Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of staged surgery on quality of life in refractory ulcerative colitis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Coloproctomucosectomy (CPM) with ileopouchanal anastomosis (IPAA), as the procedure of choice for surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC), is commonly performed either as a 2- or 3-staged procedure. For patients with considerable immunosuppression, reduced nutritional or general health status, and as part of emergency treatment, a 3-staged (3S) procedure is recommended by guidelines to minimize perioperative complication rates compared to 2-staged (2S) procedure. However, the necessity of additional hospitalization and surgery is suspect to affect quality of life (QoL). In this prospective, observational study, we evaluate the long-term QoL after 2- and 3-staged interventions of CPM with IPAA for patients with UC.

Patients and methods

Between 1997 and 2011, a total of 233 patients underwent CPM and had a 2- or 3-staged procedure. In 108 patients, surgical procedure was completed, and evaluation of QoL was performed by specific questionnaires (IBDQ, FIQoL, SF-12, CCS) up to 20 years after ileostomy closure. Data were collected within the framework of a prospective study.

Results

Observing a total of 84 patients (2S: n = 59; 3S: n = 25), QoL measured by IBDQ was higher after CPM, compared to preoperative (2S: 15 → 31; 3S: 17 → 28; p < 0.01), with no differences between 2S or 3S procedures (p > 0.05). Specific QoL assessment concerning incontinence and stool frequency (CCS, FIQoL) did not differ either (CCS: 2S:3S = 12:15; p > 0.05). General health-related QoL, determined by SF-12 score, did not differ between 2S or 3S procedures.

Conclusion

The indication for a 2-staged or 3-staged procedure should be adjusted to the severity of the underlying disease, nutritional status of the patient, and the extent of immunosuppression at the time of surgery. It should not be affected by the fear of complications or a reduced quality of life by additional surgery in 3-staged versus 2-staged procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegmund B (2009) Targeted therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis 27:465–469. doi:10.1159/000233284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Travis SPL, Stange EF, Lémann M et al (2008) European evidence-based consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: current management. J Crohns Colitis 2:24–62. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2007.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeuchi H, Uchino M, Matsuoka H et al (2010) Surgery for ulcerative colitis in 1000 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:959–965. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-0915-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M’Koma AE, Moses HL, Adunyah SE (2011) Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer: proctocolectomy and mucosectomy do not necessarily eliminate pouch-related cancer incidences. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:533–552. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1137-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Somashekar U, Gupta S, Soin A, Nundy S (2010) Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:967–973. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-0974-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramage L, Qiu S, Georgiou P et al (2016) Functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in older patients: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1007/s00384-015-2475-4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. López-Rosales F, González-Contreras Q, Muro LJ et al (2007) Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: initial experience in Mexico. Surg Endosc 21:2304–2307. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9523-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zerhouni S, Kirsch R, Bakonyi A et al (2015) Severity of inflammation as a risk factor for ileo-anal anastomotic leak after a pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:1375–1380. doi:10.1007/s00384-015-2290-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Waljee JF et al (2011) Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis: a comparison of medically and surgically treated patients. Am J Gastroenterol 106:794–799. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson P, Söderholm JD (2009) Surgery in ulcerative colitis: indication and timing. Dig Dis 27:335–340. doi:10.1159/000228570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dinnewitzer AJ, Wexner SD, Baig MK et al (2006) Timing of restorative proctectomy following subtotal colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 8:278–282. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00933.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cima RR (2010) Timing and indications for colectomy in chronic ulcerative colitis: surgical consideration. Dig Dis 28:501–507. doi:10.1159/000320409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seifarth C, Gröne J, Slavova N et al (2013) Proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis: is a multistep procedure in cases of immunosuppression advisable? Chirurg 84:802–808. doi:10.1007/s00104-013-2552-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berndtsson IE, Carlsson EK, Persson EI, Lindholm EA (2011) Long-term adjustment to living with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 54:193–199. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ff42d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandsborg S, Tøttrup A, Nicholls J, Laurberg S (2013) Restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis: a cross-sectional Danish population study on function and quality of life. Colorectal Dis 15:e453–e461. doi:10.1111/codi.12270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heikens JT, de Vries J, Goos MRE et al (2012) Quality of life and health status before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 99:263–269. doi:10.1002/bjs.7711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, Vermeire S et al (2014) Long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in 191 patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.03.001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koerdt S, Jehle EC, Kreis ME, Kasparek MS (2014) Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:545–554. doi:10.1007/s00384-013-1814-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antosh DD, Grimes CL, Smith AL et al (2013) A case-control study of risk factors for ileus and bowel obstruction following benign gynecologic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 122:108–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chapuis PH, Bokey L, Keshava A et al (2013) Risk factors for prolonged ileus after resection of colorectal cancer: an observational study of 2400 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 257:909–915. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318268a693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckert P (1985) Pathophysiology and morbidity of paralytic ileus (including peritonitis). Langenbecks Arch Chir 366:285–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257:679–685. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827d99a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Penna C, Dozois R, Tremaine W et al (1996) Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis occurs with increased frequency in patients with associated primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut 38:234–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrante M, Declerck S, De Hertogh G et al (2008) Outcome after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14:20–28. doi:10.1002/ibd.20278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chowdhry S, Katz JA (2014) Update on the pathogenesis and management of pouchitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 16:442. doi:10.1007/s11908-014-0442-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leowardi C, Hinz U, Tariverdian M et al (2010) Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:49–56. doi:10.1007/s00423-009-0479-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Browne C, Shaikh F, Iqbal N et al (2014) Quality of life, continence and frequency of pouchitis following laparoscopic versus open colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: an Irish perspective. Ir J Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s11845-014-1233-x

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

J.G. conceived the idea, and J.G. and C.S. designed this study. L.B. and C.S. conducted the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. J.P.R. and H.J.B. carried out the samples. B.S. participated in the coordination of this study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The study is part of the doctoral theses of L.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Seifarth.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Claudia Seifarth, Lara Börner, Britta Siegmund, Heinz J. Buhr, Jörg-Peter Ritz, and Jörn Gröne have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifarth, C., Börner, L., Siegmund, B. et al. Impact of staged surgery on quality of life in refractory ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 31, 643–649 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5010-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5010-y

Keywords

Navigation