Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment response scoring systems to assess long-term prognosis in self-injectable DMTs relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background and objectives

Different treatment response scoring systems in treated MS patients exist. The objective was to assess the long-term predictive value of these systems in RRMS patients treated with self-injectable DMTs.

Methods

RRMS-treated patients underwent brain MRI before the onset of therapy and 12 months thereafter, and neurological assessments every 6 months. Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected at baseline. After the first year of treatment, several scoring systems [Rio score (RS), modified Rio score (MRS), MAGNIMS score (MS), and ROAD score (RoS)] were calculated. Cox-Regression and survival analyses were performed to identify scores predicting long-term disability.

Results

We included 319 RRMS patients. Survival analyses showed that patients with RS > 1 and RoS > 3 had a significant risk of reaching an EDSS of 4.0 and 6.0 The score with the best sensitivity (61%) was the RoS, while the MRS showed the best specificity (88%). The RS showed the best positive predictive value (42%) and the best accuracy (81%).

Conclusions

The combined measures integrated into different scores have an acceptable prognostic value for identifying patients with long-term disability.

Thus, these data reinforce the concept of early treatment optimization to minimize the risk of long-term disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Rotstein D, Montalban X (2019) Reaching an evidence-based prognosis for personalized treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 15(5):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gasperini C, Prosperini L, Tintoré M et al (2019) Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: a clinical and MRI challenge. Neurology 92:180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sormani MP, De Stefano N (2013) Defining and scoring response to IFN-β in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 9:504–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Río J, Castilló J, Rovira A et al (2009) Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 15(7):848–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sormani M, Signori A, Stromillo M, De Stefano N (2013) Refining response to treatment as defined by the Modified Rio Score. Mult Scler 19(9):1246–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sormani MP, Gasperini C, Romeo M et al (2016) Assessing response to interferon-β in a multicenter dataset of patients with MS. Neurology 87(2):134–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasperini C, Prosperini L, Rovira A et al (2021) Scoring the 10 year risk of ambulatory disability in DMD-treated multiple sclerosis patients: the RoAD score. Eur J Neurol 28(8):2533–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bermel RA, You X, Foulds P et al (2013) Predictors of long-term outcome in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta. Ann Neurol 73:95–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Río J, Rovira A, Tintoré M et al (2018) Disability progression markers over 6–12 years in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 24:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergamaschi R, Berzuini C, Romani A, Cosi V (2001) Predicting secondary progression in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a Bayesian analysis. J Neurol Sci 189(1–2):13–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergamaschi R, Quaglini S, Trojano M et al (2007) Early prediction of the long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis: the Bayesian Risk Estimate for Multiple Sclerosis (BREMS) score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(7):757–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergamaschi R, Montomoli C, Mallucci G et al (2015) BREMSO: a simple score to predict early the natural course of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 22(6):981–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wattjes MP, Rovira À, Miller D et al (2015) Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis–establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients. Nat Rev Neurol 11(10):597–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D et al (2019) Association of initial disease-modifying therapy with later conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA 321(2):175–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harding K, Williams O, Willis M et al (2019) Clinical outcomes of escalation vs early intensive disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 76(5):536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Río J, Ruiz-Peña JL (2016) Short-term suboptimal response criteria for predicting long-term non-response to first-line disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 361:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Río J, Comabella M, Montalban X (2009) Predicting responders to therapies for multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 5(10):553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prosperini L, Gallo V, Petsas N, Borriello G, Pozzilli C (2009) One year MRI scan predicts clinical response to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 16(11):1202–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Prosperini L, Mancinelli C, Haggiag S et al (2020) Minimal evidence of disease activity (MEDA) in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91:271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rae-Grant A, Day GS, Marrie RA et al (2018) Practice guideline recommendations summary: disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis neurology. Neurology 90:777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rush CA, MacLean HJ, Freedman MS (2015) Aggressive multiple sclerosis: proposed definition and treatment algorithm. Nat Rev Neurol 11(7):379–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Romeo M, Martinelli V, Rodegher M et al (2015) Validation of 1-year predictive score of long-term response to interferon-β in everyday clinical practice multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 22:973–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rio J, Nos C, Tintoré M et al (2006) Defining the response to interferon-beta in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 59:344–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Filippi M, Rocca MA (2010) Multiple sclerosis: monitoring long-term treatments in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 6:421–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alenda R, Costa-Frossard L, Alvarez-Lafuente R et al (2018) Blood lymphocyte subsets identify optimal responders to IFN-beta in MS. J Neurol 265:24–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J et al (2008) Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology 70(13 Pt 2):1079–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Galassi S, Prosperini L, Logoteta A et al (2016) A lesion topography-based approach to predict the outcomes of patients with multiple sclerosis treated with Interferon Beta. Mult Scler Relat Disord 8:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Butzkueven H et al (2021) Early treatment delays long-term disability accrual in RRMS: results from the BMSD network. Mult Scler. https://doi.org/10.1177/132458211010/28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalincik T, Diouf I, Sharmin S et al (2021) Effect of disease-modifying therapy on disability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis over 15 years. Neurology 96:e783–e797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. He A, Merkel B, Brown JWL et al (2020) Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 19:307–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Buron MD, Chalmer TA, Sellebjerg F et al (2020) Initial high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study. Neurology 95:e1041–e1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Caputo F et al (2021) Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 14:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Río.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

J Río has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Almirall, Bayer-Schering Healthcare, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Merck- Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi-Aventis. A Rovira serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, SyntheticMR, Biogen and OLEA Medical, and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Novartis, Roche and Biogen. C Gasperini has received fee as speaker or advisory board by Merck, Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, Teva, Genzyme. M Tintore has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Viela Bio and Teva Pharmaceuticals. MT is co-editor of Multiple Sclerosis Journal- ETC. L Prosperini has received fee as speaker or advisory board by Merck, Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, Teva, Genzyme. S Otero-Romero has received speaking and consulting honoraria from Genzyme, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Roche, Excemed and Merk; and research support from Novartis. M Comabella has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Merk Serono, Biogen-Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novartis. C Nos has received compensation as steering committee member of clinical trials from Hoffmann-La Roche, and funding for registration in scientific meetings from Novartis. A Vidal-Jordana receives support for contracts Juan Rodes (JR16/00024) from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; and has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis, Roche, Teva, Biogen and Sanofi-Genzyme. C Tur is currently being funded by a Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship. The project that gave rise to these results received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). The fellowship code is LCF/BQ/PI20/11760008. She has also received the 2021 Merck’s Award for the Investigation in Multiple Sclerosis (Ayudas para la Investigación en Esclerosis Múltiple, 2021), awarded by the Merck Foundation. In 2015, she received an ECTRIMS Post-doctoral Research Fellowship and has received funding from the UK MS Society. She has also received honoraria and support for traveling from Merck Serono, Sanofi, Roche, TEVA Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Biogen, Bayer and Ismar Healthcare. G. Arrambide has received compensation for consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi and Merck; research support from Novartis; travel expenses for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, and ECTRIMS; and speaking honoraria from Stendhal, Sanofi, Merck. G. Arrambide is a member of the executive committee of the International Women in Multiple Sclerosis (iWiMS) network. A. Cobo-Calvo has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR19/00007. Breogán Rodríguez-Acevedo has received honoraria for consulting services from Wellspect. C Auger has received speaking honoraria from Novartis, Biogen and Stendhal. J Sastre-Garriga has received compensation for participating on Advisory Boards, speaking honoraria and travel expenses for scientific meetings, consulting services or research support from Celgene, Novartis, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Almirall, and Genzyme. X Montalban has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for participation inscientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past with Actelion, Amirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Oryzon Genomics, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva Pharmaceutical. L Midaglia, I Galán, J Castilló, and A Zabalza report no disclosures.

Ethical standard statement

The local ethical committee approved the study, and all patients provided their informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Río, J., Rovira, À., Gasperini, C. et al. Treatment response scoring systems to assess long-term prognosis in self-injectable DMTs relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol 269, 452–459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10823-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10823-z

Keywords

Navigation