Abstract
Purpose
Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) affects retinal ganglion cells causing severe vision loss. Pattern electroretinogram and photopic negative response (PhNR) of the light-adapted (LA) full-field electroretinogram (ERG) are typically affected in LHON. In the present study, we evaluated dark-adapted (DA) and LA oscillatory potentials (OPs) of the flash ERG in genetically characterized LHON patients to dissociate slow from fast components of the response.
Methods
Seven adult patients (mean age = 28.4 ± 5.6) in whom genetic diagnosis confirmed LHON with mtDNA or nuclear DNAJC30 (arLHON) pathogenic variants were compared to 12 healthy volunteers (mean age = 35.0 ± 12.1). Full-field ERGs were recorded from both eyes. Offline digital filters at 50, 75 and 100 Hz low cutoff frequencies were applied to isolate high-frequency components from the original ERG signals.
Results
ERG a-waves and b-waves were comparable between LHON patients and controls, while PhNR was significantly reduced (p = 0.009) in LHON patients compared to controls, as expected. OPs derived from DA signals (75 Hz low cutoff frequency) showed reduced peak amplitude for OP2 (p = 0.019). LA OP differences between LHON and controls became significant (OP2: p = 0.047, OP3: p = 0.039 and OP4: p = 0.013) when the 100 Hz low-cutoff frequency filter was applied.
Conclusions
Reduced OPs in LHON patients may represent disturbed neuronal interactions in the inner retina with preserved photoreceptoral (a-wave) to bipolar cell (b-wave) activation. Reduced DA OP2 and high-cutoff LA OP alterations may be further explored as functional measures to characterize LHON status and progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is a rare inherited disease predominantly affecting males with a prevalence in Europe of approximately 1:45,000 considering the three primary (m.11778G>A, m.14484T>C and m.3460G>A) maternally transmitted mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations [1]. These mtDNA mutations are associated with abnormal cellular respiratory chain function causing oxidative stress [2] that severely affects retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) causing progressive optic atrophy [3,4,5,6]. The changes in RGCs and in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) strongly impact the central retina leading to low vision or irreversible legal blindness with small number of patients that eventually recover vision partially [7, 8]. Equivalent mitochondrial alterations can be also caused by biallelic mutations in genes of the nuclear DNA leading to an autosomal recessive form of LHON, as recently reported [9, 10].
There are no specific signs of retinal alterations preceding the conversion to the acute phase in LHON patients [11]. The discovery of retinal biomarkers preceding the conversion could be relevant for early interventions. In addition to the structural examination with optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual electrophysiology plays an important role in the assessment of retinal integrity in LHON. Typically, affected LHON patients show abnormal pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) and pattern electroretinogram (PERG) with abnormal N95 amplitude or N95/P50 amplitude ratio and shortening of P50 peak time, revealing the primary dysfunction of RGCs [12,13,14,15,16,17]. The a-wave and the b-wave of the standard (ISCEV) full-field flash ERG may be classified as normal or slightly reduced in LHON patients [16, 18]. On the other hand, the photopic negative response (PhNR) originating in the inner retina, dependent on RGCs’ integrity [19], has been described as altered and associated to the disease progression in LHON patients [17, 18, 20].
In addition to the PhNR, oscillatory potentials (OPs) have been long reported to originate in the inner part of the retina, reflecting inhibitory/excitatory interactions involving bipolar and amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer of the primate retina [21, 22]. Each individual OP wavelet may be originated by a different subset of cells which may provide the possibility of accessing specific retinal mechanisms by evaluating individual and consecutive OP peaks [23,24,25,26]. Considering the proximity and physiological interdependence of RGCs and the OP generators, it could be speculated that LHON patients are at higher risk of presenting OP dysfunctions. Reduction in OP amplitudes were reported in patients with dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 gene mutations [27] and glaucoma [28, 29], conditions predominantly affecting the retinal ganglion cells. We are not aware of any prior study investigating OPs in LHON.
