Skip to main content
Log in

Specific light uptake rates can enhance astaxanthin productivity in Haematococcus lacustris

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lumostatic operation was applied for efficient astaxanthin production in autotrophic Haematococcus lacustris cultures using 0.4-L bubble column photobioreactors. The lumostatic operation in this study was performed with three different specific light uptake rates (q e) based on cell concentration, cell projection area, and fresh weight as one-, two- and three-dimensional characteristics values, respectively. The q e value from the cell concentration (q e1D) obtained was 13.5 × 10−8 μE cell−1 s−1, and the maximum astaxanthin concentration was increased to 150 % compared to that of a control with constant light intensity. The other optimum q e values by cell projection area (q e2D) and fresh weight (q e3D) were determined to be 195 μE m−2 s−1 and 10.5 μE g−1 s−1 for astaxanthin production, respectively. The maximum astaxanthin production from the lumostatic cultures using the parameters controlled by cell projection area (2D) and fresh weight (3D) also increased by 36 and 22 % over that of the controls, respectively. When comparing the optimal q e values among the three different types, the lumostatic cultures using q e based on fresh weight showed the highest astaxanthin productivity (22.8 mg L−1 day−1), which was a higher level than previously reported. The lumostatic operations reported here demonstrated that more efficient and effective astaxanthin production was obtained by H. lacustris than providing a constant light intensity, regardless of which parameter is used to calculate the specific light uptake rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, Darzins A (2008) Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J 54:621–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao B, Su Y (2014) Process effect of microalgal-carbon dioxide fixation and biomass production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:121–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding J, Zhao F, Cao Y, Xing L, Liu W, Mei S, Li S (2015) Cultivation of microalgae in dairy farm wastewater without sterilization. Int J Phytoremediat 17:222–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryu BG, Kim EJ, Kim HS, Kim J, Choi YE, Yang JW (2014) Simultaneous treatment of municipal wastewater and biodiesel production by cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris with indigenous wastewater bacteria. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 19:201–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahadar A, Bilal Khan M (2013) Progress in energy from microalgae: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:128–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chisti Y (2013) Constraints to commercialization of algal fuels. J Biotechnol 167:201–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suh IS, Lee CG (2003) Photobioreactor engineering: design and performance. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 8:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ugwu C, Aoyagi H, Uchiyama H (2008) Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresour Technol 99:4021–4028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CG, Palsson BØ (1994) High-density algal photobioreactors using light-emitting diodes. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:1161–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiang H, Zarmi Y, Richmond A (1998) Combined effects of light intensity, light-path and culture density on output rate of Spirulina platensis (Cyanobacteria). Eur J Phycol 33:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park KH, Lee CG (2000) Optimization of algal photobioreactors using flashing lights. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 5:186–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CG (1999) Calculation of light penetration depth in photobioreactors. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 4:78–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wichuk K, Brynjólfsson S, Fu W (2014) Biotechnological production of value-added carotenoids from microalgae: emerging technology and prospects. Bioengineered 5:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suh IS, Lee SB (2001) Cultivation of a cyanobacterium in an internally radiating air-lift photobioreactor. J Appl Phycol 13:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi SL, Suh IS, Lee CG (2003) Lumostatic operation of bubble column photobioreactors for Haematococcus pluvialis cultures using a specific light uptake rate as a control parameter. Enzyme Microb Technol 33:403–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Borowitzka MA (2013) High-value products from microalgae—their development and commercialisation. J Appl Phycol 25:743–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fábregas J, Otero A, Maseda A, Domínguez A (2001) Two-stage cultures for the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. J Biotechnol 89:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim ZH, Lee HS, Lee CG (2009) Red and blue photons can enhance the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. Algae 24:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eriksen NT, Geest T, Iversen JL (1996) Phototrophic growth in the lumostat: a photo-bioreactor with on-line optimization of light intensity. J Appl Phycol 8:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee HS, Kim ZH, Jung SE, Kim JD, Lee CG (2006) Specific light uptake rate can be served as a scale-up parameter in photobioreactor operations. J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:1890–1896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee HS, Seo MW, Kim ZH, Lee CG (2006) Determining the best specific light uptake rates for the lumostatic cultures in bubble column photobioreactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:447–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Y, Sommerfeld M, Chen F, Hu Q (2008) Consumption of oxygen by astaxanthin biosynthesis: a protective mechanism against oxidative stress in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae). J Plant Physiol 165:1783–1797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fábregas J, Domínguez A, Álvarez DG, Lamela T, Otero A (1998) Induction of astaxanthin accumulation by nitrogen and magnesium deficiencies in Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol Lett 20:623–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanchez O, Mas J (1996) Measurement of light absorption and determination of the specific rate of light uptake in cultures of phototrophic microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:620–624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Park EK, Lee CG (2001) Astaxanthin production by Haematococcus pluvialis under various light intensities and wavelengths. J Microbiol Biotechnol 11:1024–1030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scibilia L, Girolomoni L, Berteotti S, Alboresi A, Ballottari M (2015) Photosynthetic response to nitrogen starvation and high light in Haematococcus pluvialis. Algal Res 12:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang B, Zarka A, Trebst A, Boussiba S (2003) Astaxanthin accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis (chlorophyceae) as an active photoprotective process under high irradiance. J Phycol 39:1116–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim ZH, Kim SH, Lee HS, Lee CG (2006) Enhanced production of astaxanthin by flashing light using Haematococcus pluvialis. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:414–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaumont D, Thépenier C (1995) Carotenoid content in growing cells of Haematococcus pluvialis during a sunlight cycle. J Appl Phycol 7:529–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Park KH, Lee CG (2001) Effectiveness of flashing light for increasing photosynthetic efficiency of microalgal cultures over a critical cell density. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 6:189–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kobayashi M, Kakizono T, Nishio N, Nagai S (1992) Effects of light intensity, light quality, and illumination cycle on astaxanthin formation in a green alga, Haematococcus pluvialis. J Biosci Bioeng 74:61–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Eom H, Park S, Lee CG, Jin E (2005) Gene expression profiling of eukaryotic microalga, Haematococcus pluvialis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 15:1060–1066

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kang CD, Han SJ, Choi SP, Sim SJ (2010) Fed-batch culture of astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis by exponential nutrient feeding and stepwise light supplementation. Bioprocess Biosys Eng 33:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ranjbar R, Inoue R, Shiraishi H, Katsuda T, Katoh S (2008) High efficiency production of astaxanthin by autotrophic cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis in a bubble column photobioreactor. Biochem Eng J 39:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tran H, Lee K, Hong C (2015) Effects of LED irradiation on the growth and astaxanthin production of Hamatococcus lacustris. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 12(2):1167–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Marine Biotechnology Program funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea (Project No.: 200255). The authors are also grateful to the Manpower Development Program for Marine Energy from the same ministry. Hanwool Park was supported by Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Project No.: 2013032623).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choul-Gyun Lee.

Additional information

Ho-Sang Lee and Z-Hun Kim have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, HS., Kim, ZH., Park, H. et al. Specific light uptake rates can enhance astaxanthin productivity in Haematococcus lacustris . Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 815–823 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1561-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1561-5

Keywords

Navigation