Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Healthcare professionals and medical cannabis: a scoping review informed by the theoretical domains framework

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This scoping review aims to examine what determinants of behaviours, beyond knowledge, are used as per the theoretical domains framework (TDF) in relation to the research design and findings in the selected studies related to healthcare professionals and medical cannabis (MC).

Subject and methods

The use of MC has been legalized in various countries and states over the last 10 years. This rapid change of a stigmatised ‘drug’ to a modern ‘medicine’ and contradictory laws have undermined the consistent implementation of MC in healthcare. Data synthesis of the evidence base in the selected studies used the TDF to examine the enablers and barriers influencing implementation of medical cannabis. The TDF was developed to support the implementation of change with healthcare professionals (Cane et al. Implement Sci 7:37, 2012). The TDF is comprised of 14 theoretical domains taken from 33 psychological change theories and 128 constructs.

Results

Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews, 34 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The domains most frequently identified as influencing behaviours were ‘knowledge’ and ‘beliefs about consequences’. Through a focus on knowledge in the studies, findings showed that improving education is required. However, multiple factors influencing behaviours of professional healthcare groups must also be considered to support consistent implementation of MC.

Conclusion

Examining broader determinants of behaviour, beyond knowledge is required, such as environmental influences and the norms of healthcare professionals for consistent MC implementation. Use of the TDF to ensure multiple domains are included in future research and educative programs would support this aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

No funding was received for conducting this study.

No funds, grants, or other support were received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Rebekah O’Rourke, Maria Luisa Lima, and Jolanda Jetten. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Rebekah O’Rourke, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebekah O’Rourke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 82 kb)

ESM 2

(DOC 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Rourke, R., Lima, M.L. & Jetten, J. Healthcare professionals and medical cannabis: a scoping review informed by the theoretical domains framework. J Public Health (Berl.) 30, 1901–1913 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01624-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01624-9

Keywords

Navigation