Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 January 2016

Abstract

Hemorrhoids are one of the most common medical and surgical diseases and the main reason for a visit to a coloproctologist. This consensus statement was drawn up by the Italian society of colorectal surgery in order to provide practice parameters for an accurate assessment of the disease and consequent appropriate treatment. The authors made a careful search in the main databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane), and all results were classified on the basis of the grade of recommendation (A–C) of the American College of Chest Physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gralnek IM, Ron-Tal Fisher O, Holub JL, Eisen GM (2013) The role of colonoscopy in evaluating hematochezia: a population-based study in a large consortium of endoscopy practices. Gastrointest Endosc 77:410–418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikpour S, Ali Asgari A (2008) Colonoscopic evaluation of minimal rectal bleeding in average-risk patients for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 14:6536–6540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong RF, Khosla R, Moore JH, Kuwada SK (2004) Consider colonoscopy for young patients with hematochezia. J Fam Pract 53:879–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehanna D, Platell C (2001) Investigating chronic, bright red, rectal bleeding. ANZ J Surg 71:720–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gayer C, Chino A, Lucas C et al (2009) Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 1.112 patients admitted to an urban emergency medical center. Surgery 146:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Newman J, Fitzgerald JE, Gupta S, von Roon AC, Sigurdsson HH, Allen-Mersh TG (2012) Outcome predictors in acute surgical admissions for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Colorectal Dis 14:1020–1026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol 5. Baillière Tindall, London, pp 98–149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lunniss PJ, Mann CV (2004) Classification of internal haemorrhoids: a discussion paper. Colorectal Dis 6:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaj F, Trecca A (2007) New “PATE 2006” system for classifying hemorrhoidal disease: advantages resulting from revision of “PATE 2000 Sorrento”. Chir Ital 59:521–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chauhan A, Thomas S, Bishnoi PK, Hadke NS (2007) Randomized controlled trial to assess the role of raised anal pressures in the pathogenesis of symptomatic early hemorrhoids. Dig Surg 24:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun WM, Read NW, Shorthouse AJ (1990) Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal canal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 77:458–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poen Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta Meuwissen (1999) Anal endosonography in haemorrhoidal disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications? Colorectal Dis 1:146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt G, Heels-Andsell D et al (2006) Fiber for the treatment of hamorrhoidal complications: a systematic review and metanalysis. Am J Gastroenterol 101:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perera N, Liolitsa D, Iype S et al (2012) Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15:CD004322

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gan T, Liu YD, Wang Y, Yang J (2010) Traditional Chinese medicine herbs for stopping bleeding from haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD006791

    Google Scholar 

  16. Awad AE (2012) A prospective randomized comparative study of endoscopic band ligation versus injection sclerotherapy of bleeding internal haemorrhoids in patients with liver cirrhosis. Arab J Gastroenterol 13:77–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forlini A, Manzelli A, Quaresima S, Forlini M (2009) Long-term results after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1007–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanellos I, Goulimaris I, Christoforidis E, Kelpis T, Betsis D (2003) A comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rbl applied separately for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 5:133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukuda A, KIajiyama T, Arakawa H et al (2004) Retroflexed endoscopic multiple band ligation of symptomatic internal haemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 59:380–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernal JC, Enquis M, Lopez Garcia J, Garcia Romero J, Trullenque Peris R (2005) Rubber-band ligation for haemorrhoids in a colorectal unit: a prospective study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 97:38–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S (2009) Randomized controlled study between suture ligation and radio wave ablation and suture ligation of grade III symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:223–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Iyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2004) Long-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal haemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1364–1370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Feinstein J, Stergiuou N (2004) Hemorrhoidal elastic band ligation with flexible videoendoscopes: a prospective randomized comparison with the conventional technique that uses rigid proctoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 60:191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beattie GC, Rao MM, Campbell WJ (2006) Secondary haemorrhage after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids in patients taking clopidogrel. A cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 8:56–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chau NG, Bathia S, Raman M (2007) Pylephlebitis and pyogenic liver abscesses: a complication of haemorrhoidal banding. Can J Gastroenterol 21:601–603

