Abstract
Hydrogen is a clean and efficient energy carrier with a high energy density. Liquid hydrogen is expected to be the main form of hydrogen for large-scale storage and transportation, and its production consumes large amounts of electrical energy. A sustainable, efficient, and poly-generation hydrogen liquefaction system has been developed based on the closed Claude precooling and Joule–Brayton refrigeration cycle with mixed refrigerant, producing 367.2 tonnes of liquid hydrogen every day. In this system, a two-stage ammonia–water (NH3–H2O) absorption refrigeration system driven by waste heat precools the feed streams of compressors; a combined solar power tower generates electricity and heat, and thermal energy storage improves the system’s flexibility and balances the energy production and consumption. The process performance is evaluated based on energy, exergy, and sensitivity analyses. The minimum specific energy consumption, maximum coefficient of performance, and maximum exergy efficiency are 5.413 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1433, and 86.99%, respectively. The net power generation values during the day and at night are 1278.85 and 1353.78 MWh, respectively.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AR:
-
Absorption refrigeration
- COP:
-
Coefficient of performance
- GH2 :
-
Gaseous hydrogen
- HP:
-
High pressure
- HS:
-
Heat source
- HTF:
-
Heat transfer fluid
- IP:
-
Intermediate pressure
- J–B:
-
Joule–Brayton
- LH2 :
-
Liquid hydrogen
- LMTD:
-
Logarithmic mean temperature difference
- LNG:
-
Liquefied natural gas
- LP:
-
Low pressure
- MR:
-
Mixed refrigerant
- SEC:
-
Specific energy consumption
- SPT:
-
Solar power tower
- Temp.:
-
Temperature
- TES:
-
Thermal energy storage
- \({\dot{\text{E}}\text{x}}\) :
-
Exergy, kW
- h :
-
Specific enthalpy, kJ/kg
- \(\dot{I}\) :
-
Irreversible exergy, kW
- \(\dot{m}\) :
-
Mass flow rate, kg/s
- P :
-
Pressure, kPa
- \(\dot{Q}\) :
-
Heat duty, kW
- r :
-
Latent heat, kJ/kg
- s :
-
Specific entropy, kJ/(kg·°C)
- T :
-
Temperature, °C
- UA :
-
The unit’s overall conductance, kW/°C
- \(\dot{W}\) :
-
Electrical energy, kW
- W :
-
Work across the system boundary, kW
- ψ :
-
Concentration of para-hydrogen
- μ :
-
Exergy efficiency
- η :
-
Steam turbine’s generation efficiency
- C :
-
Cold stream
- H :
-
Hot stream
- ch :
-
Chemical
- com :
-
Compressor
- des :
-
Destruction
- eq :
-
Equilibrium
- Exp :
-
Expander
- he :
-
Heat exchanger
- HLP :
-
Hydrogen liquefaction process
- i :
-
Component
- in :
-
Inlet
- out :
-
Outlet
- p :
-
Pump
- ph :
-
Physical
- R :
-
Reaction
- Turb :
-
Turbine
- x :
-
Mole fraction
- 0 :
-
Standard state
References
Aasadnia M, Mehrpooya M (2018a) Conceptual design and analysis of a novel process for hydrogen liquefaction assisted by absorption precooling system. J Clean Prod 205:565–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.001
Aasadnia M, Mehrpooya M (2018b) Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: a review. Appl Energy 212:57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.033
Acar C, Dincer I (2014) Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060
Allevi C, Collodi G (2017) Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technologies. Elsevier, pp 419–443
Al-Malah K (2016) Aspen plus: chemical engineering applications. Wiley, New Jersey
Ansarinasab H, Mehrpooya M, Mohammadi A (2017) Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a hydrogen liquefaction plant equipped with mixed refrigerant system. J Clean Prod 144:248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.014
Ansarinasab H, Mehrpooya M, Sadeghzadeh M (2019) An exergy-based investigation on hydrogen liquefaction plant-exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses. J Clean Prod 210:530–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.090
Asadnia M, Mehrpooya M (2017) A novel hydrogen liquefaction process configuration with combined mixed refrigerant systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:15564–15585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.260
Badenhorst H (2016) A novel heat exchanger concept for latent heat thermal energy storage in solar power towers: modelling and performance comparison. Sol Energy 137:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.006
Bhattacharjee R, Bhattacharjee S (2020) Viability of a concentrated solar power system in a low sun belt prefecture. Front Energy 14:850–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0664-5
Bi Y, Ju Y (2022a) Design and analysis of an efficient hydrogen liquefaction process based on helium reverse Brayton cycle integrating with steam methane reforming and liquefied natural gas cold energy utilization. Energy 252:124047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124047
Bi Y, Ju Y (2022b) Conceptual design and optimization of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process based on helium expansion cycle integrating with mixed refrigerant pre-cooling. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:16949–16963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.202
