Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-scale interactions and non-native cattails influence the distributions of a wetland-obligate species

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Landscape configuration and composition can influence the spatial distribution of species. Cross-scale interactions may exist when multiscale effects interplay to shape species’ distribution patterns.

Objectives

We investigated how the spatial distribution of a semiaquatic mammal, muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), is influenced by local-scale resource characteristics. We also assessed how fetch, the unobstructed distance wind can travel across water, influences fine-scale habitat use by muskrats.

Methods

We used 2 years of presence-absence surveys (2015–2016) at 71 wetland sites to evaluate the spatial distribution of muskrats in a lacustrine system in Minnesota, USA. We expected site occupancy and colonization to be positively associated with the amount of Typha x glauca (a rapidly establishing invasive hybrid cattail species) at sites, and negatively associated with fetch impact, water depths, and open water areas.

Results

As expected, sites with greater coverage of T. x glauca, shallower water depths, and less open water had greater initial occupancy probabilities. Muskrats were more likely to colonize fetch-impacted sites if there were also greater coverages of T. x glauca present.

Conclusion

The distribution and intensity of fetch, dictated by the watershed-scale configuration of upland landscapes, influenced site colonization by muskrats. Our results suggest that this landscape-scale effect is mediated by the amount of T. x glauca present at much finer scales. This cross-scale interaction may facilitate distribution expansions of wetland-obligate species into otherwise unsuitable habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlers AA, Cotner LA, Wolff PJ, Mitchell MA, Heske EJ, Schooley RL (2015) Summer precipitation predicts spatial distributions of semiaquatic mammals. PLoS ONE 10:e0135036

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers AA, Heske EJ (2018) Empirical evidence for declines in muskrat populations across the United States. J Wildl Manage 81:1408–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers AA, Heske EJ, Schooley RL, Mitchell MA (2010) Home ranges and space use of muskrats Ondatra zibethicus in restricted linear habitats. Wildl Biol 16:400–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KL, MacArthur RA (1994) Digestibility and assimilation of natural forages by muskrat. J Wildl Manage 58:633–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WR (1994) Habitat selection by muskrats in experimental marshes undergoing succession. Can J Zool 72:675–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotner LA, Schooley RL (2011) Habitat occupancy by riparian muskrats reveals tolerance to urbanization and invasive vegetation. J Wildl Manage 75:1637–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1939) Reaction of muskrat populations to drought. Ecology 20:168–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1963) Muskrat populations. Iowa State University Press, Iowa City, p 665

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2017) ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber-Langendoen D, Aaseng N, Hop K, Lew-Smith M, Drake J (2007) Vegetation classification, mapping, and monitoring at Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota: an application of the U.S. national vegetation classification. Appl Veg Sci 10:361–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson DP (2005) Puget Sound Fetch. Dissertation. School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

  • Frieswyk CB, Zedler JB (2006) Do seed banks confer resilience to coastal wetlands invaded by Typha x glauca? Can J Bot 84:1882–1893

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan JB, Soranno PA, Angilletta MJ Jr, Buckley LV, Gruner DS, Keitt TH, Kellner JR, Kominoski JS, Rocha AV, Xiao J, Harms TK, Goring SJ, Koenig LE, McDowell WH, Powell H, Richardson AD, Stow CA, Vargas R, Weathers KC (2014) Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales. Front Ecol Environ 12:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland AM, Schauber EM, Nielsen CK, Hellgren EC (2019) Occupancy dynamics of semi-aquatic herbivores in riparian systems in Illinois, USA. Ecosphere 10:02614

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence BA, Bourke K, Lishawa SC, Tuchman NC (2016) Typha invasion associated with reduced aquatic macroinvertebrate abundance in northern Lake Huron coastal wetlands. J Great Lakes Res 42:1412–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Lishawa SC, Albert DA, Tuchman NC (2010) Water level decline promotes Typha x glauca establishment and vegetation change in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Wetlands 30:1085–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RA (1978) Winter movements and home ranges of the muskrat. Can Field-Nat 92:345–349

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RA (1980) Daily and seasonal activity patterns of the muskrat Ondatra zibethicus as revealed by radiotelemetry. Ecography 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackas DL, Tsurumi M, Galbraith MD, Yelland DR (2005) Zooplankton distribution and dynamics in a North Pacific eddy of coastal origin: II. Mechanisms of eddy colonization by and retention of offshore species. Deep Sea Res Part II 52:1011–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey L, Hines JE (2017) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier F, Virgl JA (1992) Differential use of bank burrows and lodges by muskrats, Ondatra zibethicus, in a northern marsh environment. Can J Zool 70:1180–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier F, Virgl JA, Marinelli L (1990) Density-dependent habitat selection in muskrats: a test of the ideal free distribution model. Oecologia 84:380–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Turner MG, Smithwick EAH, Dent CL, Stanley EH (2004) Spatial extrapolation: the science of predicting ecological patterns and process. Bioscience 54:310–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell ME, Lishawa SC, Geddes P, Larkin DJ, Teering D, Tuchman NC (2011) Time-dependent impacts of cattail invasion in a Great Lakes coastal wetland complex. Wetlands 31:1143–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2017) Climatological data for International Falls, Minnesota. National centers for environmental information. National Climatic Data Center, Ashville, North Carolina, USA. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/findstation

  • Peters DPC, Bestelmeyer BT, Turner MG (2007) Cross-scale interactions and changing pattern-process relationships: consequences for system dynamics. Ecosystems 10:790–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JC, Short MJ, Leigh RJ (2004) Development of population control strategies for mink Mustela vison, using floating rafts as monitors and trap sites. Biol Conserv 120:533–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts NM, Crimmins SM (2010) Do trends in muskrat harvest indicate widespread population declines? Northeast Nat 17:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohweder J, Rogala JT, Johnson BL, Anderson D, Clark S, Chamberlin F, Potter D, and Runyon K (2008) Application of wind fetch and wave models for habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects—2012 update. Contract report prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Upper Mississippi River Restoration—Environmental Management Program

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2017) SAS 9.4—SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA

  • Sather JH (1958) Biology of the Great Plains muskrat in Nebraska. Wildl Monogr 1:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Cotner LA, Ahlers AA, Heske EJ, Levengood JM (2012) Monitoring site occupancy for American mink in its native range. J Wildl Manage 76:824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM (1991) Wind-wave generation on restricted fetches. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Misc. Paper CERC-91-2, p 25

  • Soranno PA, Cheruvelil KS, Bissell EG, Bremigan MT, Downing JA, Fergus CE, Filstrup CT, Henry EN, Lottig NR, Stanley EH, Snow CA, Tan P, Wagner T, Webster KE (2014) Cross-scale interactions: quantifying multi-scaled cause-effect relationships in macrosystems. Front Ecol Environ 12:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling JT, Springer AM, Iverson SJ, Johnson SP, Pelland NA, Johnson DS, Lea MA, Bond NA (2014) The Sun, moon, wind, and biological imperative–shaping contrasting wintertime migration and foraging strategies of adult male and female northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus). PLoS ONE 9:e93068

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Takos MJ (1947) A semi-quantitative study of muskrat food habits. J Wildl Manag 11:331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber JM, Peterson RO, Drummer TD (1991) The effect of regulated lake levels on muskrats, Ondatra zibethicus, in Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. Can Field Nat 105:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner J, Farrell JM, Mead JV (2010) Muskrat abundance responses to water level regulation within freshwater coastal wetlands. Wetlands 30:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis SE, Marburger JE, Windels SK, Kubátová B (2010) Hybridization dynamics of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Western Great Lakes region of North America: a molecular analysis. J Ecol 98:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis SE, Marburger JE, Windels SK, Kubátová B (2011) Clonal structure of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Upper Midwest Region of the US. Wetlands 31:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 3:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) (1984) Shore Protection manual, coastal engineering research center. Fort Belvoir, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgin JA, Messier F (1997) Habitat suitability in muskrats: a test of the food limitation hypothesis. J Zool 243:237–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Rotenberry JT, Horne BV (1987) Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale. Oikos 48:132–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Windels SK, Beever EA, Paruk JD, Brinkman AR, Fox JE, MacNulty CC, Evers DC, Siegel LS, Osborne DC (2013) Effects of water-level management on nesting success of common loons. J Wildl Manage 77:1626–1638

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work was funded by the Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources (Kansas State University) and the United States National Park Service (Voyageurs National Park). We thank S. Wesche and J. Patterson for field assistance. We also think D. Ricketts and D. Haukos for valuable comments and suggestions to improve this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam A. Ahlers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larreur, M.R., Windels, S.K., Olson, B.T. et al. Cross-scale interactions and non-native cattails influence the distributions of a wetland-obligate species. Landscape Ecol 35, 59–68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00925-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00925-5

Keywords

Navigation