In the present study, OPs were extracted from DA and LA full-field ERG signals with the application of digital filters using different cutoff frequencies in genetically confirmed LHON patients to evaluate whether OP changes reflect retinal alterations caused by LHON.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 7 young adult patients aged 20 to 34 (mean age = 28.4 ± 5.6, 5 males) and 12 healthy volunteers (mean age = 35.0 ± 12.1, 2 males). All subjects underwent complete ophthalmological examination including spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). All patients showed typical LHON phenotype in chronic phase: bilateral low visual acuity; presence of central scotoma in the visual field; pale (atrophic) optic disk; retinal atrophy with predominant thinning of the ganglion cell complex both in macular and peripapillary areas; and PERG and VEP findings typical for optic neuropathies. All patients were genetically tested for mtDNA and clinical exome. Table 1 shows that six out of seven patients showed pathogenic mtDNA mutations, while one patient (number 7) showed autosomal recessive DNAJC30 152 A > G nuclear DNA mutation. One eye of the controls and LHON patients (bold VA values) were selected for statistical comparisons. Only results of the right eyes were considered, except for patient 4, who in addition to optic nerve atrophy had strabismic amblyopia on the right eye, and patient 6 who showed spontaneous visual recovery of the right eye after several months experiencing blindness (Table 1).
ERG recording
Full-field ERGs were recorded using the RetiPort system (Roland Consult, Brandenburg, Germany) from both eyes following the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) Standards [30]. First, pupils were dilated with 1% tropicamide (Mydriacyl, Alcon). ERGs were recorded with HK-loop electrodes [31]. Participants were dark-adapted for 20 min. Full-field stimulus of 20 consecutive flashes of 3.0 cd·s/m2 with a 10-s interstimulus interval were delivered for recording DA 3 ERGs. Subsequently, the participants underwent light adaptation to a background of 30 cd/m2 for 10-min. Then LA ERGs to 3.0 cd·s/m2 flashes were recorded (LA 3 ERG). Signals were amplified with a band-pass filter from 1 to 300 Hz and sampled at 512 plot points within a 150 ms time window, which gives a sampling frequency of 3413.3 Hz. All stimulus and recording conditions followed ISCEV Standard for clinical full-field electroretinography [30], except the lower corner frequency of the amplifier was higher than the recommended (1 Hz instead of 0.3 Hz). ERG signals obtained from 60 consecutive flashes for LA 3 were averaged resulting in a 150-ms epoch. Raw data were exported from the RetiPort system in time–amplitude matrix and analyzed offline.
Offline signal processing and data analysis
ERG components were analyzed by peak/trough detection: a-waves, b-waves and photopic negative response (PhNR). The amplitude of the a-wave was defined as the difference in microvolts (µV) between the baseline and the minimum value after stimulus onset. The amplitude of the b-wave was the difference in µV between a-wave trough and the peak of the b-wave. PhNR was defined as the difference between the baseline and the late negative component after the i-wave, the positive waveform following the b-wave. Peak times corresponded to the intervals, in milliseconds (ms), between the stimulus onset and the peak amplitudes.
Isolated oscillatory potentials (OPs) were extracted from the original ERG signals using fast Fourier transform (FFT) and inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) MATLAB® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA) routines. The low-frequency part of the spectrum identified with the FFT was excluded before the application of IFFT. The high cutoff frequency of the band-pass filters was 300 Hz. The low cutoff frequency was 75 Hz for DA signals, following ISCEV recommendations [30], and two cutoff frequencies, 50 Hz and 100 Hz, for LA signals to obtain OPs, respectively, more or less influenced by low-frequency ERG components. While OP2 and OP4 extracted from LA signals with the low-cutoff frequency (50 Hz) filter were always present, the other three major OPs were not always observed. Group comparisons between controls and LHON patients were performed using one-way ANOVA (independent samples t-test) or two-way ANOVA plus Bonferroni post hoc analyses in the presence of within-subjects repeated measurements such as individual OPs. Corrected p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Slow DA 3 and LA 3 ERG components
Negative (a-wave and photopic negative response: PhNR) and positive (b-wave) components of the DA 3 ERG (Fig. 1A) and of the LA 3 ERG (Fig. 1B) were first evaluated to check the integrity of retinal networks generating the low-frequency ERG components. Mean DA and LA control traces including the low ERG components analyzed are shown in Fig. 2A, and the mean (± standard deviation) amplitude and peak time values are shown in Table 2. Figure 2B shows that the mean amplitudes of the DA ERG a-wave (F(1,18) = 0.736; p = 0.403) and b-wave (F(1,18) = 0.116; p = 0.738) were comparable between the groups. Mean peak times of the DA 3 ERG a-wave (F(1,18) = 0.193; p = 0.666) and b-wave (F(1,18) = 0.157; p = 0.697) were also comparable between CTRL and LHON patients. The b-to-a-wave mean amplitude ratio was slightly larger in LHON patients compared to controls (CTRL = 1.74 ± 0.17 and LHON = 1.92 ± 0.21). However, the difference was not statistically significant (F(1,18) = 0.193; p = 0.081). LA ERG (Fig. 2C), on the other hand, was not completely comparable between the groups. The a-wave (F(1,18) = 3.864; p = 0.067) and the b-wave (F(1,18) = 4.290; p = 0.054) mean amplitudes showed marginal (nonsignificant) differences between CTRL and LHON groups. The mean peak times of the a-wave (F(1,18) = 0.047; p = 0.830) and the b-wave (F(1,18) = 0.585; p = 0.455) were similar for the LA slow components. In contrast, the mean PhNR amplitude (Fig. 2D) in LHON patients (mean = 15.6 ± 1.3 µV) was about half of the mean PhNR control amplitude (mean = 29.8 ± 11.5 µV). Group comparison showed significantly reduced (F(1,18) = 8.870; p = 0.009) PhNR amplitudes in LHON patients compared to the control group.
Dark-adapted 3 and light-adapted 3 ERG original responses. Black traces = individual response of a representative subject from the control group with normal VA = 0.0 LogMAR. Gray traces = individual responses from the seven LHON patients included in the study. A = dark-adapted responses and B = light-adapted responses. Above the signals the eye included as well as the respective VA are shown for all subjects. Note that PhNRs in LHON patients, pointed with the arrows, were reduced in comparison to controls
Dark-adapted 3 and light-adapted 3 ERG slow components. Representative control signals for dark-adapted (DA) and light-adapted (LA) ERG responses showing the components analyzed (A). Mean/median (box = IQR; whisker = minimum and maximum values) amplitudes (upper boxplots) and peak times (bottom boxplots) for a-wave and b-wave of the DA 3 ERG (B) and LA 3 ERG (C), and for the PhNR (D). Black symbols = controls. Gray symbols = LHON patients. *Significant difference (p < 0.05). PhNR was the only slow ERG component found to be significantly reduced in LHON patients compared to controls
Dark-adapted OPs in LHON
Five OPs (OP1–OP5) of the DA 3 ERG were analyzed in the time domain by peak/trough detection after the application of an offline band-pass 75–300 Hz filter. Additional filtering with different band-pass filters did not show any significant changes between the groups. Therefore only results of ISCEV standard low cutoff frequency of 75 Hz are reported.
Figure 3A shows the OP trace of a representative subject of the control group and individual OP traces from the LHON patients showing that the five OPs were detected in all traces. Although completely preserved dark-adapted a-waves and b-waves were found in LHON patients, as described in the previous section (Figs. 1 and 2), dark-adapted OPs were reduced in LHON patients. Analysis of variance showed that the sum OP amplitude was just slightly attenuated (F(1,18) = 5.397, p = 0.033) in LHON patients compared to controls (Fig. 3B). However, when individual OP amplitudes were compared between the groups, OP2 (Fig. 3C) was found to mainly drive this group difference (F(1,18) = 6.987, p = 0.017) while other OPs were just slightly reduced (Fig. 3D) and statistically comparable between the groups (OP1: F(1,18) = 3.841, p = 0.067; OP3: F(1,18) = 4.263, p = 0.055; OP4: F(1,18) = 2.851, p = 0.110; OP5: F(1,18) = 2.109, p = 0.165). Figure 3E shows that OP peak times were all comparable between the groups (F(1,18) < 1.5, p > 0.25).
