Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Social Cognition Framework for Examining Moral Awareness in Managers and Academics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation applies a social cognition framework to examine moral awareness in business situations. Using a vignette-based instrument, the investigation compares the recall, recognition, and ascription of importance to moral- versus strategy-related issues in business managers (n = 86) and academic professors (n = 61). Results demonstrate that managers recall strategy-related issues more than moral-related issues and recognize and ascribe importance to moral-related issues less than academics. It also finds an inverse relationship between socialization in the business context and moral awareness. Future directions for moral awareness research and the practical implications for these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson R. P. 1981. Psychological Status of the Script Concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agle, B. R.: 1996, Ethical Leadership at the Top: A Comprehensive Model and Illustrations of the Role of the Chief Executive Officer in Organizational Ethics. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 1–5

  • Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K., & Sonnenfeld J. A. 1999. Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R. C., & Pearson P. D. 1984. A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. In: P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, pp. 255–291. New York: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R. C., & Pichert J. W. 1978. Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R. C., Pichert, J. W., & Shirey L. L. 1983. Effects of the Readers’ Schema at Different Points in Time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M. B. 1987. Moral Development and Accounting Education. Journal of Accounting Education, 5, 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth B. E., & Fried Y. 1988. The Mindlessness of Organizational Behaviors. Human Relations, 41, 305–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel D. P. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning: An Introduction to School Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh J. A., & Thein R. D. 1985. Individual Construct Accessibility, Person Memory, and the Recall-Judgment Link: The Case of Information Overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M. H. 2001. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau M. J. 1994. Influencing the Moral Dimensions of Dental Practice. In J. R. Rest, D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, pp. 121–146. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau M. J., Rest J. R., & Yamoor C. M. 1985. Measuring Dental Students’ Ethical Sensitivity. Journal of Dental Education, 49, 225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer W. F., & Trayens J. C. 1981. Role of the Schemata in Memory for Places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. E., Trevino L. K., & Harrison D. A. 2005. Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield K. D., Trevino L. K., & Weaver G. R. 2000. Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influence of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale J. I. M., & Krebs D. L. 1992. Situational Variation in Moral Judgment: In a Stage or on a Stage. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell R. B. 1966. The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase W. G., & Simon H. A. 1973. Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J. 1972. Organizational Structure, Environment, and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6, 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkeburn, H.: 2002, `A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science', Journal of Moral Education 31, 440–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. E.: 1989, ‘Principle Components Analysis’, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-069 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)

  • Eisenberg N., Spinrad T., & Sadovsky A. 2006. Empathy-Related Responding in Children. In: M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.) Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 517–549). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S., & Hambrick D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske S. T., & Taylor S. E. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, J. and O. C. Ferrell: 1992, `Cognitive Consistency of Marketing Managers in Ethical Situations', Journal of Academy of Marketing Sciences 20, 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. 1994. The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 32–33, 122, 124, 126

  • Gioia D. A. 1992. Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz E. T., Schallert D. L., Reynolds R. E., & Radin D. I. 1983. Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 500–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins D. I., & Cocanougher A. B. 1972. Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing, 36, 61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert P., Meslin E. M., Dunn E. V., Byrne N., & Reid S. R. 1990. Evaluating Ethical Sensitivity in Medical Students: Using Vignettes as an Instrument. Journal of Medical Ethics, 16, 141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley G. D., & Marmurek H. H. C. 1982. Person Memory: The Processing of Consistent and Inconsistent Person Information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. and S. Vitell: 1986, `A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 5–16

  • Hunt S. D., & Vitell S. 1992. A General Theory of Market Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision. In N. C. Smith, J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in Marketing, pp. 775–784. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. 1991. Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J.: 2007, `Taking a First Step Towards a Moral Action: A Review of Moral Sensitivity Measurement Across Domains', Journal of Genetic Psychology 168, 323–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcher J. N. 1996. Auditors’ Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1033–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash C. A. M., Royer J. M., & Greene B. A. 1988. Effects of Schemata on Both Encoding and Retrieval of Information from Prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly C., Kocuurek P., McGaw N., & Samuelson J. 2004. Deriving Value from Corporate Values. New York: Aspen ISIB

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. 1969. Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization and Research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. 1984. The Psychology of Moral Development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus H. 1977. Self-Schemata and Processing Information About the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenson, G.: 2006, ‘Are Enrons Bustin’ Out All Over?’, New York Times, Sect. 3.1, May 28

  • Ocasio W. 1997. Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillutla M. M., & Chen X. 1999. Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Preager

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. 1994. Background: Theory and Research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics (pp. 1–26). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J., Narvaez D., Bebeau M. J., & Thoma S. J. 1999. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds S. J. 2006a. Moral Awareness and Ethical Predispositions: Investigating the Role of Individual Differences in the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds S. J. 2006b. A Neurocognitive Model of the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Implications for Study and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein E. H. 2004. Learning When and How to Lie: A Neglected Aspect of Organizational and Occupational Socialization. Human Relations, 57, 260–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M. K., Finn D. W., & Munter P. 1993. The Effects of Auditors’ Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin R. M., & Schneider M. W. 1977. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks J. R., & Hunt S. D. 1998. Marketing Researcher Ethical Sensitivity: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Exploratory Investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62, 92–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen M. S., Joag-Dev C., & Anderson R. C. 1979. A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern L. D., Marrs S., Millar M. G., & Cole E. 1984. Processing Time and the Recall of Inconsistent and Consistent Behaviors of Individuals and Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg R. J., & Wagner R. K. 1985. Practical Intelligence in Real-World Pursuits: The Role of Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P.: 1992, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd Edition (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ)

  • Stevens, G. E., W. D. Richardson and A. E. Abramowitz: 1989, ‘Perceptual Differences of Ethical Decision Situations Business vs. Law: A Difference of Opinion’, Southern Academy of Management Meeting Proceedings, 199–201

  • Sundaram A. K., & Inkpen A. C. 2004. The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organizational Science, 15, 350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. E., & Crocker J. 1981. Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 1, (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. E., Crocker J., & D’Agostino, J. 1978. Schematic Bases of Social Problem-Solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel A. E., & Messick D. M. 1999. Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma S. 1994. Moral Judgments and Moral Action. In J. R. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, pp. 199–211. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. 1986. Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., & Brown M. E. 2004. Managing to be Ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths. The Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., & Youngblood S. A. 1990. Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Brown M., & Hartman L. P. 2003. A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Ethical Suite. Human Relations, 56, 5–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel W., Jonides J., Hilton J. L., & Narayan S. 1993. Inhibitory Effect of Schematic Processing on Perceptual Encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 921–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R., Trevino L. K., & Cochran P. L. 1999a. Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R., Trevino L. K., & Cochran P. L. 1999b. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. 1990. Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R., & Crocker J. 1983. Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1994, ‘Essays in the “Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory”’, in T. Jones (ed.), Business & Society 33, 101–105

  • Wyer R. S. Jr., Srull T. K., Gordon S. E., & Hartwick J. 1982. Effects of Processing Objectives on the Recall of Prose Material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 674–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadny J. & Gerard H. B. 1974. Attributed Intentions and Informational Selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 34–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Jordan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordan, J. A Social Cognition Framework for Examining Moral Awareness in Managers and Academics. J Bus Ethics 84, 237–258 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9706-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9706-3

Keywords

Navigation