Skip to main content
Log in

176Lu–176Hf geochronology of garnet I: experimental determination of the diffusion kinetics of Lu3+ and Hf4+ in garnet, closure temperatures and geochronological implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 176Lu–176Hf and 147Sm–143Nd decay systems are routinely used to determine garnet (Grt)–whole-rock (WR) ages; however, the 176Lu–176Hf age of garnet is typically older than the 147Sm–143Nd age determined from the same aliquots. Here we present experimental data for Lu3+ and Hf4+ diffusion in garnet as functions of temperature, pressure and oxygen fugacity and show that the diffusivity of Hf4+ in almandine/spessartine garnet is significantly slower than that of Lu3+. The diffusive closure temperature (T C) of Hf4+ is significantly higher than that of Nd3+, and although this property is partly responsible for the observed 176Lu–176Hf and 147Sm–143Nd Grt–WR age discrepancies, the difference between the T C-s of Lu3+ and Hf4+ could lead to apparent Grt–WR 176Lu–176Hf ages that are skewed from the age of Hf4+ closure in garnet. In addition, the slow diffusivity of Hf4+ indicates that the bulk of metamorphic garnets retain a substantial fraction of prograde radiogenic 176Hf throughout peak metamorphic conditions, a phenomenon that further complicates the interpretation of 176Lu–176Hf garnet ages and invalidates the use of analytical T C expressions. We argue that the diffusion of trivalent rare earth elements in garnet becomes much faster when their concentration level falls below a few hundred ppm, as in the experiments of Tirone et al. (Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69: 2385–2398, 2005), and further argue that this low-concentration mechanism is appropriate for modeling the susceptibility of 147Sm–143Nd garnet ages to diffusive resetting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anczkiewicz R, Platt J, Thirlwall M (2004) Franciscan subduction off to a slow start: evidence from high-precision Lu-Hf garnet ages on high-grade blocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 224:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anczkiewicz R, Szczepanski J, Mazur S, Storey C, Crowley Q, Villa I, Thirlwall M, Jeffries T (2007) Lu-Hf geochronology and trace element distribution in garnet: implications for uplift and exhumation of ultra-high pressure granulites in the Sudetes, SW Poland. Lithos 95:363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anczkiewicz R, Thirlwall M, Alard O, Rogers N, Clark C (2012) Diffusional homogenization of light REE in garnet from the day Nui Con Voi Massif in N- Vietnam: implications for Sm-Nd geochronology and timing of metamorphism in the red river shear zone. Chem Geol 318–319:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggar G (1974) Oxygen partial pressures, control, variation, and measurement in quench furnaces at one atmosphere total pressure. Mineral Mag 39:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blichert-Toft F, Albarède F, Kornprobst J (1999) Lu-Hf isotope systematics of garnet pyroxenites from Beni Bousera, Morocco: implications for basalt origin. Science 283:1303–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch E, Ganguly J (2014) 176Lu–176Hf and 147Sm–143Nd ages of the Martian shergottites: evaluation of the shock-resetting hypothesis through diffusion kinetic experiments and modeling, and petrological observations. Earth Planet Sci Lett 395:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson W (2012) Rates and mechanism of Y, REE, and Cr diffusion in garnet. Am Mineral 97:1598–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S (1997) Rates and mechanisms of Fe-Mg interdiffusion in olivine at 980 C–1300 C. J Geophys Res 102(B6):12317–12331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Ganguly J (1991) Compositional zoning and cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets. In: J Ganguly (ed) Diffusion, atomic ordering and mass transport. Adv Phys Geochem, vol 8. Springer, Berling Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo): 120–175

