Abstract
Mutation accumulation has been proposed as a cause of senescence. During this process, age-related genetic and epigenetic mutations steadily accumulate. Cascading deleterious effects of mutations might initiate a steady “accumulation of deficits” in cells, despite the existence of repair mechanisms, leading to cellular senescence and functional decline of tissues and organs, which ultimately manifest as frailty and disease. Here, we investigate several of these aspects in differentiating cell populations through modeling and simulation using the Moran birth–death (demographic) process, under several scenarios of mutation accumulation. Deleterious mutations seem to rapidly accumulate particularly early in the course of life, during which the rate of cell division is high, thereby exerting a greater effect on subsequent cellular senescence. Our results are compatible with the principle of the Muller’s ratchet taking place in asexually reproducing organisms. The ratchet speed in a given tissue depends on the size of the cell population, mutation rate and the impact of such mutations on cell phenotypes. It varies substantially among cells in different tissues and organs due to heterogeneity in relation to cell and organ-specific demographic features. Ratchet accelerates particularly after middle age, resulting in a synergistic fitness decay at the level of cell populations. We extend Fisher’s average excess concept and rank order scale to interpret differential phenotypic effects of the increase of the mutation load among cell populations within a given tissue. We postulate that classical evolutionary genetic models can explain, at least in part, the origins of frailty, subclinical conditions, morbidity and the health consequences of senescence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison B (2008) Divergence of mechanistic pathways mediating aging and developmental programming of cardiovascular diseases. FASEB J 30:1968–1975
Ally D, Ritland K, Otto SP (2010) Aging in a long-lived clonal tree. PLoS Biol 8:q1000454
Bae T, Tomasini L, Mariani J et al (2018) Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 359(550):555
Barthes J, Özçelik H, Hindié M et al (2014) Cell microenvironment engineering and monitoring for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: the recent advances. In: BioMed Res Int
Behjati S, Huch M, van Boxtel R et al (2014) Genome sequencing of normal cells reveals developmental lineages and mutational processes. Nature 513:422–425
Bianconi E, Piovesan A, Facchin F et al (2013) An estimation of the number of cells in the human body. Ann Hum Biol 40:463–471
Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2012) Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:14646–14653
Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L (2017) Autophagy and mitophagy in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 120:1812–1824
Brenner S (2010) Sequences and consequences. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:207–212
Buchman TG (2002) The community of the self. Nature 420:246–251
Buja A, Volfovsky N, Krieger AM, Lord C, Lash AE, Wigler M, Iossifov I (2018) Damaging de novo mutations diminish motor skills in children on the autism spectrum. Proc Nat Acad Sci 115(8):E1859–E1866
Burnet M (1965) Somatic mutation and chronic disease. Br Med J 1:338–342
Buss LW (1988) The evolution of individuality, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Carrero JJ, Johansen KL, Lindholm B et al (2016) Screening for muscle wasting and dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 90:53–66
Celiker H, Gore J (2013) Cellular cooperation: insights from microbes. Trends Cell Biol 23:9–15
Cesari M, Vellas B, Gambassi G (2013) The stress of aging. Exp Gerontol 48:451–456
Crow JF (1970) Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection. Mathematical topics in population genetics. Springer, New York, pp 128–177
Crow JF (1986) Basic concepts in population, quantitative, and evolutionary genetics. Basic Concepts Popul Quant Evol Genet. Freeman, San Francisco
Crow JF (1989) Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol 61:763–775
Crow JF (1993) Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 9:3–42
Crow JF (2000) The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet 1:40–47
Cruickshanks HA, McBryan T, Nelson DM et al (2013) Senescent cells harbour features of the cancer epigenome. Nat Cell Biol 15:1495–1506
Engelman M, Seplaki CL, Varadhan R (2017) A quiescent phase in human mortality? Exploring the ages of least vulnerability. Demography 54:1097–1118
Engels EA, Wu X, Gu J et al (2007) Systematic evaluation of genetic variants in the inflammation pathway and risk of lung cancer. Cancer Res 67:6520–6527
Ewens WJ (2004) Mathematical population genetics 1: theoretical introduction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Ezawa K, Innan H (2013) Theoretical framework of population genetics with somatic mutations taken into account: application to copy number variations in humans. Heredity 111:364–374
Farr JN, Xu M, Weivoda MM et al (2017) Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice. Nat Med 23:1072–1079
Field AE, Robertson NA, Wang T et al (2018) DNA methylation clocks in aging: categories, causes, and consequences. Mol Cell 71:882–895
Finch C (1990) Longevity, senescence, and the genome. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Fisher RA (1941) Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann Eugen 11:53–63
Forsberg LA, Rasi C, Malmqvist N et al (2014) Mosaic loss of chromosome Y in peripheral blood is associated with shorter survival and higher risk of cancer. Nature Genetics 46(6):624–628
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF et al (2005) Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10604–10609
Frank SA (2010) Somatic evolutionary genomics: mutations during development cause highly variable genetic mosaicism with risk of cancer and neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:1725–1730
Frank SA (2014) Somatic mosaicism and disease. Curr Biol 24:R577–R581
Govindaraju DR (2014) Opportunity for selection in human health. In: Friedmann T, Dunlap JC, Goodwin SF (eds) Advances in genetics. Academic, Oxford, pp 1–70
Govindaraju DR (2015) Evolutionary genetic bases of longevity and senescence. Adv Exp Med Biol 847:1–44
Haldane JBS (1937) The effect of variation of fitness. Am Nat 71:337–349
Hall DW, Wayne ML (2013) Ohno’s “peril of hemizygosity” revisited: gene loss, dosage compensation, and mutation. Genome Biol Evol 5:1–15
Hartl DL, Clark AG (2006) Principles of population genetics, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates is an imprint of Oxford University Press, Sunderland
Haubold K, Herrmann H, Langer SJ et al (2003) Acute effects of desmin mutations on cytoskeletal and cellular integrity in cardiac myocytes. Cell Motil 54:105–121
Hayflick L, Moorhead PS (1961) The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res 25:585–621
Horvath S (2013) DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 14:3156
Horvath S, Raj K (2018) DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet 19:371–384
Jaenisch R, Young R (2008) Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 132:567–582
Jaiswal S et al (2014) Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med 371:2488–2498
Jamuar SS, Lam A-TN, Kircher M et al (2014) Somatic mutations in cerebral cortical malformations. N Engl J Med 371:733–743
Kacser H, Burns JA (1981) The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97:639–666
Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T (2017) Cellular senescence: a translational perspective. EBioMedicine 21:21–28
Klein BEK, Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE (2005) Frailty, morbidity and survival. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 41:141–149
Klingenberg CP (2008) Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:115–132
Kondrashov AS (1995) Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? J Theor Biol 175:583–594
Kraemer SA, Böndel KB, Ness RW et al (2017) Fitness change in relation to mutation number in spontaneous mutation accumulation lines of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Evolution 71:2918–2929
LeBrasseur NK, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL (2015) Cellular senescence and the biology of aging, disease, and frailty. Frailty Pathophysiol Phenotype Patient Care 83:11–18
Lee JH (2016) Somatic mutations in disorders with disrupted brain connectivity. Exp Mol Med 48:e239
Lee-Six H, Øbro NF, Shepherd MS et al (2018) Population dynamics of normal human blood inferred from somatic mutations. Nature 561:473–478
Levitis DA (2010) Before senescence: the evolutionary demography of ontogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:801–809
Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18
Lodato MA, Rodin RE, Bohrson CL et al (2018) Aging and neurodegeneration are associated with increased mutations in single human neurons. Science 359:555–559
Lynch M, Bürger R, Butcher D, Gabriel W (1993) The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J Hered 84:339–344
Lynch M (2010) Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(3):961–968
MacNee W, Rabinovich RA, Choudhury G (2014) Ageing and the border between health and disease. Eur Respir J 44(5):1332–1352
Medawar PB (1952) An unsolved problem of biology. Published for the College by H.K, Lewis
Medvedev ZA (1990) An attempt at a rational classification of theories of ageing. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 65:375–398
Meunier D, Achard S, Morcom A et al (2008) Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks. Neuroimage 44:715–723
Mitnitsky A, Rockwood K (2016) The rate of aging: the rate of deficit accumulation does not change over the adult life span. Biogerontology 17:199–204
Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG (2011) The developing human: clinically oriented embryology with student consult online access, 9th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Moran PAP (1962) Statistical processes of evolutionary theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Morelli KH, Seburn KL, Schroeder DG et al (2017) Severity of demyelinating and axonal neuropathy mouse models is modified by genes affecting structure and function of peripheral nodes. Cell Rep 18:3178–3191
Muller HJ (1950) Our load of mutations. Am J Hum Genet 2:111–176
Muñoz-Espín D, Serrano M (2014) Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:482–496
Neher RA, Shraiman BI (2012) Fluctuations of fitness distributions and the rate of Muller’s ratchet. Genetics 191:1283–1293
O’Huallachain M, Karczewski KJ, Weissman SM et al (2012) Extensive genetic variation in somatic human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:18018–18023
Ohta T (1973) Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96–98
Park JS, Lee J, Jung ES et al (2019) Brain somatic mutations observed in Alzheimer’s disease associated with aging and dysregulation of tau phosphorylation. Nat Commun 10:3090
Poduri A, Evrony GD, Cai X, Walsh CA (2013) Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease. Science 341:1237758
Poon A, Otto SP (2000) Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations. Evol Int J Org Evol 54:1467–1479
Rattan SIS (2018) Biogerontology: research status, challenges and opportunities. Acta Bio Med Atenei Parm 89:291–301
Ricke RM, van Deursen JM (2013) Aneuploidy in health, disease, and aging. J Cell Biol 201:11–21
Rizvi S, Raza ST, Mahdi F (2014) Telomere length variations in aging and age-related diseases. Curr Aging Sci 7(3):161–167
Rockwood K, Bergman H (2012) FRAILTY: a report from the 3rd joint workshop of IAGG/WHO/SFGG, Athens, January 2012. Can Geriatr J CGJ 15:31–36
Rockwood K, Mitnitski A (2012) How might deficit accumulation give rise to frailty? J Aging Frailty 1:8–12
Rodier F, Campisi J (2011) Four faces of cellular senescence. J Cell Biol 192:547–552
Rubinsztein DC, Mariño G, Kroemer G (2011) Autophagy and aging. Cell 146:682–695
Santilli V, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Paoloni M (2014) Clinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metabol 11:177
Sauver JLS et al (2015) Risk of developing multimorbidity across all ages in an historical cohort study: differences by sex and ethnicity. BMJ Open 5:e006413
Schaffer HE (1970) Survival of mutant genes as a branching process. In: Kojima K (ed) Mathematical topics in population genetics. Springer, Berlin, pp 317–336
Simmons MJ, Crow JF (1977) Mutations affecting fitness in drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet 11:49–78
Szilard L (1959) On the nature of the aging process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 45:30–45
Templeton AR (2006) Population genetics and microevolutionary theory. Wiley, Oxford
Teschendorff AE, West J, Beck S (2013) Age-associated epigenetic drift: implications, and a case of epigenetic thrift? Hum Mol Genet 22:R7–R15
Tomaru U, Takahashi S, Ishizu A et al (2012) Decreased proteasomal activity causes age-related phenotypes and promotes the development of metabolic abnormalities. Am J Pathol 180:963–972
Turaljik S, Sottoriva A, Graham T et al (2019) Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Rev Genet, Nat. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0114-6
Uddin MS, Stachowiak A, Mamun AA et al (2018) Autophagy and Alzheimer’s disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Front Aging Neurosci 10:4
van der Graaf A, Wardenaar R, Neumann DA et al (2015) Rate, spectrum, and evolutionary dynamics of spontaneous epimutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:6676–6681
van Deursen JM (2014) The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 509:439–446
Vassilieva LL, Hook AM, Lynch M (2000) The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 54:1234–1246
Vavouri T, Semple JI, Garcia-Verdugo R, Lehner B (2009) Intrinsic protein disorder and interaction promiscuity are widely associated with dosage sensitivity. Cell 138:198–208
Veitia RA (2018) On the loss of human sex chromosomes in lymphocytes with age: a quantitative treatment. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG 26:1875–1878
Veitia RA (2019) Darwinian selection within an individual or somatic selection: facts and models. J Mol Cell Biol 11(8):719–722
Veitia RA, Govindaraju DR, Bottani S, Birchler JA (2017) Aging: somatic mutations, epigenetic drift and gene dosage imbalance. Trends Cell Biol 27:299–310
Vijg J (2007) Aging of the genome: the dual role of the DNA in life and death. Springer, New York
Villacampa-Fernández P, Navarro-Pardo E, Tarín JJ, Cano A (2017) Frailty and multimorbidity: two related yet different concepts. Maturitas 95:31–35
Visvader JE (2011) Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 469:314–322
Wagner GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Integr Comp Bio 36:36–43
Walston J, Robinson TN, Zieman S et al (2017) Integrating frailty research into the medical specialties—report from a U13 conference. J Am Geriatr Soc 65:2134–2139
Wang J, Egnot B, Paluh J (2016) Cell competition and cooperation in tissue development. J Tissue Sci Eng 7:1–3
Winblad B et al (2016) Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol 15(5):455–532
Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eug 15:323–389
Xiao FH, Wang HT, Kong QP (2019) Dynamic DNA methylation during aging: a “prophet” of age-related outcomes. Front Genet 10:107
Zink F, Stacey SN, Norddahl GL et al (2017) Clonal hematopoiesis, with and without candidate driver mutations, is common in the elderly. Blood 130(6):742–752
Acknowledgements
We dedicate this paper to Richard Lewontin and Tomoko Ohta and for their prescient ideas on units of selection and mutational effects, respectively. We thank the referees for helpful comments. DRG thanks Peter Ellison, David Haig, Nir Barzilai, Jan Vijg for support, and Drs. Caleb Finch, Robert Perlman, Annapurna Poduri, Sri Raj and Alan Templeton, for suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DRG, HI, and RV designed study, performed research, contributed new analytical tools, analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Innan, H., Veitia, R. & Govindaraju, D.R. Genetic and epigenetic Muller’s ratchet as a mechanism of frailty and morbidity during aging: a demographic genetic model. Hum Genet 139, 409–420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-019-02067-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-019-02067-9