Skip to main content
Log in

Out-of-plane shake-table tests of strengthened multi-leaf stone masonry walls

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing unreinforced multi-leaf stone masonry (URM) buildings are one of the most earthquake prone types of construction. Failure typically occurs even at low levels of earthquake-induced loads, with the out-of-plane delamination of masonry leaves and consequent collapse of the whole façade. Although this issue has been tackled by several researchers, dynamic tests reproducing the earthquake behaviour of as-built and strengthened multi-leaf stone URM walls are very limited in the literature. In response to this lack, shake-table testing of eight full-scale multi-leaf stone masonry walls followed by dynamic modal identification was performed. The application of steel tie-rods in the wall cross-section, the injection of the inner-core using hydraulic lime-based grout, and a combination of the two techniques are presented herein as suitable interventions to enhance the monolithic behaviour of multi-leaf stone URM walls. Tying the outer masonry leaves together increased the seismic capacity by a factor of 1.8 compared to unreinforced condition, while injecting grout into the inner-core of the wall provided resistance to peak ground acceleration (PGA) that were 2.3–3.6 times the PGA resisted by as-built walls, depending on the quality in the execution of the intervention. The results obtained in the walls strengthened with both techniques were significantly related to the grout injection only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adanur S (2010) Performance of masonry buildings during the 20 and 27 December 2007 Bala (Ankara) earthquakes in Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2547–2556. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-2547-2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C943 (2010) Standard practice for making test cylinders and prisms for determining strength and density of preplaced-aggregate concrete in the laboratory. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairrão R, Falcão Silva MJ (2009) Shaking table tests of two different reinforcement techniques using polymeric grids on an asymmetric limestone full-scaled structure. Eng Struct 31:1321–1330. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binda L, Penazzi D (2000) Classification of masonry cross sections and of typologies of historic buildings. Technical report—RILEM MMM Committee

  • Binda L, Modena C, Baronio G, Abbaneo S (1997) Repair and investigation techniques for stone masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 11:133–142. doi:10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00031-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras A, Henriques FMA (2012) Natural hydraulic lime based grouts—the selection of grout injection parameters for masonry consolidation. Constr Build Mater 26:135–144. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.05.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa AA, Arede A, Costa AC et al (2013) Out-of-plane behaviour of a full-scale stone masonry facade. Part 1: specimen and ground motion selection. Earthq Eng Struct. doi:10.1002/eqe.2313

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ayala DF, Paganoni S (2011) Assessment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bull Earthq Eng 9:81–104. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9224-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Porto F, Silva B, Costa C, Modena C (2012) Macro-scale analysis of damage to churches after earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. J Earthq Eng 16:739–758. doi:10.1080/13632469.2012.685207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva BLQ, Dalla Benetta M, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (2013) Compression and sonic tests to assess effectiveness of grout injection on three-leaf stone masonry walls. Int J Archit Herit 8:408–435. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.826300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decanini L, De Sortis A, Goretti A et al (2004) Performance of masonry buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20:191–220. doi:10.1193/1.1765106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizhur D, Ingham J, Moon L et al (2011) Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):279–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizhur D, Dhakal RP, Bothara J, Ingham J (2016) Building typologies and failure modes observed in the 2015 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 49(2):211–232

    Google Scholar 

  • DM 14/01/2008 (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni—NTC 2008. Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Italy (in Italian)

  • Elmenshawi A, Shrive N (2014) Assessment of multi-wythe stone masonry subjected to seismic hazards. J Earthq Eng 19:85–106. doi:10.1080/13632469.2014.940631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmenshawi A, Sorour M, Mufti A, Jaeger L, Shrive N (2010) Damping mechanisms and damping ratios in vibrating unreinforced stone masonry. Eng Struct 32(10):3269–3278. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaretton M, Dizhur D, da Porto F, Ingham JM (2016) Seismic assessment and improvement of unreinforced stone masonry buildings: literature review and application to New Zealand. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 49(2):148–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot C, Ashall G, Hughes J (2007) Characterisation of old mortars with respect to their repair. In: Final report 28 by RILEM TC 167–COM. RILEM. ISBN: 978-2-912143-56-3

  • Kalagri A, Miltiadou-Fezans A, Vintzileou E (2010) Design and evaluation of hydraulic lime grouts for the strengthening of stone masonry historic structures. Mater Struct 43:1135–1146. doi:10.1617/s11527-009-9572-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G, Penna A, Senaldi IE et al (2014) Shaking table test of a strengthened full-scale stone masonry building with flexible diaphragms. Int J Archit Herit 8:349–375. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.826299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzon N (2010) Influence of grout injection on the dynamic behaviour of stone masonry buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova (Italy). Supervisor: Valluzzi MR

  • Meyer P, Ochsendorf J, Germaine J, Kausel E (2007) The impact of high-frequency/low-energy seismic waves on unreinforced masonry. Earthq Spectra 23(1):77–94. doi:10.1193/1.2431211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltiadou-Fezans A, Tassios TP (2012) Fluidity of hydraulic grouts for masonry strengthening. Mater Struct 45:1817–1828. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9872-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modena C, Casarin F, da Porto F, Munari M (2010) L’Aquila 6th April 2009 earthquake: emergency and post—emergency activities on cultural heritage buildings. In: Garevski M, Ansal A (eds) Earthquake engineering in Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 495–521

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira DV, Silva RA, Garbin E, Lourenço PB (2012) Strengthening of three-leaf stone masonry walls: an experimental research. Mater Struct 45:1259–1276. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9832-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPCM 3274 (2003) Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. Ordinanza del Primo Ministro del 20/03/2003. (in Italian)

  • Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 13:855–878. doi:10.1006/mssp.1999.1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penna A, Galasco A, Magenes G (2007) Selezione dell’accelerogramma da utilizzare per la prova su tavola vibrante. Technical report, Università degli Studi di Pavia. Allegato 4.2-UR01-1. (in Italian)

  • Reynders E, Schevenels M, De Roeck G (2011) MACEC 3.2: a Matlab toolbox for experimental and operational modal analysis. User’s manual. University of Leuven, Leuven

  • RILEM TC 127-MS (1996) In-situ and non-destructive test proposed test method. MS.D.1 Measurement of mechanical pulse velocity for masonry. Mater Struct 29:463–466

  • RILEM TC 203-RHM (2012) Repair mortars for historic masonry. Mater Struct 45:1287–1294. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9847-9

  • Savoia M, Vincenzi L (2008) Differential evolution algorithm for dynamic structural identification. J Earthq Eng 12:800–821. doi:10.1080/13632460701574738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva B, Dalla Benetta M, da Porto F, Modena C (2014) Experimental assessment of in-plane behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 53:149–161. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toumbakari E-E (2002) Lime-pozzolan-cement grouts and their structural effects on composite masonry walls. Ph.D. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)

  • UNI EN 1015-11 (2007) Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Part 11: determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • UNI EN 12372 (2007) Natural stone test methods. Determination of flexural strength under concentrated load. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • UNI EN 12390-3 (2003) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • UNI EN 14580 (2005) Natural stone test methods. Determination of static elastic modulus. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • UNI EN 1926 (2007) Natural stone test methods. Determination of compressive strength. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • UNI EN 1936 (2007) Natural stone test methods. Determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, Italy

  • Valluzzi MR (2000) Comportamento meccanico di murature consolidate con materiali e tecniche a base di calce. Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Trieste (Italy). Supervisor: Modena C. (in Italian)

  • Valluzzi MR, da Porto F, Modena C (2004) Behavior and modeling of strengthened three-leaf stone masonry walls. Mater Struct 37:184–192. doi:10.1007/BF02481618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overschee P, De Moor BLR (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation, applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vintzileou E (2011) Three-leaf masonry in compression, before and after grouting: a review of literature. Int J Archit Herit 5:513–538. doi:10.1080/15583058.2011.557137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vintzileou E, Miltiadou-Fezans A (2008) Mechanical properties of three-leaf stone masonry grouted with ternary or hydraulic lime-based grouts. Eng Struct 30:2265–2276. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tassullo SpA is acknowledged for supplying the material used in construction of the specimens. The staff of the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA) is thanked for assisting with its expertise and facilities during the shake-table testing. Students and staff of the University of Padova who participated in the various laboratory testing and data analysis efforts are acknowledged. Financial supports were provided by NIKER project (FP7-ENV-2009-1-244123), ProVaCI project (PON01_02324), and the Italy–Japan MAE Programme of Scientific and Technological Cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Giaretton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giaretton, M., Valluzzi, M.R., Mazzon, N. et al. Out-of-plane shake-table tests of strengthened multi-leaf stone masonry walls. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 4299–4317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0125-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0125-7

Keywords

Navigation