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tejirian T, Abbas MA (2006) Bacterial endocarditis following rubber band ligation in a patient with ventricular septal defect: report of a case and guide line analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1931–1933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sim HL, Tan KY, Poon PL, Cheng A, Mak K (2009) Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 13:161–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yano T, Asano M, Tanaka S, Oda N, Matsuda Y (2014) Prospective study comparing the new sclerotherapy and hemorrhoidectoy in terms of therapeutic outcomes at 4 years after treatment. Surg Today 44:449–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyamoto H, Asanoma M, Mijamoto H, Shimada M (2012) ALTA injection sclerosing therapy. Non excisional treatment of internal haemorrhoids. Hapatogastroenterology 59:77–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tokunaga Y, Sasaky H (2013) Impact of less invasive treatments including sclerotherapy with a new agent and hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing internal haemorrhoids. Int Surg 98:210–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Moser KH, Mosch C, Walgenbach M et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam in comparison with fluid sclerosant in the treatment of first grade haemorrhoidal disease. A randomized, controlled, single blind multicentre trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1439–1447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Takano M, Iwadare J, Ohba H et al (2006) Sclerosing therapy of internal haemorrhoids with a novel sclerosing agent. Comparison with ligation and excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:44–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yano T, Nagaki T, Asano M, Tanaka S, Kawakami K, Matsuda J (2013) Outcome of case-matched injection scleroteraphy with a new agent for haemorrhoids in patients treated with or without blood thinners. Surg Today 43:854–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bullock N (1997) Impotence after sclerotherapy of hemorrhoids: case reports. BMJ 314:419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Schulte T, Fandrich F, Kahlke V (2008) Life-threatening rectal necrosis after injection sclerotherapy for haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:725–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang P, Wang YJ, Li F, Sun JB (2011) Hemorrhoid sclerotherapy with the complication of abdominal compartment syndrome: report of a case. Chin Med 124:1919–1920

    Google Scholar 

  37. Linares Santiago E, Gòmez Parra M, Mendoza Olivares FJ, Pellicer Bautista FJ, Herrerías Gutiérrez JM (2001) Effectiveness of haemorrhoidal treatment by rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation. Rev Esp Enfer Dig 93:238–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Marques CF, Nahas SC, Nahas CS, Sobrado CW Jr, Habr-Gama A, Kiss DR (2006) Early results of the treatment of internal hemorrhoid disease by infrared coagulation and elastic banding: a prospective randomized cross-over trial. Tech Coloproctol 10:312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Devillé W, Meuwissen SG (2000) A Randomized controlled trial of rubber band ligation versus infrared coagulation in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:535–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E et al (2015) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 17:910–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta PJ, Kalaskar S, Taori S, Heda PS (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM (2012) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 255:840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall MR, Baig MK (2012) A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Festen S, van Hoogstraten MJ, van Geloven AA, Gerhards MF (2009) Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1401–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: 3-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, THD group of the SICCR (Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery) (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 14:205–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tsang YP, Fok KL, Cheung YS, Li KW, Tang CN (2014) Comparison of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation and stapled haemorrhoidopexy in management of haemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study and literature review. Tech Coloproctol 18:1017–1022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C (2014) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57:348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Denoya PI, Fakhoury M, Chang K, Fakhoury J, Bergamaschi R (2013) Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 15:1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Sarago M et al (2007) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 16:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  57. Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 777–784

  58. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen HL, Woo XB, Cui J, Chen CQ, Peng JS (2014) Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ, Tong DN (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 19:4799–4807

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Naldini G (2011) Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 13:323–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S (2000) Closed versus open hemorrhoidectomy—is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum 43:31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. You SY, Kim SH, Chung CS, Lee DK (2005) Open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gençosmanoğlu R, Sad O, Koç D, Inceoğlu R (2002) Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:70–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fareed M, El-Awady S, Abd-El Monaem H, Aly H (2009) Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 13:243–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Tan EK, Cornish J, Darzi AW, Papagrigoriadis S, Tekkis PP (2007) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes of randomized controlled trials of LigaSure versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 142:1209–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I (2009) Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:CD006761