  • Chakraborty S, Ganguly J (1992) Cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets: experimental determination in spessartines-almandine diffusion couples, evaluation of effective binary diffusion coefficients, and applications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 111:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, King R, Nakamura E, Vervoort J, Zhou Z (2008) Coupled Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains garnet growth in ultra-high-pressure eclogites from the Dabie orogen. J Metamorph Geol 26:741–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, DuFrane S, Vervoort J, Nakamura E, Zheng Y, Zhou Z (2010) Protracted oceanic subduction prior to continental subduction: new Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology of oceanic-type high-pressure eclogite in the western Dabie orogen. Am Mineral 95:1214–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort J, Li X-H, Li Q-L, Zheng S, Cao D (2011) Geochronology of the transition of eclogite to amphibolite facies metamorphism in the north Qinling orogen of central China. Lithos 125:969–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zhang C, Vervoort J, Zhou Z (2013) New Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains the subduction of oceanic crust during the Carboniferous–Permian in the Dabie orogen. J Asian Earth Sci 63:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Dieckmann R, Schmalzreid H (1977) Defects and cation diffusion in magnetite (I). Ber Bunsen Phys Chem 81(3):344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson M (1973) Closure temperatures in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib Mineral Petrol 40:259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen R, Chakraborty S (2007) Fe-Mg diffusion in olivine II: point defect chemistry, change of diffusion mechanisms and a model for calculation of diffusion coefficients in natural olivine. Phys Chem Minerals 34:409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen R, Becker H-W, Chakraborty S (2007) Fe-Mg diffusion in olivine I: experimental determination between 700 and 1,200 C as a function of composition, crystal orientation and oxygen fugacity. Phys Chem Minerals 34:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen R, Kasemann S, Coogan L, Chakraborty S (2010) Diffusion of Li in olivine. Part 1: experimental observations and a multi species diffusion model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:274–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducea M, Ganguly J, Rosenburg E, Patchett J, Cheng W, Isachsen C (2003) Sm-Nd dating of spatially controlled domains of garnet single crystals: a new method of high- temperature thermochronology. Earth Planet Sci Lett 213:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne S, Blichert-Toft J, Télouk P, Lardeaux J-M, Albarède F (1997) The Lu–Hf dating of garnets and the ages of the Alpine high-pressure metamorphism. Nature 387:586–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elphick S, Ganguly J, Loomis T (1985) Experimental determination of cation diffusivities in aluminosilicate garnets I. Experimental methods and interdiffusion data. Contrib Mineral Petrol 90:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Tirone M (1999) Diffusion closure temperature and age of a mineral with arbitrary extent of diffusion: theoretical formulation and applications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 170:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Battacharya R, Chakraborty S (1988) Convolution effect in the determination of compositional profiles and diffusion coefficients by microprobe step scans. Am Mineral 73:901–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Tirone M, Hervig R (1998a) Diffusion kinetics and closure temperature of Sm and Nd in garnet. Science 281:805–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Cheng W, Chakraborty S (1998b) Cation diffusion in aluminosilicate garnets: experimental determination in pyrope-almandine diffusion couples. Contrib Mineral Petrol 131:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker B, Kelemen P, Rioux M, McWilliams M, Gans P, Reiners P, Layer P, Söderlund U, Vervoort J (2011) Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U-Th/He, Sm–Nd, and Lu–Hf dating. Tectonics 30(1):TC1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz D, Nagel T, Münker C, Scherer E, Froitzheim N (2011) Tracing two orogenic cycles in one eclogite sample by Lu–Hf garnet chronometry. Nature Geosci 4:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito M, Ganguly J (2006) Diffusion kinetics of Cr in olivine and 53Mn–53Cr thermochronology of early solar system objects. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James F, Roos M (1975) MINUIT, a system of function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations. Comput Phys 10:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E, Carlson W, Connelly J (2011) Implications of garnet resorption for the Lu-Hf garnet geochronometer: an example from the contact aureole of the Makhavinekh Lake Pluton, Labrador. J Metamorph Geol 29:901–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn M (2009) Models of garnet differential geochronology. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylander-Clark A, Hacker B, Johnson C, Beard B, Mahlen N, Lapen T (2007) Coupled Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology constrains prograde and exhumation histories of high- and ultrahigh-pressure eclogites from western Norway. Chem Geol 242:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapen T, Johnson C, Baumgartner L, Mahlen N, Beard B, Amato J (2003) Burial rates during prograde metamorphism of an ultra-high-pressure terrane: an example from Lagi di Cignana, western Alps, Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 215:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesher C (1990) Decoupling of chemical and isotopic exchange during magma mixing. Nature 344:235–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger K, Essene E, Halliday A (1992) Closure temperatures of the Sm-Nd decay system in metamorphic garnets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 113:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sano J, Ganguly J, Hervig R, Dohmen R, Zhang X (2011) Neodymium diffusion in orthopyroxene: experimental studies and applications to geologic and planetary problems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75(16):4684–4698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer E, Cameron K, Blichert-Toft J (2000) Lu–Hf garnet geochronology: closure temperature relative to the Sm–Nd system and effects of trace mineral inclusions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64(19):3413–3432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon R (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst A32:751–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit M, Scherer E, Mezger K (2013) Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd garnet geochronology: chronometric closure and implications for dating petrological processes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 381:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit M, Scherer E, Mezger K (2014) Corrigendum to “Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd garnet geochronology: chronometric closure and implications for dating petrological processes”. Earth Planet Sci Lett 381(2013):222–233. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.015

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Dieckmann R (2012a) Orientation, oxygen activity and temperature dependencies of the diffusion of cobolt in cobolt orthosilicate, Co2SiO4. Solid State Ion 212:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Dieckmann R (2012b) Orientation, oxygen activity and temperature dependencies of the diffusion of manganese in manganese orthosilicate, Mn2SiO4. Solid State Ion 228:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirone M, Ganguly J, Dohmen R, Langenhorst F, Hervig R, Becker H-W (2005) Rare earth diffusion kinetics in garnet: experimental studies and applications. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:2385–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orman J, Grove T, Shimizu N, Layne G (2002) Rare earth element diffusion in a natural pyrope single crystal at 2.8 GPa. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NSF Grant No. EAR-1016189 to JG, which is gratefully acknowledged. The SIMS facility at the Arizona State University is supported by NSF EAR-0948878. Thanks are due to Jon Patchett, Pete Reiners, Clem Chase, Bob Downs, Lynda Williams and Klaus Franzreb for their helpful suggestions and discussions during the course of this research. We also thank Ken Domanik for his help in simulating the excitation volume of the microprobe analyses conducted in this study, as well as Hans-Werner Becker and Ralf Dohmen for determining the thickness of the Au film deposited for SIMS analyses. Constructive formal reviews and follow-up discussions by Ralf Dohmen and an anonymous reviewer have led to substantial improvement of the quality of this manuscript and are greatly appreciated. Finally, we thank Sumit Chakraborty for his insightful suggestion that the diffusivities of the rare earths in garnet could depend on their concentrations, Richard Thompson for sharing his insights about garnet structure and Tim Grove for editorial handling and suggestions for the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Bloch.

Additional information

Communicated by Timothy L. Grove.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1941 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bloch, E., Ganguly, J., Hervig, R. et al. 176Lu–176Hf geochronology of garnet I: experimental determination of the diffusion kinetics of Lu3+ and Hf4+ in garnet, closure temperatures and geochronological implications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 169, 12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1109-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1109-8

Keywords

Navigation