Skip to main content
Log in

Aggression Norms in the Classroom Social Network: Contexts of Aggressive Behavior and Social Preference in Middle Childhood

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

In a cross-sectional sample of African-American 2nd–4th grade students (N = 681), we examine the moderating effects of classroom overt and relational aggression norms on peers’ social acceptance of classmates who exhibit overt and relational aggression in urban schools. Extending theory and research on classroom norms, we integrate social network data to adjust aggression norms based on children’s direct and indirect connections in the classroom. Results of multilevel models indicate that network-based classroom aggression norms moderated relations between children’s aggressive behavior and their social preference. Specifically, children benefited socially when their form of aggressive behavior fit with what was normative in the classroom social context. The moderating effect of classroom aggression norms was stronger for the association between overt aggression and social preference than relational aggression and social preference. Relationally aggressive youth were socially preferred by peers regardless of the classroom norm, although this positive association was magnified in classrooms with higher levels of relational aggression. Future research focused on aggression norms within classroom social networks are discussed and implications for school prevention efforts are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning theory analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnow, S., Lucht, M., & Freyberger, H. J. (2005). Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control (p. 485). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, M., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 269–279. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, E., & Orue, I. (2011). The impact of violence exposure on aggressive behavior through social information processing in adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 38–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, E., Kim, H. Y., Neal, J. W., & Jackson, D. R. (2013). Classroom peer relationships and behavioral engagement in elementary school: The role of social network equity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 367–379. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9603-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, E., & Neal, J. W. (2012). A classmate at your side: Teacher practices, peer victimization, and network connections in urban schools. School Mental Health, 4(2), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five-year study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317–2327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social–psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRosier, M. E., Cillessen, A. H., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). Group social context and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 65(4), 1068–1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behaviorof popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289–1299. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9251-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, A. L., & Nesdale, D. (2009). Peer groups, social identity, and children’s bullying behavior. Social Development, 18, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in inner-city early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518–528. doi:10.1080/01650250143000472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 992–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., & Xie, H. L. (2007). Aggression and school social dynamics: The good, the bad, and the ordinary. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 461–478. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1699–1710. doi:10.1037/a0025271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12(4), 349–360. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotpeter, J. K., & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67(5), 2328–2338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01860.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2006). Introduction to social network analysis. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.

  • Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01714.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013–1057. doi:10.1086/320298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(4), 176–217. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0037-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Van Acker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59–81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., Comfort, C., Schonert-Reichl, K., & McDougall, P. (1996). Academic failure and school dropout: The influence of peers. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 313–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Galván, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. Prinstein & K. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225–244). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klovdahl, A. S. (2005). Social network research and human subjects protection: Towards more effective infectious disease control. Social Networks, 27(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, K., Tremblay, R. E., Lacourse, E., Nagin, D. S., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 403–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). A multilevel study of predictors of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of classroom-level factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 96. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9(2), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppens, S., Grietens, H., Onghena, P., Michiels, D., & Subramanian, S. V. (2008). Individual and classroom variables associated with relational aggression in elementary-school aged children: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 639–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Distinct relation systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment? Child Development, 68, 1181–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, B. J., Boone, E. M., Sangster, N. A., & Mathieson, L. C. (2006). Sex differences in the personal costs and benefits of relational and physical aggression in high school. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 409–419. doi:10.1002/ab.20139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likeability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeux, L., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). It’s not just being popular, it’s knowing it, too: The role of self-perceptions of status in the associations between peer status and aggression. Social Development, 17(4), 871–888. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00474.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, S. D., Todd, N. R., Martinez, A., Coker, C., Sheu, C., Washburn, J., & Shah, S. (2013). Aggressive and prosocial behavior: Community violence, cognitive, and behavioral predictors among urban African American youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 407–421. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9560-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molinsky, A. (2007). Cross-cultural code-switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 622–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1987). Person-environment congruence in work, school, and health care settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Close, D., & Crick, N. R. (2006). Mutual antipathy involvement: Gender and associations with aggression and victimization. School Psychology Review, 35, 472–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J. W. (2008). Kracking the missing data problem: Applying Krackhardt’s cognitive social structures to school-based social network research. Sociology of Education, 81(2), 140–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J. W. (2009). Network ties and mean lies: A relational approach to relational aggression. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 737–753. doi:10.1002/jcop.20328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Z. (2011). Differentiating centrality and power in the world city network. Urban Studies, 48, 2733–2748. doi:10.1177/0042098010388954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Z. P. (2014). A network perspective on the processes of empowered organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 407–418. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9623-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J. W., Cappella, E., Wagner, C., & Atkins, M. S. (2011). Seeing eye to eye: Predicting teacher-student agreement on classroom social networks. Social development, 20(2), 376–393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00582.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J. W., & Christens, B. D. (2014). Linking the levels: Network and relational perspectives for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 314–323. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9654-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171–1190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., Roseth, C. J., Mliner, S., Bohn, C. M., Ryzin, M. Z., Vance, N., et al. (2007). Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(1), 54–64. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipsen, L. C., Bridges, S. K., McLemore, T. G., & Saponaro, L. A. (1999). Perceptions of social behavior and peer acceptance in kindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14(1), 68–77. doi:10.1080/02568549909594753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, C. J., & Bierman, K. L. (2013). The multifaceted impact of peer relations on aggressive-disruptive behavior in early elementary school. Developmental psychology, 49(6), 1174–1186. doi:10.1037/a0028400.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. (2008). Mobilizing and weakening peer influence as mechanisms for changing behavior: Implications for alcohol intervention programs. In M. Prinstein & K. Dodge (Eds.), Peer influence processes among youth (pp. 161–180). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodkin, P. C., & Gest, S. D. (2011). Teaching practices, classroom peer ecologies, and bullying behaviors among schoolchildren. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American schools (pp. 75–90). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17–24. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (2012). An emerging action science of social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10464-011-9469-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 1009–1019. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L., Rose, A. J., & Schwartz-Mette, R. A. (2009). Relational and overt aggression in childhood and adolescence: Clarifying mean-level gender differences and associations with peer acceptance. Social Development, 19(2), 243–269.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70(1), 169–182. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00013.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., & Napolitano, S. A. (2009). Bullying prevention and intervention: Realistic strategies for schools. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., & Ostrov, J. M. (2010). Measuring relational aggression in middle childhood in a multi-informant multi-method study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(4), 490–500. doi:10.1007/s10862-010-9184-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. E., Bierman, K. L., & Powers, C. J. (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive–disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82(3), 751–757.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. E., Bierman, K. L., & The Conduct Problems Group. (2006). The impact of classroom aggression on the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Development and Psychopathology, 18(2), 471. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060251.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torrente, C. E., Cappella, E., & Neal, J. W. (2014). Children’s positive school behaviors and social preference in urban classrooms. Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217–228. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9101-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. L., & Hembree, S. E. (1994). Peer social status and friendship: Independent contributors to children’s social and academic adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 4(4), 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2004). Maladaptive peer relationships and the development of relational and physical aggression during middle childhood. Social Development, 13, 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual–group similarity and the social ‘misfit’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. L., Boye, A. E., & Nelson, D. A. (2006). Relational aggression: Understanding, identifying, and responding in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hunter, T. A., & Pronk, R. (2007). A model of behaviors, peer relations and depression: Perceived social acceptance as a mediator and the divergence of perceptions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

These data were collected during an NIMH-funded intervention study (PI: Atkins, R01 MH073749). Additional financial support was provided in a training fellowship to the first author by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305B080019 to New York University (NYU). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the funding organizations. The study was reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Boards at New York University (#6378), Michigan State University (#09-959), and University of Illinois at Chicago (#2005-0133). We appreciate the efforts of the research team and the participation of the students, families, teachers, and schools.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise Cappella.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr. David B. Henry, a friend and colleague, whose impressive body of work has informed and inspired contextually-based research on classroom aggression norms, social networks, and urban schools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, D.R., Cappella, E. & Neal, J.W. Aggression Norms in the Classroom Social Network: Contexts of Aggressive Behavior and Social Preference in Middle Childhood. Am J Community Psychol 56, 293–306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9757-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9757-4

Keywords

Navigation