Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative analysis of risk from fragmental rockfalls

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rockfalls are ubiquitous diffuse hazard in mountain regions, cliffs, and cutslopes, with the potential of causing victims and severely damaging buildings and infrastructures. A vast majority of detached rock masses break up when impacting the ground, generating multiple trajectories of rock fragments. In this paper, we present the quantitative risk analysis (QRA) of fragmental rockfalls. Fragmentation in rockfalls requires the redefinition of the probability of reach and the evaluation of the effect of multiple rock blocks trajectories on the exposure. An example of QRA was carried out at the Monasterio de Piedra, Spain, using RockGIS, a rockfall propagation model that takes fragmentation into account (Matas et al. Landslides 14:1565–1578, 2017). The results show that fragmentation has a significant but contrasting effect in the calculation of risk. The risk is reduced if the slope where blocks propagate is sufficiently long and gentle. The reason for this is that, compared to the unfragmented rock masses, the new fragments generated travel shorter distances with lesser kinetic energy. The effect disappears in case of large rockfalls. Conversely, the risk increases if the rock fragments propagate over steep slopes. The reason is that few blocks stop along the way while the generation of a cone of fragments increases the exposure. Our simulations also show that assuming a continuous flow of visitors or segregating the flow in groups of different number of people has only a minor influence on the results. Finally, we observed that the capability of the protection barriers to stop rockfalls of up to a few tens of cubic meters increases with fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agliardi F, Crosta GB (2003) High resolution three-dimensional numerical modelling of rockfalls. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agliardi F, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2009) Integrating rockfall risk assessment and countermeasure design by 3D modelling techniques. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1059–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenas C, Vázquez-Urbez M, Auqué L, Sancho C, Osácar C, Pardo G (2014) Intrinsic and extrinsic controls of spatial and temporal variations in modern fluvial tufa sedimentation: a thirteen-year record from a semi-arid environment. Sedimentology 61:90–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteriou P, Saroglou H, Tsiambaos (2012) Geotechnical and kinematic parameters affecting the coefficients of restitution for rock fall analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 54:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourrier F, Hungr O (2011) Rockfall dynamics: a critical review of collision and rebound models. In: Lambert S, Nicot F (eds) Rockfall engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 175–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourrier F, Dorren L, Nicot F, Berger F, Darve F (2009) Toward objective rockfall trajectory simulation using a stochastic impact model. Geomorphology 110:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourrier F, Berger F, Tardif P, Dorren L, Hungr O (2012) Rockfall rebound: comparison of detailed field experiments and alternative modelling approaches. Earth Surf Process Landf 37:656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce CM, Cruden DM, Morgenstern NR (1997) Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway. Can Geotech J 34:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Wong RCH, Liu J, Lee CF (2003) Rockfall hazard analysis for Hong Kong based on rockfall inventory. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36:383–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith JT (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Corona C, Lopez-Saez J, Favillier A, Mainieri R, Eckert N, Trappmann D, Stoffel M, Bourrier F, Berger F (2017) Modeling rockfall frequency and bounce height from three-dimensional simulation process models and growth disturbances in submontane broadleaved trees. Geomorphology 281:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2004) Parametric evaluation of 3D dispersion of rockfall trajectories. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TR, McSaveney MJ (2002) Dynamic simulation of the motion of fragmenting rock avalanches. Can Geotech J 39:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorren LKA (2012) Rockyfor3D (v5.1) revealed—transparent description of the complete 3D rockfall model. http://www.ecorisq.org/

  • Dorren LKA, Berger F, Putters US (2006) Real-size experiments and 3-D simulation of rockfall on forested and non-forested slopes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorren L, Domaas U, Kronholm K, Labiouse V (2011) Methods for predicting rockfall trajectories and run-out zones. In: Lambert S, Nicot F (eds) Rockfall Engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 143–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JD, Badger TC (2012) Flexible rockfall fences. In: Turner, Schuster (eds) Rockfall characterization and control. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., pp 526–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans S, Hungr O (1993) The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes. Can Geotech J 30:620–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard CH, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ, on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlisi S, Cascini L, Corominas J, Matano F (2012) Rockfall risk assessment to persons travelling in vehicles along a road: the case study of the Amalfi coastal road (southern Italy). Nat Hazards 62:691–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frattini P, Crosta GB, Agliardi F, Imposimato S (2013) Challenging calibration in 3D rockfall modelling. In: Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (eds) Landslide science and practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 169–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giani GP, Giacomini A, Migliazza M, Segalini A (2004) Experimental and theoretical studies to improve rock fall analysis and protection work design. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37:369–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gischig V, Hungr O, Mitchell A, Bourrier F (2015) Pierre3D - a 3D stochastic rock fall simulator based on random ground roughness and hyperbolic restitution factors. Can Geotech J 52:1360–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez Elorza M, Sesé Martínez VH (2001) Multiple talus flatirons, variations of scarp retreat rates and the evolution of slopes in Almazán Basin (semi-arid central Spain). Geomorphology 38:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Crosta GB, Detti R, Agliardi F (2002) STONE: a computer program for the three-dimensional simulation of rock-falls. Comput Geosci 28:1079–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ghigi S (2004) Rockfall hazard and risk assessment along a transportation corridor in the Nera Valley, central Italy. Environ Manag 34:191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantz D (2011) Quantitative assessment of diffuse rock fall hazard along a cliff foot. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Bray JW (1988) Rock slope Engineering. (3rd edition) Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 357 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Columbia. Can Geotech J 36:224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaboyedoff M, Baillifard F, Philippossian F, Rouiller JD (2004) Assessing fracture occurrence using weighted fracturing density a step towards estimating rock instability hazard. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaboyedoff M, Labiouse V (2011) Technical note: preliminary estimation of rockfall runout zones. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert S, Bourrier F, Toe D (2013) Improving three-dimensional rockfall trajectory simulation codes for assessing the efficiency of protective embankments. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Martin CD, Zhou CH, Lim CH (2010) Rockfall hazard analysis using LiDAR and spatial modeling. Geomorphology 118:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loye A, Jaboyedoff M, Pedrazzini A (2009) Identification of potential rockfall source areas at a regional scale using a DEM-based geomorphometric analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1643–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macciotta R, Martin CD, Cruden DM (2015) Probabilistic estimation of rockfall height and kinetic energy based on a three-dimensional trajectory model and Monte Carlo simulation. Landslides 15:757–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macciotta R, Martin CD, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2016) Quantitative risk assessment of slope hazards along a section of railway in the Canadian cordillera – a methodology considering the uncertainty in the results. Landslides 13:15–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Matas G, Lantada N, Corominas J, Gili JA, Ruiz-Carulla R, Prades A (2017) RockGIS: a GIS-based model for the analysis of fragmentation in rockfalls. Landslides 14:1565–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michoud C, Derron MH, Horton P, Jaboyedoff M, Baillifard FJ, Loye A, Nicolet P, Pedrazzini A, Queyrel A (2012) Rockfall hazard and risk assessments along roads at a regional scale: example in Swiss Alps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:615–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolet P, Jaboyedoff M, Cloutier C, Crosta G, Lévy S (2016) Brief communication: on direct impact probability of landslides on vehicles. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osácar MC, Arenas C, Vázquez-Urbez M, Sancho C, Auqué LF, Pardo G (2013) Environmental factors controlling the δ13C and δ18O variatins of recent fluvial tufas: a 12-year record from the Monasterio de Piedra Natural Park (NE Iberian Peninsula). J Sediment Res 83:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preh A, Mitchell A, Hungr O, Kolenprat B (2015) Stochastic analysis of rockfall dynamics in quarry slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberds W (2005) Estimating temporal and spatial variability and vulnerability. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (eds) Landslide Risk Management. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 129–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Carulla R, Corominas J, Mavrouli O (2015) A methodology to obtain the block size distribution of fragmental rockfall deposits. Landslides 12:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Carulla R, Corominas J, Mavrouli O (2017) A fractal fragmentation model for rockfalls. Landslides 14:875–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancho C, Gutiérrez M, Peña JL, Burillo F (1988) A quantitative approach to scarp retreat starting from triangular slope facets, central Ebro Basin, Spain. Catena Suppl 13:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadari M, Giacomini A, Buzzi O, Hambleton JP (2012) Prediction of the bullet effect for rockfall barriers: a scaling approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffel M, Wehrli A, Kühne R, Dorren LKA, Perret S, Kienholz H (2006) Assessing the protective effect of mountain forests against rockfall using a 3D simulation model. For Ecol Manag 225:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D, Schubert M (2008) Modeling and managing uncertainties in rock-fall hazards. Georisk 2:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK, Jayaprakash GP (2012) Introduction. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Rockfall characterization and control. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein A, Schellenberg K, Labiouse V, Agliardi F, Berger F, Bourrier F, Dorren LKA, Gerber W, Jaboyedoff M (2011) Rockfall characterisation and structural protection—a review. Nat Hazards Earth Syst 11:2617–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie DC (2014) Calibration of rock fall modeling parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 67:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all the facilities provided by Monasterio de Piedra S.A. to carry out this work. We would like to thank the helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This work has been carried out with the support of the fellowship to the last two authors and within the framework of the research project Rockmodels financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development’s funds (FEDER), (BIA2016- 75668-P, AEI/FEDER, UE) and by the grants to the second and third authors (BES-2014-069795 and FPU13/04252, respectively).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Corominas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corominas, J., Matas, G. & Ruiz-Carulla, R. Quantitative analysis of risk from fragmental rockfalls. Landslides 16, 5–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1087-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1087-9

Keywords

Navigation