratic form defined on 2-by-2 symmetric matrices.
Consider the function
with \(\alpha \) a real number. For fixed \(\alpha \), \(Q_{\mathrm{det}}( \cdot ;\alpha )\) is a quadratic function—recall that \(\mathbf{L}\) may be represented by a \(2\times 2\) matrix—and hence it is convex if and only if \(Q_{\mathrm{det}}(\mathbf{L};\alpha )\ge 0\) for every \(\mathbf{L}\). This inequality is satisfied for all \(\mathbf{L}\) with determinant equal to zero, since \(Q\) is positive definite. If \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\), the condition \(Q_{\mathrm{det}}(\mathbf{L};\alpha ) \ge 0\) for every \(\mathbf{L}\) holds if and only if
that is equivalent to
or
Similarly, if \(\det \mathbf{L}<0\), the condition \(Q_{\mathrm{det}}( \mathbf{L};\alpha )\ge 0\) for every \(\mathbf{L}\) holds if and only if
Note that \(\alpha ^{-}, \alpha ^{+}>0\), since \(Q\) is positive definite. Hence, \(Q_{\mathrm{det}}(\cdot ;\alpha )\) is convex if and only if \(-\alpha ^{-}\le \alpha \le \alpha ^{+}\), and
is also convex, for the point-wise supremum of convex functions is convex. It immediately follows that
where \((\det \mathbf{L})^{+}\) is the positive part of \(\det \mathbf{L}\), and \((\det \mathbf{L})^{-}\) is the negative part, i.e., \((\det \mathbf{L})^{-}=- \det \mathbf{L}\) if \(\det \mathbf{L}<0\) and zero otherwise.
Clearly, \(W(\mathbf{L})\ge Q_{\mathrm{det}}(\mathbf{L};\alpha )\) for any \(\mathbf{L}\) and for any \(\alpha \), hence \(W(\mathbf{L})\ge W_{c}( \mathbf{L})\). Since \(W_{c}\) is convex it also follows that
In the rest of the section we will show that the inequality above is indeed an equality, and that the lower bound can be achieved by a single lamination. More precisely, we show that given \(\mathbf{L}\) we can find two symmetric tensors \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\), and \(0< t<1\) such that
By the definition of \(W\), the statement above is equivalent to: given \(\mathbf{L}\) there exist two symmetric tensors \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) with \(\det \mathbf{A}=\det \mathbf{B}=0\), and \(0< t<1\) such that
In this statement we may eliminate the tensor \(\mathbf{A}\) by noticing that: given \(\mathbf{L},\mathbf{B}\) and \(t\), as above, there exists a symmetric tensor \(\mathbf{A}\) with \(\det \mathbf{A}=0\) and satisfying the equation
if and only if \(\det (\mathbf{L}- t\mathbf{B})=0\). Since
the statement to be proven is: given \(\mathbf{L}\) there exist a symmetric tensor \(\mathbf{B}\) with \(\det \mathbf{B}=0\), and \(0< t<1\) such that
Recalling (60) and (61), let \(\mathbf{D}^{-}, \mathbf{D}^{+}\) be the two symmetric matrices with \(\det \mathbf{D}^{-}=-1\) and \(\det \mathbf{D}^{+}=1\) such that
Note that the tensors \(\mathbf{D}^{-}\) and \(\mathbf{D}^{+}\) only depend on the bending stiffness tensor \(\mathbb{D}\). We now show that if \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\) there exist a symmetric tensor \(\mathbf{B}\) with null determinant and \(0< t<1\) such that
and
Assuming, for the moment, the validity of this statement we deduce (64) in the case \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\):
where we have used, in order, (67), (66), (65), and (63). Hence, assuming (66) and (67) we have shown that if \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\) then \(W^{**}(\mathbf{L})= W_{c}(\mathbf{L})\). A similar proof can be made for \(\det \mathbf{L}<0\), while the result is trivial for \(\det \mathbf{L}=0\).
We therefore only need to show the validity of (66) and (67). In doing it, we shall provide formulae that deliver \(\mathbf{B}\) and \(t\).
For \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\), set \(\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{L}-\eta \mathbf{D}^{-}\) where the real number \(\eta \) is chosen by imposing that \(\det \mathbf{B}=0\). With (1), this amount to solve the second order equation
where we used the fact that \(\det \mathbf{D}^{-}=-1\). Of the two solutions we choose
To keep the notation compact, we set
so that
Now that \(\mathbf{B}\) has been fixed, we find \(t\) by solving (66)1. We first write
and by using (1), we write (66)1 as
which simplifies, thanks to (68), to
Thus
We may easily verify that \(0< t<1\). Indeed, \(t>0\) if and only if \(2\lambda (\sqrt{\lambda ^{2}+1}-\lambda )<2\), which clearly holds if \(\lambda \le 0\), while for \(\lambda >0\) is equivalent to \(\sqrt{ \lambda ^{2}+1}<\frac{1}{\lambda }+\lambda \) which is trivially verified. Similarly we may check that \(t<1\).
From the definition of \(\mathbf{B}\), we have that \(\eta \mathbf{D}^{-}= \mathbf{L}-\mathbf{B}\). Taking the determinant, we find \(-\eta ^{2}=\det ( \mathbf{L}-\mathbf{B})\) from which (67) follows. Finally, by applying (1) twice, we obtain that
and recalling (66)1 we deduce (66)2.
We close this appendix by summarizing the results found:
where
If \(\det \mathbf{L}>0\), set
while, if \(\det \mathbf{L}<0\), set
Then, with
we have that
1.2 A.2 Evaluation of \(\alpha ^{\pm }\) for Various Symmetries
We first turn our attention to the computation of the constants \(\alpha ^{+}\) and \(\alpha ^{-}\) in the definition of the convexification \(W^{**}\) in (24). According to (25) we must minimize the quadratic form \(Q(\mathbf{L})\) over the manifolds \(\{\mathbf{L}: \det \mathbf{L}=\pm 1\}\). We accomplish this task through the method of Lagrange multipliers by seeking stationary points of the augmented functional\((\mathbf{L},\beta )\mapsto Q(\mathbf{L})+\beta (\det \mathbf{L}\pm 1)\). We note that the determinant of a 2-by-2 matrix is a quadratic form. Thus, there exists a fourth-order tensor \(\mathbb{E}\) such that
Thus, the augmented functional is
We now argue that the minima \(\alpha ^{\pm }\) have the following property:
that is \(\alpha ^{\mp }\) are generalized eigenvalues of\(\mathbb{D}\)with respect to\(\mathbb{E}\). To verify the last statement, let us recall the definition of \(\mathbf{D}^{\pm }\), see (27), that is
Then there exist \(\beta ^{\mp }\) such that the pair \((\mathbf{D}^{\pm }, \beta ^{\mp })\) is a stationary point of the augmented functional defined in (70). The stationarity conditions for such pair are
It follows from the second stationarity condition that \(\mathbf{D}^{ \pm }\neq \mathbf{0}\). This implies that the tensor \(\mathbb{D}+ \beta ^{\mp }\mathbb{E}\) is singular. Moreover, the minimum \(\alpha ^{\mp }\) coincides with the Lagrange multiplier \(\beta ^{\mp }\), up to sign:
To carry our calculation further on, we observe that
and that
Thus, on denoting by and the matrices appearing in the definitions of the quadratic forms (75) and (76), we can write (71) as
Orthotropic Response
In the special case, when the material is orthotropic with respect to the basis \((\mathbf{e}_{1},\mathbf{e}_{2})\), we have
(the other vanishing components of \(\mathbb{D}\) are obtained by application of the standard symmetries: \(\mathbb{D}_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta }=\mathbb{D}_{\beta \alpha \gamma \delta }=\mathbb{D} _{\gamma \delta \alpha \beta }\)). In this case, the characteristic polynomial
has the following set of roots:
The positive definiteness of \(\mathbb{D}\) implies that the first root is negative, and that the remaining roots are positive. The negative root must coincide with \(\beta ^{-}=-\alpha ^{-}\), that is
On the other hand, the minimality of \(\alpha ^{+}\) yields
We note that the foregoing calculation can be used also when the plate is orthotropic with respect to a basis \((\mathbf{e}'_{1},\mathbf{e}'_{2})\), not necessarily coincident with \((\mathbf{e}_{1},\mathbf{e}_{2})\). In this case, the relevant strain energy is \(W'(\mathbf{L})=W(\mathbf{R}\mathbf{L} \mathbf{R}^{T})\), where \(\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{e}'_{\alpha }\otimes \mathbf{e} _{\alpha }\) is a rotation matrix. Then it can be easily shown that the convexification of \(Q'\) is given by
Isotropic Response
For the isotropic strain energy \(Q(\mathbf{L})=d_{\mu }|\mathbf{L}|^{2}+\frac{d _{\lambda }}{2} (L_{11}+L_{22})^{2}\) the relevant components of \(\mathbb{D}\) are \(\mathbb{D}_{1111}=\mathbb{D}_{2222}=2d_{\mu }+d_{ \lambda }\), \(\mathbb{D}_{1122}=d_{\lambda }\), \(\mathbb{D}_{1212}=d _{\mu }\). Then
and so
1.3 A.3 Compatibility Among Curvatures
The aim of this Appendix is to prove the following statement.
Let \(\omega , \omega _{\mathbf{A}}\) and \(\omega _{\mathbf{B}}\) be three two-dimensional open sets, with \(\omega = \omega _{\mathbf{A}}\cup \omega _{\mathbf{B}}\cup \varGamma \), where \(\varGamma =\overline{\omega }_{ \mathbf{A}}\cap \overline{\omega }_{\mathbf{B}}\) is a smooth curve and \(\overline{\omega }_{\mathbf{A}}\) denotes the closure of \(\omega _{ \mathbf{A}}\). Let \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\), with \(\mathbf{A}\ne \mathbf{B}\), be two 2-by-2 symmetric matrices with null determinant. If there exists a deformation \(\mathbf{y}\) continuously differentiable on \(\omega \) and twice differentiable on \(\overline{\omega }_{\mathbf{A}}\) and on \(\overline{\omega }_{\mathbf{B}}\) such that
where \(\mathbf{K}_{\mathbf{y}}\) denotes the second fundamental form of \(\mathbf{y}\), then the curve \(\varGamma \) is straight and the matrices \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) are proportional, that is, there exists a constant \(\sigma \) for which either \(\mathbf{A}=\sigma \mathbf{B}\) or \(\mathbf{B}=\sigma \mathbf{A}\).
We assume that a deformation \(\mathbf{y}\) as described in the statement above exists and we study the consequences.
Since \(\mathbf{A}\ne \mathbf{B}\), we may assume without loss of generality that \(\mathbf{A}\neq \mathbf{0}\). Since \(\mathbf{y}\) is continuously differentiable we have that \(\nabla \mathbf{y}\) and the normal \(\boldsymbol{\nu }= \partial _{1}\mathbf{y}\wedge \partial _{2}\mathbf{y}\) are continuous on \(\omega \). Let \(\mathbf{t}\) be the unit tangent to the curve \(\varGamma \). Since \((\nabla \boldsymbol{\nu })\mathbf{t}= \partial _{\mathbf{t}}\boldsymbol{\nu }\) and since \(\mathbf{K}=- (\nabla \mathbf{y})^{\top }\nabla \boldsymbol{\nu }\) we have that
Thus \(\det (\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{B})=0\), and the identity \(\det (\mathbf{A}- \mathbf{B})=\det \mathbf{A}-\mathbf{A}^{*}\cdot \mathbf{B}+ \det \mathbf{B}\) implies that
Let \((\lambda ,\mathbf{a}_{1})\) and \((0,\mathbf{a}_{2})\) be the pairs of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of \(\mathbf{A}\), so that
with \(\lambda \neq 0\). Then \(\mathbf{A}^{*}= \lambda \mathbf{a}_{2}\otimes \mathbf{a}_{2}\) and \(\mathbf{A}^{*}\cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \) implies that \(\mathbf{B}\mathbf{a}_{2}\cdot \mathbf{a}_{2}=0\). We may therefore write
and, since \(\det \mathbf{B}=0\), conclude that
Setting \(\sigma =\beta /\lambda \) we obtain \(\mathbf{B}= \sigma \mathbf{A}\). Since \(\mathbf{A}\ne \mathbf{B}\), from the identity \(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{t}= \mathbf{B}\mathbf{t}\) we deduce that \(\mathbf{a}_{1}\cdot \mathbf{t}=0\), which implies that \(\mathbf{t}\) is constant and, in turn, that the curve \(\varGamma \) is a straight segment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paroni, R., Tomassetti, G. Macroscopic and Microscopic Behavior of Narrow Elastic Ribbons. J Elast 135, 409–433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-018-09712-w
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-018-09712-w