Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Niche lability mitigates the impact of invasion but not urbanization

  • Highlighted Student Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Native species can coexist with invasive congeners by partitioning niche space; however, impacts from invasive species often occur alongside other disturbances. Native species’ responses to the interactions of multiple disturbances remain poorly understood. Here we study the impacts of urbanization and an invasive congener on a native species. Using abundance (catch-per-unit effort) and vertical distribution of native green anoles (Anolis carolinensis) and invasive brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) across a gradient of natural-to-urban forests, we ask if niche shifting (lability) is occurring, and if it can mitigate impacts from one or both disturbances. We use generalized linear models to relate species abundances across the landscape to urbanization, forest structural complexity, and congener abundances (i.e., A. sagrei); and test for an interaction between urbanization and congener abundance. Our data show that A. sagrei presence results in a 17-fold upward shift in vertical niche of A. carolinensis—an 8.3 m shift in median perch height, and models reveal urbanization also drives an increase in A. carolinensis perch height. A. carolinensis and A. sagrei abundances negatively and positively correlate with urbanization, respectively, and neither species’ abundance correlate with congener abundance. Despite a positive correlation between A. sagrei abundance and urbanization, our results do not show evidence of this interaction affecting A. carolinensis. Instead, niche lability appears to enable the native species to mitigate the impact of one driver of decline (invasive competition) while our data suggest it declines with the second (urbanization).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data from this study will be archived in an online repository (Dryad) upon acceptance and publication, and R-script provided upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Christian Garcia, Shannon Finnerty, Emily Steffes, and our many other research assistants. We declare no conflicts of interest. All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JBB and BRS designed the research; BRS funded the research; JBB, SB and BRS wrote the paper; JBB collected and analyzed the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse B. Borden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

Ethics approval

All research was approved by the University of Florida’s IACUC committee.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Lin Schwarzkopf.

Our study examines the impacts of two current major threats to global biodiversity—invasive species and urbanization—and explores how vertical niche lability could mitigate such threats.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 7022 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borden, J.B., Bohlman, S. & Scheffers, B.R. Niche lability mitigates the impact of invasion but not urbanization. Oecologia 198, 1–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05039-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05039-x

Keywords

Navigation