Abstract
Objective
To develop an ultrasound-driven clinical deep learning radiomics (CDLR) model for stratifying the risk of testicular masses, aiming to guide individualized treatment and minimize unnecessary procedures.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 275 patients with confirmed testicular lesions (January 2018 to April 2023) from two hospitals, split into training (158 cases), validation (68 cases), and external test cohorts (49 cases). Radiomics and deep learning (DL) features were extracted from preoperative ultrasound images. Following feature selection, we utilized logistic regression (LR) to establish a deep learning radiomics (DLR) model and subsequently derived its signature. Clinical data underwent univariate and multivariate LR analyses, forming the "clinic signature." By integrating the DLR and clinic signatures using multivariable LR, we formulated the CDLR nomogram for testicular mass risk stratification. The model’s efficacy was gauged using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), while its clinical utility was appraised with decision curve analysis(DCA). Additionally, we compared these models with two radiologists' assessments (5–8 years of practice).
Results
The CDLR nomogram showcased exceptional precision in distinguishing testicular tumors from non-tumorous lesions, registering AUCs of 0.909 (internal validation) and 0.835 (external validation). It also excelled in discerning malignant from benign testicular masses, posting AUCs of 0.851 (internal validation) and 0.834 (external validation). Notably, CDLR surpassed the clinical model, standalone DLR, and the evaluations of the two radiologists.
Conclusion
The CDLR nomogram offers a reliable tool for differentiating risks associated with testicular masses. It augments radiological diagnoses, facilitates personalized treatment approaches, and curtails unwarranted medical procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The incidence rate of testicular tumors, which account for approximately 1% of all male tumors and 5% of urinary system tumors, has increased in recent decades, particularly among young and middle-aged men (Park et al. 2018; Znaor et al. 2020; Gurney et al. 2019). The primary symptom is painless testicular enlargement. However, sometimes, they present with symptoms or imaging resembling orchitis, tuberculosis, or other tumor-like conditions, complicating clinical differential diagnosis (Belfield and Findlay-Line 2022; Tandstad et al. 2016). For non-neoplastic testicular lesions, conservative treatment is typically the first approach. However, testicular malignancies often require radical orchiectomy. Studies have shown that unilateral orchiectomy can result in infertility, sexual dysfunction, and reduced sexual function (Henriques et al. 2022; Kerie et al. 2021). Recently, some studies suggest that benign testicular tumors smaller than 2–3 cm in diameter can have a favorable prognosis with partial orchiectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy (Fankhauser et al. 2021; Paffenholz et al. 2018; Gentile et al. 2020; Sm et al. 2023). Thus, preoperative risk assessment of testicular masses is crucial. Accurately differentiating between malignant tumors, benign tumors, and non-neoplastic lesions before treatment ensures the best treatment plan for patients. This strategy prevents over-treatment and unnecessary complete resection, prioritizing the preservation of organ function. Ultrasound is essential in evaluating testicular lesions because of its cost-effectiveness, convenience, high reproducibility, and lack of radiation exposure (Minhas et al. 2021). It offers detailed information about a tumor’s location, size, shape, and blood supply (Lai et al. 2023). However, the varied ultrasound characteristics of testicular masses can challenge diagnosis (Marko et al. 2017).
Radiomics technology, a recent advancement in clinical methods, is proving invaluable for diagnosing, selecting treatments, and assessing the prognosis of patients with tumors (Zhang et al. 2023). It utilizes quantitative analysis techniques to extract extensive lesion information from conventional medical images, conducting in-depth exploration and analysis of medical images to reveal hidden, intricate details within the images (Lafata et al. 2022). Earlier studies have investigated its use in predicting testicular and other urinary system diseases (Santi et al. 2022; Fan et al. 2022; Xue et al. 2023; Baessler et al. 2020). Lately, deep learning (DL) algorithms have gained widespread recognition and adoption in the field of medical image analysis (Beuque et al. 2023; Tong et al. 2022). DL employs neural networks for feature extraction, enabling automated image analysis post-training—a significant advantage over radiomics. Scholars propose merging DL network output with radiomics features, potentially enhancing image-based radiomics' accuracy and reliability, especially with limited training datasets (Zhang et al. 2022). Among the DL algorithms, convolutional neural networks, with their inherent data-driven modeling capabilities, can directly extract task-related features from medical images, thereby significantly enhancing model accuracy and diagnostic efficiency (Yu et al. 2023; Dominique et al. 2022). Yet, there is a current gap in research that merges DL with ultrasound radiomics to predict the risk stratification of testicular masses.
Hence, we introduced two clinical deep learning radiomics (CDLR) nomograms to evaluate their capability in distinguishing between tumors and non-neoplastic lesions, and in differentiating malignant tumors from benign lesions.
Materials and methods
Research subjects
Having received approval from the Ethics Review Committee and a waiver for patient informed consent, we undertook a retrospective study of 275 patients (275 lesions) diagnosed with testicular space-occupying lesions from January 2018 to April 2023. These patients, representing 275 lesions, were treated at both the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Center 1) and Baise People’s Hospital (Center 2). To qualify for the study, patients needed to meet certain inclusion criteria. They must have undergone ultrasound examinations within 1 week before surgery, had full ultrasound images and clinical records pre-surgery, and received definitive postoperative pathological diagnoses. Exclusions involved cases with inferior ultrasound image clarity, no evident lesions, concurrent primary tumors elsewhere, or those who underwent neoadjuvant treatment before their ultrasound. Of the participants, 226 from Center 1 were randomly divided into the training (n = 158 patients) and validation (n = 68 patients) cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. The remaining 49 patients from Center 2 formed an external test cohort. The distribution of lesion pathology types is presented in Supplementary Table 1. An overview of our research process is depicted in Fig. 1.
Clinical data
The collated clinical information included demographics and health metrics such as age, body mass index (BMI), symptom (scrotal pain), existing medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease), complete blood count, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) levels, and more. Radiological evaluations were conducted by experienced radiologists (with 5–8 years under their belts). They meticulously analyzed the ultrasound imagery, gauging lesion blood flow distribution through the Adler grading system. The blood flow was then categorized as either sparse (grades 0–1) or abundant (grades 2–3) based on color Doppler ultrasound readings (Adler et al. 1990; Ma et al. 2015). All clinical data was retrospectively retrieved from the hospital's HIS system.
Image acquisition
The equipment differed between the two centers. Center 1 utilized the ESAOTE-PLUS color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic equipment from Parkson Medical Company, boasting a high-frequency linear array probe with a 12-MHz frequency. By contrast, Center 2 implemented the Siemens Acuson Sequoia 512 color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic device, outfitted with a 10L4 linear array probe that covered frequencies in the range of 2.9–9.9 MHz. Skilled radiologists, each with more than 5 years of experience, captured the ultrasound images in both institutions. For uniformity, the most expansive cross-sectional lesion view was chosen and saved in the digital imaging and communications in medicine format, accumulating 275 images in total. All images were obtained from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and stored in digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) format.
Image segmentation and feature extraction
We imported all images into ITK-SNAP software (version 3.8; http://www.itksnap.org). The region of interest (ROI) for each lesion was manually outlined along the edge of the lesion within the software by a radiologist with 5 years of experience. To ensure reliability, we evaluated the reproducibility of the outlined features using both intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). To do this, 30 images were selected at random. A radiologist with 8 years of experience outlined the ROI on these images and, after a week, repeated the process for intra-observer consistency assessment. The both radiologists were blinded to the patients’ clinical information and pathology results.
We extracted radiomics features from these ROIs using the python pyradiomics (https://pyradiomics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) package. This included (1) fourteen 2D shape-based features, (2) 306 first-order features, (3) texture features, including features from gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) (n = 374), gray-level dependence matrix (GLDM) (n = 238), gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM) (n = 272), gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM) (n = 272), and neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM) (n = 85), yielding a total of 1,561 radiomics features (Supplementary material Fig. 1). For the extraction of DL features, we utilized a pre-trained ResNet 50 network on the ImageNet database (https://image-net.org/). The training and validation sets remained consistent before training. We fine-tuned model parameters using a 0.01 initial learning rate, 50 epochs, and a batch size of 32, all processed with a stochastic gradient descent optimizer. The output of the ResNet 50 average pooling layer, with adjusted parameters, helped us obtain 2,048 DL features from the ROI of each patient’s ultrasound image. Figure 2 illustrates our research workflow.
Feature selection
For the training cohort, we employed a sequential approach to feature screening and dimensionality reduction: First, we retained radiomics features with an ICC exceeding 0.75 and integrated them with the DL features. Then, all selected features were regularized. Second, we applied the minimum redundancy maximum correlation algorithm to further refine feature selection. Finally, using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model along with a tenfold cross-validation process, we identified and retained features with non-zero values. LASSO’s inherent ability for powerful shrinkage and addressing multicollinearity significantly bolstered the accuracy of the model (Liu et al. 2023).
Establishment of DLR and clinical models
We used LR to construct our models. After the steps of feature screening and dimensionality reduction, we utilized the remaining features to create a DLR model, leading to the generation of a DLR signature. Additionally, single-factor LR analysis was conducted on the clinical characteristics of the training cohort for each variable. If a variable met the significance threshold of p < 0.05, it was chosen for multi-factor LR analysis. This process enabled us to pinpoint critical predictive variables, facilitating the construction of a clinical model. From this, we derived the odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals, resulting in a clinical signature.
Establishment of CDLR
Aiming to fuse clinical and imaging data to develop a precise, objective, and reliable decision-support model, we combined both the clinical and DLR signatures. Using multivariable LR analysis, a combined dimensional CDLR was formulated. For validation, two seasoned radiologists—with 5 and 8 years of ultrasound diagnostic experience—reviewed patient ultrasound images from the validation and test cohorts without knowledge of the pathology. They developed two separate ultrasound feature models, termed Model A and Model B. To gauge the efficacy of these models, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for the training, validation, and test cohorts. From these curves, we determined metrics including AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The Delong test was used to discern differences in AUC between models, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. This meticulous evaluation ensures the robustness of our CDLR as a decision-support tool.
Statistical analysis
For our statistical assessments, we leveraged several software tools, including SPSS software (version 26.0), R software (version 3.6.3; https://www.r-project.org), and Python software (version 3.5.6; http://www.python.org). Descriptive statistics were conveyed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences between cohorts were identified using independent sample t-tests. When data displayed a skewed distribution (Q1, Q3), the Mann–Whitney U test was applied. Ratios for categorical variables were derived from the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, while skewed count data were subjected to rank sum tests. Both univariate and multivariate LR analyses were performed, with a statistical significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Results
Clinical characteristics
Our results can be found in Supplementary Table 2. The results indicated no significant differences among the training, validation, and external test cohorts (p < 0.05). In our study, the training, validation, and test cohorts consisted of 158, 68, and 49 patients, respectively. In Supplementary Table 3, within the training cohort, significant differences were observed in several parameters such as age, lymphocyte count (LYMPH), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), symptom, serum β-HCG, and AFP when comparing patients with testicular neoplastic lesions to those with non-neoplastic lesions (p < 0.05). Additionally, in Supplementary Table 4, there were distinct differences between benign and malignant testicular lesions in terms of symptom, serum AFP, β-HCG levels, and color Doppler blood flow signals (p < 0.05).
