Abstract
Individuals’ implicit theories that people’s character is fixed (entity theorist) versus malleable (incremental theorist) are associated with their holding beliefs that morality is primarily determined by fulfilling prescribed duties (duty-based morality) versus upholding basic rights of others (rights-based morality), respectively. Three studies provide evidence that the ability to recognize that a situation can legitimately be considered from a moral point of view (moral awareness) is interactively dependent upon the nature of perceivers’ implicit theories (and their associated schemas in the moral domain) and the extent to which the issue involves a violation that emphasizes a failure to fulfill a prescribed duty (duty-based violation) versus a failure to uphold a fundamental right of others (rights-based violation). The studies experimentally manipulated the characteristics of a hypothetical business situation to involve either a duty-based violation or a rights-based violation or no behavioral violation. In addition, Study 1 experimentally manipulated subjects’ implicit theories, while Studies 2 and 3 measured subjects’ chronically held implicit theories. Collectively, the studies provide consistent evidence that entity theorists have greater moral awareness than incremental theorists when considering situations involving duty-based violations, while incremental theorists have greater moral awareness than entity theorists when considering situations involving rights-based violations, and moral awareness is not significantly different for perceivers who are neither strongly entity nor incremental theorists, when considering situations involving duty- versus rights-based violations. Study 3 also found evidence of a moderated-mediated association between violation type and moral intentions, through moral awareness as a mediator, moderated by perceivers’ implicit theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 1–63.
Akaah, I. (1989). Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 375–381.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.
Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., & Shirey, L. L. (1983). Effects of the readers’ schema at different points in time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–279.
Arlow, P. (1991). Characteristics in college students’ evaluations of business ethics and corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 63–69.
Baier, K. (1958). The moral point of view: A rational basis for ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.
Bazerman, M. H. (2001). Judgment in managerial decision making (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Beltramini, R. F., Peterson, R. A., & Kozmetsky, G. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(3), 195–200.
Bentham, J. (1948). Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner. Original work published 1789.
BEQ Author Guide. (2014). Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.pdcnet.org/pdf/BEQ%20Author%20Guide.pdf.
Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in productivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 321–324.
Borkowski, S., & Ugras, Y. (1998). Business students and ethics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25–38). New York: PsychologyPress.
Briggs, N. (2006). Estimation of the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect in multiple mediator models. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 475B.
Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018.
Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, Y. Y., & Fu, H. Y. (1997a). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923–940.
Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1997). Justice from a Chinese perspective. In H. S. R. Kao & D. Sinha (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (pp. 164–184). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997b). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30.
Collins, D. (1989). Organizational harm, legal condemnation and stakeholder retaliation: A typology, research agenda and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 1–13.
Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1500 articles published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 1–73.
Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 221–259.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 29–38.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333.
Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644–656.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 25, 109–116.
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.
Ellingson, J. E., Smith, D. B., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). Investigating the influence of social desirability in personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 122–133.
Epstein, S. (1989). Values from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp. 3–22). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Erdley, C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863–878.
Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55–64.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefi attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Taylor.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.
Gervey, B. M., Chiu, C.-Y., Hong, Y.-Y., & Dweck, C. (1999). Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 17–27.
Gioia, D. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–391.
Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Radin, D. I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What Real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 500–510.
Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 709–722.
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2012). Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes. In G. R. Hancock & O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 629–636.
Hebert, P., Meslin, E. M., Dunn, E. V., Byrne, N., & Reid, S. R. (1990). Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: Using vignettes as an instrument. Journal of Medical Ethics, 16, 141–145.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hemsley, G. D., & Marmurek, H. H. C. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433–438.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.
Higgins, E. T., & King, G. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kohlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69–122). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hinkley, D. V. (1977). Jackknifing in unbalanced situations. Technometrics, 19, 285–292.
Hong, Y., Levy, S. R., & Chiu, C. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 97–105.
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macro Marketing, 6, 5–16.
Jackson, J. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Johnson, J. A. (1981). The “self-disclosure” and “self-presentation” views of items response dynamics and personality scale validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 761–769.
Johnson, J. A., Germer, C. K., Efran, J. S., & Overton, W. F. (1988). Personality as a basis for theoretical predilections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 824–835.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.
Jordan, J. (2009). A social cognitive framework for examining moral awareness in managers and academics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 237–258.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Key, S., & Popkin, S. J. (1998). Integrating ethics into the strategic management process: Doing well by doing good. Management Decision, 36, 331–338.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper & Row.
Kutner, M. H., & Nachtsheim, C. J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Lau, C. L. L. (2010). A step forward: Ethics education matters! Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 565–584.
Levontin, L., Halperin, E., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Implicit theories block negative attributions about a longstanding adversary: The case of Israelis and Arabs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 670–675.
Levy, S. R., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (2006). Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 5–24.
Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Trait- versus process-focused social judgment. Social Cognition, 16, 151–172.
Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). The impact of children’s static versus dynamic conceptions of people on stereotype formation. Child Development, 70, 1163–1180.
Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Modes of social thought: Person theories and social understanding. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 179–202). New York: Guilford Press.
Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156–168.
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436.
Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. American Statistician, 54, 217–224.
Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. F. (1989). Ethics in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 27–31.
Lopez, Y. P., Rechner, P. L., & Olson-Buchanan, J. P. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 341–358.
Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what is should be: The role of gender academic status and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 205–217.
Luthar, H. K., & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical the ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 353–368.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29, 305–325.
May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in moral decision-making. Business and Society, 41, 84–117.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When mediation is moderated and moderation is mediated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.
Okleshen, M., & Hoyt, R. (1996). A cross cultural comparison of ethical perspectives and decision approaches of business students: United States of America versus New Zealand. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 537–549.
Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65, 84–91.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 805–817.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Reynolds, S. J. (2002). Identifying ethical issues: The roles of issue characteristics, individual differences, and context in managerial sensemaking. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International. 63, 1907.
Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 233–243.
Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1027–1041.
Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: A critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 61–90.
Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179–186.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Azzna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (pp. 1–65). Boston: Academic Press.
Shen, W., Kiger, T. B., Davies, S. E., Rasch, R. L., Simon, K. M., & Ones, D. S. (2011). Samples in applied psychology: Over a decade of research in review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1055–1064.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, M. W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shweder, R. A., & Miller, J. G. (1985). The social construction of the person: How is it possible? In K. J. Kenneth & K. E. Davis (Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp. 41–69). New York: Springer.
Singer, M. S. (1996). The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison of managerial professionals and the general public. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 459–474.
Singer, M. S., & Singer, A. E. (1997). Observer judgments about moral agents’ ethical decisions: The role of scope of justice and moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 473–484.
Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45, 89–99.
Singhapakdi, A., Salyachivin, S., Virakul, B., & Veerayangkur, V. (2000). Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 271–284.
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. The Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–35.
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.
Smith, P. L., & Oakley, E. F. (1997). Gender related differences in ethical and social values of business student: Implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45.
Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A Cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29.
Stern, L. D., Marrs, S., Millar, M. G., & Cole, E. (1984). Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253–262.
Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing’. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., Hilton, J. L., & Narayan, S. (1993). Inhibitory effect of schematic processing on perceptual encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 921–935.
Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–160.
Weber, J., & Glyptis, S. (2000). Measuring the impact of a business ethics course and community service experience on students’ values and opinions. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(4), 341–358.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23–51.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322–359.
Wyer, R. S, Jr, Srull, T. K., Gordon, S. E., & Hartwick, J. (1982). Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 674–688.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was determined to be EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL REGULATIONS by the University Institutional Review Board. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Vignette: A COMPANY CAR
Manipulation: (duty-based violation/no harm)
“A manager in your area, Terry, drives a company car. Company policy states that corporate cars are to be inspected every 3000 miles without exception. Terry routinely has her car inspected about every 5000 miles—she says that she ‘just doesn’t want to be bothered that often.’” (Reynolds 2006, p. 243)
There has never been a mechanical problem with Terry’s company car. (new text developed for the present study)
Vignette: COMPANY DRUG TESTING
Manipulation: (rights-based violation/no harm)
Your friend Janice works for a company whose management implemented a mandatory drug testing policy last year to combat the potentially serious negative effects of illegal drug use. It was recently revealed that, in addition to identifying traces of illegal drugs in employees’ bodies, the drug test also identifies traces of legal drugs that can easily be matched to particular medical conditions of employees. The employee’s union argues that management is collecting complete medical histories of all employees, and that the potential exists that this information may be used against employees during the course of their careers. However, there have been no formal complaints of adverse career actions based on employee medical conditions identified by the drug tests and the mandatory drug testing policy remains in effect. The company remains highly profitable. (new text developed for the present study)
Appendix 2
Vignette: A HEALTH PRODUCTS COMPANY (version 1)
Manipulation: (duty-based violation/no harm)
“One of your most important customers, a medical clinic, called yesterday. They had ordered a product 10 days ago (products are normally delivered within 7–10 days), but it had not arrived. Quickly, you traced the order to the shipping office. You asked the shipping clerk about the order and she said, “I shipped it two days ago!” As you left the shipping clerk’s office, you glanced at her desk and saw her shipping receipts. You could clearly see that the order had shipped this morning. You called the clinic back to let them know the product was on its way. As you talked with them you learned that the delay of the product had not affected any patients in any way.” (Reynolds 2006, p. 242)
Vignette: A HEALTH PRODUCTS COMPANY (version 2)
Manipulation: (rights-based violation/no harm)
“One of your most important customers, a medical clinic, called yesterday. They had ordered a product 10 days ago (products are normally delivered within 7–10 days), but it had not arrived. Quickly, you traced the order to the shipping office. You asked the shipping clerk about the order and she said,” (Reynolds 2006, p. 242)
“I tried to ship the order last week, but the shipping company sent a driver in his late sixties to make the pick-up and I believe senior citizens are often unreliable, so I held the order until 2 days ago when the shipping company sent a younger driver for the pick- up. The order still shipped on time.” (new text developed for the present study)
“As you left the shipping clerk’s office, you glanced at her desk and saw her shipping receipts. You could clearly see that the order had shipped 2 days ago. You called the clinic back to let them know the product was on its way. As you talked with them you learned that the delay of the product had not affected any patients in any way.” (Reynolds 2006, p. 242)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wurthmann, K. Implicit Theories and Issue Characteristics as Determinants of Moral Awareness and Intentions. J Bus Ethics 142, 93–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2714-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2714-1