Abstract
In the present research, a new finite element approach is presented for large deflection modeling of planar Euler–Bernoulli beams. In this approach, in addition to the position and rotation (kinematic variables), internal force and moment (kinetic variables) are considered as the nodal coordinates. For this purpose, each of the kinematic and kinetic variables are individually interpolated. Thereby, the primary governing equations of the elements (such as constitutive, equilibrium and geometric equations) are not combined with each other. On the other hand, the nonlinear governing equations are not simplified to linear equations. Finally, using the weighted residual method for each of the governing equations, several nonlinear equations are obtained due to the nodal coordinates. The Gauss–Legendre nodes are used for discretization of the finite element. Using the presented approach, a new higher-order nonlinear element is obtained which is simple, more efficient and more accurate than similar beam elements. The accuracy and efficiency of the presented higher-order element are investigated by comparing the results with recent works using the finite element method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shabana, A.A., Yakoub, R.A.: Three dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: theory. J. Mech. Des. 123, 606–613 (2001)
Yakoub, R.A., Shabana, A.A.: Three dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: implementation and applications. J. Mech. Des. 123, 614–621 (2001)
Simo, J.C.: A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 49, 55–70 (1985)
Simo, J.C.: A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 58, 79–116 (1986)
Romero, I.: A comparison of finite elements for nonlinear beams: the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20, 51–68 (2008)
Bauchau, O.A., Han, S., Mikkola, A., Matikainen, M.K.: Comparison of the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations for beams. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 32(1), 67–85 (2014)
Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Omar, M.A., Shabana, A.A.: Two-dimensional shear deformable beam for large rotation and deformation problems. J. Sound Vib. 243(3), 565–576 (2001)
Gerstmayr, J., Shabana, A.A.: Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 45, 109–130 (2006)
Gerstmayr, J., Matikainen, M.K., Mikkola, A.M.: A geometrically exact beam element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20, 359–384 (2008)
Kerkkänen, K.S., Sopanen, J.T., Mikkola, A.M.: A linear beam finite element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Mech. Des. 127, 621–630 (2005)
Sugiyama, H., Gerstmayr, J., Shabana, A.A.: Deformation modes in the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Sound Vib. 298, 1129–1149 (2006)
Gerstmayr, J., Irschik, H.: On the correct representation of bending and axial deformation in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation with an elastic line approach. J. Sound Vib. 318, 461–487 (2008)
Nachbagauer, K., Pechstein, A.S., Irschik, H., Gerstmayr, J.: A new locking-free formulation for planar, shear deformable, linear and quadratic beam finite elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26, 245–263 (2011)
Nachbagauer, K., Gruber, P., Gerstmayr, J.: Structural and continuum mechanics approaches for a 3D shear deformable ANCF beam finite element: application to static and linearized dynamic examples. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8, 021004 (2013)
Nachbagauer, K., Gerstmayr, J.: Structural and continuum mechanics approaches for a 3D shear deformable ANCF beam finite element: application to buckling and nonlinear dynamic examples. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9, 011013 (2014)
Gerstmayr, J., Sugiyama, H., Mikkola, A.: Review on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for large deformation analysis of multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8, 031016 (2013)
Nachbagauer, K.: State of the Art of ANCF elements regarding geometric description, interpolation strategies, definition of elastic forces, validation and the locking phenomenon in comparison with proposed beam finite elements. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 21(3), 293–319 (2014)
Yamashita, H., Sugiyama, H.: Numerical convergence of finite element solutions of nonrational B-spline element and absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 67, 177–189 (2012)
Valkeapaa, A.I., Matikainen, M.K., Mikkola, A.M.: Meshing strategies in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation-based Euler–Bernoulli beam elements. J. Multi-body Dyn. 230(4), 606–614 (2015)
Babuska, I., Guo, B.Q.: The h, p and h-p version of the finite element method; basis theory and applications. Adv. Eng. Softw. 15, 159–174 (1992)
Guo, B.Q., Babuska, I.: The h-p version of the finite element method, part 1: the basic approximation results. Comput. Mech. 1, 21–41 (1986)
Sharifnia, M.: Nonlinear dynamics of flexible links in the planar parallel robots using a new beam element. J. Vib. Control 26(7–8), 475–489 (2020)
Zheng, Y., Shabana, A.A.: A two-dimensional shear deformable ANCF consistent rotation-based formulation beam element. Nonlinear Dyn. 87(2), 1031–1043 (2017)
Zheng, Y., Shabana, A.A.: ANCF consistent rotation-based finite element formulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11, 014502 (2016)
Kulkarni, S., Shabana, A.A.: Spatial ANCF/CRBF beam elements. Acta Mech. 230(3), 929–952 (2019)
Jonker, J.B., Meijaard, J.P.: A geometrically non-linear formulation of a three-dimensional beam element for solving large deflection multibody system problems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 53, 63–74 (2013)
Yilmaz, M., Omurtag, M.H.: Large deflection of 3D curved rods: an objective formulation with principal axes transformations. Comput. Struct. 163, 71–82 (2016)
Fan, W., Zhu, W.D., Ren, H.: A new singularity-free formulation of a three-dimensional Euler–Bernoulli beam using Euler parameters. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11, 041013 (2016)
Fan, W., Zhu, W.D.: An accurate singularity-free formulation of a three-dimensional curved Euler–Bernoulli beam for flexible multibody dynamic analysis. J. Vib. Acoust. 138, 051001 (2016)
Fan, W., Zhu, W.D.: An accurate singularity-free geometrically exact beam formulation using Euler parameters. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(2), 1095–1112 (2018)
Sharifnia, M., Akbarzadeh, A.: A constrained assumed modes method for solution of a new dynamic equation for an axially moving beam. Comput. Math. Appl. 72(9), 2167–2180 (2016)
Sharifnia, M., Akbarzadeh, A.: A constrained assumed modes method for dynamics of a flexible planar serial robot with prismatic joints. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 40(3), 261–285 (2017)
Sharifnia, M.: A new beam element for analysis of planar large deflection. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 92 (2018)
Hoffman, J.D.: Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. McGraw-Hill, New York (1992)
Nachbagauer, K., Gruber, P.G., Vetyukov, Y., Gerstmayr, J.: A spatial thin beam finite element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation without singularities. In: 8th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, Washington, DC, USA, August 28–31 (2011)
Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M.: Theory of Elastic Stability. McGraw-Hill, New York (1961)
Campanelli, M., Berzeri, M., Shabana, A.A.: Performance of the incremental and non-incremental finite element formulations in flexible multibody problems. Trans. ASME 122, 498–507 (2000)
Funding
No funding was received for the present paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharifnia, M. A higher-order nonlinear beam element for planar structures by using a new finite element approach. Acta Mech 233, 495–511 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03076-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03076-4