Boeva OA, Odintzov AA, Solovov RD et al (2017) Low-temperature ortho–para hydrogen conversion catalyzed by gold nanoparticles: Particle size does not affect the rate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:22897–22902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.187
Bracha M, Lorenz G, Patzelt A, Wanner M (1994) Large-scale hydrogen liquefaction in Germany. Int J Hydrogen Energy 19:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(94)90177-5
Chang H-M, Kim BH, Choi B (2020) Hydrogen liquefaction process with Brayton refrigeration cycle to utilize the cold energy of LNG. Cryogenics (guildf) 108:103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2020.103093
Chen L, Xiao R, Cheng C et al (2020) Thermodynamic analysis of the para-to-ortho hydrogen conversion in cryo-compressed hydrogen vessels for automotive applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:24928–24937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.252
Dagdougui H, Sacile R, Bersani C, Ouammi A (2018) Hydrogen infrastructure for energy applications. Elsevier, pp 37–52
Das T, Kweon S-C, Choi J-G et al (2015) Spin conversion of hydrogen over LaFeO3/Al2O3 catalysts at low temperature: synthesis, characterization and activity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.137
Dewar J (1898) Liquid hydrogen. Nature 58:125–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/058125a0
Dincer I, Acar C (2015) Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:11094–11111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
Dumas A, Anzillotti S, Madonia M, Trancossi M (2011) Effects of altitude on photovoltaic production of hydrogen. In: ASME 2011 5th international conference on energy sustainability, Parts A, B, and C. ASMEDC, pp 1365–1374
Ebrahimi A, Saharkhiz MHM, Ghorbani B (2021) Thermodynamic investigation of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process using thermo-electrochemical water splitting cycle and solar collectors. Energy Convers Manag 242:114318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114318
El-Emam RS, Özcan H (2019) Comprehensive review on the techno-economics of sustainable large-scale clean hydrogen production. J Clean Prod 220:593–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.309
Fu Q (2005) Thermodynamic analysis method of energy system [In Chinese]. Xi ’an Jiaotong University Press, Xi’an
Ghorbani B, Mehrpooya M, Aasadnia M, Niasar MS (2019) Hydrogen liquefaction process using solar energy and organic Rankine cycle power system. J Clean Prod 235:1465–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.227
Ghorbani B, Zendehboudi S, Moradi M (2021) Development of an integrated structure of hydrogen and oxygen liquefaction cycle using wind turbines, Kalina power generation cycle, and electrolyzer. Energy 221:119653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119653
Jensen JE, Tuttle WA, Stewart RB et al (1980) Brookhaven National Laboratory selected cryogenic data notebook: Volume 1, Sections 1–9
Kanoglu M, Yilmaz C, Abusoglu A (2016) Geothermal energy use in absorption precooling for Claude hydrogen liquefaction cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:11185–11200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.068
Karasavvas E, Panopoulos KD, Papadopoulou S, Voutetakis S (2020) Energy and exergy analysis of the integration of concentrated solar power with calcium looping for power production and thermochemical energy storage. Renew Energy 154:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.018
Khalilpour KR (2019) Polygeneration with polystorage for chemical and energy hubs. Elsevier, pp 157–173
Kim JH, Karng SW, Oh I-H, Nah IW (2015) Ortho-para hydrogen conversion characteristics of amorphous and mesoporous Cr2O3 powders at a temperature of 77 K. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:14147–14153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.105
Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Elsevier, pp 29–56
Krasae-in S (2014) Optimal operation of a large-scale liquid hydrogen plant utilizing mixed fluid refrigeration system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:7015–7029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.046
Krasae-in S, Stang JH, Neksa P (2010) Exergy analysis on the simulation of a small-scale hydrogen liquefaction test rig with a multi-component refrigerant refrigeration system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:8030–8042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.049
Kuendig A, Loehlein K, Kramer GJ, Huijsmans J (2006) Large scale hydrogen liquefaction in combination with LNG re-gasification. In: 16th World Hydrog Energy Conf 2006, WHEC 2006, vol 4, pp 3326–3333
Lee H, Haider J, Abdul Qyyum M et al (2022) An innovative high energy efficiency–based process enhancement of hydrogen liquefaction: energy, exergy, and economic perspectives. Fuel 320:123964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123964
Li K, Gao Y, Zhang S, Liu G (2022) Study on the energy efficiency of bioethanol-based liquid hydrogen production process. Energy 238:122032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122032
McCarty RD, Hord J, Roder HM (1981) Selected properties of hydrogen (engineering design data). National Engineering Lab. (NBS), Boulder, CO, USA
McPherson M, Mehos M, Denholm P (2020) Leveraging concentrating solar power plant dispatchability: a review of the impacts of global market structures and policy. Energy Policy 139:111335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111335
Mehrpooya M, Ansarinasab H, Moftakhari Sharifzadeh MM, Rosen MA (2017) Process development and exergy cost sensitivity analysis of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell power plant and carbon dioxide capturing process. J Power Sources 364:299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.024
Nandi T, Sarangi S (1993) Performance and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction cycles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 18:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(93)90199-K
Nouri M, Miansari M, Ghorbani B (2020) Exergy and economic analyses of a novel hybrid structure for simultaneous production of liquid hydrogen and carbon dioxide using photovoltaic and electrolyzer systems. J Clean Prod 259:120862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120862
Pernsteiner D, Kasper L, Schirrer A et al (2020) Co-simulation methodology of a hybrid latent-heat thermal energy storage unit. Appl Therm Eng 178:115495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115495
Petitpas G, Aceves SM, Matthews MJ, Smith JR (2014) Para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion in a full-scale automotive cryogenic pressurized hydrogen storage up to 345 bar. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:6533–6547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.205
Quack H (2002) Conceptual design of a high efficiency large capacity hydrogen liquefier. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, pp 255–263
Riaz A, Qyyum MA, Min S et al (2021) Performance improvement potential of harnessing LNG regasification for hydrogen liquefaction process: energy and exergy perspectives. Appl Energy 301:117471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117471
Sadaghiani MS, Mehrpooya M (2017) Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:6033–6050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136
Seyam S, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M (2020) Analysis of a clean hydrogen liquefaction plant integrated with a geothermal system. J Clean Prod 243:118562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118562
Wang M, Liu G, Hui CW (2017) Novel shortcut optimization model for regenerative steam power plant. Energy 138:529–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.088
Yang J-H, Yoon Y, Ryu M et al (2019) Integrated hydrogen liquefaction process with steam methane reforming by using liquefied natural gas cooling system. Appl Energy 255:113840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113840
Yang H, Li J, Huang Y et al (2020) Feasibility research on a hybrid solar tower system using steam and molten salt as heat transfer fluid. Energy 205:118094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118094
Yilmaz C, Kaska O (2018) Performance analysis and optimization of a hydrogen liquefaction system assisted by geothermal absorption precooling refrigeration cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:20203–20213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.019
Yin L, Ju Y (2020) Process optimization and analysis of a novel hydrogen liquefaction cycle. Int J Refrig 110:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.11.004
Zhang S, Liu G (2022) Design and performance analysis of a hydrogen liquefaction process. Clean Technol Environ Policy 24:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02078-z
Zhang S, Li K, Zhu P et al (2022) An efficient hydrogen production process using solar thermo-electrochemical water-splitting cycle and its techno-economic analyses and multi-objective optimization. Energy Convers Manag 266:115859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115859
Zhao CY, Wu ZG (2011) Thermal property characterization of a low melting-temperature ternary nitrate salt mixture for thermal energy storage systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 95:3341–3346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.029
Zhu P, Yao J, Qian C et al (2020) High-efficiency conversion of natural gas fuel to power by an integrated system of SOFC, HCCI engine, and waste heat recovery: thermodynamic and thermo-economic analyses. Fuel 275:117883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117883
Funding
Financial supports provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21736008) and (22078259) are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by SZ, KL, and GL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SZ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Li, K. & Liu, G. An efficient hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with a solar power tower and absorption precooling system. Clean Techn Environ Policy 25, 1015–1041 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02423-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02423-w