Oscillatory potentials of the DA 3 ERG. DA OP traces of a representative control subject and all LHON patients examined with the respective eye tested and LogMAR visual acuity (A). DA OPs (OP1–OP5) were derived from DA ERG signals with 75–300 Hz band-pass digital filter. Mean (± one standard deviation) control (black) and LHON patients (gray) sum OP amplitudes (B) and amplitudes (upper plots, C) and implicit times (bottom plots, D) of controls (black) and LHON patients (gray). *Significant difference (p < 0.05)
Light-adapted OPs in LHON
LA 3 ERG signals (Fig. 1B) were filtered using two offline band-pass filters: one was set at 50 Hz low cutoff frequency and the other was set at 100 Hz low cutoff frequency. In both conditions 300 Hz was selected as the high cutoff frequency. The OP signals extracted from the original LA 3 ERG are shown in Fig. 4 for a representative subject of the control group and the individual OP traces from LHON patients. In both filter conditions five OPs (OP1–OP5) were observed. However, for the 50 Hz condition, OP1 was near the baseline level and OP3 was not always measurable. OP5 implicit time was usually over b-wave peak and, therefore, strongly influenced by the PhNR. Therefore, only major components, OP2 and OP4, were analyzed in the time domain using 50 Hz cutoff filter. OP4, the largest oscillation, coincided in time with the b-wave peak (control mean b-wave peak time = 30.9 ± 1.4 ms and control OP4 peak time = 30.6 ± 1.3), as expected. Therefore, it was more influenced by the b-wave peak. At 100 Hz cutoff condition, LA OP waveforms were less influence by the slow ERG components. All five OPs were measurable in all subjects and they were analyzed in the time domain by peak/trough detection, as shown in Fig. 4B. At 50 Hz filter condition, sum OPs (OP2 amplitude + OP4 amplitude) were slightly reduced in LHON patients (Fig. 4C), but still comparable to controls (group effect: F(1,18) = 4.731 and p = 0.050): mean control = 65.1 ± 15.8 and mean LHON = 48.2 ± 17.2 µV. The within-subjects variable, using two-way analysis of variance, revealed a marginal OP*group effect (F(1,18) = 4.377 and p = 0.052) with significant group difference for OP4 amplitude (F(1,18) = 5.463 and p = 0.032) but not for OP2 amplitude (F(1,18) = 2.856 and p = 0.109).
Oscillatory potentials of the LA 3 ERG. LA OP traces of a representative control subject and all LHON patients examined with the respective eye tested and visual acuity (A, B). OPs were derived from LA ERG signals with 50–300 (A) and 100–300 (B) Hz band-pass digital filters. Mean (± one standard deviation) control (black) and LHON patients (gray) sum OP amplitudes (C). Mean (± one standard deviation) amplitudes (left plots, D) and implicit times (right plots, E) of controls (black) and LHON patients (gray) for the 100 Hz filter. *Significant difference (p < 0.01). Sum OPs as well as individual OPs differences were more pronounced in the 100 Hz filter condition
On the other hand, sum OP (Figure 4C), group effects of the LA OPs extracted with 100 Hz cutoff frequency showed more evident group differences (F(1,18) = 8.330 and p = 0.010) when comparing controls (mean = 54.2 ± 15.3) with LHON patients (mean = 36.6 ± 5.8). Further analysis including OP as within-subjects variable using two-way analysis of variance revealed no significant OP*group effect (F(1,18) = 1.634 and p = 0.176). However, Figure 4D shows that individual OP amplitudes were significantly affected in LHON patients. While early OPs showed only marginal differences (F(1,18) < 5.198 and p > 0.036), OP4 amplitude reduction was statistically significant (F(1,18) = 7.798 and p = 0.013). OP5 amplitude was comparable between the groups (F(1,18) = 2.986 and p = 0.102). The comparisons of OP peak times (Figure 4D right column) showed no significant group (F(1,18) = 0.139 and p = 0.714) or OP*group (F(1,18) = 0.194 and p = 0.665) effects. The individual analysis also revealed no group effects on OP peak times (F(1,18) < 0.902 and p > 0.356). Finally, there were no correlations between PhNR and LA OP amplitudes (Spearman correlation = − 0.17 to 0.33 and p > 0.4).
Discussion
In addition to the well-known, and confirmed by this study, inner retina dysfunction reflected by pattern ERG (PERG) and photopic negative response (PhNR) changes, the present report shows that oscillatory potentials (OPs) are also affected in LHON patients. Retinal alterations caused by LHON were reflected in full-field dark-adapted (DA) and light-adapted (LA) ERG OPs. Interestingly, LA OP abnormalities were more evident when slow components were filtered out using a higher-band-pass digital filter. The present data also confirm preserved or relatively preserved photoreceptor to bipolar cell (outer retina) mechanisms as revealed by normal a-wave and b-wave values in the DA responses (Fig. 1A) and close to normal values in the LA responses (Fig. 1B) in our cohort, as previously reported [17, 18, 20]. In addition, LHON patients also showed affected inner retinal components of the multifocal ERG [32].
