Skip to main content
Log in

Improved submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection with slant tunnel for submucosal tumors in proximal esophagus

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The improved submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) with slant tunnel was created by our group innovatively for submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the proximal esophagus. This study aimed to provide the preliminary results of the improved STER from our center.

Methods

The key step of the improved STER is establishing a slant tunnel instead of a vertical tunnel. After a longitudinal incision was made proximally in the inclined top to the tumor, a submucosal tunnel was established from the incision to the SMT slantingly. 28 patients undergoing STER with slant tunnel were enrolled in the retrospective study. Clinical results including en bloc resection, curative resection and complication were collected.

Results

All the submucous tumors located at proximal esophagus originated from muscularis propria were successfully resected by the innovative STER. Tumor size ranged from 18-43 mm, with 96.4% (27/28) en bloc resection rate and 92.9% (26/28) curative rate. Three patients suffered complication, 1 patient with mild pleural effusion and another 2 patients with fever for one day. All of the complications were cured by conservative treatment.

Conclusions

STER with slant tunnel seems to provide an optional treatment for tumors in proximal esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Von Rahden BHA, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR et al (2004) Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus: minimally invasive versus open approach. Surg Endosc 18(6):924–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mujawar P, Pawar T, Chavan RN et al (2016) Video assisted thoracoscopic surgical enucleation of a giant esophageal leiomyoma presenting with persistent cough. Case Rep Surg 2016:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang H, Tan Y, Zhou Y et al (2015) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(7):776–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishii M, Takeno S, Nishida T et al (2017) Thoracoscopic enucleation in the left decubitus position for leiomyoma of the upper thoracic esophagusUtility of preoperative diagnosis applying endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Int J Surg Case Rep 34:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen T, Lin Z-W, Zhang Y-Q et al (2017) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection vs thoracoscopic enucleation for large submucosal tumors in the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. J Am Coll Surg 225(6):806–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical E, Guidelines P (2014) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(suppl 3):iii21–iii26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S et al (2013) Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 25(5):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Song S, Wang X, Zhang S et al (2018) Efficacy and complications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors and exploration for influencing factors. Z Gastroenterol 56(4):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chai N, Du C, Gao Y et al (2018) Correction to: comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 32(7):3373–3373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lv X-H, Wang C-H, Xie Y et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu J, Jiao T, Zheng M et al (2014) Endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors in muscularis propria: the choice between direct excavation and tunneling resection. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 28(12):3401–3407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oezcelik A, DeMeester SR (2011) General anatomy of the esophagus. Thorac Surg Clin 21(2):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X-Y, Xu M-D, Yao L-Q et al (2014) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a feasibility study (with videos). Surg Endosc 28(6):1971–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu M-D, Cai M-Y, Zhou P-H et al (2012) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: a new technique for treating upper GI submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 75(1):195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumta N, Xu M-M, Marfatia P et al (2016) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of a symptomatic leiomyoma in the proximal esophagus. Endoscopy 48(S01):E398–E398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen T, Zhou P-H, Chu Y et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg 265(2):363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishida T, Blay J-Y, Hirota S et al (2016) The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer 19(1):3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Meng Y, Xu Y et al (2017) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection and thoracoscopic enucleation for the treatment of esophageal submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 86(3):485–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen T, Zhang C, Yao L-Q et al (2015) Management of the complications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 48(02):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kushnir VM, Keswani RN, Hollander TG et al (2015) Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 81(6):1378–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB (2006) American gastroenterological association institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130(7):2217–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81861168036, 81702305), Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (Grant Nos. 19411951600, 19411951601). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhou Pinghong or Zhong Yunshi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Sun Di, Shi Qiang, Qi ZhiPeng, Li Bing, Cai Shilun, Zhou Pinghong, and Zhong Yunshi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article originally published with incorrect tables. This article has been updated to correct the tables.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di, S., Qiang, S., ZhiPeng, Q. et al. Improved submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection with slant tunnel for submucosal tumors in proximal esophagus. Surg Endosc 35, 4055–4060 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08503-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08503-0

Keywords

Navigation