Abstract
Background
Some studies have reported that the electromagnetic navigation (EN) technique is better than the free-hand (FH) method. Nevertheless, there are few clinical trials. In recent years, several clinical trials have been conducted, providing sufficient information to compare the two methods.
Methods
We compared the FH and EN techniques (SURESHOT, Smith and Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) in terms of the distal locking time, exposure time, first success rate, healing time and operative time. We comprehensively searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then we extracted data for specific variables from these reports. The risk of bias was assessed. Stata 13.0 was used for analysis.
Results
Nine studies involving 579 patients were pooled in this study. The meta-analysis showed that EN was associated with a shorter distal locking time (P = 0.001) and exposure time (P = 0.001) than FH performed by surgeons who are not proficient in using the FH technique. No significant differences were found in the first success rate (P = 0.231), healing time (P = 0.09) or operative time (P = 0.510).
Conclusion
The EN technique has the advantages of a shorter distal locking time and smaller amount of ionizing radiation exposure compared with the FH technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FH:
-
Free-hand
- EN:
-
Electromagnetic navigation
- RCT:
-
Randomized controlled trial
- NRCT:
-
Non-randomized control trial
- NOS:
-
Newcastle–Ottawa scale
References
Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D, Nilsson F, Moller M (2016) Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2011 humeral fractures: data from the swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskele Disord 17:159
Camarda L, Zini S, Butera M et al (2018) Electromagnetic distal targeting system does not reduce the overall operative time of the intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop 15(3):899–902
Daniel S, Chan M, Burris RB, Murat Erdogan H, Sagi C (2013) The insertion of intramedullary nail locking screws without fluoroscopy: a faster and safer technique. J Orthop Trauma 27(7):363–366
Fan Y, Wang J, Cai M, Wang X, Xia L (2019) The correlation between postoperative cervical sagittal alignment and spine sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 134:e311
Hak DJ (2017) Radiation exposure during intramedullary nailing. Injury 48(1):26–29
Han B, Shi Z, Fu Y, Ye Y, Jing J, Li J (2017) Comparison of free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(29):e7450
Leroux T, Khoshbin A, Nousiainen MT (2015) Training distal locking screw insertion skills to novice trainees: a comparison between fluoroscopic- and electromagnetic- guided techniques. J Orthop Trauma 29(10):441–446
Levin PE, Schoen RW Jr, Browner BD (1987) Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69(5):761–766
Ma Z, Guo F, Qi J, Xiang W, Zhang J (2016) Meta-analysis shows that obesity may be a significant risk factor for prosthetic joint infections. Int Orthop 40(4):659–667
Maxwell K, Langfitt M, Jason JH, Aaron TS, Beth PS, Gregory BR, Riyaz HJ, Anna NM, Eben AC (2013) Distal locking using an electromagnetic field–guided computer-based real-time system for orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 27(7):367–372
Moreschini O, Petrucci V, Cannata R et al (2014) Insertion of distal locking screws of tibial intramedullary nails: a comparison between the free-hand technique and the Sureshot distal targeting system. Injury 45(2):405–407
Ng AC, Drake MT, Clarke BL et al (2012) Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984–2007. Osteoporos Int 23(6):1721–1726
Persiani P, Gurzi M, Moreschini O, Di Giacomo G, Villani C (2017) Fluoroscopic free-hand and electromagnetic-guided targeting system for distal locking screws of humeral intramedullary nail. Musculoskelet Surg 101(1):19–23
Rosa N, Marta M, Vaz M et al (2017) Recent developments on intramedullary nailing: a biomechanical perspective. Ann NY Acad Sci 1408(1):20–31
Rosa N, Marta M, Vaz M et al (2017) Intramedullary nailing biomechanics evolution and challenges. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. J Eng Med 233(3):295–308
Sithombo Maqungo M, Anria H, Brian B, Marius K, Stephen R (2014) Distal interlocking screw placement in the femur: free-hand vs. electromagnetic assisted technique (Sureshot). J Orthop Trauma 28:e281–e283
Somerson JS, Rowley D, Kennedy C, Buttacavoli F, Agarwal A (2014) Electromagnetic navigation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for proximal interlocking in retrograde femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma 28(7):417–421
Stathopoulos I, Karampinas P, Evangelopoulos DS, Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Vlamis J (2013) Radiation-free distal locking of intramedullary nails: evaluation of a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system. Injury 44(6):872–875
Uruc V, Ozden R, Dogramaci Y et al (2013) The comparison of free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants. Injury 44(6):863–866
Wang Y, Han B, Shi Z et al (2018) Comparison of free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation in distal locking of tibia intramedullary nails. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(27):e11305
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson Welch JV (2011) The Newcastle–-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of case–control studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605
Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Moller M (2018) Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the swedish fracture register. Injury 49(11):2068–2074
Zhentao Zhou XZ, Shan B, Zhou H, Zhengfeng Lu, Dong Q (2016) Electromagnetic navigation in distal locking of long diaphyseal interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Phys Surg Pak 26:975–979
Zhu Y, Chang H, Yu Y, Chen W, Liu S, Zhang Y (2017) Meta-analysis suggests that the electromagnetic technique is better than the free-hand method for the distal locking during intramedullary nailing procedures. Int Orthop 41(5):1041–1048
Funding
There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, X., Fan, Y. & Chen, J. A comparison of free-hand method and electromagnetic navigation technique for the distal locking during intramedullary nailing procedures: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 45–53 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03456-w
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03456-w