Construction and validation of DLR
To differentiate testicular tumors from non-tumor lesions, we used 7 radiomics features and 19 DL features to construct the DLR model, from which we derived the DLR signature (Fig. 3a and c, Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 5). The DLR model’s AUC values for the training, validation, and test cohorts were 0.954, 0.850, and 0.803, respectively (Fig. 5a, b and c). To distinguish between benign and malignant testicular lesions, we employed the same feature selection method, identifying 4 radiomics features and 20 DL features (Fig. 3b and d, Fig. 4b, Supplementary Table 5). This DLR model yielded AUCs of 0.894, 0.823, and 0.799 for the training, validation, and test cohorts, respectively (Fig. 5d, e and f).
Development and validation of clinical model and CDLR
Within the training cohort, three independent predictors for testicular neoplastic lesions were identified: the absence of symptom, serum AFP levels ≥ 10 ng/mL, and β-HCG levels ≥ 5 mIU/mL (Supplementary Table 6). From this data, we developed a clinical model, leading to the creation of the clinic signature. By integrating the clinic signature with the DLR signature using multivariable LR, the CDLR showcased enhanced diagnostic prowess (Fig. 5a, b and c, Fig. 6a, Table 1). Specifically, its performance was notably superior to the clinical model (AUC: 0.909 vs. 0.831, p = 0.045), DLR (AUC: 0.909 vs. 0.850, p = 0.211), radiologist A (AUC: 0.909 vs. 0.735, p = 0.041), and radiologist B (AUC: 0.909 vs. 0.775, p = 0.065) in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, CDLR achieved an AUC of 0.835, which exceeded the performances of the clinical model (AUC = 0.768), DLR (AUC = 0.803), and both radiologists (AUC = 0.738 and 0.777, respectively). The absence of symptom, serum AFP ≥ 10 ng/mL, β-HCG ≥ 5 mIU/mL, and color Doppler flow signals (categorized as Adler classification: 2–3) were determined to be independent indicators of testicular malignancy (Supplementary Table 7). In the realm of predicting testicular malignancy (Fig. 5d, e and f, Fig. 6b, Table 2), the CDLR outperformed the clinical model (AUC: 0.851 vs. 0.735, p = 0.014), DLR (AUC: 0.851 vs. 0.823, p = 0.372), radiologist A (AUC: 0.851 vs. 0.744, p = 0.122), and radiologist B (AUC: 0.851 vs. 0.755, p = 0.182) in the validation cohort. Additionally, in the test cohort, CDLR achieved an AUC of 0.834, which outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.720), DLR (AUC = 0.799), and radiologist A (AUC = 0.730) and radiologist B (AUC = 0.754). Furthermore, the DCA further indicated that the CDLR delivered more net benefits than the clinical model and DLR in predictions concerning testicular tumors and malignancies (Fig. 6b and d). This superiority in prediction accuracy was further corroborated by the results from the confusion matrix (Fig. 7). Figure 8 displays the activation maps of a convolutional neural network utilized for the identification of testicular non-neoplastic lesions, benign tumors, and malignant tumors.
Discussion
Our study indicates that the CDLR surpasses the clinical model, DLR, and radiologists with 5–8 years of experience in diagnosing testicular tumors and malignancies. CDLR can be a pivotal tool to support radiologists in imaging diagnosis and help clinicians in making tailored decisions, ultimately cutting down on unnecessary medical procedures.
Correctly diagnosing testicular masses is vital, as treatments range from conservative measures to radical surgery. Overlooking a testicular malignancy diagnosis can cause treatment delays and poorer outcomes. For patients with benign testicular tumors, partial orchiectomy can conserve testicular function (Fankhauser et al. 2021; Paffenholz et al. 2018; Gentile et al. 2020; Sm et al. 2023). Conversely, unneeded surgical resections for those with non-neoplastic testicular lesions can adversely affect androgen levels, sexual function, fertility, among others (Henriques et al. 2022; Kerie et al. 2021). Hence, it’s paramount to study and ascertain the nature of testicular masses to minimize unnecessary surgeries and reduce missed diagnoses of malignancies. To our understanding, we are the first research team to devise and authenticate CDLR nomograms to predict testicular mass risk stratification, targeting the identification of neoplastic lesions and malignancies.
Radiomics is a burgeoning non-invasive diagnostic method in medical imaging, which focuses on extracting a plethora of quantitative traits from comprehensive medical image data and leveraging this for diagnosis and forecasting. This approach is renowned for its objectivity, non-invasiveness, and data-mining capabilities, marking its potential in tumor diagnosis and treatment (Lambin et al. 2012; Guiot et al. 2022). DL is a formidable method in image analysis, facilitating the derivation of profound insights from image datasets. In our research, we employed deep transfer learning to draw DL attributes and merged them with radiomics traits to determine the nature of the masses. When predicting neoplastic lesions and malignant tumors, DL features stood out in terms of volume and significance among the chosen attributes. This observation underscores that DL technology can adeptly pinpoint key quantitative data mirroring the nature of the masses, thus becoming an indispensable tool for precise diagnoses.
Prior research has identified a link between pain and non-neoplastic lesions, with angiogenesis detected via color Doppler ultrasound emerging as a vital independent risk factor for malignancy (Liu et al. 2023). Tumor markers like AFP and β-HCG are instrumental in pinpointing testicular tumors (Esen et al. 2018). Our results concur with these findings; we recognized asymptomatic scrotal conditions and elevated serum AFP or β-HCG levels as standalone predictors of testicular tumors. Moreover, we identified asymptomatic scrotal conditions, increased serum AFP or β-HCG levels, and distinct blood flow signals via color Doppler ultrasound as independent predictors of testicular malignancy. Nevertheless, the accuracy of conventional ultrasound diagnosis for testicular tumors needs enhancement, currently hovering around 76.9% (Lung et al. 2020; Andipa et al. 2004). While contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a newer imaging modality, standard ultrasonography remains the go-to for diagnosing testicular masses (Schröder et al. 2016). The constraints of CEUS—such as the need for specialized expertise, higher costs, limited access, and potential contraindications linked to ultrasound contrast agents—have curbed its broad clinical adoption (Liu et al. 2017). In our research, the CDLR attained a commendable accuracy of 88.2%. Past studies emphasized the difficulty in differentiating benign from malignant testicular masses using only conventional ultrasound (Andiap et al. 2004). Fan et al. leveraged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis, attaining an AUC of 0.822 (Fan et al. 2020). They then integrated MRI imaging with machine learning, producing a prediction model for testicular masses with an AUC of 0.868 (Fan et al. 2022). The enhanced performance in these studies might stem from the extraction of richer features in the radiomics model. Yet, MRI comes with challenges: it’s less sensitive to calcifications, has patient contraindications, is costlier, and has extended examination durations. Our CDLR, showcasing an AUC of 0.851 and an accuracy rate of 79.4%, underlines its significant advantages and potential in this arena.
In this study, the standalone DLR showcased superior performance compared to the clinical model, highlighting the importance of using deep image information from radiomics and DL to discern the features of testicular masses. When combined with clinical data, the CDLR displayed better predictive capabilities, surpassing even radiologists with 5–8 years of experience. This breakthrough can assist radiologists in precisely identifying testicular tumors and malignancies.
However, this study has some limitations. Firstly, as a retrospective study, selection bias and errors are unavoidable. For instance, if ultrasound examinations are conducted by different doctors, subjective errors might arise when selecting the maximum diameter section of the tumor. Secondly, while our study combines clinical characteristics, imaging, and modeling of radiomics and DL features, it doesn’t include other imaging techniques such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography for comparison or multi-modal fusion. Lastly, defining the ROI boundary might introduce researcher subjectivity. We anticipate using DL technology for automatic identification and delineation of ROI in the future, and we plan on conducting prospective, multicenter studies to further validate our proposed model.
Conclusion
The clinical-deep learning ultrasound radiomics nomogram introduced in this study produced encouraging results in predicting testicular tumors and malignancies. It even outperformed radiologists with between 3 and 8 years of professional experience. This is crucial for early patient diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical method decision-making. It can help prevent unnecessary testicle removal or damage to testicular function from excessive medical intervention, providing solid backing for achieving precise tumor treatment goals.
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Abbreviations
- AUC:
-
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
- AFP:
-
Alpha-fetoprotein
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- β-HCG:
-
Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin
- CDLR:
-
Clinical deep learning radiomics
- CEUS:
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- DLR:
-
Deep learning radiomics
- DCA:
-
Decision curve analysis
- DICOM:
-
Digital imaging and communications in medicine
- GLCM:
-
Gray level co-occurrence matrix
- GLDM:
-
Gray-level dependence matrix
- GLRLM:
-
Gray-level run length matrix
- GLSZM:
-
Gray-level size zone matrix
- ICC:
-
Interclass correlation coefficient
- LR:
-
Logistic regression
- LASSO:
-
Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator
- LYMPH:
-
Lymphocyte count
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- NGTDM:
-
Neighboring gray tone difference matrix
- NLR:
-
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- PAS:
-
Picture archiving and communication system
- PLR:
-
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
References
Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, Quinn-Reid D (1990) Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:553–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-d
Andipa E, Liberopoulos K, Asvestis C (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of penile and testicular masses. World J Urol 22:382–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0425-9
Baessler B, Nestler T, Pinto Dos Santos D et al (2020) Radiomics allows for detection of benign and malignant histopathology in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors prior to post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Eur Radiol 30:2334–2345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06495-z
Belfield J, Findlay-Line C (2022) Testicular germ cell tumours-the role of conventional ultrasound. Cancers (basel) 14:3882. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163882
Beuque MPL, Lobbes MBI, van Wijk Y et al (2023) Combining deep learning and handcrafted radiomics for classification of suspicious lesions on contrast-enhanced mammograms. Radiology 307:e221843. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221843
De Santi B, Spaggiari G, Granata AR et al (2022) From subjective to objective: a pilot study on testicular radiomics analysis as a measure of gonadal function. Andrology 10:505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13131
Dominique C, Callonnec F, Berghian A et al (2022) Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours. Eur Radiol 32:4834–4844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4
Esen B, Yaman MÖ, Baltacı S (2018) Should we rely on Doppler ultrasound for evaluation of testicular solid lesions? World J Urol 36:1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2273-z
Fan C, Min X, Feng Z et al (2020) Discrimination between benign and malignant testicular lesions using volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis. Eur J Radiol 126:108939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108939
Fan C, Sun K, Min X et al (2022) Discriminating malignant from benign testicular masses using machine-learning based radiomics signature of appearance diffusion coefficient maps: Comparing with conventional mean and minimum ADC values. Eur J Radiol 148:110158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110158
Fankhauser CD, Roth L, Kranzbühler B et al (2021) The role of frozen section examination during inguinal exploration in men with inconclusive testicular tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7:1400–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.019
Gentile G, Rizzo M, Bianchi L et al (2020) Testis sparing surgery of small testicular masses: retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort. J Urol 203:760–766. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000579
Guiot J, Vaidyanathan A, Deprez L et al (2022) A review in radiomics: making personalized medicine a reality via routine imaging. Med Res Rev 42:426–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21846
Gurney JK, Florio AA, Znaor A et al (2019) International trends in the incidence of testicular cancer: lessons from 35 years and 41 countries. Eur Urol 76:615–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.002
Henriques D, Mota Pinto A, Donato H, Leão R (2022) Prevalence and management of incidental testicular masses-a systematic review. J Clin Med 11:5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770
Kerie S, Workineh Y, Kasa AS et al (2021) Erectile dysfunction among testicular cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 7:e07479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07479
Lafata KJ, Wang Y, Konkel B, Yin FF, Bashir MR (2022) Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping. Abdom Radiol 47(9):2986–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03254-x
Lai DK-H, Cheng ES-W, Mao Y-J et al (2023) Sonoelastography for testicular tumor identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Cancers (basel) 15:3770. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153770
Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R et al (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
Liu Z, Zhang X-Y, Shi Y-J et al (2017) Radiomics analysis for evaluation of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:7253–7262. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1038
Liu J, Ma Y, Xie W et al (2023) Lasso-based machine learning algorithm for predicting postoperative lung complications in elderly: a single-center retrospective study from China. Clin Interv Aging 18:597–606. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S406735
Liu H, Dong L, Xiang LH, Xu G, Wan J, Fang Y, Ding SS, Jin Y, Sun LP, Xu HX (2023) Multiparametric ultrasound for the assessment of testicular lesions with negative tumoral markers. Asian J Androl 25(1):50
Lung PFC, Fang C, Jaffer OS et al (2020) Vascularity of intra-testicular lesions: inter-observer variation in the assessment of non-neoplastic versus neoplastic abnormalities after vascular enhancement with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 46:2956–2964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.028
Ma Y, Li G, Li J, Ren W-D (2015) The diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting blood flow signals of breast lesions: a preliminary study comparing SMI to color Doppler flow imaging. Medicine (baltimore) 94:e1502. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001502
Marko J, Wolfman DJ, Aubin AL, Sesterhenn IA (2017) Testicular seminoma and its mimics: from the radiologic pathology archives. Radiographics 37:1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160164
Minhas S, Bettocchi C, Boeri L et al (2021) European Association of Urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2021 update on male infertility. Eur Urol 80:603–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.014
Paffenholz P, Held L, Loosen SH et al (2018) Testis sparing surgery for benign testicular masses: diagnostics and therapeutic approaches. J Urol 200:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.007
Park JS, Kim J, Elghiaty A, Ham WS (2018) Recent global trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Medicine (baltimore) 97:e12390. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012390
Schröder C, Lock G, Schmidt C et al (2016) Real-time elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the evaluation of testicular masses: a comparative prospective study. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:1807–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.03.026
Sm C, Jw M et al (2023) Diagnosis and management of indeterminate testicular lesions. Nat Rev Urol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00786-3
Tandstad T, Stahl O, Dahl O, Haugnes HS, Håkansson U, Karlsdottir Å, Kjellman A, Langberg CW, Laurell A, Oldenburg J, Solberg A (2016) Treatment of stage I seminoma, with one course of adjuvant carboplatin or surveillance, risk-adapted recommendations implementing patient autonomy: a report from the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA). Ann Oncol 27(7):1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw164
Tong T, Gu J, Xu D, Song L, Zhao Q, Cheng F, Yuan Z, Tian S, Yang X, Tian J, Wang K (2022) Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for assisted diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. BMC Med 20(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02258-8
Xue N, Wang G, Zhang S, Lu Y (2023) The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of primary testicular germ cell tumors and non-germ cell tumors over 50 years old. Front Oncol 13:1090823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1090823
Yu F-H, Miao S-M, Li C-Y et al (2023) Pretreatment ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for the early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur Radiol 33:5634–5644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09555-7
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Qiu X, Tan W, Yin X, Liao L (2022) Deep learning with radiomics for disease diagnosis and treatment: challenges and potential. Front Oncol 17(12):773840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.773840
Zhang Y-P, Zhang X-Y, Cheng Y-T et al (2023) Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics study in cancer: the role of feature engineering and modeling. Mil Med Res 10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00458-8
Znaor A, Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E et al (2020) Testicular cancer incidence predictions in Europe 2010–2035: a rising burden despite population ageing. Int J Cancer 147:820–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32810
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to Dr. Chengyang Li (Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University) for his selfless assistance throughout the present study.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81660125).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CL and JZ: Conceptualization, funding acquisition and methodology. FF and YS: formal analysis, software, and writing–original draft. XL, HH, YH, WY, LW and GX: Data curation. YW, ZL: Review and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Because the study was retrospective, the institutional review board waived the patient's informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, F., Sun, Y., Huang, H. et al. Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for risk stratification of testicular masses: a two-center study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 150, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05549-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05549-6