The OPs of the full-field flash ERG are low-voltage high-frequency electric oscillations consistently observed in the rising phase of the b-wave [26, 33,34,35]. DA OP analysis is recommended by ISCEV [30] using band-pass (~ 75–300 Hz) filter of signals obtained with the standard (3.0 cd·s/m2) DA full-field ERG. Interestingly, individual OPs are generated by distinct retinal mechanisms which are also differentially influenced by the flash intensity and the state of adaptation [24,25,26, 35,36,37]. It has been proposed that the early OPs may have more distal retinal origins while intermediate and late OPs show inner retinal spiking generators [38]. Since the late OPs are believed to originate from the inner retina (amacrine/ganglion cells) which is severely affected in LHON, we investigated the integrity of the five major DA and LA OPs. DA OPs have been consistently reported to be sensitive to retinal changes caused by diabetes [39,40,41] and other conditions affecting inner retinal mechanisms [24]. OP alterations may accompany other optic neuropathies as they have been reported in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy [27]. However, OPs were not specifically studied in LHON patients. Abnormal OPs have also been reported in patients with glaucoma primarily affecting retinal ganglion cells. These findings suggested amacrine cells alterations in addition to ganglion cells alteration [28, 29]. DA OPs in non-human primate with experimental glaucoma were not consistently different from control eyes [42], while LA OPs were not specifically studied.
In the present report, DA OP differences between controls and LHON patients with completely intact DA a-wave and b-wave were slight for the sum of the DA OPs (Fig. 3B). The comparisons of individual OPs revealed that OP2 was mainly affected. The LA OPs seemed more affected in LHON patients. Importantly, significant differences between LHON patients and controls for OPs extracted with the 100 Hz low-cutoff frequency filter suggested that fast OPs (105–215 Hz) [23] likely originated at inner retinal cells [38] might be involved in the pathogenies.
There are no current standard recommendations to derive OPs from LA ERG signals although they are clinically relevant. For instance, reduced or absent LA OP2 has been observed in inherited retinal conditions affecting signal transmission between photoreceptors and bipolar cells [43]. Interestingly, in patients with congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB), LA OP2 and OP3 were absent while OP4 was preserved [44]. Likely, abnormal OP2 and OP3 was probably due to a defect in the on-bipolar cells, with normal OP4 as off-bipolar cells were properly functioning. The present data shows asymmetric LA OP alterations in LHON patients with OP4 more prominently reduced. Although the origins of the ERG OPs have been debated for several decades [22, 25, 45, 46], early observations indicated that they may originate in the retinal interneurons with different OPs representing the electrical manifestation of a distinct retinal event [35]. Possibly, the lower OP amplitudes found in LHON patients represent functional changes of the amacrine cells, similar to what has been reported in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy [27]. However, a direct effect of RGCs dysfunction on the OP amplitudes [45] may also be taken into consideration when analyzing OP changes in LHON patients.
Visual processing driven by the RGCs that are responsible for sharp vision and color discrimination are at high risk of suffering from mitochondrial dysfunction [47] which may influence inner retinal mechanisms. DA OPs have been long reported to be specifically affected in diabetic patients with no detectable signs of diabetic retinopathy [48], with lower amplitudes of the early OPs correlated with the vascular changes [49]. Microvascular changes have also been considered a pathogenic mechanism and a potential biomarker in LHON patients [50]. Special microvascular properties are present in the optic nerve head that is affected in LHON [5] and may therefore influence DA OP2 amplitudes perhaps in presymptomatic stages. However, other mechanisms affecting the synaptic conduction of affected ganglion cells may play a role in the chronic stage as observed in the patients included in this study.
The limitations of the study were small sample size and the genetic / clinical heterogeneity of LHON patients included in the study. In order to confirm whether this group can be representative of the LHON disease, future studies may consider investigating genetically homogeneous groups as well as subjects with and without microvascular changes (OCT) in presymptomatic stages.
Conclusion
The particular group of genetically characterized LHON patients in chronic stage of the disease displayed OP abnormalities suggesting inner retinal dysfunction in addition to ganglion cell loss. Inner retinal ERG components such as P50/N95 (PERG) and the PhNR may be affected as a consequence of retinal ganglion cells’ dysfunction. OP abnormalities could be the result of a direct dysfunction of retinal mechanisms other than RGCs. These findings, however, remain to be further explored in terms of pathophysiology and possible cellular generators. Finally, if future investigations show that the OPs are reduced early in the disease process, then it would prove to be a useful biomarker for the diseases progression.
References
Mascialino B, Leinonen M, Meier T (2012) Meta-analysis of the prevalence of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy mtDNA mutations in Europe. Eur J Ophthalmol 22:461–465. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000055
Lin CS, Sharpley MS, Fan W et al (2012) Mouse mtDNA mutant model of leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:20065–20070. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217113109
Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Savini G et al (2010) Natural history of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: longitudinal analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 117:623–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.026
Berninger TA, Bird AC, Arden GB (1989) Leber’s hereditary optic atrophy. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet 10:211–227. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816818909009877
Carelli V, Ross-Cisneros FN, Sadun AA (2004) Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of optic neuropathies. Prog Retin Eye Res 23:53–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.10.003
Howell N (1997) Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: mitochondrial mutations and degeneration of the optic nerve. Vis Res 37:3495–3507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00167-8
Nikoskelainen EK, Huoponen K, Juvonen V et al (1996) Ophthalmologic findings in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, with special reference to mtDNA mutations. Ophthalmology 103:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30665-9
Yen M-Y, Wang A-G, Wei Y-H (2006) Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: a multifactorial disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 25:381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.05.002
Petrovic Pajic S, Jarc-Vidmar M, Fakin A et al (2022) Case report: long-term follow-up of two patients with LHON caused by DNAJC30:c.152G>A pathogenic variant-case series. Front Neurol 13:1003046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1003046
Stenton SL, Sheremet NL, Catarino CB et al (2021) Impaired complex I repair causes recessive Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. J Clin Invest 131:138267. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138267
Hwang TJ, Karanjia R, Moraes-Filho MN et al (2017) Natural history of conversion of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: a prospective case series. Ophthalmology 124:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.002
Holder GE (1997) The pattern electroretinogram in anterior visual pathway dysfunction and its relationship to the pattern visual evoked potential: a personal clinical review of 743 eyes. Eye 11(Pt 6):924–934. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.231
Jarc-Vidmar M, Tajnik M, Brecelj J et al (2015) Clinical and electrophysiology findings in Slovene patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Doc Ophthalmol 130:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-015-9489-7
Porciatti V, Alba DE, Feuer WJ et al (2022) The relationship between stage of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy and pattern electroretinogram latency. Transl Vis Sci Technol 11:31. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.3.31
Robson AG, Nilsson J, Li S et al (2018) ISCEV guide to visual electrodiagnostic procedures. Doc Ophthalmol 136:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9621-y
Salomão SR, Berezovsky A, Andrade RE et al (2004) Visual electrophysiologic findings in patients from an extensive Brazilian family with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Doc Ophthalmol 108:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:doop.0000036829.37053.31
Majander A, Robson AG, João C et al (2017) The pattern of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Mitochondrion 36:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2017.07.006
Karanjia R, Berezovsky A, Sacai PY et al (2017) The photopic negative response: an objective measure of retinal ganglion cell function in patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:BIO300–BIO306. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-21773
Frishman L, Sustar M, Kremers J et al (2018) ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 136:207–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-018-9638-x
Botelho GIS, Salomão SR, Tengan CH et al (2020) Impaired ganglion cell function objectively assessed by the photopic negative response in affected and asymptomatic members from Brazilian families with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Front Neurol 11:628014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.628014
Heynen H, Wachtmeister L, van Norren D (1985) Origin of the oscillatory potentials in the primate retina. Vis Res 25:1365–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90214-7
Wachtmeister L, Dowling JE (1978) The oscillatory potentials of the mudpuppy retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:1176–1188
Gauthier M, Gauvin M, Lina J-M, Lachapelle P (2019) The effects of bandpass filtering on the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 138:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-019-09683-w
Speros P, Price J (1981) Oscillatory potentials. History, techniques and potential use in the evaluation of disturbances of retinal circulation. Surv Ophthalmol 25:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(81)90093-x
