Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Review on the design and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction processes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key technologies of liquefied hydrogen have been developing rapidly due to its prospective energy exchange effectiveness, zero emissions, and long distance and economic transportation. However, hydrogen liquefaction is one of the most energy-intensive industrial processes. A small reduction in energy consumption and an improvement in efficiency may decrease the operating cost of the entire process. In this paper, the detailed progress of design and optimization for hydrogen liquefaction in recent years are summarized. Then, based on the refrigeration cycles, the hydrogen liquefaction processes are divided into two parts, namely precooled liquefaction process and cascade liquefaction process. Among the existing technologies, the SEC of most hydrogen liquefaction processes is limited in the range of 5–8kWh/kgLH2 (LH2: liquid hydrogen). The exergy efficiencies of processes are around 40% to 60%. Finally, several future improvements for hydrogen liquefaction process design and optimization are proposed. The mixed refrigerants (MRs) as the working fluids of the process and the combination of the traditional hydrogen liquefaction process with the renewable energy technology will be the great prospects for development in near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner J A. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science, 2004, 305 (5686): 972–974

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cardella U, Decker L, Klein H. Roadmap to economically viable hydrogen liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(19): 13329–13338

    Google Scholar 

  3. LBST, Hydrogen Refueling Station Worldwide. 2019-06-18, available at netinform.de website

  4. Valenti G. Hydrogen liquefaction and liquid hydrogen storage. In: Gupta R B, Basile A, Nejat T. Compendium of Hydrogen Energy. Woodhead Publishing, 2016, 27–51

  5. Acar C, Dincer I. Hydrogen energy. In: Dincer I, eds. Comprehensive Energy Systems, Elsevier, 2018, 1: 568–605

  6. Ball M, Wietschel M. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li M, Bai Y F, Zhang C Z, Song Y, Jiang S, Grouset D, Zhang M. Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(21): 10677–10693

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nash D, Aklil D, Johnson E, Gazey R, Ortisi V. Hydrogen storage: compressed gas. Comprehensive Renewable Energy, 2012, 4: 131–155

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dewar J. Liquid hydrogen. Science, 1900, 11(278): 641–651

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krasae-in S, Stang J H, Neksa P. Development of large-scale hydrogen liquefaction processes from 1898 to 2009. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(10): 4524–4533

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drnevich R. Hydrogen delivery: liquefaction and compression. In: Strategic initiatives for Hydrogen Delivery Workshop, Tonawanda, NY, USA, 2003

  12. Bracha M, Lorenz G, Patzelt A, Wanner M. Large-scale hydrogen liquefaction in Germany. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1994, 19(1): 53–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shimko M, Gardiner M. Innovative hydrogen liquefaction cycle. FY 2008 Annual Progress Report, DOE Hydrogen Program, 2008

  14. Tang L. Hydrogen liquefaction process design and system simulation based on liquid nitrogen precooling. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011, 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuksel Y E, Ozturk M, Dincer I. Analysis and assessment of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16): 11429–11438

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krasae-in S, Stang J H, Neksa P. Simulation on a proposed large-scale liquid hydrogen plant using a multi-component refrigerant refrigeration system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(22): 12531–12544

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ansarinasab H, Mehrpooya M, Mohammadi A. Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a hydrogen liquefaction plant equipped with mixed refrigerant system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 144: 248–259

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stetson N T, Olson G L, Bowman R C Jr. Overview of hydrogen storage, transportation, handling and distribution. In: Sherif S A, Goswami D Y, Stefanakos E K. et al. Handbook of Hydrogen Energy. CRC Press, 2014: 567–592

  19. Vander Arend P. Large-scale liquid hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1961, 57(10): 62–67

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hutchinson H L. A kinetics study of the para-ortho shift of hydrogen. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Colorado: University of Colorado, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silvera I F. The solid molecular hydrogens in the condensed phase: fundamentals and static properties. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1980, 52(2): 393–452

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sullivan N, Zhou D, Edwards C. Precise and efficient in situ orthopara-hydrogen converter. Cryogenics, 1990, 30(8): 734–735

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barron R F. Liquefaction cycles for cryogens. In: Timmerhaus K D. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Boston: Springer, 1972, 20–36

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aasadnia M, Mehrpooya M. Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: a review. Applied Energy, 2018, 212: 57–83

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nandi T K, Sarangi S. Performance and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction cycles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1993, 18(2): 131–139

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peschka W. Liquid Hydrogen: Fuel of the Future. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

  27. Yin L, Ju Y L. Comparison and analysis of two nitrogen expansion cycles for BOG Re-liquefaction systems for small LNG ships. Energy, 2019, 172: 769–776

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baker C R, Shaner R L. A study of the efficiency of hydrogen liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1978, 3(3): 321–334

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mitsugi Ch, Harumi A, Kenzo F W E N E T. Japanese hydrogen program. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23(3): 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kuz’menko I F, Morkovkin I M, Gurov E I. Concept of building medium-capacity hydrogen liquefiers with helium refrigeration cycle. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2004, 40(1/2): 94–98

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garceau N M, Baik J H, Lim C M, Kim S Y, Oh I H, Karng S W. Development of a small-scale hydrogen liquefaction system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(35): 11872–11878

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammad A, Dincer I. Analysis and assessment of an advanced hydrogen liquefaction system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(2): 1139–1151

    Google Scholar 

  33. Staats W L. Analysis ofa supercritical hydrogen liquefaction cycle. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuda H, Nagami M. Study of large hydrogen liquefaction process. Hydrogen Energy, 1997, 8: 175–175

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quack H. Conceptual design of a high efficiency large capacity hydrogen liquefier. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2002, 613: 255–263

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valenti G, Macchi E. Proposal of an innovative, high-efficiency, large-scale hydrogen liquefier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(12): 3116–3121

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stang J, Neksa P, Brendeng E. On the design of an efficient hydrogen liquefaction process. In: 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference 2006 (WHEC 2006), Lyon, France, 2006: 1–6

  38. Krasae-in S. Optimal operation of a large-scale liquid hydrogen plant utilizing mixed fluid refrigeration system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(13): 7015–7029

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sadaghiani M S, Mehrpooya M. Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(9): 6033–6050

    Google Scholar 

  40. Asadnia M, Mehrpooya M. A novel hydrogen liquefaction process configuration with combined mixed refrigerant systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(23): 15564–15585

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cardella U, Decker L, Sundberg J, Klein H. Process optimization for large-scale hydrogen liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(17): 12339–12354

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kuendig A, Loehlein K, Kramer G, Huijsmans J. Large scale hydrogen liquefaction in combination with LNG re-gasification. In: 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference 2006 (WHEC 2006), Lyon, France, 2006: 3326–3333

  43. Kramer G J, Huijsmans J, Austgen D. Clean and green hydrogen. In: 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference 2006 (WHEC 2006), Lyon, France, 2006: 3317–3325

  44. Ansarinasab H, Mehrpooya M, Sadeghzadeh M. An exergy-based investigation on hydrogen liquefaction plant-exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210: 530–541

    Google Scholar 

  45. Aasadnia M, Mehrpooya M. Conceptual design and analysis of a novel process for hydrogen liquefaction assisted by absorption precooling system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 205: 565–588

    Google Scholar 

  46. Muradov N Z, Veziroglu T N. “Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: an overview of carbon-neutral technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(23): 6804–6839

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yilmaz C, Kaska O. Performance analysis and optimization of a hydrogen liquefaction system assisted by geothermal absorption precooling refrigeration cycle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(44): 20203–20213

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yilmaz C. Optimum energy evaluation and life cycle cost assessment of a hydrogen liquefaction system assisted by geothermal energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.105

  49. Yuksel Y E, Ozturk M, Dincer I. Energetic and exergetic assessments of a novel solar power tower based multigeneration system with hydrogen production and liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(26): 13071–13084

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang H, Gimaev R, Kovalev B, Kamilov K, Zverev V, Tishin A. Review on the materials and devices for magnetic refrigeration in the temperature range of nitrogen and hydrogen liquefaction. Physica B, Condensed Matter, 2019, 558: 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  51. He T B, Karimi I A, Ju Y L. Review on the design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction processes for onshore and offshore applications. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 132: 89–114

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kwak D H, Heo J H, Park S H, Seo S J, Kim J K. Energy-efficient design and optimization of boil-off gas (BOG) re-liquefaction process for liquefied natural gas (LNG)-fuelled ship. Energy, 2018, 148: 915–929

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Liang Yin & Yonglin Ju

Authors
  1. Liang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yonglin Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonglin Ju.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, L., Ju, Y. Review on the design and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction processes. Front. Energy 14, 530–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0657-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0657-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation