Skip to main content
Log in

Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of 138 college students reveals an undergraduate major has a greater influence on corporate social responsibility than business ethics. Business students are no less ethical than nonbusiness students. Females are more ethical and socially responsible than males. Age is negatively related to one's Machiavellian orientation and positively related to negative attitudes about corporate efforts at social responsibility. The results suggest a greater need to focus busines ethics instruction based on student characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldag, R. J., Aldag, D. W. and Jackson, Jr. 1977, ‘Assessments of Attitudes Toward Social Responsibilities’, Journal of Business Administration 8(2); 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P., and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, ‘Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study’, Akron Business and Economic Review 11(3), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P., and T. A. Ulrich: 1988, ‘A Longitudinal Survey of Business School Graduates' Assessments of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Resopnsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 29(2), 446–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V.: 1979, Moral Issues in Business (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D.: 1976, ‘Can Ethics be Taught?’, Change (Octobetr). 26–30.

  • Boyd, D. P.: 1981–82, ‘Improving Ethical Awareness Through the Business and Society Course’, Business and Society 20–21 (Winter/Spring), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week.: 1976. How companies react to the ethics crisis. February 9: 78–9.

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1986. Toward CSR 3: Why ethical analysis is indispensable and unavoidable in corporate affaire. California Management Review 28(2): 126–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K. O. 1978. What good are ethics courses? Across the Board 24(9), pp. 10–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. W., and R. R. Gleissner: 1981, ‘Codes of Ethics in State Government: A Nationwide Survey’, Public Personnel Management Journal 10(1), 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, I.: 1987, ‘Ethics, Anyone? Or Morals?’, Wall Street Journal (September 15), 32.

  • Lane, M. S., D. Shaupp, and B. Parsons, B. Parsons 1988. Pymalion Effect: An issue for business education and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 7, 223–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T.: 1983. Business ethics' new appeal. New York Times, December 11:F3.

  • Magnet, M.: 1986. The decline and fall of business ethics. Fortune, December 8: 65, 66, 68, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. R.: 1981–82. Do courses in ethics improve the ethical judgment of students? Business and Society 20–21 (Winter/Spring): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesing, P. and J. F. Preble: 1985. A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. J.: 1987. Ethics Programs: Just a pretty face? Business Month, (September): 30–2.

  • Salmans, S.: 1987. Suddenly business schools tackle ethics. New York Times, Education Life, August 2: 64–6, 68–9.

  • Stevens, E.: 1979. Business ethics. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G.: 1984. Business ethics and social responsibility: The responses of present and future managers. Akron Business and Economic Review 15(3): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 1987, ‘Could an Ethics Course have kept Ivan from going bad?’, Wall Street Jurnal 27, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. J., and B. R. Montgometry: 1980, ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct. California Management Review 23(2): 80–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Peter Arlow is Professor of Management at Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio, U.S.A., where he teaches M.B.A. and undergraduate management courses. He has previously published in the Academy of Management Review, Business Horizons, International Journal of Management, Long-Range Planning, Journal of Business Ethics, Akron Business and Economic Review, and other Journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arlow, P. Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 10, 63–69 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383694

Keywords

Navigation