Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Caulobacter bacteriophages illustrate the diversity of the podovirus genus Rauchvirus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The podovirus BPP-1 is currently the only member of the Podovirus genus Rauchvirus. Here, we describe three new Caulobacter bacteriophages (Jess A, SR18, and RW) that show genetic similarity to BPP-1 but have many different genetic and structural features that differentiate them from BPP-1. Jess A and SR18 are closely related to each other and should be considered two members of a new species. They share a similar gene order with BPP-1. However, they do not appear to form lysogens or have the tropism switching mechanism that has been described for BPP-1. Bacteriophage RW also exhibits some homology to BPP-1. However, it is quite different from the other three phages, and we propose that it should be considered a representative of a third species of the genus Rauchvirus. Taken together, the differences among these four members of the genus Rauchvirus indicate that this divergent genus has a long evolutionary history and that there are many more rauchviruses waiting to be discovered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poindexter JS (1964) Biological properties and classification of the Caulobacter group. Bacteriol Rev 28:231–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Agabian-Keshishian N, Shapiro L (1970) Stalked bacteria: properties of deoxyribonucleic acid bacteriophage phiCbK. J Virol 5(6):795–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R (2012) The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genom 13:542. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ash KT, Drake KM, Gibbes WS, Ely B (2017) Genomic Diversity of Type B3 Bacteriophages of Caulobacter crescentus. Curr Microbiol 74:779–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1248-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson K, Ely B (2019) Analyses of four new Caulobacter Phicbkviruses indicate independent lineages. J Gen Virol 100:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen D, Ely B (2018) A genome comparison of T7-like podoviruses that infect Caulobacter crescentus. Curr Microbiol 75(6):760–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1445-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu M, Deora R, Doulatov SR, Gingery M, Eiserling FA, Preston A, Duncan J, Simons RW, Cotter PA, Parkhill J, Miller JF (2002) Reverse transcriptase-mediated tropism switching in Bordetella bacteriophage. Science 295:2091–2094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu M, Gingery M, Doulatov SR, Liu Y, Hodes A, Baker S et al (2004) Genomic and genetic analysis of Bordetella bacteriophages encoding reverse transcriptase-mediated tropism-switching cassettes. J Bacteriol 186(5):1503–1517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai W, Hodes A, Hui WH, Gingery M, Miller JF, Zhou JH (2010) Three-dimensional structure of tropism-switching Bordetella bacteriophage. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107(9):4347–4352. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915008107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ely B, Croft RH (1982) Transposon mutagenesis of Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 149(2):620–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson RC, Ely B (1977) Isolation of spontaneously derived mutants of Caulobacter crescentus. Genet 86:25–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ely B, Weppleman RM, Massey HC, Hartman PE (1974) Some improved methods in P22 transduction. Genet 76:625–631

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scott D, Ely B (2015) Comparison of genome sequencing technology and assembly methods for the analysis of a GC-rich bacterial genome. Curr Microbiol 70:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0721-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ely B, Wilson K, Ross K, Ingram D, Lewter T, Herring J et al (2018) Genome evolution observed in wild isolates of Caulobacter crescentus. Curr Microbiol 76:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1606-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G et al (2010) Tablet—next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics 26(3):401–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T et al (2013) The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucl Acids Res 42:D206–D214. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M (2012) Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 28(8):1166–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B (2000) Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16(10):944–945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT (2010) progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Schaffer MA, AA, Yu Y-K, (2005) Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS J 272:5101–5109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ely B (2020) Recombination and gene loss occur simultaneously during bacterial horizontal gene transfer. PLoS ONE 15(1):e0227987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded in part by National Institutes of Health grant GM076277 to BE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Ely.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Johannes Wittmann.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ely, B., Liese, J., Corley, S. et al. Novel Caulobacter bacteriophages illustrate the diversity of the podovirus genus Rauchvirus. Arch Virol 165, 2549–2554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04791-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04791-4

Navigation