Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) for the treatment of hip ankylosis in the lateral position.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 24 patients (39 hips) who underwent THA via the DAA in the lateral position for the treatment of hip ankylosis between January 2016 and December 2018. We performed bilateral THA for fifteen patients and unilateral THA for nine patients. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of incisions, straight leg-raising time, length of postoperative hospital stay, operation-related complication, prosthesis position, radiological outcomes, postoperative pain relief (evaluated by VAS) and functional rehabilitation [evaluated by Harris hip score and range of motion (ROM)] were analyzed to determine clinical efficacy. These clinical data were compared and statistically analyzed with the clinical data of another 23 patients (28 hips) who underwent THA via the posterolateral approach (PLA) for the treatment of hip ankylosis in the lateral position.

Results

Follow-up was performed at 12–15 months. The incision length in the DAA group and the PLA group was (11.12 ± 1.69 vs. 14.36 ± 3.42) cm, the intraoperative blood loss was (371.25 ± 120.55 vs. 396.80 ± 101.21) ml, the operation time was (122.47 ± 25.40 vs. 138.47 ± 24.45) min, the postoperative hospital stay was (9.59 ± 4.62 vs. 12.08 ± 3.58) days, and the straight leg elevation time was (9.20 ± 2.12 vs. 12.34 ± 3.25) days, respectively. The prosthesis of the two groups was in a good position: The average angle of cup anteversion in the DAA group and the PLA group was (10.76 ± 2.84 vs. 15.36 ± 3.42)°, and the average angle of cup abduction in the DAA group and the PLA group was (40.00 ± 3.45 vs. 41.21 ± 2.85)° (P > 0.05). The VAS score, ROM and Harris score at different follow-up time points were significantly improved in the two groups compared with those before surgery. In the first 3 months after surgery, the VAS score, ROM and Harris score of the DAA group were significantly better than those of the PLA group (P < 0.05), but with the extension of the follow-up time, there was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). One case of greater trochanteric fracture occurred in the DAA group. Two cases of hip posterior dislocations occurred in the PLA group, and no dislocations occurred after manual closed reduction and hip fixation in bed for 1 month to the last follow-up. No complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, fat embolism, prosthesis loosening, limb length inequality or joint dislocation were reported.

Conclusion

THA via the DAA for the treatment of hip ankylosis in the lateral position was safe and effective and had the advantage of reduced trauma, quicker recovery of hip function, lower incidence of postoperative dislocation and ability to expose the acetabulum fully and fit the prosthesis properly, providing satisfactory clinical efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

DAA:

Direct anterior approach

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

PLA:

Posterolateral approach

HHS:

Harris hip score

ROM:

Range of motion

References

  1. Raychaudhuri SP, Deodhar A (2014) The classification and diagnostic criteria of ankylosing spondylitis. J Autoimmun 48–49(2):128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhan S, Eachempati KK, Malhotra R (2008) Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty for bony ankylosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Arthroplasty 23(6):859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eilander W, Harris SJ, Henkus HE, Cobb JP, Hogervorst T (2013) Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement. Bone Jt J 95-B(10):1326–1331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Magrey M, Khan MA (2010) Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 12(5):332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sochart DH, Porter ML (1997) Long-term results of total hip replacement in young patients who had ankylosing spondylitis. Eighteen to thirty-year results with survivorship analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79(8):1181–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nogler M, Mayr E, Krismer M (2012) The direct anterior approach to the hip revision. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24(2):153–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang W, Huang G, Huang T, Wu R (2014) Bilaterally primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15(1):344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamara E (2016) Comparison of robotic-assisted posterior approach and fluoroscopic-guided anterior approach acetabular cup placement in tha. Sulfur Dioxide 2(1):iii

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M (2009) The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 40(3):311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rittmeister M, Starker M, Zichner L (2000) Hip and knee replacement after longstanding hip arthrodesis. Clin Orthop 371(371):136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS et al (2011) Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(15):1392–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandl LA, Zhu R, Huang WT, Zhang M, Alexiades MM, Figgie MP et al (2015) Short term total hip arthroplasty outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis skin disease, and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 68(2):410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2009) Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(11):2895–2900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rachbauer F, Kain MSH, Leunig M (2015) The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 40(3):311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen M, Luo ZL, Ji XF, Cheng P, Tang GL, Shang XF (2016) Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position: our experiences and early results. J Arthroplasty 32(1):131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Huynh C (2015) Comparison of cup alignment, jump distance, and complications in consecutive series of anterior approach and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(11):1959–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jewett BA, Collis DK (2011) High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(2):503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J, Eulert J, Broscheit J, Rudert M et al (2012) Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 36(3):491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho KWK, Young SK (2012) Reducing the rate of early primary hip dislocation by combining a change in surgical technique and an increase in femoral head diameter to 36 mm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(7):1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Homma Y, Baba T, Sano K, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Kobayashi H et al (2016) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40(8):1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo ZL, Chen M, Shang XF et al (2016) Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 96(35):2807–2812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tippets DM, Zaryanov AV, Burke WV, Patel PD, Suarez JC, Ely EE et al (2014) Incidence of heterotopic ossification in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective radiographic review. J Arthroplasty 29(9):1835–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Collaborative (ATHAC) Investigators (2009) Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin N Am 40(3):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (1804h08020269) and Key Research and Development Project of Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Department (1608085MH167).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Han Wu or Juehua Jing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Cheng, Wd. & Jing, J. Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 993–1001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02655-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02655-w

Keywords

Navigation