Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

176Lu–176Hf geochronology of garnet II: numerical simulations of the development of garnet–whole-rock 176Lu–176Hf isochrons and a new method for constraining the thermal history of metamorphic rocks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present numerical modeling results for the development of 176Lu–176Hf and 147Sm–143Nd garnet–whole-rock (WR) isochrons and show that the 176Lu–176Hf system can sometimes produce spurious garnet ages due to the faster diffusion of Lu3+ relative to Hf4+ in garnet, and resulting preferential retention of 176Hf relative to 176Lu. It is found that when 176Lu–176Hf garnet–WR ages are compromised by diffusion, the corresponding ages generally tend to pre- and post-date garnet growth in metapelites and metabasites, respectively. 147Sm–143Nd garnet ages are not compromised by preferential retention of the daughter product, due to the nearly identical diffusion kinetic properties of the parent and daughter nuclides. Garnet Hf isotopes are rarely re-equilibrated with those of the surrounding matrix phase(s) via diffusion at peak temperature; as a consequence, unlike ages determined from the 147Sm–143Nd system, garnet 176Lu–176Hf ages seldom represent cooling ages. When 176Lu–176Hf garnet ages are spurious due to preferential retention of the daughter product, it is still possible to use these ages to constrain the prograde thermal history of the host rocks, provided the peak P–T conditions and cooling rate are independently constrained. This technique has been exemplified by modeling the grain-size-dependent 176Lu–176Hf and 147Sm–143Nd garnet ages of metapelites from the Pikwitonei granulite domain, Canada. Although this study focuses on the 176Lu–176Hf decay system in garnet, preferential retention of the daughter product could potentially impact any geochronological system in which the parent nuclide diffuses significantly faster than the daughter isotope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anczkiewicz R, Platt J, Thirlwall M (2004) Franciscan subduction off to a slow start: evidence from high-precision Lu–Hf garnet ages on high-grade blocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 224:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anczkiewicz R, Szczepański J, Mazur S, Storey C, Crowley Q, Villa I, Thirlwall M, Jeffries T (2007) Lu–Hf geochronology and trace element distribution in garnet: implications for uplift and exhumation of ultra-high pressure granulites in the Sudetes, SW Poland. Lithos 95:363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anczkiewicz R, Thirlwall M, Alard O, Rogers N, Clark C (2012) Diffusional homogenization of light REE in garnet from the Day Nui Con Voi Massif in N-Vietnam: implications for Sm–Nd geochronology and timing of metamorphism in the Red River shear zone. Chem Geol 318–319:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund M, Wieser M (2011) Isotopic compositions of the elements 2009 (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 83(2):397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird A, Thirlwall M, Strachan R, Manning C (2013) Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd dating of metamorphic garnet: evidence for multiple accretion events during the Caledonian orogeny in Scotland. J Geol Soc 170:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blichert-Toft F, Albarède F, Kornprobst J (1999) Lu-Hf isotope systematics of garnet pyroxenites from Beni Bousera, Morocco: implications for basalt origin. Science 283:1303–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch E, Ganguly J, Hervig R, Cheng W (2015) 176Lu–176Hf geochronology of garnet I. Experimental determination of the diffusion kinetics of Lu3+ and Hf4+ in garnet, diffusion mechanisms, closure temperatures and geochronological implications. Contrib Minera Petrol. doi:10.1007/s00410-015-1109-8

  • Caddick M, Konopásek J, Thompson A (2010) Preservation of garnet growth zoning and the duration of prograde metamorphism. J Petrol 51:2327–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Ganguly J (1991) Compositional zoning and cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets. In: Ganguly J (ed) Diffusion, atomic ordering and mass transport advances in physical geochemistry, v 8. Springer, New York, pp 120–175

  • Cheng H, King R, Nakamura E, Vervoort J, Zhou Z (2008) Coupled Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains garnet growth in ultra-high-pressure eclogites from the Dabie orogen. J Metamorp Geol 26:741–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, DuFrane S, Vervoort J, Nakamura E, Zheng Y, Zhou Z (2010) Protracted oceanic subduction prior to continental subduction: new Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology of oceanic-type high-pressure eclogite in the western Dabie orogen. Am Mineral 95:1214–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort J, Li X-H, Li Q-L, Zheng S, Cao D (2011) Geochronology of the transition of eclogite to amphibolite facies metamorphism in the north Qinling orogen of central China. Lithos 125:969–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort J, Zhou Z (2013) New Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains the subduction of oceanic crust during the Carboniferous–Permian in the Dabie orogen. J Asian Earth Sci 63:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Dodson M (1973) Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib Mineral Petrol 40:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne S, Blichert-Toft J, Télouk P, Lardeaux J-M, Albarède F (1997) The Lu–Hf dating of garnets and the ages of the Alpine high-pressure metamorphism. Nature 387:586–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry J, Spear FS (1978) Experimental calibration of the partitioning of Fe and Mg between biotite and garnet. Contrib Mineral Petrol 9:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaidies F, Capitani C, Abart R (2008) THERIA_G: a software program to numerically model prograde garnet growth. Contrib Mineral Petrol 155:657–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Saxena S (1987) Mixtures and mineral reactions. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Tirone M (1999) Diffusion closure temperature and age of a mineral with arbitrary extent of diffusion: theoretical formulation and applications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 170:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Cheng W, Tirone M (1996) Thermodynamics of aluminosilicate garnet solid solution: new experimental data, an optimized model, and thermometric applications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 126:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker B, Keleman P, Rioux M, McWilliams M, Gans P, Reiners P, Layer U, Söderlund U, Vervoort J (2011) Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U–Th/He, Sm–Nd, and Lu–Hf dating. Tectonics 30:TC1011. doi:10.1029/2010TC002798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaman L, Böhm C, Machado N, Krogh T, Weber W, Corkery M (2011) The Pikwitonei granulite domain, Manitoba: a giant Neoarchean high-grade terrane in the northwest Superior Province. Can J Earth Sci 48:205–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz D, Nagel T, Münker C, Scherer E, Froitzheim N (2011) Tracing two orogenic cycles in one eclogite sample by Lu–Hf garnet chronometry. Nat Geosci 4:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollister L (1966) Garnet zoning: an interpretation based on the Rayleigh fractionation model. Science 30:1647–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu L (1968) Selected phase relationships in the system Al–Mn–Fe–Si–O–H: a model for garnet equilibria. J Petrol 9:40–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E, Carlson W, Connelly J (2011) Implications of garnet resorption for the Lu–Hf garnet geochronometer: an example from the contact aureole of the Makhavinekh Lake Pluton, Labrador. J Metamorp Geol 29:901–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E, Carlson W, Ketcham R (2013) Magnitudes of departures from equilibrium during regional metamorphism of porphyroblastic rocks. J Metamorp Geol 31:981–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn M (2009) Models of garnet differential geochronology. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad-Schmolke M, Handy M, Babist J, O’Brien P (2005) Thermodynamic modeling of diffusion controlled garnet growth. Contrib Mineral Petrol 16:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretz R (1994) Metamorphic crystallization. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Kylander-Clark A, Hacker B, Johnson C, Beard B, Mahlen N, Lapen T (2007) Coupled Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains prograde and exhumation histories of high- and ultrahigh-pressure eclogites from western Norway. Chem Geol 242:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapen T, Johnson C, Baumgartner L, Mahlen N, Beard B, Amato J (2003) Burial rates during prograde metamorphism of an ultra-high-pressure terrane: an example from Lago di Cignana, western Alps, Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 215:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapen T, Medaris G, Johnson C, Beard B (2005) Archean to middle Proterozoic evolution of Baltica subcontinental lithosphere: evidence from combined Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf isotope analyses of the Sandvik ultramafic body, Norway. Contrib Mineral Petrol 150:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger K, Hanson G, Bohlen S (1989) U–Pb systematics of garnet: dating the growth of garnet in the late Archean Pikwitonei granulite domain at Cauchon and Natawahunan Lakes, Manitoba, Canada. Contrib Mineral Petrol 101:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger K, Bohlen S, Hanson G (1990) Metamorphic history of the Archean Pikwitonei granulite domain and the Cross Lake Subprovince, Superior Province, Manitoba, Canada. J Petrol 31:483–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger K, Essene E, Halliday A (1992) Closure temperatures of the Sm–Nd system in metamorphic garnets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 113:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer E, Cameron K, Blichert-Toft J (2000) Lu–Hf garnet geochronology: closure temperature relative to the Sm–Nd system and effects of trace mineral inclusions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64(19):3413–3432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu Q, Brey G, Gerdes A, Hoefer H (2014) Mantle eclogites and garnet pyroxenites—the meaning of two-point isochrons, Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf closure temperatures and the cooling of the subcratonic mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 389:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit M, Scherer E, Mezger K (2013) Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd garnet geochronology: chronometric closure and implications for dating petrological processes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 381:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirone M, Ganguly J (2010) Garnet compositions as recorders of P–T–t history of metamorphic rocks. Gondwana Res 18:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirone M, Ganguly J, Dohmen R, Langenhorst F (2005) Rare earth diffusion kinetics in garnet: experimental studies and applications. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:2385–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orman J, Grove T, Shimizu N, Layne G (2002) Rare earth element diffusion in a natural pyrope single crystal at 2.8 GPa. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NSF Grant No. EAR-1016189 to JG, which is gratefully acknowledged. We are thankful to two anonymous reviewers whose reviews greatly improved the quality of this manuscript, to Jon Patchett, Pete Reiners, Clem Chase, Bob Downs and Max Tirone for their helpful suggestions and discussions during the course of this research, and to Tim Grove for editorial handling and thoughtful suggestions for improving this manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Elias Bloch

    Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Elias Bloch & Jibamitra Ganguly

Authors
  1. Elias Bloch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jibamitra Ganguly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Bloch.

Additional information

Communicated by Timothy L. Grove.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1170 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bloch, E., Ganguly, J. 176Lu–176Hf geochronology of garnet II: numerical simulations of the development of garnet–whole-rock 176Lu–176Hf isochrons and a new method for constraining the thermal history of metamorphic rocks. Contrib Mineral Petrol 169, 14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1115-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1115-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation