Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic assessment of a natural gas upgrading process using pressure vacuum swing adsorption for nitrogen removal

  • Published:
Adsorption Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventional process employed for the removal of N2 in a natural gas upgrading facility is cryogenic distillation (CD) and entails a significant investment outlay. Operation of the CD unit occurs at approximately 40 bar and − 120 °C, provided by a suitable refrigeration system. At such a low temperature, significant pre-treatment of the feed gas is required to prevent hydrate formation, solidification of CO2 and heat exchanger corrosion damage from mercury. In the current study, the conventional nitrogen removal unit (NRU) using CD is compared to the use of an optimized 9-step pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) detailed process model employing a Takeda carbon molecular sieve as the adsorbent. The PVSA unit preferentially adsorbs N2 based upon kinetic selectivity of the carbon molecular sieve. Nitrogen rejection by PVSA allows a higher tolerance to the contaminant levels over CD. The impact of this advantage on the overall performance of the entire natural gas upgrading process is evaluated by analysing, in HYSYS, the unit operations upstream and downstream of the CD unit. By employing dimethylethanolamine solvent for acid gas scrubbing and relocating the C2+ fractionation unit upstream of the NRU, the natural gas upgrading process is shown to be more profitable for the production of pipeline gas from raw natural gas at flow rates of up to 40 MMscfd (versus the currently accepted breakeven at 15 MMscfd) using PVSA instead of CD for the NRU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Don MacElroy, J.M.: Closing the carbon cycle through rational use of carbon-based fuels. Ambio 45, 5–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0728-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Duc Long, N., Lee, M.: Improvement of natural gas liquid recovery energy efficiency through thermally coupled distillation arrangements. Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 7, S71–S77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smil, V.: Natural Gas: Fuel for the 21st Century. Wiley, New Jersey (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. BP: An Annual Review of the World’s Energy Consumption Pattern; BP Statistical Review of World Energy. (2015)

  5. Mokhatab, S., William, A.: Poe: Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foss, M.M., Ph, D., Land, S.: Interstate Natural Gas — Quality Specifications & Interchangeability. (2004)

  7. Kent, J.A. (ed.): Riegel’s Handbook of Industrial Chemistry. Springer, US, Boston, MA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tobin, J., Shambaugh, P., Mastrangelo, E. (2006) Natural Gas Processing The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market. Washington, DC

  9. Kuo, J.C., Wang, K.H., Chen, C.: Pros and cons of different Nitrogen Removal Unit (NRU) technology. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 7, 52–59 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2012.02.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sant Anna, H.R., Barreto, A.G., Tavares, F.W., do Nascimento, J.F. : Methane/nitrogen separation through pressure swing adsorption process from nitrogen-rich streams. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 103, 70–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Netusil, M., Ditl, P.: Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 20, 471–476 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60218-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coade, R., Coldham, D.: The interaction of mercury and aluminium in heat exchangers in a natural gas plants. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 83, 336–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.02.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckersley, N.: Advanced mercury removal technologies: New technologies can cost-effectively treat “wet” and “dry” natural gas while protecting cryogenic equipment. Hydrocarb. Process. 89, 29–35 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gas Processors Association: Engineering data book : SI version. Vol. 2 ; Gas Processors Association. Tulsa, Okla. Gas Processors Suppliers Association (2004)

  15. Gassner, M., Baciocchi, R., Maréchal, F., Mazzotti, M.: Integrated design of a gas separation system for the upgrade of crude SNG with membranes. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 48, 1391–1404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2009.07.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guild Associates Inc: Nitrogen Rejection and CO2 Removal Made Easy, http://www.moleculargate.com/

  17. Mitariten, M.: Nitrogen removal from natural gas with the molecular gateTM adsorption process. GPA Annu. Conv. Proc. 1, 544–555 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maqsood, K.: Synthesis of Energy Efficient Cryogenic Distillation Networks for Maximum Methane Recovery from Natural Gas with Carbon Dioxide and Heavy Hydrocarbons. J. Appl. Sci. 15, 492–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2015.492.499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Effendy, S., Xu, C., Farooq, S.: Optimization of a pressure swing adsorption process for nitrogen rejection from natural gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 5417–5431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turton, R., Bailie, R.C., Whiting, W.B., Shaelwitz, J.A.: Analysis. Prentice Hall, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes Third Edition (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. AspenTech: Aspen HYSYS, https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-hysys

  22. Hewitt, G.F., Pugh, S.J.: Approximate Design and Costing Methods for Heat Exchangers. Heat Transf. Eng. 28, 76–86 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630601023229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luyben, W.L.: Estimating refrigeration costs at cryogenic temperatures. Comput. Chem. Eng. 103, 144–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.03.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lagorsse, S., Campo, M.C., Magalhães, F.D., Mendes, A.: Water adsorption on carbon molecular sieve membranes: Experimental data and isotherm model. Carbon N. Y. 43, 2769–2779 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.05.042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laroche, C.R., Padilla, G., Dowdle, J.R.: Hybrid solvent formulations for selective h2s removal, (2014)

  26. Willmott, L.F., Batchelder, H.R., Wenzell, L.P., Hirst, L.L.: Performance of a Girbotol Purification Plant at Louisiana. Mo. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Siriwardane, R.V., Shen, M.-S., Fisher, E.P., Poston, J.A.: Adsorption of CO2 on Molecular Sieves and Activated Carbon. Energy Fuels 15, 279–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef000241s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vargas, D.P., Balsamo, M., Giraldo, L., Erto, A., Lancia, A., Moreno-Piraján, J.C.: Equilibrium and Dynamic CO2 Adsorption on Activated Carbon Honeycomb Monoliths. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 7898–7905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The financial support from the National University of Singapore for CENGas (R-261-508-001-646; R-261-508-001-733) is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Author notes

  1. S. Effendy

    Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 25 Ames St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117585, Singapore

    S. Effendy & S. Farooq

  2. Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences, A-Star, 1 Pesek Road, Jurong Island, Singapore, 627833, Singapore

    M. J. Purdue

Authors
  1. S. Effendy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Purdue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Farooq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Farooq.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (docx 207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Effendy, S., Purdue, M.J. & Farooq, S. Economic assessment of a natural gas upgrading process using pressure vacuum swing adsorption for nitrogen removal. Adsorption 27, 591–602 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-021-00302-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-021-00302-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation