Abstract
GLONASS has been transmitting the code division multiple access navigation signals on the third band L3 for six GLONASS-M + and three GLONASS-K satellites, in addition to the legacy frequency division multiple access signals on L1 and L2. However, the significant inconsistency between the phase bias of different ionospheric-free (IF) combinations for GLONASS-M + satellites, known as the phase inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB), hinders the utilization of GLONASS triple-frequency positioning. We discuss the coupling relationship between GLONASS IFCB and the phase center offset (PCO) and propose a new IFCB estimation model considering the PCO differences between L3 and L2. GLONASS triple-frequency observations from 151 globally distributed IGS stations are employed to validate the proposed IFCB estimation model. The results show that the mean root mean square (RMS) value of IFCB estimates decreases from 0.097 m to 0.028 m when considering PCO differences, suggesting the GLONASS IFCB is ignorable. Meanwhile, the L3 PCO estimates for GLONASS-M + satellites exhibit high stability and consistency, with standard deviations of 52, 113, and 13 mm, in x-, y-, and z-components, respectively. By correcting the estimated L3 PCO instead of the legacy IFCB, the GLONASS-only triple-frequency precise point positioning PPP achieves positioning accuracies of 1.8, 0.9, and 1.5 cm in east, north, and up components, with the improvement of 13%, 3%, and 33%, respectively. Moreover, the RMS value of L3 phase residuals reduces from 10.2 to 5.0 mm. Therefore, we recommend correcting the PCO on L3 for GLONASS-M + satellites and disregarding the IFCB for GLONASS triple-frequency positioning, which can significantly simplify the observation model and achieve higher accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data in this article are publicly accessible. The GNSS data and products can be obtained at https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive.
References
Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025546
Geng J, Bock Y (2013) Triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning with rapid ambiguity resolution. J Geod 87(5):449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0619-2
Guo F, Zhang X, Wang J, Ren X (2016) Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning. J Geod 90(11):1–13
Li H, Zhou X, Wu B, Wang J (2012) Estimation of the inter-frequency clock bias for the satellites of PRN25 and PRN01. Sci China Phys, Mech Astron 55(11):2186–2193
Li H, Zhou X, Wu B (2013) Fast estimation and analysis of the inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites. GPS Solut 17(3):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0283-7
Li P, Zhang X, Ge M, Schuh H (2018) Three-frequency BDS precise point positioning ambiguity resolution based on raw observables. J Geod 92:1357–1369
Li X, Li X, Liu G, Feng G, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Ren X (2019) Triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with multi-constellation GNSS: BDS and Galileo. J Geod 93:1105–1122
Li X, Liu G, Li X, Zhou F, Feng G, Yuan Y, Zhang K (2020) Galileo PPP rapid ambiguity resolution with five-frequency observations. GPS Solut 24:1–13
Li X, Han X, Li X, Liu G, Feng G, Wang B, Zheng H (2021) GREAT-UPD: an open-source software for uncalibrated phase delay estimation based on multi-GNSS and multi-frequency observations. GPS Solut 25(2):1–9
Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L, Deng Z, Zhao Q, Perosanz F, Romero I, Noll C, Schmid R, Rothacher M, Thaller D, Steigenberger P (2005) Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas: impact on global GPS solutions and estimation of azimuthal phase center variations of the satellite antenna. GPS Solut 9:283–293
Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Langley RB (2010) Three’s the challenge: a close look at GPS SVN62 triple frequency signal combinations finds carrier-phase variations on the new L5. GPS World 21(8):819
Pan L, Zhang X, Li X, Liu J, Li X (2017) Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 21(2):811–822
Pan L, Zhang X, Guo F, Liu J (2019) GPS inter-frequency clock bias estimation for both uncombined and ionospheric-free combined triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod 93:473–487
Saastamoinen J (1973) Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Bull Géod 107(1):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522083
Stürze A, Weber G (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS) – achievements. Prosp Chall, Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697
Urlichich Y, Subbotin V, Stupak G, Dvorkin V, Povalyaev A, Karutin S (2011) GLONASS Modernization.in: Proceedings of the 24th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS 2011), Portland, OR, 2011, pp. 3125–3128
Zaminpardaz S, Teunissen PJG, Nadarajah N (2017) GLONASS CDMA L3 ambiguity resolution and positioning. GPS Solut 21(2):535–549
Zaminpardaz S, Teunissen PJG, Khodabandeh A (2021) GLONASS– only FDMA+CDMA RTK: performance and outlook. GPS Solut 25(3):1–12
Zeng T, Sui L, Ruan R, Jia X, Tian Y, Zhang B (2021) Estimation of GPS satellite antenna phase center offsets of the third frequency using raw observation model. Adv Space Res 68(8):3268–3278
Zhang F, Chai H, Li L, Wang M, Feng X, Du Z (2022) Understanding the characteristic of GLONASS inter-frequency clock bias using both FDMA and CDMA signals. GPS Solut 26(2):1–7
Zhang F, Chai H, Wang M, Bai T, Li L, Guo W, Du Z (2023) Considering inter-frequency clock bias for GLONASS FDMA + CDMA precise point positioning. GPS Solut 27(1):10
Acknowledgements
This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41974027, No. 42204017), the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020CFA002), the special fund of Hubei Luojia Laboratory (220100006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042022kf1001), and the Sino-German mobility program (Grant No. M-0054). The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JW and XL provided the initial idea and designed the experiments for this study; JW, XL, YY, and XL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; XL, HZ, and WZ helped with the writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J., Li, X., Yuan, Y. et al. Estimation of GLONASS inter-frequency clock bias considering the phase center offset differences on the L3 signal. GPS Solut 27, 130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01468-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01468-8