Wachtmeister L (1987) Basic research and clinical aspects of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 66:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00145232
Wachtmeister L (1998) Oscillatory potentials in the retina: what do they reveal. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:485–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-9462(98)00006-8
Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M et al (2007) Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:820–824. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0845
Gur M, Zeevi YY, Bielik M, Neumann E (1987) Changes in the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Eye Res 6:457–466. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688709025202
Rangaswamy NV, Zhou W, Harwerth RS, Frishman LJ (2006) Effect of experimental glaucoma in primates on oscillatory potentials of the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:753–767. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1051
Robson AG, Frishman LJ, Grigg J et al (2022) ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09872-0
Hawlina M, Konec B (1992) New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 81:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156014
Kurtenbach A, Leo-Kottler B, Zrenner E (2004) Inner retinal contributions to the multifocal electroretinogram: patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). Multifocal ERG in patients with LHON. Doc Ophthalmol 108:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-004-8676-8
Cobb W, Morton HB (1952) The human retinogram in response to high-intensity flashes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 4:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(52)90086-2
King-Smith PE, Loffing DH, Jones R (1986) Rod and cone ERGs and their oscillatory potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:270–273
Lachapelle P (1994) The human suprathreshold photopic oscillatory potentials: method of analysis and clinical application. Doc Ophthalmol 88:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203698
Lachapelle P (1991) Evidence for an intensity-coding oscillatory potential in the human electroretinogram. Vis Res 31:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90145-u
Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM, Faubert J (1989) The diagnostic use of the second oscillatory potential in clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 73:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154488
Dong C-J, Agey P, Hare WA (2004) Origins of the electroretinogram oscillatory potentials in the rabbit retina. Vis Neurosci 21:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523804214043
Tzekov R, Arden GB (1999) The electroretinogram in diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 44:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00063-6
Ba-Ali S, Larsen M, Andersen HU, Lund-Andersen H (2022) Full-field and multifocal electroretinogram in non-diabetic controls and diabetics with and without retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15184
Bresnick GH, Korth K, Groo A, Palta M (1984) Electroretinographic oscillatory potentials predict progression of diabetic retinopathy: preliminary report. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1307–1311. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040031057023
Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L et al (1996) The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:125–141
Fitzgerald KM, Cibis GW, Giambrone SA, Harris DJ (1994) Retinal signal transmission in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: evidence for dysfunction in the photoreceptor/depolarizing bipolar cell pathway. J Clin Invest 93:2425–2430. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117250
Lachapelle P, Little JM, Polomeno RC (1983) The photopic electroretinogram in congenital stationary night blindness with myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:442–450
Ogden TE (1973) The oscillatory waves of the primate electroretinogram. Vis Res 13:1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(73)90144-2
Peachey NS, Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ et al (1991) Effects of light adaptation on the response characteristics of human oscillatory potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(91)90015-v
Sadun AA, La Morgia C, Carelli V (2013) Mitochondrial optic neuropathies: our travels from bench to bedside and back again. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41:702–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12086
Coupland SG (1987) A comparison of oscillatory potential and pattern electroretinogram measures in diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 66:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145234
Midena E, Torresin T, Longhin E et al (2021) Early microvascular and oscillatory potentials changes in human diabetic retina: amacrine cells and the intraretinal neurovascular crosstalk. J Clin Med 10:4035. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184035
Balducci N, Cascavilla ML, Ciardella A et al (2018) Peripapillary vessel density changes in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: a new biomarker. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46:1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13326
Funding
The study was done within the framework of research program P3-0333 of Slovenian Research Agency to MH and National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary (OTKA-PD grant number 134799) to MTSB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Informed consent
The patients consented to participate in the study.
Statements of human rights
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were done in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Statement on the welfare of animals
This article does not contain any animal experiment.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Barboni, M.T.S., Sustar Habjan, M., Petrovic Pajic, S. et al. Electroretinographic oscillatory potentials in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Doc Ophthalmol 148, 133–143 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-024-09968-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-024-09968-9