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wang JY, Lu CY, Tsai HL et al (2006) Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids. World J Surg 30:462–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sakr MF (2010) LigaSure versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 14:13–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Milito G, Cadeddu F, Muzi MG, Nigro C, Farinon AM (2010) Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 12:85–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Altomare DF, Roveran A, Pecorella G, Gaj F, Stortini E (2006) The treatment of hemorrhoids: guidelines of the Italian society of colo-rectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 10:181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, Whitehead WE (2014) ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1141–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL, Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2011) Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum 54:1059–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ng L, Monagle K, Monagle P, Newall F, Ignjatovic V (2015) Topical use of antithrombotics: review of literature. Thromb Res 135:575–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Gupta PJ (2002) Use of enzyme and heparin paste in acute haemorrhoids. Rom J Gastroenterol 11:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Čavčić J, Turčić J, Martinac P, Mestrović T, Mladina R, Pezerović-Panijan R (2001) Comparison of topically applied 0.2 % glyceryl trinitrate ointment incision and excision in the treatment of perianal thrombosis. Dig Liv Dis 33:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Jongen J, Bach S, Stübinger SH, Bock J-U (2003) Excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoid under local anesthesia. A retrospective evaluation of 340 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1226–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Di Pierro F, Spinelli G, Monsù G et al (2011) Clinical effectiveness of a highly standardized and bioavailable mixture of flavonoids and triterpenes in the management of acute hemorroidal crisis. Acta Biomed 82:35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Patti R, Arcara M, Bonventre S et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of botulinum toxin injection for pain relief in patients with thrombosed external haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 95:1339–1343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Perrotti P, Antropoli C, Molino D, De Stefano G, Antropoli M (2001) Conservative treatment of acute thrombosed external hemorrhoids with topical nifedipine. Dis Colon Rectum 44:405–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Zuber TJ (2002) Hemorrhoidectomy for thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Am Fam Physician 65:1629–1639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Allan A, Samad AJ, Mellon A, Marshall T (2006) Prospective randomised study of urgent haemorrhoidectomy compared with non-operative treatment in the management of prolapsed thrombosed internal haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 8:41–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Lai H-J, Jao S-W, Su C-C, Lee M-C, Kang J-C (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy for acute hemorrhoidal crisis. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1654–1661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wong JCH, Chung CC, Yau KK et al (2008) Stapled technique for acute thrombosed hemorrhoids: a randomized, controlled trial with long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:397–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Saleeby RG, Rosen L, Stasik SJ et al (1991) Haemorrhoidectomy during pregnancy: risk or relief. Dis Colon Rectum 34:260–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Quijano CE, Abalos E (2005) Conservative management of symptomatic and/or complicated haemorrhoids in pregnancy and the puerperium. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD004077

    Google Scholar 

  92. Abramowitz L, Benabderrhamane D, Philip J, Pospait D, Bonin N, Merrouche M (2011) Pathologie hémorroïdaire de la parturiente. Presse Med 40:955–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy

    M. Trompetto & G. Clerico

  2. Unit of Emergency and General Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    G. F. Cocorullo

  3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Barts Health, London, UK

    P. Giordano

  4. Department of General Surgery, “A. Perrino” Hospital, Brindisi, Italy

    F. Marino

  5. General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    J. Martellucci

  6. Department of General Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy

    G. Milito

  7. Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    M. Mistrangelo

  8. Proctology Unit, University Hospital “A Gemelli”, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    C. Ratto

Authors
  1. M. Trompetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Clerico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. F. Cocorullo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Giordano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Marino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Martellucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G. Milito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Mistrangelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. C. Ratto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Trompetto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research comitee and with the 1964 Helsinky declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trompetto, M., Clerico, G., Cocorullo, G.F. et al. Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol 19, 567–575 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1371-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1371-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation